[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014

[BITpashaCOIN]

Funny story: this right here is my go-to thread when people say that crypto enthusiasts don't know jack about the projects themselves and/or technology behind them. I always link this thread (it's huge, hahaha) and it's filled with in-depth techy discussions. Perfect!

[1714163237]

1714163237

[1714163237]

1714163237

[1714163237]

1714163237

[1714163237]

1714163237

[1714163237]

1714163237

[ninjacoins]

Whats the latest with BBR? any milestones achieved recently or coming up?

[oldcoinguru]

Whats the latest with BBR? any milestones achieved recently or coming up?

They got the blockchain out of RAM and into an lmdb database.

Boolberry now has an lmdb-based daemon and GUI wallet.

[mmo4me.2016]

With  lmdb-based daemon on GUI wallet, I can run Boolberry very lightly on my PC. But BBR needs to be improved and has a wallet on a mobile device
Thanks Dev!

[oldcoinguru]

With  lmdb-based daemon on GUI wallet, I can run Boolberry very lightly on my PC. But BBR needs to be improved and has a wallet on a mobile device
Thanks Dev!

RAM usage went from almost 4 gigs to around 450 mb.  It's a great improvement and necessary as the blockchain grows in size. 

[ninjacoins]

Has there been a monthly report for June?

[CoinsMaxMoney]

dear developers ... but where are we going? Exchange BTC-alfa coins does not return after a malfunction with ID ya purses, now generally the input is disabled ... my translation of the campaign, too, into the void left ... what does happen?

[crypto_zoidberg]

Has there been a monthly report for June?

Sorry for the delay, we've been testing last things and found some issues. We gonna publish it on Monday.

Zoidberg

[crypto_zoidberg]

Has there been a monthly report for June?

Sorry for the delay, we've been testing last things and found some issues. We gonna publish it on Monday.

Zoidberg

Sorry, it's already published here:

https://medium.com/@BoolberryBBR/boolberry-monthly-progress-report-june-10d3e8bfd37

[IconOfMilenium]

I'm all about anonymity Very good

[triplexDP]

Hi,

I tried to contact you guys thru mail but i am getting no response, can someone give me one of boolberrys devs telegram? We need some info to list your coin on Digitalprice exchange.

Thanks
Claudio

[versprichnix]

...
Hi fluffypony.  In light of the recent "double counting bug", I'd like to have a retrospective on your remarks above from ~1390 days ago.
...

Hater. No individual on earth has enough worth to be important, not me, not you, not fluffypony, and even not Trump. You cannot make a single entity beeing guilty. My major concern is that decentralisation on programming and testing code seems not to work with monero, what the team claimed for themselves. This way even Bitcoin could fall quickly.

[logictense]

Next time you commit any code, think about how you're potentially fucking up a blockchain, and also consider the fact that you have no clue what you're doing, and that you admitted this to us back in 2014. Now that you've fucked your code-base, may I offer a suggestion to perhaps consider starting over and forking Verge?  I heard Verge is more secure than Monero.
...

While it may be generally considered bad advice to suggest people listen to you, there is one exception-- your statement from almost 4 years ago quoted above.  Hopefully people will heed those words "straight from the pony's mouth" about yourself and your Monero team.

Well Ive never heard about that statement nor anything else that may have come out of his mouth inbetween fake pumps, maybe because these very intricated moments of speech are hardly accessible / require more digging into his reddit / bitcointalk account post history. If u repeat that enough times to put that bullshit on public exhibition as though fluffyponys posts would be indexed by google search, even then no one would give a fuck because 1) within monero community, statement made 4 years back is not enough to cause mutations of a sentiment 2) because they dropped a neat collection of banknotes into monero ages ago. And verge is funded by nobody.

[versprichnix]

..  What the fuck is your damage? ...

You have a question to me? I'm rather sure you believe to have an answer to it.

It's not necessary to prove you are a hater this quick. Finished.

[sowle]

I'd like to clarify that Boolberry is not affected by recently discovered "Monero double counting bug" [1] [2] [3].

The bug was discovered in wallet's incoming tx handler [1]: incoming coins were counted as many times per transaction as tx pub keys were put to the extra (in most cases it should be one). It seems the bug was introduced with the implementation of sub addresses.

Unlike Monero, Boolberry wallet gets tx pub key only once per transaction.
Moreover, for a BBR tx it is explicitly prohibited to have duplicate TX_EXTRA_TAG_PUBKEY entry in its extra.

I consider this bug to be very Monero-specific, so only Monero forks may be affected.

[1] https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/3985
[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/8wl12t/is_this_an_exploit_that_was_fixed_or_what_exactly/
[3] https://medium.com/@graftnetwork/graft-wallets-are-safe-and-not-affected-by-double-counting-bug-5d81d2d44cb8

[crypto_zoidberg]

I'd like to clarify that Boolberry is not affected by recently discovered "Monero double counting bug" [1] [2] [3].

The bug was discovered in wallet's incoming tx handler [1]: incoming coins were counted as many times per transaction as tx pub keys were put to the extra (in most cases it should be one). It seems the bug was introduced with the implementation of sub addresses.

Unlike Monero, Boolberry wallet gets tx pub key only once per transaction.
Moreover, for a BBR tx it is explicitly prohibited to have duplicate TX_EXTRA_TAG_PUBKEY entry in its extra.

I consider this bug to be very Monero-specific, so only Monero forks may be affected.

[1] https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/3985
[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/8wl12t/is_this_an_exploit_that_was_fixed_or_what_exactly/
[3] https://medium.com/@graftnetwork/graft-wallets-are-safe-and-not-affected-by-double-counting-bug-5d81d2d44cb8

Thank you sowle for this clarification. (Just to avoid confusion - sowle and wnntaler are the same person, BBR core-dev).

We just had a call with BTC-Alpha they will re-enable deposits. They have put it on hold because they didn't know if BBR was by affected by Monero's double counting bug.


Zoidberg

[zjy]

I'd like to clarify that Boolberry is not affected by recently discovered "Monero double counting bug" [1] [2] [3].

The bug was discovered in wallet's incoming tx handler [1]: incoming coins were counted as many times per transaction as tx pub keys were put to the extra (in most cases it should be one). It seems the bug was introduced with the implementation of sub addresses.

Unlike Monero, Boolberry wallet gets tx pub key only once per transaction.
Moreover, for a BBR tx it is explicitly prohibited to have duplicate TX_EXTRA_TAG_PUBKEY entry in its extra.

I consider this bug to be very Monero-specific, so only Monero forks may be affected.

[1] https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/3985
[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/8wl12t/is_this_an_exploit_that_was_fixed_or_what_exactly/
[3] https://medium.com/@graftnetwork/graft-wallets-are-safe-and-not-affected-by-double-counting-bug-5d81d2d44cb8

Thank you sowle for this clarification. (Just to avoid confusion - sowle and wnntaler are the same person, BBR core-dev).

We just had a call with BTC-Alpha they will re-enable deposits. They have put it on hold because they didn't know if BBR was by affected by Monero's double counting bug.


Zoidberg

BTC-Alpha still can't deposits 

[dmp]

https://app.stocks.exchange/en/basic-trade/pair/BTC/BBR/1D

[crypto_zoidberg]

I'd like to clarify that Boolberry is not affected by recently discovered "Monero double counting bug" [1] [2] [3].

The bug was discovered in wallet's incoming tx handler [1]: incoming coins were counted as many times per transaction as tx pub keys were put to the extra (in most cases it should be one). It seems the bug was introduced with the implementation of sub addresses.

Unlike Monero, Boolberry wallet gets tx pub key only once per transaction.
Moreover, for a BBR tx it is explicitly prohibited to have duplicate TX_EXTRA_TAG_PUBKEY entry in its extra.

I consider this bug to be very Monero-specific, so only Monero forks may be affected.

[1] https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/3985
[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/8wl12t/is_this_an_exploit_that_was_fixed_or_what_exactly/
[3] https://medium.com/@graftnetwork/graft-wallets-are-safe-and-not-affected-by-double-counting-bug-5d81d2d44cb8

Thank you sowle for this clarification. (Just to avoid confusion - sowle and wnntaler are the same person, BBR core-dev).

We just had a call with BTC-Alpha they will re-enable deposits. They have put it on hold because they didn't know if BBR was by affected by Monero's double counting bug.


Zoidberg

BTC-Alpha still can't deposits 

Finally, they enabled it!

Zoidberg

[oldcoinguru]

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQWMtE64TPe1xY54SVt2IkA


I have the 3D files for the BBR logo if anyone's in interested.