Betmoco.com | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | VIP Deals | 25k Leader Board 🚀

[noormcs5]

I'm not concluding on this yet till its confirm which I hope its not. I hope they come on forum to address all concern as soon as possible.

Ps, the reason for pausing the signature campaign was so to avoid more deposit into the site just for speculative reasons as it's a necessary precautive measure that should be taken for the safety of forum members and external visitors who may not be aware of the on going withdrawal issue..

Whatever is the issue, why can't they just put a message on the site that they are in maintenance mode and will be back soon. Bring down the site doesn't seems good. And the fear and concern of those who are awaiting withdrawals from the site whether it be players or the signature participants are real.

Just checked the domain and it was just registered a month ago in January. 

[GODENKOR]

Well, as expected, another thief out of a dozen others has done their dirty work. I warn you again: until casinos pay the security deposit on the bitcointalk website, you shouldn't even visit the casinos advertised here, because there are too many thieves there.

[terrific]

I don't understand why they have to shut their website down when they've just got a campaign.
But then, if it's possible that there were some huge deposits happen already then, that's how they bite the dust.

until casinos pay the security deposit on the bitcointalk website, you shouldn't even visit the casinos advertised here, because there are too many thieves there.

That's an escrow and I agree.
Until a new casino have proven themselves to be worthy and reputed, if it's about the marketing they need to escrow funds first.

[btcnbegun]

As your account is completely new, it is requested to escrow funds before beginning any review campaign and sign the btc address to verify that it belongs to you or BETMOCO entity.

Who's making such rules compulsory? Theres no where it's written thats a must to escrow funds. I'm managing their brand on the forum, and all financial deals are made with me. Funds for the review have already been made available, so I don't see the use of what you mean here..

Give the address where the funds are deposited in the campaign thread.

BTC addresses for the escrow is requested but the campaign manager is unable to provide. Please do proper due research before posting your campaign

[SmartGold01]

I don't understand why they have to shut their website down when they've just got a campaign.
But then, if it's possible that there were some huge deposits happen already then, that's how they bite the dust.

until casinos pay the security deposit on the bitcointalk website, you shouldn't even visit the casinos advertised here, because there are too many thieves there.

That's an escrow and I agree.
Until a new casino have proven themselves to be worthy and reputed, if it's about the marketing they need to escrow funds first.

This is good ideas for those who are gambling from Bitcointalk or even joining their campaign from the forum this would act as an escrow amount toward those who are anticipating on their campaign. But however, how about those that reaches the site?
How would they be able to recover their funds from the site now that they site is shut down?

[GODENKOR]

I don't understand why they have to shut their website down when they've just got a campaign.
But then, if it's possible that there were some huge deposits happen already then, that's how they bite the dust.

until casinos pay the security deposit on the bitcointalk website, you shouldn't even visit the casinos advertised here, because there are too many thieves there.

That's an escrow and I agree.
Until a new casino have proven themselves to be worthy and reputed, if it's about the marketing they need to escrow funds first.

This is good ideas for those who are gambling from Bitcointalk or even joining their campaign from the forum this would act as an escrow amount toward those who are anticipating on their campaign. But however, how about those that reaches the site?
How would they be able to recover their funds from the site now that they site is shut down?

The Bitcointalk administration should outline all these steps so that those affected by the fraud receive funds from the escrow account. This deposit should be substantial. Without this deposit, I recommend immediately deleting new casino ads. Scammers have repeatedly robbed players here, and the constant casino banners are a turnoff to this site, because the people advertising on the avatar are often on the side of these thieves themselves. Some rules are needed; right now, this site is a complete chaos for thieves who make big money off players.

[Itz-prisigold]

@Hatchy probably you are the only person with direct communication with these guys, any news or maybe players prepare for the worst 

Question is, have the signature campaign participants being able to get their payments withdrawal from this site, since I can see from the front page that their requested to pay participants into their betmoco account, so if withdrawal for the complainants are denied I think both the signatures campaign participants are in the same shoe with this user also, and with that we can actually confirm that the betmoco scam exit project happened.

From what I am seeing even the participants in the signature campaign seem to be experiencing the same issues as normal users. Because their payments have been credited to Betmoco accounts,  and their withdrawals have been pending since yesterday,  so I think the issue is not an isolated issue. And now to make things worse the site is down just as users start demanding for their pending withdrawals,  I don't know if I am over reacting but this is also very suspicious.  For a time, the site seemed to operate very well because I used the platform when they first came to the forum, but now,  as trust has been built and they got a large number of users, all of a sudden serious withdrawal problems have appeared and now they are taking down the site instead of resolving issues. Omo I really hope that this is just a temporary issue,  if not this their pattern strongly suggest an exist scam.

[SenseiBitcoin]

Sometimes you have to know when you've been wrong all along.
This is my case.
I believed in it so much at first The site offered such original, powerful betting choices.
What must have been magical turned into a nightmare.
They paid me but my deposits were in hundreds of euros not thousands (I always deposit little when a new casino arrives to test it for a while).

I still hope that the last unpaid players will be, could this be my last naivety towards them?

[Hatchy]

As your account is completely new, it is requested to escrow funds before beginning any review campaign and sign the btc address to verify that it belongs to you or BETMOCO entity.

Who's making such rules compulsory? Theres no where it's written thats a must to escrow funds. I'm managing their brand on the forum, and all financial deals are made with me. Funds for the review have already been made available, so I don't see the use of what you mean here..

Give the address where the funds are deposited in the campaign thread.

BTC addresses for the escrow is requested but the campaign manager is unable to provide. Please do proper due research before posting your campaign

Please if you have nothing reasonable to contribute on the issue on ground, just keep off the thread.. Betmoco is not the first campaign to pay participants through their casino account.. and like we have seen from the past few campaigns they did well paying all participants who did the review and they were able to withdraw directly to their crypto addresses..

Raising unreasonable concern just leads the discussion out of context...  if you are still referring to the funds from that time, it was enscrowed to me and you can ask the people from the first review campaign, I paid them directly to their addresses, they were not paid to the casino sites until the second review which was as well successful...

[terrific]

That's an escrow and I agree.
Until a new casino have proven themselves to be worthy and reputed, if it's about the marketing they need to escrow funds first.

This is good ideas for those who are gambling from Bitcointalk or even joining their campaign from the forum this would act as an escrow amount toward those who are anticipating on their campaign.

It's a common practice for the new casinos when they advertise or run a promotion in the forum.
They usually give that fund to an escrow or it's within the manager himself to assure that they're not going to waste everyone's time and money.
I think they did fine at first with the review campaign.

But however, how about those that reaches the site?
How would they be able to recover their funds from the site now that they site is shut down?

Unfortunately, you think what others are thinking right now if they have shut down the website. They already ran.

[SmartGold01]

That's an escrow and I agree.
Until a new casino have proven themselves to be worthy and reputed, if it's about the marketing they need to escrow funds first.

This is good ideas for those who are gambling from Bitcointalk or even joining their campaign from the forum this would act as an escrow amount toward those who are anticipating on their campaign.

It's a common practice for the new casinos when they advertise or run a promotion in the forum.
They usually give that fund to an escrow or it's within the manager himself to assure that they're not going to waste everyone's time and money.
I think they did fine at first with the review campaign.

But however, how about those that reaches the site?
How would they be able to recover their funds from the site now that they site is shut down?

Unfortunately, you think what others are thinking right now if they have shut down the website. They already ran.

This is another reason why I do not like joining campaign that pays directly on their gambling site, this is the only way they can scam the manager and their participants. I believe in next campaign the manager would never accept in promoting a company that pays directly on their sites and even if they must pay on their it must be a well know gambling site where people have given good reviews about the gambling site.

[Ruttoshi]

This is another reason why I do not like joining campaign that pays directly on their gambling site, this is the only way they can scam the manager and their participants. I believe in next campaign the manager would never accept in promoting a company that pays directly on their sites and even if they must pay on their it must be a well know gambling site where people have given good reviews about the gambling site.

I don't see paying signature participants their funds directly to the the casino account for withdrawal as a problem because a reputable casino would always make sure that signature participants get their funds. I haven't seen any Stake signature campaign participants or the casino I am wearing their signature participants having this issue.

A casino that isn't trustworthy or that plans an exit scam are the ones that will take paying signature participants directly to their casino accounts as an advantage to scam the participants. We have also seen casinos that pay directly to your btc wallet address pulled an exit scam here in the forum. So, it all depends on aim of the casino.

[xLays]

I don't understand why they have to shut their website down when they've just got a campaign.
But then, if it's possible that there were some huge deposits happen already then, that's how they bite the dust.

Yes, that’s possible or maybe they already reached their target amount to scam or perhaps a whale deposited and played on the site and they decided to scam that user. lol
I just feel bad for those who joined the signature campaign and won’t get paid. I know this isn’t the first time this has happened herein bitcointalk and it still hurts when you put in effort and end up with nothing. The worst part is when you were expecting that payment because you needed it to pay someone else..

[betswift]

I don't understand why they have to shut their website down when they've just got a campaign.
But then, if it's possible that there were some huge deposits happen already then, that's how they bite the dust.

Yes, that’s possible or maybe they already reached their target amount to scam or perhaps a whale deposited and played on the site and they decided to scam that user. lol
I just feel bad for those who joined the signature campaign and won’t get paid. I know this isn’t the first time this has happened herein bitcointalk and it still hurts when you put in effort and end up with nothing. The worst part is when you were expecting that payment because you needed it to pay someone else..

yep, but it's a risk you always take signing up, you know.

there should be more inflows of funds, more reliable ones..

[Hatchy]

This is another reason why I do not like joining campaign that pays directly on their gambling site, this is the only way they can scam the manager and their participants. I believe in next campaign the manager would never accept in promoting a company that pays directly on their sites and even if they must pay on their it must be a well know gambling site where people have given good reviews about the gambling site.

I don't see paying signature participants their funds directly to the the casino account for withdrawal as a problem because a reputable casino would always make sure that signature participants get their funds. I haven't seen any Stake signature campaign participants or the casino I am wearing their signature participants having this issue.

A casino that isn't trustworthy or that plans an exit scam are the ones that will take paying signature participants directly to their casino accounts as an advantage to scam the participants. We have also seen casinos that pay directly to your btc wallet address pulled an exit scam here in the forum. So, it all depends on aim of the casino.

At least someone is saying something reasonable..Im still surprised some members that have been on the forum for quite a long time simply cannot analyse the issues on ground. It's not about payment to casino account as we have a good number of campaigns runned by casino who still pays directly to their casino accounts and so far no issues.. Betmoco is still very new thus the concern and I completely agree with that, but pointing fingers won't solve anything right now till we get to hear from the casino on how they want to solve the issues and try to revive their reputation on the forum. I just want to  believe that Betmoco clearly knows what they doing and would fix things..

[Rashlyowl]

Bros @yahoo62278, it really happened.

Seeing a post from bros @_act_ made me go here & see what's going on. It turns out some people have already been trapped by this damn new site.

They're currently running a review campaign, offering $20 for 10 users. Spending $200 to get good money isn't a bad idea & I don't mean to offend, but I have a feeling this site will be on a scam accusation board someday with this crazy promotion (didn't mean to accuse). If the site is brave enough, it would be good for them to do escrow with one of the reputable users on the forum, it will increase the confidence of players who come from the forum.

I think it would be a good idea for new managers to do their due diligence before actually launching anything here.

[Ruttoshi]

I think it would be a good idea for new managers to do their due diligence before actually launching anything here.

It's not possible for a campaign manager to know if his clients has the intention to scam their customers if not, the manager wouldn't accept working with them to promote their brand here because the forum frowns at anything scam and the manager might harm his business.

You cannot say new campaign managers because nobody knows it all and you ain't a seer to know the intentions of your clients towards the forum. Even old campaign managers can fall for this, they might have fallen in the past and lunch a scam casino herein the community.

[Rashlyowl]

It's not possible for a campaign manager to know if his clients has the intention to scam their customers if not, the manager wouldn't accept working with them to promote their brand here because the forum frowns at anything scam and the manager might harm his business.

You cannot say new campaign managers because nobody knows it all and you ain't a seer to know the intentions of your clients towards the forum. Even old campaign managers can fall for this, they might have fallen in the past and lunch a scam casino herein the community.

Have you ever heard 'mitigation' term bros?

I'm not blaming anyone here, just give an advice, if the brand that want to promote is new, it's a good idea for managers to take action such as escrow campaign funds. At least it sheds some light on the participants, not just the campaign, but also the unreasonable promotions the site used to run. Try reading the post I quoted in my previous post, you'll see where the oddity lies bros.

[justinlamode]

This casino started very well and did everything right until now, it's such a shame we are seeing things go this direction. This situation shows that they were never ready for the Bitcointalk community or it has been their plan to pull a fast one on us. One of this situations will be the case and I wish it never happened. This will make people highly skeptical about new platform, indeed, I'm still in shock seeing what is happening here.

[Hendrikus51]

This casino started very well and did everything right until now, it's such a shame we are seeing things go this direction. This situation shows that they were never ready for the Bitcointalk community or it has been their plan to pull a fast one on us. One of this situations will be the case and I wish it never happened. This will make people highly skeptical about new platform, indeed, I'm still in shock seeing what is happening here.

Did everything right until now? They (or rather "he") did everything wrong from the start.