🔸 SageSwap.io - Fast Crypto Swap 🔸 Escrow $3000 🔸 NO KYC/AML!

[SFR10]

However, it is the users who have to check the amount if they want to make a claim on escrow.

This is true in most situations, but it's worth noting that SageSwap has users from other forums/platforms who don't know the formula for calculating the exact remaining funds in escrow ^{[I wouldn't mind doing it for them (especially if it gets reflected onto the opening posts as well)]}.
^{- This might only be useful for those who transact smaller amounts (based on SageSwap's latest post, I believe there are still a lot of them who fall into this category).}

[cLoazyL]

That's a lot of completed transactions. I guess it's no surprise that people who are looking for instant swap and no KYC platform would pick the no AML swap mode. Getting used by some projects are great too.

As an average number of transactions, 21,000 transactions is not a large number, and it represents ~ 3,500 transactions per month. However, compared to a trading volume of $100 million, the average value of each transaction is about $5,000, which is not a small amount. Therefore, assume that a whale used their service in the past months.

The average transaction amount is significantly inflated due to large individual transactions in AML mode, which could reach as high as $250,000 per transaction

I'm curious to know what the largest single transaction was can you tell us?

[UmerIdrees]

That's a lot of completed transactions. I guess it's no surprise that people who are looking for instant swap and no KYC platform would pick the no AML swap mode. Getting used by some projects are great too.

As an average number of transactions, 21,000 transactions is not a large number, and it represents ~ 3,500 transactions per month. However, compared to a trading volume of $100 million, the average value of each transaction is about $5,000, which is not a small amount. Therefore, assume that a whale used their service in the past months.

The average transaction amount is significantly inflated due to large individual transactions in AML mode, which could reach as high as $250,000 per transaction

I'm curious to know what the largest single transaction was can you tell us?

Even if they tell you their largest single transaction, what does it prove? A bad service may have a very large single transaction, and a good service may not have that many big single transactions. Hence, it doesn't show anything.

As far as SageSwap.io is concerned, they have proved their existence and gained enough trust that you can swap your coins through them without getting into more technical details and records.  

[SamReomo]

As far as SageSwap.io is concerned, they have proved their existence and gained enough trust that you can swap your coins through them without getting into more technical details and records.  

I agree with you, I've used their service myself and I never faced any issue. I believe when a platform is generating profits then its owners and founders always try their best to remain genuine to their users. SageSwap has proved multiple times that they're going to remain in the market for long term and that's why they always deliver the best services possible.

[cLoazyL]

That's a lot of completed transactions. I guess it's no surprise that people who are looking for instant swap and no KYC platform would pick the no AML swap mode. Getting used by some projects are great too.

As an average number of transactions, 21,000 transactions is not a large number, and it represents ~ 3,500 transactions per month. However, compared to a trading volume of $100 million, the average value of each transaction is about $5,000, which is not a small amount. Therefore, assume that a whale used their service in the past months.

The average transaction amount is significantly inflated due to large individual transactions in AML mode, which could reach as high as $250,000 per transaction

I'm curious to know what the largest single transaction was can you tell us?

Even if they tell you their largest single transaction, what does it prove? A bad service may have a very large single transaction, and a good service may not have that many big single transactions. Hence, it doesn't show anything.

As far as SageSwap.io is concerned, they have proved their existence and gained enough trust that you can swap your coins through them without getting into more technical details and records.  

I've never said sageswap is not reputable, I'm just curious

[hugeblack]

Despite the claim of processing millions of dollars, stopping the signature campaign at this time sends a negative signal. What are the reasons that prompted you to do this if the service achieved successes by advertising here? 

[SageSwap]

Despite the claim of processing millions of dollars, stopping the signature campaign at this time sends a negative signal. What are the reasons that prompted you to do this if the service achieved successes by advertising here?  

The budget allocated for the campaign at the beginning of the year has been exhausted, for now, we are postponing the campaign’s extension, though we may resume it in the future.

Is it a bad sign that the campaign has been running for five months and the budget has already been spent?

[icopress]

Despite the claim of processing millions of dollars, stopping the signature campaign at this time sends a negative signal. What are the reasons that prompted you to do this if the service achieved successes by advertising here?  

Pausing a sig campaign isn't a negative sign. I'd call it resource optimization. For example, if you look at Whale, you'll see that their signature campaign was paused, but the workflow structure that was set up over the past six months remains intact and is still operational. Incidentally, both Whale and Sportsbet's campaigns were paused on the same day, with the only difference being that Sportsbet's activity dropped by 80%, while Whale's activity only slightly.

At this stage, I think the same concept will be maintained with SageSwap.

[SageSwap]

Effective today, we are no longer providing support via Signal.

Due to the app’s poor practices, we have unfortunately had to make this decision. We recommend contacting us via other communications apps, which can be found at: https://SageSwap.io/Support

[UmerIdrees]

Despite the claim of processing millions of dollars, stopping the signature campaign at this time sends a negative signal. What are the reasons that prompted you to do this if the service achieved successes by advertising here?  

The budget allocated for the campaign at the beginning of the year has been exhausted, for now, we are postponing the campaign’s extension, though we may resume it in the future.

Is it a bad sign that the campaign has been running for five months and the budget has already been spent?

Of course, there is nothing wrong with this. Even if you had the budget, you could have stopped the campaign for any reason, that shouldn't put a question on any company's reputation. As long as SageSwap is providing good and trusted service (as they are doing now), it's good to go. Marketing campaigns can be started and paused based on the company's budget as well as the strategies. Also, it's sometimes good to analyze how much the business gains or loses with and without the campaigns.

[Forsyth Jones]

The budget allocated for the campaign at the beginning of the year has been exhausted, for now, we are postponing the campaign’s extension, though we may resume it in the future.

Is it a bad sign that the campaign has been running for five months and the budget has already been spent?

I only just found out the campaign is on pause/hold. Everyone knows the quality provided by SageSwap, and as mentioned before, a temporary drop in traffic is expected, but this can be completely reversed. Anyone who doesn't know quality services like SageSwap isn't following the forum.

I'll miss seeing your banners around, I hope you bring the campaign back someday.

We love you guys, thanks for simply existing.

[NotATether]

Is it a bad sign that the campaign has been running for five months and the budget has already been spent?

Completely depends on the metrics you're getting from Bitcointalk.

If you don't track these (to be clear, I am not expecting you to) then you basically have no idea whether thr Bitcointalk campaign is directly leading more users to your site as opposed to just hearing about the name.

[SamReomo]

Is it a bad sign that the campaign has been running for five months and the budget has already been spent?

No, it isn't a bad sign, sometimes it's needed to put resources at other areas, SageSwap has provided good services and we all hope that we'll see improvements in the service overtime. When it comes to signature campaign then it can be restarted when there's need for it, but personally most of us want to see a good platform like SageSwap to get most exposure and success. Hope, you'll be active on this announcement thread and in future we might see the campaign running once again.

[examplens]

Is it a bad sign that the campaign has been running for five months and the budget has already been spent?

Completely depends on the metrics you're getting from Bitcointalk.

Signature campaigns are exclusively a long-term (1+ year) marketing activity.
As I recall, some of the most successful projects on this forum had very long signature campaigns. Even when they were maximally recognizable here, they still had an active campaign.
In similar cases, I always take the best case as a target.

Of course, financial sustainability is certainly important.

[joniboini]

Personally, after many years on this forum I also notice that some popular brands have very long campaign, even as far as 3 years or more. I imagine they increase the budget as the campaign goes on, but no one claims that's the only way to run a business. As long as the service gets better, I'm sure running another round of campaign will increase brand awareness easily. The competition for instant swap is high these days, which means the market is quite big.

[Forsyth Jones]

@SageSwap Is there any plan to add PAXG and other gold and metal-based stablecoins?

For those looking to diversify into digital gold, this would be great.

Personally, after many years on this forum I also notice that some popular brands have very long campaign, even as far as 3 years or more. I imagine they increase the budget as the campaign goes on, but no one claims that's the only way to run a business. As long as the service gets better, I'm sure running another round of campaign will increase brand awareness easily. The competition for instant swap is high these days, which means the market is quite big.

uhum, SageSwap has already proven to be trustworthy, and continued marketing would be a plus, but it all depends on how much they want to expand, growing too quickly can also attract unwanted problems.

[SageSwap]

@SageSwap Is there any plan to add PAXG and other gold and metal-based stablecoins?

For those looking to diversify into digital gold, this would be great.

I'll take a look at that

[Trêvoid]

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I confirm on behalf of SageSwap.io (OP) that I hold 2.7 XMR (at today's rate, approximately $1,000). This is Trêvoid from bitcointalk.org. I do not have an escrow fee.

My PGP public key is published at:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539912.0
Please use this key to verify this guarantee of letter.

PGP Fingerprint:  F642 642B 1E73 F786 7AD3  EA0D 8E63 A6E0 D659 B2CC

Latest Bitcoin block is: 0000000000000000000177ed33a695aaa6b239bdc51ed13ff4a6d544ebdd1c1c

Regards,
Trêvoid
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iJEEARYKADkWIQT2QmQrHnP3hnrT6g2OY6bg1lmyzAUCaiuglRsUgAAAAAAEAA5t
YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMiwyLDEACgkQjmOm4NZZssxrWQEAnU2vip5QgSDI4L5LaHP3
Q7M1v0bjNsWPWPi4GTXr13cA/ibAQb5lKly/bXL4q8pEFwLpwaD8UxZPJHBDyipL
9GcN
=alcY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Read more: https://trevoid.com/threads/sageswap-private-monero-bitcoin-exchange-no-javascript-no-kyc.29/post-51

Best regards,
— Trêvoid

[Dextrust_Defi]

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I confirm on behalf of SageSwap.io (OP) that I hold 2.7 XMR (at today's rate, approximately $1,000). This is Trêvoid from bitcointalk.org. I do not have an escrow fee.

My PGP public key is published at:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5539912.0
Please use this key to verify this guarantee of letter.

PGP Fingerprint:  F642 642B 1E73 F786 7AD3  EA0D 8E63 A6E0 D659 B2CC

Latest Bitcoin block is: 0000000000000000000177ed33a695aaa6b239bdc51ed13ff4a6d544ebdd1c1c

Regards,
Trêvoid
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iJEEARYKADkWIQT2QmQrHnP3hnrT6g2OY6bg1lmyzAUCaiuglRsUgAAAAAAEAA5t
YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMiwyLDEACgkQjmOm4NZZssxrWQEAnU2vip5QgSDI4L5LaHP3
Q7M1v0bjNsWPWPi4GTXr13cA/ibAQb5lKly/bXL4q8pEFwLpwaD8UxZPJHBDyipL
9GcN
=alcY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Read more: https://trevoid.com/threads/sageswap-private-monero-bitcoin-exchange-no-javascript-no-kyc.29/post-51

Best regards,
— Trêvoid

Quoted for future reference!

[examplens]

Read more: https://trevoid.com/threads/sageswap-private-monero-bitcoin-exchange-no-javascript-no-kyc.29/post-51

Best regards,
— Trêvoid

It is good to see that you are expanding the scope of your services.
But are the conditions here the same as in your similar deals?
This $1k is a guarantee only for swap orders that go through you as an intermediary?