Claymore XPM GPU Miner discussion

[Kazulya]

i am getting 98% GPU usage when solo mining is this normal? should it be 99%?

How mining solo? Pls write me sittings
http://s020.radikal.ru/i714/1405/ac/9022abd3f318t.jpg
is this normal?

[Claymore]

Announcement: within 1-3 days I will release new version with about x1.5 speedup for all cards. Be ready

[Strannik-74]

i am getting 98% GPU usage when solo mining is this normal? should it be 99%?

How mining solo? Pls write me sittings

is this normal?

There are written, that the client has been found.
Correct your settings:

primecoin.conf
________________
rpcuser=111
rpcpassword=222
rpcallowip=*.*.*.*
rpcport=7332
server=1

.bat
NsXpmMiner.exe -o 127.0.0.1:7332 -u 111 -p 222 -xpm APeYiUi***********C2nMc89 -di 0 -ss 2 -t 8

[aikklond]

Announcement: within 1-3 days I will release new version with about x1.5 speedup for all cards. Be ready

this is some very good news!

[kaleruka]

Announcement: within 1-3 days I will release new version with about x1.5 speedup for all cards. Be ready

what about power consumstion?its still the same?or become as script?

[Claymore]

Announcement: within 1-3 days I will release new version with about x1.5 speedup for all cards. Be ready

what about power consumstion?its still the same?or become as script?

It will be the same.

[kaleruka]

great!)

[WINNIE_POOL]

I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

[Claymore]

I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?

[ozzy1926]

i have found a 11 ch and get this

═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
05/08/14-10:25:33 - BLOCK FOUND! - (Th#: 3) - DIFF:11.755423 - TYPE:1
Coin client rejected block
res type: 2

but my block doesnt count
 why is that?

[Claymore]

i have found a 11 ch and get this

═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
05/08/14-10:25:33 - BLOCK FOUND! - (Th#: 3) - DIFF:11.755423 - TYPE:1
Coin client rejected block
res type: 2

but my block doesnt count
 why is that?

Do you use v7.0?

[Strannik-74]

i have found a 11 ch and get this

═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
05/08/14-10:25:33 - BLOCK FOUND! - (Th#: 3) - DIFF:11.755423 - TYPE:1
Coin client rejected block
res type: 2

but my block doesnt count
 why is that?

It's okay =)

[ozzy1926]

i have found a 11 ch and get this

═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
05/08/14-10:25:33 - BLOCK FOUND! - (Th#: 3) - DIFF:11.755423 - TYPE:1
Coin client rejected block
res type: 2

but my block doesnt count
 why is that?

Do you use v7.0?

yes and its solo

[WINNIE_POOL]

I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?

I'm using -ss 2, if <3 card it's ok but 5 cards slower, can I use other option?

[aistto]

I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?

I'm using -ss 2, if <3 card it's ok but 5 cards slower, can I use other option?

I think core2duo too slow. I use -ss 2 -t 8 for 2*280x on core2duo
but Athlone 2 270x handle 6*280x

[WINNIE_POOL]

I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?

I'm using -ss 2, if <3 card it's ok but 5 cards slower, can I use other option?

I think core2duo too slow. I use -ss 2 -t 8 for 2*280x on core2duo
but Athlone 2 270x handle 6*280x

I know core 2 duo too slow, so I ask Claymore for optimize it because I have 10 x grid [core2duo, 4G RAM, 5 X 270)

[primer10]

You are looking for conspiracy where likely there is none. The guy gets % from mining revenue - he has no incentive to slow things down. It's not like he is charging for updates.
And what's wrong with anouncing next release he is testing probably now?

Nah .. if everything is so straight-forward and clear in this world, there wouldn't be conspiracies, scams, etc right?

Just imagine .. having the cake and eating it at the same time: charges ppl for weak miner while mine for himself using the fastest miner. not to mention regular updates keep ppl interested and generate more ppl for his revenue. At some point in time, the dev fee is going to exceed those he gained from his own mining. but overall, win-win.

Now .. I am not saying this is true, I have no proof. I do not dismiss this possibility since there is nothing to lose for him.

As for your last point .. There is nothing wrong.

[djm34]

You are looking for conspiracy where likely there is none. The guy gets % from mining revenue - he has no incentive to slow things down. It's not like he is charging for updates.
And what's wrong with anouncing next release he is testing probably now?

Nah .. if everything is so straight-forward and clear in this world, there wouldn't be conspiracies, scams, etc right?

Just imagine .. having the cake and eating it at the same time: charges ppl for weak miner while mine for himself using the fastest miner. not to mention regular updates keep ppl interested and generate more ppl for his revenue. At some point in time, the dev fee is going to exceed those he gained from his own mining. but overall, win-win.

actually this was a month ago, when the first gpu miner got released.
that's clearly the only reason to wait for 10.5 diff to release them. It just means it wasn't profitable for them to mine on their own.
(or at least to primegpu... but since primegpu was kind of greedy. he showed to others they could also make a lot releasing their own miners)

All this is really bad for the coin itself (but who cares actually) as it will certainly be the reason why it will never get the success bitcoin has.
(full acceptance of a 10% fee coins will hopefully never happened... for that matter any fiat currency "driven by corrupt bankers" (lol) is still better)

[primeGPU]

All this is really bad for the coin itself (but who cares actually) as it will certainly be the reason why it will never get the success bitcoin has.
(full acceptance of a 10% fee coins will hopefully never happened... for that matter any fiat currency "driven by corrupt bankers" (lol) is still better)

How does it differ from paying "10% fee" for bitcoin ASICs?

[Claymore]

I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?

I'm using -ss 2, if <3 card it's ok but 5 cards slower, can I use other option?

I think core2duo too slow. I use -ss 2 -t 8 for 2*280x on core2duo
but Athlone 2 270x handle 6*280x

I know core 2 duo too slow, so I ask Claymore for optimize it because I have 10 x grid [core2duo, 4G RAM, 5 X 270)

Ok, I will add -ss 3 option.