Is AI Your Best Friend or Worst Enemy? 🤖

[Kazkaz27]

Eye-Opening Insights Revealed!

Lately, I’ve noticed a growing number of complaints about AI usage scattered across the forum. This frustration is understandable—it’s been derailing legitimate threads and sparking off-topic debates in places where they don’t belong.

To address this head-on and maintain focus, I’m launching this dedicated thread as the go-to spot for all AI-related discussions, debates, and insights.

Let’s funnel that passion here and keep other threads on track!

Now, let’s dive into AI 🤖

In our fast-evolving world, AI is omnipresent and irreversible—it’s quietly embedding itself into everyday life, from recommendations to automation, often without fanfare.

This thread is your hub for unpacking the facts, weighing the pros and cons, brainstorming potential forum rules, and deciding what’s permissible versus off-limits.

Starting with the Essential—key facts to ground our discussion:

   •   AI is a potent tool, ultimately shaped and directed by its human operator.

   •   Like any technology, AI has inherent limitations. It shouldn’t be trusted blindly; always verify and peer-review its outputs.

   •   AI detection tools are imperfect, prone to false positives and negatives.

   •   BitcoinTalk lacks official guidelines or policies on AI usage—yet.


The Compelling Pros: Why AI Will Revolutionize Our World!

   •   Blazing Speed and Insight: AI analyzes vast datasets in moments, revealing patterns and trends that might elude even the sharpest human minds. Though still maturing, envision an ultra-intelligent aide with real-time access to the web’s collective knowledge!

   •   Creativity Catalyst: Platforms like ChatGPT excel at ideation, counterarguments, and innovative problem-solving, fueling breakthroughs in projects big and small.

   •   Democratizing Access: AI breaks down barriers, distilling complex ideas into digestible forms, empowering beginners to learn, contribute, and thrive.

   •   Fortified Security: Advanced AI detects fraud, scams, and hacks with precision, safeguarding communities like ours.

   •   Enhanced Objectivity: By minimizing emotional bias, AI promotes fairer, more professional exchanges and decision-making.

The Alarming Cons: The Dark Side of AI’s Power!

   •   Employment Disruption: AI’s automation potential threatens jobs across sectors.

   •   Inherent Biases and Flaws: Fed flawed data? AI outputs misinformation, skewed analyses, or outright errors—garbage in, garbage out.

   •   Privacy and Resource Strain: AI’s data-hungry nature invades privacy while its processing demands can overwhelm servers, causing lags, crashes, or systemic vulnerabilities.

   •   Deception Dangers: From deepfakes to automated spam and scams, AI could infiltrate and undermine forum integrity.


Thought-Provoking Questions: Fuel the Debate!

   1.   How might we craft balanced AI regulations for BitcoinTalk that encourage innovation without inviting abuse?

        2.   How do we regulate without stifling AI’s legitimate usage?

   3.   Does AI-generated content (art, code, posts) qualify as “original” for merits, bounties, or rewards?

   4.   Ethical crossroads: Should undisclosed AI assistance be banned to ensure authentic, human-driven conversations?

   5.   What’s the fuss about AI? Share your top arguments in favor—and against.

   6.   Is an AI-assisted post inherently spam? Where do we draw the line between helpful enhancement and unwanted noise?

       7.     How can we truly certify or verify a post is AI generated if AI detection analyst tools are not 100% accurate?

       8.     If AI detection analyst tools are not 100% accurate and can read false positives or negatives can we count on them?

       9.   In non-AI threads, should mentions of AI be permitted, or do they inevitably derail productive dialogue?

      10.     Could it marginalize human contributors in forums, leaving bots to rule the roost?

      11.     What do you consider to be the strongest positive and negative impacts of AI?

      12.     Does utilizing AI inherently make users “Lazy” or “unintelligent”?

      13.   Ultimate verdict: Friend or foe? Where do you stand on AI’s role in our lives and community?


Share your personal stories, experiences, or wild ideas below. Let’s make this a respectful, enlightening exchange that could shape forum policies!

The goal here is to kill the stereotypes, end AI derailments, shine light on facts, and possibly create some official policy’s regarding AI on the Forum.

Eager to hear from you all!


Disclaimer: AI was indeed utilized to enhance this post; this is not spam. This is a genuine attempt to improve the forum and its policies regarding AI, as well as to direct AI disputes and discussions from unrelated threads here.
 

[Kazkaz27]

Reserved—I am an AI advocate and will be happy to make counterarguments in favor of AI usage, although I do not support spam or the utilization of AI to do 100% of the work.

[Xxmodded]

Eye-Opening Insights Revealed!

Lately, I’ve noticed a growing number of complaints about AI usage scattered across the forum. This frustration is understandable—it’s been derailing legitimate threads and sparking off-topic debates in places where they don’t belong.

To address this head-on and maintain focus, I’m launching this dedicated thread as the go-to spot for all AI-related discussions, debates, and insights.

Let’s funnel that passion here and keep other threads on track!

Now, let’s dive into AI 🤖

In our fast-evolving world, AI is omnipresent and irreversible—it’s quietly embedding itself into everyday life, from recommendations to automation, often without fanfare.

This thread is your hub for unpacking the facts, weighing the pros and cons, brainstorming potential forum rules, and deciding what’s permissible versus off-limits.

Starting with the Essential—key facts to ground our discussion:

   •   AI is a potent tool, ultimately shaped and directed by its human operator.

   •   Like any technology, AI has inherent limitations. It shouldn’t be trusted blindly; always verify and peer-review its outputs.

   •   AI detection tools are imperfect, prone to false positives and negatives.

   •   BitcoinTalk lacks official guidelines or policies on AI usage—yet.


The Compelling Pros: Why AI Will Revolutionize Our World!

   •   Blazing Speed and Insight: AI analyzes vast datasets in moments, revealing patterns and trends that might elude even the sharpest human minds. Though still maturing, envision an ultra-intelligent aide with real-time access to the web’s collective knowledge!

   •   Creativity Catalyst: Platforms like ChatGPT excel at ideation, counterarguments, and innovative problem-solving, fueling breakthroughs in projects big and small.

   •   Democratizing Access: AI breaks down barriers, distilling complex ideas into digestible forms, empowering beginners to learn, contribute, and thrive.

   •   Fortified Security: Advanced AI detects fraud, scams, and hacks with precision, safeguarding communities like ours.

   •   Enhanced Objectivity: By minimizing emotional bias, AI promotes fairer, more professional exchanges and decision-making.

The Alarming Cons: The Dark Side of AI’s Power!

   •   Employment Disruption: AI’s automation potential threatens jobs across sectors.

   •   Inherent Biases and Flaws: Fed flawed data? AI outputs misinformation, skewed analyses, or outright errors—garbage in, garbage out.

   •   Privacy and Resource Strain: AI’s data-hungry nature invades privacy while its processing demands can overwhelm servers, causing lags, crashes, or systemic vulnerabilities.

   •   Deception Dangers: From deepfakes to automated spam and scams, AI could infiltrate and undermine forum integrity.


Thought-Provoking Questions: Fuel the Debate!

   1.   How might we craft balanced AI regulations for BitcoinTalk that encourage innovation without inviting abuse?

        2.   How do we regulate without stifling AI’s legitimate usage?

   3.   Does AI-generated content (art, code, posts) qualify as “original” for merits, bounties, or rewards?

   4.   Ethical crossroads: Should undisclosed AI assistance be banned to ensure authentic, human-driven conversations?

   5.   What’s the fuss about AI? Share your top arguments in favor—and against.

   6.   Is an AI-assisted post inherently spam? Where do we draw the line between helpful enhancement and unwanted noise?

       7.     How can we truly certify or verify a post is AI generated if AI detection analyst tools are not 100% accurate?

       8.     If AI detection analyst tools are not 100% accurate and can read false positives or negatives can we count on them?

       9.   In non-AI threads, should mentions of AI be permitted, or do they inevitably derail productive dialogue?

      10.     Could it marginalize human contributors in forums, leaving bots to rule the roost?

      11.     What do you consider to be the strongest positive and negative impacts of AI?

      12.     Does utilizing AI inherently make users “Lazy” or “unintelligent”?

      13.   Ultimate verdict: Friend or foe? Where do you stand on AI’s role in our lives and community?


Share your personal stories, experiences, or wild ideas below. Let’s make this a respectful, enlightening exchange that could shape forum policies!

The goal here is to kill the stereotypes, end AI derailments, shine light on facts, and possibly create some official policy’s regarding AI on the Forum.

Eager to hear from you all!


Disclaimer: AI was indeed utilized to enhance this post; this is not spam. This is a genuine attempt to improve the forum and its policies regarding AI, as well as to direct AI disputes and discussions from unrelated threads here.
 

whether we like it or not ai is now apart of everyday life in some form. i personally dont mind ai being apart of life if some thing is there to work along side you and makes life just a little easier then why not i dont see the problem. people have the idea that ai is here to take over not to co exists this thought process is wrong yes it will change the format of everyday life but this is the world we live in and we have to learn to adapt and change with it.

[MisFoxie]

Reserved—I am an AI advocate and will be happy to make counterarguments in favor of AI usage, although I do not support spam or the utilization of AI to do 100% of the work.

OP your post is above 50% is made pf AI. AI can be used for research only, No one want to read a topic generated by AI. You generate a post about AI using AI.
Undetectableai: 91% AI
Quillbot: 72% AI

[Kazkaz27]

Reserved—I am an AI advocate and will be happy to make counterarguments in favor of AI usage, although I do not support spam or the utilization of AI to do 100% of the work.

OP your post is above 50% is made pf AI. AI can be used for research only, No one want to read a topic generated by AI. You generate a post about AI using AI.
Undetectableai: 91% AI
Quillbot: 72% AI

Spent hours on this post, read the post or don’t. You really can’t count on your AI detection analyzers. It’s more human than AI. This is my stance. I talk to my AI somewhat as a friend who plays devils andvocate and I go back and forth for hours to create something of meaning. I attempt to enhance and eliminate biases and create meaningful interactions.

“No one wants to read a topic generated by AI.”—I’d personally love to read someone’s post, topic or comment which AI is utilized.—In fact I do all the time.

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

Now, let’s dive into AI 🤖

Is AI related to forum issues and discussions?
If it is not, your topic belongs to either Off-topic board or forum trash can.
Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ
Newbies - Read before posting.

Off-topic - "Other topics that might be of interest to bitcoiners"

[Cookdata]

whether we like it or not ai is now apart of everyday life in some form. i personally dont mind ai being apart of life if some thing is there to work along side you and makes life just a little easier then why not i dont see the problem. people have the idea that ai is here to take over not to co exists this thought process is wrong yes it will change the format of everyday life but this is the world we live in and we have to learn to adapt and change with it.

You quote an entire thread to reply nonsense. Is everything ok?

Edit: seems everything is not okay: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5573695.0

[Kazkaz27]

Now, let’s dive into AI 🤖

Is AI related to forum issues and discussions?
If it is not, your topic belongs to either Off-topic board or forum trash can.
Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ
Newbies - Read before posting.

Off-topic - "Other topics that might be of interest to bitcoiners"

100% AI is related to forum issues and discussions.

[Jostern]

Eye-Opening Insights Revealed!

Lately, I’ve noticed a growing number of complaints about AI usage scattered across the forum. This frustration is understandable—it’s been derailing legitimate threads and sparking off-topic debates in places where they don’t belong.

To address this head-on and maintain focus, I’m launching this dedicated thread as the go-to spot for all AI-related discussions, debates, and insights.

Let’s funnel that passion here and keep other threads on track!

Now, let’s dive into AI 🤖

In our fast-evolving world, AI is omnipresent and irreversible—it’s quietly embedding itself into everyday life, from recommendations to automation, often without fanfare.

This thread is your hub for unpacking the facts, weighing the pros and cons, brainstorming potential forum rules, and deciding what’s permissible versus off-limits.

Starting with the Essential—key facts to ground our discussion:

   •   AI is a potent tool, ultimately shaped and directed by its human operator.

   •   Like any technology, AI has inherent limitations. It shouldn’t be trusted blindly; always verify and peer-review its outputs.

   •   AI detection tools are imperfect, prone to false positives and negatives.

   •   BitcoinTalk lacks official guidelines or policies on AI usage—yet.


The Compelling Pros: Why AI Will Revolutionize Our World!

   •   Blazing Speed and Insight: AI analyzes vast datasets in moments, revealing patterns and trends that might elude even the sharpest human minds. Though still maturing, envision an ultra-intelligent aide with real-time access to the web’s collective knowledge!

   •   Creativity Catalyst: Platforms like ChatGPT excel at ideation, counterarguments, and innovative problem-solving, fueling breakthroughs in projects big and small.

   •   Democratizing Access: AI breaks down barriers, distilling complex ideas into digestible forms, empowering beginners to learn, contribute, and thrive.

   •   Fortified Security: Advanced AI detects fraud, scams, and hacks with precision, safeguarding communities like ours.

   •   Enhanced Objectivity: By minimizing emotional bias, AI promotes fairer, more professional exchanges and decision-making.

The Alarming Cons: The Dark Side of AI’s Power!

   •   Employment Disruption: AI’s automation potential threatens jobs across sectors.

   •   Inherent Biases and Flaws: Fed flawed data? AI outputs misinformation, skewed analyses, or outright errors—garbage in, garbage out.

   •   Privacy and Resource Strain: AI’s data-hungry nature invades privacy while its processing demands can overwhelm servers, causing lags, crashes, or systemic vulnerabilities.

   •   Deception Dangers: From deepfakes to automated spam and scams, AI could infiltrate and undermine forum integrity.


Thought-Provoking Questions: Fuel the Debate!

   1.   How might we craft balanced AI regulations for BitcoinTalk that encourage innovation without inviting abuse?

        2.   How do we regulate without stifling AI’s legitimate usage?

   3.   Does AI-generated content (art, code, posts) qualify as “original” for merits, bounties, or rewards?

   4.   Ethical crossroads: Should undisclosed AI assistance be banned to ensure authentic, human-driven conversations?

   5.   What’s the fuss about AI? Share your top arguments in favor—and against.

   6.   Is an AI-assisted post inherently spam? Where do we draw the line between helpful enhancement and unwanted noise?

       7.     How can we truly certify or verify a post is AI generated if AI detection analyst tools are not 100% accurate?

       8.     If AI detection analyst tools are not 100% accurate and can read false positives or negatives can we count on them?

       9.   In non-AI threads, should mentions of AI be permitted, or do they inevitably derail productive dialogue?

      10.     Could it marginalize human contributors in forums, leaving bots to rule the roost?

      11.     What do you consider to be the strongest positive and negative impacts of AI?

      12.     Does utilizing AI inherently make users “Lazy” or “unintelligent”?

      13.   Ultimate verdict: Friend or foe? Where do you stand on AI’s role in our lives and community?


Share your personal stories, experiences, or wild ideas below. Let’s make this a respectful, enlightening exchange that could shape forum policies!

The goal here is to kill the stereotypes, end AI derailments, shine light on facts, and possibly create some official policy’s regarding AI on the Forum.

Eager to hear from you all!


Disclaimer: AI was indeed utilized to enhance this post; this is not spam. This is a genuine attempt to improve the forum and its policies regarding AI, as well as to direct AI disputes and discussions from unrelated threads here.
 

whether we like it or not ai is now apart of everyday life in some form. i personally dont mind ai being apart of life if some thing is there to work along side you and makes life just a little easier then why not i dont see the problem. people have the idea that ai is here to take over not to co exists this thought process is wrong yes it will change the format of everyday life but this is the world we live in and we have to learn to adapt and change with it.

You’re absolutely correct, our day to day activities mostly things we are doing on the internet have been done by ai, and also everything there is advantage and disadvantage to everything we are doing, but the most ugly part is that some individuals doesn’t want to work smart anymore they now prefer artificial intelligence for aiding themselves, they’re only interested in using ai for some many things, little things they can do by themselves they will have to apply ai in making things easier for them like they say, but I’m completely sure that here in this platform there is a common rules of not using ai in writing which will obviously make that person a shit poster, and if you’re found using ai to make post here then you will definitely get into terrible trouble, the thought process of some people are very wrong, all in the understanding of making things easier for themselves.

[Lucius]

~snip~
Disclaimer: AI was indeed utilized to enhance this post; this is not spam. This is a genuine attempt to improve the forum and its policies regarding AI, as well as to direct AI disputes and discussions from unrelated threads here.
 [/center]

The very fact that you had to use AI to create your post speaks volumes about the way AI is being abused on this forum. Apart from creating images or analyzing some data (with a note that AI was used), everything else should be prohibited. The fact that the admin has not spoken out on this issue all these years is the biggest problem (as far as the forum is concerned).

Your post gives the following results :

Copyleaks -> AI Content Found - Percentage of text that may be AI-generated 100% - AI Phrases Detected 3
ZeroGPT -> Your text is a blend of signals, some parts likely generated by GPT. 53.17% is written by a human, 46.83% is generated by an AI/GPT.
GPTZero -> We are highly confident this text is a mix of AI and human - 37/50Sentences likely AI generated.

According to the criteria that the users themselves created when reporting AI generated posts and which the moderators follow, your post will definitely be deleted if someone makes a report.

[nutildah]

Knowing OP's post was written by AI, I can't bring myself to read it. If someone can't be bothered to write their own words, why should I bother to read them? It is peak laziness.

This is a forum where _people_ (not robots) come to interact with each other. If you are going to outsource your brain to AI, you're not really participating in the forum in good faith. Nobody will take you seriously, and you won't actually accomplish anything, regardless of your own independent viewpoints on the subject.

I expect this thread to have a similar effect as every other thread you've opened recently: people will walk away from it thinking you are a bit looney tunes in the head.

[Kazkaz27]

Don’t count on it, AI detection analyzers aren’t really sufficient indicators. It’s more human than AI as I declared, if you would like to claim it’s more AI than human because you used an AI detection analyzer it is not sufficient. Also is that not a bit hypocritical? Should you have done the leg work 100% yourself?—Don't use AI then complain about it. I disclose that AI was utilized to enhance this post but is not the main element. I the human component am the main component.

I’m happy you guys express your opinions but many of your responses show the hypocrisy and highlight exactly the points I’ve expressed in the main text.

[OsaiEmma]

Share your personal stories, experiences, or wild ideas below. Let’s make this a respectful, enlightening exchange that could shape forum policies!

The goal here is to kill the stereotypes, end AI derailments, shine light on facts, and possibly create some official policy’s regarding AI on the Forum.

Eager to hear from you all!


Disclaimer: AI was indeed utilized to enhance this post; this is not spam. This is a genuine attempt to improve the forum and its policies regarding AI, as well as to direct AI disputes and discussions from unrelated threads here.
 [/center]

In my honest opinion, I love AI, but I don't just copy and paste whatsoever AI has written, some times I create an article, write an argument, or whatsoever and ask AI to analyze, improve, and give suggestions, when it does, I read through, take key points and either include it in my work or don't.

But I think copying and pasting AI without explicitly saying so can be considered plagiarism, although I know most a times it is not allowed in the forum, but honestly, I don't think I've come across a set rule that explicitly says AI generated texts are not allowed, I might be wrong though, but I honestly have not seen it as a rule set out there, but certainly I love AI, I use it almost everyday, before AI I use Google for research, questions and learning or getting informations, but now AI just makes the work simpler.

With that being said, it would really be a good idea to make a formal thread addressing the do's and don't's on the utilization of AI including text and image generations in forum activities so as not to fall under any unnecessary scrutiny while engaging in forum activities.

[nutildah]

Don’t count on it, AI detection analyzers aren’t really sufficient indicators. It’s more human than AI as I declared, if you would like to claim it’s more AI than human because you used an AI detection analyzer it is not sufficient. Also is that not a bit hypocritical? Should you have done the leg work 100% yourself?—Don't use AI then complain about it. I disclose that AI was utilized to enhance this post but is not the main element.

"Leg work." Who has a better idea of what is AI or not than AI itself? One AI detector by itself may return inaccurate results by 3 detectors all saying the same thing suggests it is on to something.

Here's the thing: if you're a native english speaker, there's absolutely no excuse for doing this. I know you think AI is helping you express your thoughts better, but it is not. It removes the soul from your thoughts and replaces it with a sterile, cookie cutter template response.

I’m happy you guys express your opinions but many of your responses show the hypocrisy and highlight exactly the points I’ve expressed in the main text.

Not reading your main text. It is too long, boring & artificial.

[Vod]

AI is my friend.    Like any friend worth keeping, I've spent considerable time getting to know it.  While I don't use it to generate content for signature money, I do use it to organize my life and help me program.  My development server, which for years has been annoying with the fan speed - is now purring along at 11% controlling my Google devices, managing media and my torrents.   AI is also the driving force for a switch to Linux after 40 years of strictly Windows use (you use what you support).  The way Linux is built from the ground up as a terminal (as compared to Windows implementing it in via Powershell) makes it incredibly easy for AI to pilot the server without any input from me.

If you want to use AI for detailed or repetitive tasks, you have to spend time building the relationship.  For a person that means learning what they like but for AI it means learning how it responds to your instructions.  And it does make a big difference if your ongoing tasks are mundane and boring (copy files to server, set permission, run script) - having your friend do this perfectly just by asking allows you to keep creative juices flowing instead of techinal.

[Kazkaz27]

"Leg work." Who has a better idea of what is AI or not than AI itself? One AI detector by itself may return inaccurate results by 3 detectors all saying the same thing suggests it is on to something.

Here's the thing: if you're a native english speaker, there's absolutely no excuse for doing this. I know you think AI is helping you express your thoughts better, but it is not. It removes the soul from your thoughts and replaces it with a sterile, cookie cutter template response.

Not reading your main text. It is too long, boring & artificial.

Using this metric and code from this post which received over 75 merits from highly respective members that indicates if a post is of pure quality or not. [Experimental] ⭐Bitcointalk BRDb score This thread/post, “Is AI Your Best Friend or Worst Enemy? 🤖” is of high quality. https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNQ_5ed08bdf-cfe9-4b3d-8847-ca922ca921ad.

You seem upset about the use of AI, yet you heavily rely on it to detect it. The “soulless” comment is merely an opinion and holds no real validity. As I’ve stated three times now, I spent hours creating the topic—it’s far more my work than AI’s. If you’d like to engage in a thread, it’s worth reading the content first. It’s rather difficult to have a meaningful discussion on a topic without reviewing its main body. In fact, it’s somewhat foolish to respond or engage in dialogue with someone who refuses to read the core material—it’s simply not effective.


Message to Moderator Michell, this post belongs in Meta not in off topics.—I will be moving this topic back to Meta for the following reasons: https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNQ_639a401a-516b-49d7-92c0-daa8ea315888

This thread strongly references to forum rules, derailing, and policy suggestions.

This thread is your hub for unpacking the facts, weighing the pros and cons, brainstorming potential forum rules, and deciding what’s permissible versus off-limits.

In fact its sole objective is to…

kill the stereotypes, end AI derailments, shine light on facts, and possibly create some official policy’s regarding AI on the Forum.
….
This is a genuine attempt to improve the forum and its policies regarding AI, as well as to direct AI disputes and discussions from unrelated threads here.

[SamReomo]

When it comes to content writing then I would say AI isn't a useful tool but a tool that could destroy someone's ideas and opinions. If we rely on opinions that're purely generated by AI then the posts/threads will be emotionless and thus a human with emotions would not give his/her time to read those posts/threads.

I know we can't neglect that fact that AI is becoming smart and smart each week, and in a year or two we might see AI at human level intelligence that some people call AGI, and these tools can be used for good as well. But, when such tools are used to create posts/threads/comments, then human element won't be there and thus destroys healthy discussion.

AI video generators, AI image generators, and AI Upscalers are useful tools for artists and those're getting good overtime, similarly LLMS and language models are getting better overtime. We can use those tools in good way but using those to create forum posts/threads isn't a good use of those tools in my opinion.

[nutildah]

You seem upset about the use of AI, yet you heavily rely on it to detect it.

First, I don't care if people use AI. I use it all the time. What I do care is if people use it to post on the forum and try to convince us that this is their actual writing and brain at work (its neither). Its disingenuous. If you preface a post by saying it was generated with AI, that's fine, as its a totally honest approach. That's not what most AI spammers do, however. And its not what you did either.

Second, I don't rely on AI to detect it. I detect it with my own brain and then confirm my suspicions using the detectors.

As I’ve stated three times now, I spent hours creating the topic—it’s far more my work than AI’s.

What a waste of time.

[Kazkaz27]

First, I don't care if people use AI. I use it all the time. What I do care is if people use it to post on the forum and try to convince us that this is their actual writing and brain at work (its neither). Its disingenuous. If you preface a post by saying it was generated with AI, that's fine, as its a totally honest approach. That's not what most AI spammers do, however. And its not what you did either.

Second, I don't rely on AI to detect it. I detect it with my own brain and then confirm my suspicions using the detectors.

What a waste of time.

Okay, well, I did in fact say AI was used to enhance the post. Perhaps you missed that, seeing as you didn’t read the post. Admittedly, you declared you won’t read the post—and obviously you haven’t read it—yet you say the post is disingenuous. How is that even possible for you to determine?

Given the fact that you refuse to read the topic and obviously haven’t, I really don’t think you know what you’re talking about. If you want to comment, I respect that. Opinions are fine as well. What’s disappointing—and even more disingenuous—is that you judge this thread without even reading it. I have a feeling that if you liked me, this post would receive a merit or two, but I don’t think you view me that way. It’s actually full of “soul”, just like this reply.

What’s really special is how you said that you didn’t read it yet you used your own brain “🧠” to determine it was AI?

This is very confusing. Are you claiming you have super powers?

If you did read the post, why would I trust a word you say moving forward if you declared you wouldn’t?

If you don’t want to read the post, that’s truly fine, but I’ll ask you to find a post to comment on that you actually care to read. That way, you can be a bit more constructive in regards to the topic.

[ABCbits]

This has been discussed so many times. Here are some related example (sorted from new to old),
Don't we think is not best time for theymos to address us of using AI
This AI case makes me think
[Suggestion/Idea] "AI Spammer" Title For Users Making Obvious AI-generated Posts
Acceptable uses of AI in the forum (unofficial)
Why Are We Even Considering a Ban on AI Tools Like ChatGPT?
Shouldn't there be a forum rule against obvious AI-generated content?
Should this forum ban the use of chatbots and AI entirely?
Artificial Intelligence on the Forum
Use of AI on Bitcoin talk
It is bad to use AI to help my post quality improve?
How can Bitcointalk evolve to adapt to a post 2023 (ChatGPT, etc) internet?

But even after so many years and so many threads, there's still no rule change from admin.

Message to Moderator Michell, this post belongs in Meta not in off topics.—I will be moving this topic back to Meta for the following reasons: https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNQ_639a401a-516b-49d7-92c0-daa8ea315888

FYI, i tried opening the link with few different VPN region, but the website always say "This service is not available in your region.". You may want to share content on that link here.