[ANN] NiceHash.com - sell & buy hash rate cloud mining service / multipool

[ATCkit]

Is there a way to see daily payouts on the site? I know i can see all my payouts but its quite a hassle to calculate daily income of that since the payouts come at different times.

Is there like an 3rd party site that does that? I know there was alot of stats pages for middlecoin but don't know of any for nicehash.

poolpicker.eu shows avg stats for each pool on each algo. It also shows the comparison to ltc.

Are you wanting to know your personal BTC/GHS for a 24 hr period?  Unfortunately, not many pools show that average for each person. However, I agree with you. It would be a great stat.

Another statistic which would be useful is seeing the average hashrate for a 24 hr period.

BTW, NiceHash is generally a top performing pool... and has been #1 for many days over the last 2 weeks.

I think a more immediate concern is to get some of those higher paying orders from NiceHash onto WestHash. If they can do that, then our mining rigs can stay connected to West Hash. In other words,  NiceHash needs to balance the "order load ". If that can't happen, then we won't be able to mine on WestHash as our rigs will continually fall over to our second priority pools as the order price is too low to stay connected to WestHash.

[BombaUcigasa]

There's something bothering me about this tread, every time...

Why don't you ask the guy that gave you negative trust to remove it or show some proof. Did he really trust you with 27 BTC. Why are people standing to such an abuse?

[ATCkit]

whats the minimum pay-out per day?

i still have some balance there and im wondering when will it be transferred to my wallet?

I think .01

https://nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=faq#faqs4

Is there a way to see daily payouts on the site? I know i can see all my payouts but its quite a hassle to calculate daily income of that since the payouts come at different times.

Is there like an 3rd party site that does that? I know there was alot of stats pages for middlecoin but don't know of any for nicehash.

You have it on our main page. According to this: http://poolpicker.eu/vs?algo=scrypt our reported stats are pretty accurate.

My Blizzards have been hanging in all day. I had to lower the price to 0.55 tho. They would not connect at 0.60 even though there were open orders above that price with space for my 9.3 MHS. So I figure I am connected to an order that is only paying 0.56 atm. That is likely better than i will get on clevermining, wafflepool or any ltc pool atm.

I don't know why your Thunders are doing that.

For my Antminers, the same thing happened. They divorced themselves from BTCGUILD and connected to WestHash (my priority pool) when someone put in an order for .029. I had the price set at .0280 you see.

Anyway, they hummed along nicely for about 15 mins then jumped back to BTCGUILD ...eventho that order still had several hrs left to fill. Then,  before i could re connect my Ants, someone else' miners filled the gap on West Hash.

So i set my price to .0268 and am now likely connected to an order paying 0.0270. I just did some math and hat will give me less payout compared to if i had them on BTCGUILD. So i have to re-set my price higher and let my second priority pool, BTCGUILD, take over....which it will. I am setting a price that will equal their payout....and i know all the buy orders on West Hash (except for 2) are lower than the price i have to set. The 2 that are higher are being filled by other miners so i know i won't connect to them. But if new orders above my price com ein, Bob's your uncle. My Ants will grab them.

Ya, I asked myself why did i ever get into scrypt. I sold off all my batch 2 Zeus Hurricanes when diff was beginning to climb. I kept my batch 1 blizzards as i can connect them to other circuits that are not quite full with my Antminers.

Call me crazy (or a contrarian) ...but I am thinking of getting a Batch 3 Thunder x6 under Zeus' 30% discount -ie: the one you get when you show them a refund from a competitor. I think scrypt diff will continue going sideways for awhile because my gut tells me that Zeus' competitors are gonna run into similar challenges. I think that's why Alpha decided to delay fabrication after tapeout. I am willing to bet others will do the same after tapeout. That will delay their fabrication just like it did Alpha's. It seems like scrypt ASICs are not as easy to roll out as sha256 ASICs. Interesting times indeed. Just like the old gold rush-lol.

For miners, it does not matter what kind of orders there are, as long as there are orders. Your miner doesn't get paid for order it works on, but weighted average price - all miners are paid with same rate. And you can view that rate on main page where it says "Currently paying". When you set p=, this parameter is checked against "Currently paying" and not against orders available. There may be higher orders than what you set in p= and your miner will not work on NH/WH, because average is lower - remember, all miners are paid same rate.

Often disconnects are due to needed extranonce change (so your miner can swap to another order). We created stratum extension to get rid of this problem with no reconnects, but sadly, most of ASIC providers are not interested to implement these features. We have mailed many ASIC providers, but we are getting either no response or very poor response. Probably they are not taking us seriously. We think, it is you - customers of these devices - you should press on them and request these things to be implemented, because without them, your profit is lower.

True...but do they listen to their customers?

Many people are disenchanted with customer service from these suppliers. It seems once they have your money and delivered a rig they are not interested in helping with changes that will improve the performance of your rig. instead, they would rather sell you another one.

[evolvia31]

Hi all,

I try to use a stratum-proxy server (https://www.nicehash.com/docs/connect-via-proxy/) all works very fine but if i try to activate the option "appendWorkerNames", nicehash accept the first connection but reject the all other rigs.

My pool config on stratum proxy:

Code:

  {
    "name" : "Nicehash",
     "host" : "stratum.nicehash.com:3333",
     "user" : "[btc_address]",
     "password" : "d=4096",
     "enableExtranonceSubscribe" : true,
     "appendWorkerNames" : true,
     "workerNameSeparator" : ".",
     "useWorkerPassword" : false,
     "weight" : 1,
     "isEnabled": true
  }

My pool config on rigs:

Code:

{
                "url" : "stratum+tcp://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.:xxxx",
                "user" : "gsd2",
                "pass" : "x"
}

My log error on stratum-proxy:

Code:

2014-08-08 08:14:13,779 WARN  [/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:59835-Thread]: [WorkerConnection] User connection not authorized. Worker [btc_address].gsd2 is not authorized on pool Nicehash. Cause: JsonRpcError [code=null, message=null, traceback=null]
2014-08-08 08:14:13,779 WARN  [/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:40005-Thread]: [WorkerConnection] User connection not authorized. Worker [btc_address].gsd4 is not authorized on pool Nicehash. Cause: JsonRpcError [code=null, message=null, traceback=null]
2014-08-08 08:14:13,779 WARN  [/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:33364-Thread]: [WorkerConnection] User connection not authorized. Worker [btc_address].gsd1 is not authorized on pool Nicehash. Cause: JsonRpcError [code=null, message=null, traceback=null]

How you can view the first server (gsd3) was accepted without any problem but after all other server was rejected

Anyone can tell me which is the problem ?[/code][/code][/code]

[crashoveride54902]

Hi all,

I try to use a stratum-proxy server (https://www.nicehash.com/docs/connect-via-proxy/) all works very fine but if i try to activate the option "appendWorkerNames", nicehash accept the first connection but reject the all other rigs.

My pool config on stratum proxy:

Code:

  {
    "name" : "Nicehash",
     "host" : "stratum.nicehash.com:3333",
     "user" : "[btc_address]",
     "password" : "d=4096",
     "enableExtranonceSubscribe" : true,
     "appendWorkerNames" : true,
     "workerNameSeparator" : ".",
     "useWorkerPassword" : false,
     "weight" : 1,
     "isEnabled": true
  }

My pool config on rigs:

Code:

{
                "url" : "stratum+tcp://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.:xxxx",
                "user" : "gsd2",
                "pass" : "x"
}

My log error on stratum-proxy:

Code:

2014-08-08 08:14:13,779 WARN  [/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:59835-Thread]: [WorkerConnection] User connection not authorized. Worker [btc_address].gsd2 is not authorized on pool Nicehash. Cause: JsonRpcError [code=null, message=null, traceback=null]
2014-08-08 08:14:13,779 WARN  [/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:40005-Thread]: [WorkerConnection] User connection not authorized. Worker [btc_address].gsd4 is not authorized on pool Nicehash. Cause: JsonRpcError [code=null, message=null, traceback=null]
2014-08-08 08:14:13,779 WARN  [/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:33364-Thread]: [WorkerConnection] User connection not authorized. Worker [btc_address].gsd1 is not authorized on pool Nicehash. Cause: JsonRpcError [code=null, message=null, traceback=null]

How you can view the first server (gsd3) was accepted without any problem but after all other server was rejected

Anyone can tell me which is the problem ?[/code][/code][/code]

thought to have them on proxy server you have to put http://IPofServerHost:xxxx  ??
if anything put them all on gsd3 cause nicehash doesn't honor the appendworkername anyways...to get that to happen you'd need to open up a seperate proxy for each worker and that is a whole nother fun bucket right there

so i tried the proxy again both on WH n NH (i'm in usa) but both of them have wild swings on hashrate...is that suppose to be normal? rejects is pretty much nil but for a blade is about 5.2mh/s and it started out at bout 4 jumped to almost 6 then down to 3 then back upto 6...i mean i can understand some swing but dang...also that is for an 1hr test...kinda looks just like my hashrate graph down there...just makes me mad cause i wanna mine here so bad but dunno if i'm losting money do it or not
EDIT: i've also tried stratum n getwork with the proxy...both same results
EDIT2: ok weird...i'm just on the WH now w/o proxy and it hasn't lost connection for 63min...and as i said previously that i could never get a connection longer then like 15min w/o proxy...hmmm..I did have the proxy still up but wasn't connected to it...just shut it down, wonder if i'll lose connection now like before

EDIT3: Ok so i dunno if ya did something or not, but the unstable issue went away, i'm on WH w/o proxy now and its working pretty good...most are keep a connection for longer then 20mins...some at 105min right now works for me...looking forward to seeing the site merged together

[EcoCrypto]

Same add for all worker
You can separate your worker with .workerName after your btc adress

Like 16ndferdlfdfldjfkshfd.Worker1

Thank you Zels for the info!

[prof7bit]

Whats going on with the SHA256 prices again? They are buying like crazy, 50% above break even value, is there a new pump&dump coin with sha256 around?

[Billyboy402]

Whats going on with the SHA256 prices again? They are buying like crazy, 50% above break even value, is there a new pump&dump coin with sha256 around?

i always use nicehash as a base , if it higher then BTC  you know your mining the wrong coin

[suchmoon]

Whats going on with the SHA256 prices again? They are buying like crazy, 50% above break even value, is there a new pump&dump coin with sha256 around?

There is a pool offering 12.5% bonus but that's still well below 0.035 so there must be something else going on.

[toxic0n]

NiceHash Widget update

• Added Support for WestHash.com
• Added option to wake up the device to refresh data (beta)
• The hash rate graph is now scrollable and zoomable
• Bug fix: If the widget fails to fetch new data, it will not be stored as 0 values

Uploading the new version now. Enjoy!

[kebabman]

Why does the balance go to zero without a payout? For example I had nicehash as a failover pool, so I had sporadic Scrypt hashrate over the last 7 days and accrued some small balance.

https://nicehash.com/?p=miners&a=0&d=7&addr=1MuvhMMDR2RTurY3keJP2grpSXjKVkLdCF

The balance (black line) dropped to 0 several times, but I never got a payout to my BTC address for it (as you can see in the transactions list below). Is this normal? 

[crashoveride54902]

Why does the balance go to zero without a payout? For example I had nicehash as a failover pool, so I had sporadic Scrypt hashrate over the last 7 days and accrued some small balance.

https://nicehash.com/?p=miners&a=0&d=7&addr=1MuvhMMDR2RTurY3keJP2grpSXjKVkLdCF

The balance (black line) dropped to 0 several times, but I never got a payout to my BTC address for it (as you can see in the transactions list below). Is this normal? 

If you're mining on west hash then the payout is combined between both

[kebabman]

Never used Westhash, only Nicehash. Just wondering where my (admittedly small) balance went?  

[crashoveride54902]

Never used Westhash, only Nicehash. Just wondering where my (admittedly small) balance went?  

1MuvhMMDR2RTurY3keJP2grpSXjKVkLdCF (total unpaid balance: 0.00821341 BTC) oh look at the top...its still there, i think you need .01 to be paid out

[kebabman]

No, that's the balance from my SHA miners that was generated today, look at my SHA page you will see the unpaid balance on that page matches my total unpaid balance, the balance on my Scrypt page is 0, and you can see from the black line I generated some balance from Scrypt over the last 7 days but it kept dropping back to zero (without payouts).

[nicehashdev]

No, that's the balance from my SHA miners that was generated today, look at my SHA page you will see the unpaid balance on that page matches my total unpaid balance, the balance on my Scrypt page is 0, and you can see from the black line I generated some balance from Scrypt over the last 7 days but it kept dropping back to zero (without payouts).

Plug in one of your scrypt miners for 5min so the graph can refresh. It is obvious that the graph is displaying old data - this happens if you stop mining, because we don't keep data for addresses with balance of 0.

[crashoveride54902]

so nicehashdev, when exactly are miners getting paid the same for both sites?

[kebabman]

No, that's the balance from my SHA miners that was generated today, look at my SHA page you will see the unpaid balance on that page matches my total unpaid balance, the balance on my Scrypt page is 0, and you can see from the black line I generated some balance from Scrypt over the last 7 days but it kept dropping back to zero (without payouts).

Plug in one of your scrypt miners for 5min so the graph can refresh. It is obvious that the graph is displaying old data - this happens if you stop mining, because we don't keep data for addresses with balance of 0.

Thanks! That's all I needed to know.

Suggestion: maybe you should wipe the graphs out rather than leave them frozen when people stop mining >7days, it's confusing at the moment because when I go and look and hover over the graph it says "4hrs 55mins" ago it makes me think that it is current information, better it showed nothing if theres no new data than keep showing old data that appears current.

[ATCkit]

so nicehashdev, when exactly are miners getting paid the same for both sites?

Good question. I think a ton of us are wondering.

[crashoveride54902]

so nicehashdev, when exactly are miners getting paid the same for both sites?

Good question. I think a ton of us are wondering.

ya next week kinda vague...and well its next week hehe