Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 05:33:55 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore XPM GPU Miner discussion  (Read 142055 times)
primer10
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 07:11:13 AM
 #961

Claymore, is there something to be hidden in the Data.bin in v8 of your miner? Your v7 and below has always been using k<num>.dat, which is the compiled OpenCL binary. OpenCL binary is an ELF format file (you can see ELF in the strings if you try to open it). v7 and below, your OpenCL binary is not encrypted but in v8, it seems to be. Was it because you are using madmax - eXtremal's code?

If you are, that's fine so long as you give credits to these great ppl. It is unethical if you are using theirs and taking dev fee for yourself not giving credit.

I had a lot of miner versions before opensource miners and speed of my miner always was comparable with best miners. v9 will have more speed than v8. v10 will be faster than v9. And you always can say that I steal some ideas from somebody, I won't be able to prove anything since my miner is not opensource and I'm not going to do it. But also somebody (who knows a lot about ELF files for example) can steal my ideas so I decided to protect both EXE and OpenCL code. I'm not going to discuss it anymore.
I do give credits to all opensource miners - we have a lot of miners now and you can select the best miner for you.

Sure, since we can't prove anything and no point spending effort proving shady business, you can say whatever you want. Work will have to continue with open source miners and I agree with what you said, people just have to compare ROI with various miners and use the better one.
alphawolf099
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 07:21:45 AM
 #962

Claymore, is there something to be hidden in the Data.bin in v8 of your miner? Your v7 and below has always been using k<num>.dat, which is the compiled OpenCL binary. OpenCL binary is an ELF format file (you can see ELF in the strings if you try to open it). v7 and below, your OpenCL binary is not encrypted but in v8, it seems to be. Was it because you are using madmax - eXtremal's code?

If you are, that's fine so long as you give credits to these great ppl. It is unethical if you are using theirs and taking dev fee for yourself not giving credit.

I had a lot of miner versions before opensource miners and speed of my miner always was comparable with best miners. v9 will have more speed than v8. v10 will be faster than v9. And you always can say that I steal some ideas from somebody, I won't be able to prove anything since my miner is not opensource and I'm not going to do it. But also somebody (who knows a lot about ELF files for example) can steal my ideas so I decided to protect both EXE and OpenCL code. I'm not going to discuss it anymore.
I do give credits to all opensource miners - we have a lot of miners now and you can select the best miner for you.

If you won't release the source why is it safe to use? why won't you release it? another ypool coin hoard by the looks of it

It is only fair to release the code ( i know ypool devs do not release code because of greed ) but do the community a favor
bclcjunkie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 833
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 11, 2014, 09:04:45 AM
 #963

hit my first block with version 8.0 after about 3hrs of mining.. so far so good... let's see how it goes..
rots
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 09:20:33 AM
 #964

Claymore, which XPT version do you use? I try to bulid my own trail pool which using
XPT protocol,now it can successfully be connected with traditional jh miner, but when I
try to use you miner, it seems your miner using a different version of XPT, which I can't
understand. 

v8.0 is available.

- Improved speed by about 50-60%. Up to 7 CPD on 290X.
- Improved chain targeting: more 8-10 chains and less 4-6 chains.
- Added "-ss 3" option for very slow CPU.
- Removed "-hc" option.
- Removed "-ss 0" option, works as "-ss 1" now.
primer10
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 09:27:12 AM
 #965

Claymore, which XPT version do you use? I try to bulid my own trail pool which using
XPT protocol,now it can successfully be connected with traditional jh miner, but when I
try to use you miner, it seems your miner using a different version of XPT, which I can't
understand. 

v8.0 is available.

- Improved speed by about 50-60%. Up to 7 CPD on 290X.
- Improved chain targeting: more 8-10 chains and less 4-6 chains.
- Added "-ss 3" option for very slow CPU.
- Removed "-hc" option.
- Removed "-ss 0" option, works as "-ss 1" now.

Claymore understood that he could protect his binary but not the comm. Likely he worked something out with ypool to protect the traffic.
fudge
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 666
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 12:33:39 PM
 #966

Got 5-7% rejected (outdated) shares on ypool
pc time is ok

Haшa гpyшa нaйpoзкopчyмaкyвaтiшa!
murders10
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 01:27:32 PM
 #967

Yeah allot of rejected. ypool  Huh Huh

Many Orphaned to ...
olajos
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 01:53:00 PM
 #968

Hello Claymore. Thanks for the speedup. I have one question. Do you planning to add temp target setting in your miner with auto fan option? i have one card on my rig which is a little bit crazy. around 15 C is hotter than others. with msi afterburner i can adjust fan control but for all cards and separately not. All my fans is at 80% cause of that one crazy card. Thanks
cptfisher
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 649
Merit: 505


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 01:56:43 PM
 #969

hello sorry for dosturb i will be honest dont want to read the whole 49 pages so here is my question ... will this miner work for radeon 6990 ?

 if yes what performance can i expect ? thank you and regards
bclcjunkie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 833
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 11, 2014, 02:23:41 PM
 #970

so far 5 blocks from my 2 rigs within 7 hrs of mining. well done claymore, i don't know what you did but it's working... Cheesy

hit my first block with version 8.0 after about 3hrs of mining.. so far so good... let's see how it goes..
nicegirls
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 03:34:45 PM
Last edit: May 11, 2014, 04:09:37 PM by nicegirls
 #971

hi Claymore
I run  with v .7 is ok with V.8 with bat file and error:
NsXpmMiner.exe has stopped working
help how to fix it?
 run 2x 280x driver 13:12
gilad215
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 430
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 11, 2014, 06:44:28 PM
 #972

been using v8 for about 20+ hours. 1 hour ago i had 20 unconfirmed xpms. now i have 70 uncomfirmed! Smiley can someone explain?

my total share value is 1300/h and by my calculation 60 xpm/day

Neluns
♦ New Generation Financial Ecosystem ♦
Pre-sale on Aug, 1
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 07:24:43 PM
 #973

Yeah allot of rejected. ypool  Huh Huh

Many Orphaned to ...

Primecoin network generates new blocks too quickly now, 2-3 blocks per minute instead of 1. In a few days it will work more stable.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 07:25:43 PM
 #974

Hello Claymore. Thanks for the speedup. I have one question. Do you planning to add temp target setting in your miner with auto fan option? i have one card on my rig which is a little bit crazy. around 15 C is hotter than others. with msi afterburner i can adjust fan control but for all cards and separately not. All my fans is at 80% cause of that one crazy card. Thanks

Yes. Also I plan multigpu support.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 07:31:25 PM
 #975

hi Claymore
I run  with v .7 is ok with V.8 with bat file and error:
NsXpmMiner.exe has stopped working
help how to fix it?
 run 2x 280x driver 13:12

Check troubleshooting section in readme, helps in 95% cases.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
patinencomun
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 09:28:26 PM
 #976

7990 (2x7970) and 280x at same mem/gpuclock have the same performance with v7 version, but different performance (7990 12% slower) in version v8.

This is right? Is possible to apply same optimizations on both?
Thank you Claymore, very good job with v8 miner.
topnetdeal
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 11:36:18 PM
Last edit: May 11, 2014, 11:49:34 PM by topnetdeal
 #977

WTF is with ypool ? Last valid Block 537569 and next 55 same but Orphaned.

▒ NOW token ▒ by ChangeNOW ▒ Get the WIN! ▒
ChangeNOW - an instant Non-custodial Exchange Service  (( changenow.io ))
Whitepaper  ▓  Telegram  ▓  Twitter  ▓  Facebook  ▓  Medium  ▓  Reddit  ▓  Bounty Thread
hashfun
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 11:49:10 PM
 #978

WTF is with ypool ? Last Block 537569 and all next same with Share value 0.00.

Now all orphaned a big list of blocks..

kev7112001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 479
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 12, 2014, 01:19:26 AM
 #979

lol stop mining on that pool hit 5 blocks solo since v8

MCXNOW MODERATOR
kev7112001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 479
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 12, 2014, 01:21:19 AM
 #980

7990 (2x7970) and 280x at same mem/gpuclock have the same performance with v7 version, but different performance (7990 12% slower) in version v8.

This is right? Is possible to apply same optimizations on both?
Thank you Claymore, very good job with v8 miner.

its not all about the card cpu has an effect to plus have u tried diff settings on the miner

MCXNOW MODERATOR
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!