bitbollo is a scammer, ponzi promoter, account trader, cheater, and abuser.

[Shishir99]

What's the TL;DR here? Do OP's findings prove a connection sufficiently?

All you need to check is the original post of this thread.
The addition is this one - Look at the transaction below; both addresses from bitbollo and Cs87kxy are in the same input. There is no way he could say he doesn't own it.

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/87141eade85e9c7b669a6c15563b800cf3e4fd1bf84a8cec4c1fe8d24a878281

Look at what is actually on the table

• Both accounts used Italian wording.
• Both accounts posted the same address.
  
• There was no email change.
  
• He never claimed the account was hacked or traded.
• His story is that a "friend" posted his address.

[Free Market Capitalist]

What's the TL;DR here? Do OP's findings prove a connection sufficiently?

Shishir99 has already provided the TLDR. I'd add that it depends on what you mean by “sufficiently.” There's enough evidence for many of us to doubt bitbollo's reputation, but considering that it goes back to a scam from 8 years ago and that he's been steadily accumulating green tags for a decade, it doesn't seem like enough to red-tag him without any further evidence.

The “friend” theory might be true in this case. Furthermore, someone who is a cheater and scammer doesn't usually undergo a personality change to become honest. A murderer might kill just once and then lead a normal life out of fear of being caught and sent to prison for life or even condemned to death.

But someone who is alleged to have bought accounts and scammed people—what would have stopped him from continuing to do so instead of cultivating an honest profile (reflected in the green tags) on Bitcointalk? Here, if you scam someone and get caught, you can just abandon that account and keep scamming with others.

[mindrust]

It seems to me the community can't really decide what to do with the old forum offenses...

Say, a currently decent guy with good reputation committed some shady shit 10 years ago and somehow managed to hide his mess or the old DT somehow missed it.

The evidence are quite there, but nobody wants to act.

But it also doesn't feel quite right.

It is a deadlock.

People might think, "I did no wrongdoings in the past, and this guy did some shady shit and somehow managed to hide it, got away with it and now he is acting righteous and shiet over the other peepl. Is this just?"

Does that mean no matter what the account owner committed in the past, are we going to act like nothing has happened?

What is the expiration date on the forum offenses?

Obviously we don't care about the 10 year old offenses.

What about 5 years?

How about 1 year?

What about 1 month old offenses?

How about yesterrdaayy?

Let's make it an official forum rule so everyone will know when will they get their jail-free card.

[Shishir99]

But someone who is alleged to have bought accounts and scammed people—what would have stopped him from continuing to do so instead of cultivating an honest profile (reflected in the green tags) on Bitcointalk? Here, if you scam someone and get caught, you can just abandon that account and keep scamming with others.

You are right about it.
Nothing would stop someone from operating multiple accounts and scamming instead of maintaining one profile. However, you never know if someone has decided to maintain one good account and operate scams with other accounts. There is no way to know if someone has multiple accounts till they get connected somehow or make some mistake. This forum doesn't moderate scams. A scammer can decide to create an account, scam, abandon the account and repeat the same process.

I have said this before, and I will say it again. You can trust him for the last few years of good behaviour if that's what you choose. That doesn't wash away what came before. Nobody has to red-tag him today for a scam from eight years ago. I am not asking for a witch hunt. I am asking for honesty. He is not some angel who never dirtied his hands. He's a bully this forum's DT network has covered for, year after year, while the rest of us were expected to look away.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Let's make it an official forum rule so everyone will know when will they get their jail-free card.

There's not gonna be an official forum rule because scams are not moderated. And you are not going to get all DTs to agree on such a point, so there won't be an unofficial rule based on consensus either.

You can trust him for the last few years of good behaviour if that's what you choose.

I don't know if you're speaking in general or referring to me, but in my case, I've put him on ignore because he's such annoyance. What a pain in the neck, for heaven's sake! All the time repeating the same.

He's a bully this forum's DT network has covered for, year after year, while the rest of us were expected to look away.

Indeed. The way he's acted makes him seem like a bully.

[LoyceV]

What is the expiration date on the forum offenses?
Obviously we don't care about the 10 year old offenses.
What about 5 years?
How about 1 year?
What about 1 month old offenses?
How about yesterrdaayy?

If it's 10 years ago, does the suspect's age matter? What if he's an adult now, and you find out he stole some candy when he was 10?

In my country, the statute of limitations for theft or fraud is 12 years. Type 2 Flags on Bitcointalk expire in 3 years, type 3 Flags expire in 10 years. This is why:

In the spirit of forgiveness/redemption

I've seen good people turn bad in much less time, and I'm not going to tag someone for something that was already known 10 years ago.

[icopress]

What's the TL;DR here? Do OP's findings prove a connection sufficiently?

No. It’s just an attempt at a counter-attack against the red tag.

[AB de Royse777]

What's the TL;DR here? Do OP's findings prove a connection sufficiently?

Yes. The findings prove a connection sufficiently.
1. Cs87kxy wanted to join a campaign using the address 14A8fkAAv2yaLJUBU5Nb82QWTtpPSYFPp2 and bitbollo staked the same address after two months.
2. These are bitbollo's addresses 1BoSH7RisUAPpGfNbX8scSB43YP6Tx3g7M and 14A8fkAAv2yaLJUBU5Nb82QWTtpPSYFPp2 (staked). On this transaction you are going to see both input addresses together.
3. Both Cs87kxy and bitbollo has Italian local post.

There are no denial that Cs87kxy and bitbollo are the same person (unless we go for arguments like friends, sister, brother, parents or grand parents). However, all these were from long time ago. bitbollo maintained a good account from the last 8 to 10 years.

So the good thing: Everyone is giving him an opportunity and not tagging him for promoting the Ponzi project.
The bad thing: He is using his DT status to bully other users. He is using the power to silence others with unjustified (~)distrust and negative feedback.

[edit]
Discovered their common local board
https://bitlist.co/user/id/524089?date_min=2015-06-19&date_max=2026-10-02
https://bitlist.co/user/id/364070?date_min=2014-08-07&date_max=2026-10-02

[bitbollo]

Thanks for confirming you are a liar and continue to fabricate a pure bullshit, still trying to push bullshit OLD and posted 11 years again.
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/87141eade85e9c7b669a6c15563b800cf3e4fd1bf84a8cec4c1fe8d24a878281
This txid has been made with keys in my possession since 13 years, full kyc, that have still funds.
You are not proving any scam, just trying to fabricate an accuse old 11 years.
LIAR!

[edit]
Discovered their common local board
https://bitlist.co/user/id/524089?date_min=2015-06-19&date_max=2026-10-02
https://bitlist.co/user/id/364070?date_min=2014-08-07&date_max=2026-10-02

yeah that was already posted by your friend Shisir99 .
You can't invent any TXID that can link my person and these keys to any of these scam.
Thanks for forging this scam accusation completely non-sense and stupid by itself: these keys in my possession since 13 years, full kyc, that have still funds.
LIAR!

What's the TL;DR here? Do OP's findings prove a connection sufficiently?

Yes. The findings prove a connection sufficiently.
1. Cs87kxy wanted to join a campaign using the address 14A8fkAAv2yaLJUBU5Nb82QWTtpPSYFPp2 and bitbollo staked the same address after two months.
2. These are bitbollo's addresses 1BoSH7RisUAPpGfNbX8scSB43YP6Tx3g7M and 14A8fkAAv2yaLJUBU5Nb82QWTtpPSYFPp2 (staked). On this transaction you are going to see both input addresses together.

There are no denial that Cs87kxy and bitbollo are the same person (unless we go for arguments like friends, sister, brother, parents or grand parents). However, all these were from long time ago. bitbollo maintained a good account from the last 8 to 10 years.

So the good thing: Everyone is giving him an opportunity and not tagging him for promoting the Ponzi project.
The bad thing: He is using his DT status to bully other users. He is using the power to silence others with unjustified (~)distrust and negative feedback.

Again this user continue to say that I AM SCAMMER without providing a single proof of what he is saying.
Despite there is a double topic about it, I would just quote the same message posted - I would not deal anymore with this argument after this.

...
Can someone post a scam / single txid?  NO OF COURSE

I have posted clearly that ALL MY keys are still used, in my possession and FULL KYC in dozen of CEX - I would see a TXID before being accused of somewhat.
I am not seeing as possible to have managed a "ponzi, have used hundreds of account, scam directbet, run secondstrade" - This guy has used these accuse for red trust me .
I have clearly explained DOZEN OF TIMES CLEARLY EVEN why this guy deserve a red trust - open references - if you would have a trusted guy that can't help the community with a proven scam after 7 days, please add him to your trust list.

If you was wondering why they made this topic please check

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation against Little Mouse
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0 scam accusation 2nd topic Little Mouse/frogbet.com
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3590 FLAG LITTLE MOUSE
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3591 FLAG FROGBET
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67177664#msg67177664 Shisir99 supporting a scam after 7 days
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67184623#msg67184623 there are 4 scam accusations against websites advertised by Little Mouse in the last month

[alani123]

I don't see why it would be hard to get to the bottom of this without huge walls of text.

The OP established Blockchain based connections to dozens of accounts. Are these disputed?

Some accounts have red trust. Some of these accounts even got tagged recently. There's all sorts of trust violations among these accounts.
How can a connection be denied after Blockchain proof has been supplied then?

[nutildah]

I don't see why it would be hard to get to the bottom of this without huge walls of text.

The OP established Blockchain based connections to dozens of accounts. Are these disputed?

Some accounts have red trust. Some of these accounts even got tagged recently. There's all sorts of trust violations among these accounts.
How can a connection be denied after Blockchain proof has been supplied then?

You should read the entire thread, check the blockchain, and then come to your own conclusions.

[bitbollo]

I don't see why it would be hard to get to the bottom of this without huge walls of text.

The OP established Blockchain based connections to dozens of accounts. Are these disputed?

Some accounts have red trust. Some of these accounts even got tagged recently. There's all sorts of trust violations among these accounts.
How can a connection be denied after Blockchain proof has been supplied then?

You should read the entire thread, check the blockchain, and then come to your own conclusions.

Conclusion? You are still trying to push a completely non-sense - "all sort of violation"- even with this retard conclusion using a dozens of address in my possess, right?
Tryng to fabricate desperately this fake accusation using 11 years it's just the last resort to hide all the scam promoted on forum.

...
However, it is evidence that nobody is perfect, and anyone posturing themselves as high & mighty above others probably isn't. We are all human and experience errors in judgment; thus it is better to remain humble when possible... myself included.
...

That's a total non-sense. I haven't made any scam or supported any scam.
If there was a single satoshi linked to illicit activity these address was already blacklisted or whatever and not used for 13 years
If you can prove I have received/my person has been involved with any of these scam related this account please show one single TXID, otherwise I would refuse any illogic accuse immediately.

After being in this forum for all of these years, I don't see anything wrong on my profile to have the honor to receive such treatment

bitbollo is a scammer, ponzi promoter, account trader, cheater, and abuser.

I don't wait a couple of weeks/dozens of pages before confirming someone is a scammer/warning the community.
After organizing events free for all forum for thousands of dollars since many years and giving away many items for free, I would not being expected to be accused to have run a "PONZI using 13 years address posted and never linked to a single illicit TXID! These hays have thousands of transactions and may have still coins inside. It's utterly offensive try to depict my activity "as shady" despite these are the same address used with THOUSANDS OF TRANSACTIONS including CEX websites.

Trying to fabricate an accuse on my person after 13 years it's just the last resort to hide a dozen of scams that have passed underground in the last months.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation against Little Mouse
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0 scam accusation 2nd topic Little Mouse/frogbet.com
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67177664#msg67177664 Shisir99 supporting a scam after 7 days
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67184623#msg67184623 there are 4 scam accusations against websites advertised by Little Mouse in the last month

Still now there are sites linked with many other previous scam/showing fake wins/fake traffic being advertised.
After you have posted this connection what has changed on these accusation? Nothing.

[alani123]

I don't see why it would be hard to get to the bottom of this without huge walls of text.

The OP established Blockchain based connections to dozens of accounts. Are these disputed?

Some accounts have red trust. Some of these accounts even got tagged recently. There's all sorts of trust violations among these accounts.
How can a connection be denied after Blockchain proof has been supplied then?

You should read the entire thread, check the blockchain, and then come to your own conclusions.

That's what I'm trying to do and I keep thinking I might be dumb.

At first we're shown direct Blockchain reference of accounts being linked.
Some of these accounts have valid trust tags recently.

Then we get an entire thread about how the person in question spent a decade being ok.

So isn't it normal to want to understand what's going on here? Is the evidence not strong enough?
Then there should be some clear cut counter arguments as to why the person in question isn't in fact connected to the offences that had the other Blockchain-linked accounts tagged.

If there's no counter arguments, like in most such cases, the standard procedure I remember in this forum for someone linked to offending account would be for DT also tagging that person.

I'm trying to give both sides a chance to explain themselves in case I'm the one not understanding something properly. So far I haven't seen bitbollo presenting a valid counter argument against the Blockchain evidence which I think he should do. The 10 year argument doesn't stand when there's red trust ratings that are much more recent.

[nutildah]

You should read the entire thread, check the blockchain, and then come to your own conclusions.

Conclusion? You are still trying to push a completely non-sense - "all sort of violation"- even with this retard conclusion using a dozens of address in my possess, right?
Tryng to fabricate desperately this fake accusation using 11 years it's just the last resort to hide all the scam promoted on forum.

I'm not trying to push anything. I had backed out of the discussion until today.

So isn't it normal to want to understand what's going on here? Is the evidence not strong enough?

That's for you to decide -- you're a member of the forum as much as anybody else. Its weird to expect people to provide you with a summary. You have access to the same information as everybody else.

[bitbollo]

I had backed out of the discussion until today.

If you skip the evidences, like the guy that "ignore my explanations and my posts", after there are 4 topics to harrass me... It's the simply demonstration the totally untrustworthy approach most of these users have, and how they are completely biased on "scam evaluation".

No one has showed a single TXID linked to a scam. But you continue to comment that people have to "decide"?
You avoid any logic evidence, skip all my explanations?
Meanwhile people are harvesting by other scams "that are just team in contact - take 100 usd" ?  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594949.msg67202919#msg67202919

These address have made thousands of transactions - no one has been ever linked to anything illicit or a scam - I don't accept any doubt on the argument, I don't accept such retard accuse to have made a "ponzi" 11 years ago.

...
However, it is evidence that nobody is perfect, and anyone posturing themselves as high & mighty above others probably isn't. We are all human and experience errors in judgment; thus it is better to remain humble when possible... myself included.
...

That's a total non-sense. I haven't made any scam or supported any scam.
If there was a single satoshi linked to illicit activity these address was already blacklisted or whatever and not used for 13 years
If you can prove I have received/my person has been involved with any of these scam related this account please show one single TXID, otherwise I would refuse any illogic accuse immediately.

After being in this forum for all of these years, I don't see anything wrong on my profile to have the honor to receive such treatment

bitbollo is a scammer, ponzi promoter, account trader, cheater, and abuser.

I don't wait a couple of weeks/dozens of pages before confirming someone is a scammer/warning the community.
After organizing events free for all forum for thousands of dollars since many years and giving away many items for free, I would not being expected to be accused to have run a "PONZI using 13 years address posted and never linked to a single illicit TXID! These hays have thousands of transactions and may have still coins inside. It's utterly offensive try to depict my activity "as shady" despite these are the same address used with THOUSANDS OF TRANSACTIONS including CEX websites.

Trying to fabricate an accuse on my person after 13 years it's just the last resort to hide a dozen of scams that have passed underground in the last months.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation against Little Mouse
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0 scam accusation 2nd topic Little Mouse/frogbet.com
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67177664#msg67177664 Shisir99 supporting a scam after 7 days
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67184623#msg67184623 there are 4 scam accusations against websites advertised by Little Mouse in the last month

Still now there are sites linked with many other previous scam/showing fake wins/fake traffic being advertised.
After you have posted this connection what has changed on these accusation? Nothing.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

That's what I'm trying to do and I keep thinking I might be dumb.

At first we're shown direct Blockchain reference of accounts being linked.
Some of these accounts have valid trust tags recently.

Then we get an entire thread about how the person in question spent a decade being ok.

If you are referring to the list of accounts of the Directbet.eu tipster competition, I think the key is here:

I don't think there's anything to respond to here. This is a false accusation; it is clearly just a case of funds being moved within the DirectBet platform. I have checked and can see that each participant deposited a significant amount; a unique Bitcoin address was assigned to each bet, and after the bets were placed, the funds were moved between addresses within the same system.

Op himself has ceased to insist on that hypothesis, focusing on the more proven one, the connection between bitbollo and Cs87kxy. He also said that he was going to bring more evidence but that hasn't happened, so that's why things stand like this today.

[Shishir99]

and I'm not going to tag someone for something that was already known 10 years ago.

It is eight years, to be precise. Not ten. Please stop stretching the clock to make this sound ancient and settled.

The account connection was disclosed back in 2015. The scam came in 2017. So no, it is not "known for ten years." The connection was public before the scam, and nobody looked twice, because there was no tag. Not even a neutral one. The scam itself was never known. People saw a link and walked past it.

bitbollo never said a word about it. He probably did not even realize the connection was sitting in the open. He learned it the moment I posted the old link and quoted that post. Two years later, that account opened a Ponzi.

Think about that. If bitbollo had known the connection was exposed, he would never have used that account. And if it really was "someone else", a friend, a stranger, a buyer, he would have warned this community the second he saw his name tied to a scam. He did not. He stayed quiet.

So don't tell me this was known for a decade and somehow forgiven. What failed, eight years ago, was the DT network: they never marked a scammer. And now the story gets rewritten as if everyone knew, and everyone chose mercy. [Edit: used AI to rewrite some wording]

He also said that he was going to bring more evidence but that hasn't happened, so that's why things stand like this today.

I was referring to the blockchain connection, in which bitbollo and Cx87kxy's account addresses were in the same input. I have disclosed this already - https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/87141eade85e9c7b669a6c15563b800cf3e4fd1bf84a8cec4c1fe8d24a878281

As for his connection with secondstrade.com, I think he used their service, which is why he is connected to that account as well. So, I didn't post the connection between bitbollo and Secondstrade.

[oneadvocate]

Been going through the late-September threads instead of the quote walls. Putting down what the posts actually contain, point by point.

Bitbollo (Legendary, joined August 2014, activity around 4130, merit around 5106, about 12,800 posts) opened topic 5594694 on 21 September about frogbet and the campaign run by Little Mouse. Public version of that dispute: a deposit on 14 September got converted into a bonus with heavy wagering after a free spin, the review reward was not paid on the stated schedule, he was told 24 hours, a week passed, escrow that had been held for the campaign was sent back, and the casino side later said roughly $100 had been credited on the site. He filed flags and left negative trust over the handling and the continued promotion. Amount was small. That part is a campaign and deposit argument, written up in 5594694 and 5594724.

Seven days later, 28 September, topic 5595318 opens under the title that he is a scammer, ponzi promoter, account trader, cheater and abuser. The arguments under that title do not hold up. Here is why.

1. Timing. The heavy title only shows up after he filed the frogbet complaint and the flags. The address overlap those posts rely on was already public in December 2016 (Avirunes note naming bitbollo, Cs87kxy and Cearea11). Nothing stuck to the Legendary account then. It gets reused now, a week after the campaign dispute.

2. One old address is not control of another account. The load-bearing link is 14A8fkAAv2yaLJUBU5Nb82QWTtpPSYFPp2. Cs87kxy posted it on 19 June 2015 in a signature-campaign signup. Bitbollo posted the same string on 12 August 2015 next to 1BoSH7RisUAPpGfNbX8scSB43YP6Tx3g7M and 1JwLxS3za2s9gFVzn4SKk6xpgg24bxxh9d. In 2015 addresses were pasted into contests, quoted, and reused in giveaways. Posting a string someone else already posted does not show who held the key in 2016 or 2017, when the other account picked up its negative trust.

3. Exchange hot wallets are shared. Later posts point at both sides sending toward a cex.io hot wallet. A hot wallet receives deposits from thousands of customers. Shared traffic into an exchange wallet is not proof the keys are controlled by one person. Deposit addresses and hot wallets get mixed traffic all the time.

4. No proceeds TXID. Bitbollo has said in the thread that 1BoSH7RisUAPpGfNbX8scSB43YP6Tx3g7M is a long-used address he can sign for, that those addresses have years of ordinary exchange activity, and that he wants a TXID of scheme proceeds hitting them. Across the pages of 5595318 that TXID is not produced. What gets shown is old posts, co-spending into exchange infrastructure, and a list of DirectBet tipster addresses. Negative feedback for the boostcrypto thread (exit in about a week, trust note March 2017, “ponzi scammer”) and for account sales sits on Cs87kxy, not on the Legendary account.

5. DirectBet and account sales do not carry the title. The tipster rules linked in the accusation allowed a few entries per player. Account buying and selling was ordinary marketplace traffic on this board in 2015–2016. Neither of those, on the posts cited, turned into a red tag on bitbollo at the time.

6. Record after the old posts. Merit and activity accumulated across the decade after 2015. He has run the Bitcoin collectibles meetups (Milan, Catania, Tokyo, Seoul dates in topic 5503159), free drinks and open invite, merited by long-standing members. That is the visible activity, not a hidden scheme tied to a satoshi trace.

I went through the cited posts, the June and August 2015 address dates, the 2016 note, the trust entries on the other account, and the transaction claims in 5595318. No post in that thread shows scheme proceeds entering an address Bitbollo has used in the open for more than ten years. The charges in the title are not established by the material that was posted.

Shishir99 only started digging after Bitbollo left him a negative on the 21st. He said that himself on the 30th. The frogbet thing was a missed reward and a deposit, about a hundred bucks. Hours later, he opens 5594724 quoting the trust note. A week later, 5595318 shows up with the long title, and under it is a 2015 address plus a note from 2016 that never got bitbollo a tag. No tx of bad coins hitting an address he has used in the open for ten years. That is a reply to the feedback, not a new case. Bitbollo is innocent. Not a scammer, not a ponzi promoter, not an account trader, not a cheater, not an abuser. Bitbollo is innocent of the accusations that he is a scammer, a ponzi promoter, an account trader, a cheater, or an abuser.

[Free Market Capitalist]

If you're going to create a new account just to say that, don't expect many people to take you seriously. In my case, I saw that you're a new account, so I scrolled to the bottom to see if there was a conclusion, which is this:

Bitbollo is innocent of the accusations that he is a scammer, a ponzi promoter, an account trader, a cheater, or an abuser.

and as a result, I skipped reading the wall of text you wrote. If you’d posted it on your main account, I probably would have read it, but by hiding behind a pseudonym, the only thing you’re making clear is that you’re either bitbollo or a friend of his, and you’re trying to come across as impartial when you’re not.

[bitbollo]

How many days/weeks/months/years would you continue?
This is the way you are showing to be trustworthy and my trust was wrong right? Did you think that trying to ruin my reputation, continuing to posting dozens of fake accusation, and create a retard topic has helped users scammed by frogbet or the dozens of website that have scammed here on forum?

bitbollo is a scammer, ponzi promoter, account trader, cheater, and abuser.

...
bitbollo never said a word about it.
...

What I should comment about keys that are in my possession since 13 years and never linked to any scam and used with CEX KYC?
You continue to skip my evidence and explanations with a completely delirant accusation... but ok, this demonstrate how these guys keep care of community and want to fight scam.
Meanwhile the current scam section is floaded, as demonstrated in my scam accusation, they find really useful spent 5 topics/dozens of page by spreading this bullshit.

Again this user continue to say that I AM SCAMMER without providing a single proof of what he is saying.
Despite there is a double topic about it, I would just quote the same message posted - I would not deal anymore with this argument after this.

...
Can someone post a scam / single txid?  NO OF COURSE

I have posted clearly that ALL MY keys are still used, in my possession and FULL KYC in dozen of CEX - I would see a TXID before being accused of somewhat.
I am not seeing as possible to have managed a "ponzi, have used hundreds of account, scam directbet, run secondstrade" - This guy has used these accuse for red trust me .
I have clearly explained DOZEN OF TIMES CLEARLY EVEN why this guy deserve a red trust - open references - if you would have a trusted guy that can't help the community with a proven scam after 7 days, please add him to your trust list.

If you was wondering why they made this topic please check

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation against Little Mouse
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0 scam accusation 2nd topic Little Mouse/frogbet.com
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3590 FLAG LITTLE MOUSE
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3591 FLAG FROGBET
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67177664#msg67177664 Shisir99 supporting a scam after 7 days
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67184623#msg67184623 there are 4 scam accusations against websites advertised by Little Mouse in the last month

No I am not this account " oneadvocate " but thanks for having the doubt I have a full time life dedicate about these crappy non-sense accusations.

edit: in the last 2 weeks @OP has quoted or mentioned my username 144 times .