|
lajz99
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 04:41:49 PM |
|
FYI - I have stepped down as COO of NoirGroup. If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask me privately.
I wish you all the best on this coin...
.68 GF shares available if you're interested.
Sorry to see that your leaving. I personally wish you all the best. Thank you, I appreciate that! You'll still see me around as I am a GF investor (more than the .5 I'm selling) and still have an interest in NRS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed
timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It
takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but
hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mrrr
|
|
June 19, 2014, 07:31:52 PM |
|
It would be nice if coins had a self-destructing kill switch in the event that said coin(s) was/were flagged as stolen.
That is one of the single best ideas I've seen. If someone could figure it out to destroy the stolen coins > this would create a hole where new coins are needed so the volume stays the same > patch the blockchain with new coins to a new address where the victim would be given back their losses and volume would be back to original number this would create an insurance type of system, and it would also gain trust with the public Heh after the 'anonymity' fad wears off this might just be a thing. I could imagine a wallet offering 3rd party 2FA in return for a slightly higher transaction fee. |
burp...
|
|
|
|
chocobo
|
|
June 19, 2014, 08:29:17 PM |
|
It would be nice if coins had a self-destructing kill switch in the event that said coin(s) was/were flagged as stolen.
That is one of the single best ideas I've seen. If someone could figure it out to destroy the stolen coins > this would create a hole where new coins are needed so the volume stays the same > patch the blockchain with new coins to a new address where the victim would be given back their losses and volume would be back to original number this would create an insurance type of system, and it would also gain trust with the public Heh after the 'anonymity' fad wears off this might just be a thing. I could imagine a wallet offering 3rd party 2FA in return for a slightly higher transaction fee. This seems like it would be abused and become the crypto equivalent of a chargeback. Things need to be trustless. |
|
|
|
|
|
LemonAndFries
|
|
June 19, 2014, 09:27:10 PM |
|
It would be nice if coins had a self-destructing kill switch in the event that said coin(s) was/were flagged as stolen.
That is one of the single best ideas I've seen. If someone could figure it out to destroy the stolen coins > this would create a hole where new coins are needed so the volume stays the same > patch the blockchain with new coins to a new address where the victim would be given back their losses and volume would be back to original number this would create an insurance type of system, and it would also gain trust with the public Heh after the 'anonymity' fad wears off this might just be a thing. I could imagine a wallet offering 3rd party 2FA in return for a slightly higher transaction fee. This seems like it would be abused and become the crypto equivalent of a chargeback. Things need to be trustless. there is details to be worked out, but things cannot be trustless we need trust in the system otherwise nothing will ever work do you go to work not trusting the guarantee that your employer will give you a paycheck? of course you don't, you trust your employer otherwise why even go to work this would mean a middleman being involved and certain regulations would have to be put in place in order to guarantee the transaction |
|
|
|
|
|
chocobo
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:01:45 AM |
|
It would be nice if coins had a self-destructing kill switch in the event that said coin(s) was/were flagged as stolen.
That is one of the single best ideas I've seen. If someone could figure it out to destroy the stolen coins > this would create a hole where new coins are needed so the volume stays the same > patch the blockchain with new coins to a new address where the victim would be given back their losses and volume would be back to original number this would create an insurance type of system, and it would also gain trust with the public Heh after the 'anonymity' fad wears off this might just be a thing. I could imagine a wallet offering 3rd party 2FA in return for a slightly higher transaction fee. This seems like it would be abused and become the crypto equivalent of a chargeback. Things need to be trustless. there is details to be worked out, but things cannot be trustless we need trust in the system otherwise nothing will ever work do you go to work not trusting the guarantee that your employer will give you a paycheck? of course you don't, you trust your employer otherwise why even go to work this would mean a middleman being involved and certain regulations would have to be put in place in order to guarantee the transaction That goes against what bitcoin is all about. Middleman = centralization. When you have to trust you open the door for corruption. |
|
|
|
|
|
LemonAndFries
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:50:57 AM |
|
It would be nice if coins had a self-destructing kill switch in the event that said coin(s) was/were flagged as stolen.
That is one of the single best ideas I've seen. If someone could figure it out to destroy the stolen coins > this would create a hole where new coins are needed so the volume stays the same > patch the blockchain with new coins to a new address where the victim would be given back their losses and volume would be back to original number this would create an insurance type of system, and it would also gain trust with the public Heh after the 'anonymity' fad wears off this might just be a thing. I could imagine a wallet offering 3rd party 2FA in return for a slightly higher transaction fee. This seems like it would be abused and become the crypto equivalent of a chargeback. Things need to be trustless. there is details to be worked out, but things cannot be trustless we need trust in the system otherwise nothing will ever work do you go to work not trusting the guarantee that your employer will give you a paycheck? of course you don't, you trust your employer otherwise why even go to work this would mean a middleman being involved and certain regulations would have to be put in place in order to guarantee the transaction That goes against what bitcoin is all about. Middleman = centralization. When you have to trust you open the door for corruption. Aren't the miners essentially middlemen? what about the pools? what about Ghash.io? isn't everyone scared that if Ghash gains enough hashing power it could result in double spending and even the death of BTC? What about the pump and dumps by the miners, aren't they acting as middlemen/gate keepers that hold access to the coins? I just don't see where people think there is no "middleman" in BTC, there is a system in place (not a very regulated one) that acts as a middleman to the coins. Just look at the exchanges, they are middlemen and even some of them have become corrupt. how about implementing a system of checks and balances where the middlemen will be regulated by that same system and the people supporting said system. human nature is what really needs to be kept in check so corruption can be avoided as much as possible |
|
|
|
|
wallace512
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 03:40:41 AM |
|
It would be nice if coins had a self-destructing kill switch in the event that said coin(s) was/were flagged as stolen.
That is one of the single best ideas I've seen. If someone could figure it out to destroy the stolen coins > this would create a hole where new coins are needed so the volume stays the same > patch the blockchain with new coins to a new address where the victim would be given back their losses and volume would be back to original number this would create an insurance type of system, and it would also gain trust with the public Heh after the 'anonymity' fad wears off this might just be a thing. I could imagine a wallet offering 3rd party 2FA in return for a slightly higher transaction fee. I think the "middleman" also could be a DAC This seems like it would be abused and become the crypto equivalent of a chargeback. Things need to be trustless. there is details to be worked out, but things cannot be trustless we need trust in the system otherwise nothing will ever work do you go to work not trusting the guarantee that your employer will give you a paycheck? of course you don't, you trust your employer otherwise why even go to work this would mean a middleman being involved and certain regulations would have to be put in place in order to guarantee the transaction That goes against what bitcoin is all about. Middleman = centralization. When you have to trust you open the door for corruption. Aren't the miners essentially middlemen? what about the pools? what about Ghash.io? isn't everyone scared that if Ghash gains enough hashing power it could result in double spending and even the death of BTC? What about the pump and dumps by the miners, aren't they acting as middlemen/gate keepers that hold access to the coins? I just don't see where people think there is no "middleman" in BTC, there is a system in place (not a very regulated one) that acts as a middleman to the coins. Just look at the exchanges, they are middlemen and even some of them have become corrupt. how about implementing a system of checks and balances where the middlemen will be regulated by that same system and the people supporting said system. human nature is what really needs to be kept in check so corruption can be avoided as much as possible I think the "Middleman" could be a DAC |
|
|
|
|
butterfly sea
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
June 20, 2014, 06:11:30 AM |
|
hope everything of NRS will be good
|
|
|
|
|
LemonAndFries
|
|
June 21, 2014, 03:08:23 AM |
|
I think the "Middleman" could be a DAC
thinking the same here |
|
|
|
|
|
noirtalks (OP)
|
|
June 21, 2014, 09:38:00 AM |
|
China's largest alt exchange BTC38 announces opening of NRS/BTC deposits, trading opening soon
https://twitter.com/btc38com
Noirshare deposit available at http://en.btc38.com , with NRS/BTC trade coming soon. BTW, another new coin will be listed in a few days.hyz
|
|
|
|
|
atp1916
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 21, 2014, 09:51:39 AM |
|
Wow, that is one hell of a pump. Good time to be sleepless  |
|
|
|
|
|
ieatm3s
|
|
June 21, 2014, 09:53:27 AM |
|
Wow, BTC38! even vertcoin aint listed there. Good job!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ning_aric
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:00:09 AM |
|
we need something technical to support the price |
|
|
|
|
|
barwizi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 21, 2014, 03:26:31 PM |
|
we need something technical to support the price Work has been slow since we are short on some talent, but the coming week will see a wallet update with a surprise as well as a highly experimental new product in two weeks. |
|
|
|
|
barwizi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 21, 2014, 03:28:39 PM |
|
For all GF shareholders who wish to participate, or at least have daily progress updates, please contact hyz so you can be added to the skype group, a lot happens there and your opinions and ideas matter to us, please join up.
|
|
|
|
|
wallace512
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2014, 03:33:53 PM |
|
we need something technical to support the price Work has been slow since we are short on some talent, but the coming week will see a wallet update with a surprise as well as a highly experimental new product in two weeks. Great job! can't wait to see the new update! |
|
|
|
|
|
mitache365
|
|
June 21, 2014, 06:37:44 PM |
|
we need something technical to support the price Work has been slow since we are short on some talent, but the coming week will see a wallet update with a surprise as well as a highly experimental new product in two weeks. good. coin need some innovations. |
BTC
|
|
|
Nrsinv
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
June 21, 2014, 06:47:05 PM |
|
we need something technical to support the price Work has been slow since we are short on some talent, but the coming week will see a wallet update with a surprise as well as a highly experimental new product in two weeks. Take you time. Do it right. The support will come. What we all know now about NRS: Mature wallet produces 3% per 14 days. Selling your NRS every 14 days from POS would still produce 78% per annum. Keeping NRS POS for future development only compounds. POW will be over. My calculations might be out but I believe its on the 60,000 block. No more miner dumping. 5,000,000 Shares is a low number. This is a business. Both General fund shareholders and shareholders knows that every company needs time to organize and build into the infrastructure. Future development is imminent from our own CEO. |
|
|
|
|
|
