Bitcoin Forum
October 17, 2019, 09:06:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 [455] 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014  (Read 1172362 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 499
Merit: 250

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2018, 03:28:51 AM
 #9081

after the offline signatures implementation how close is the current Boolberry daemon to other cryptonote integrations?

I ask because every single exchange is going to have the same problems, we should just chase the exchanges that Aeon and Monero are on

What about Qryptos https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/qryptos/

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  JOIN THE NETWORK
         airdrops available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
1571303176
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571303176

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571303176
Reply with quote  #2

1571303176
Report to moderator
1571303176
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571303176

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571303176
Reply with quote  #2

1571303176
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1571303176
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571303176

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571303176
Reply with quote  #2

1571303176
Report to moderator
wenjiannin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 01, 2018, 07:45:58 AM
 #9082

I have about 20000BBR trapped in the Phoenix do not know when to get it back
crypto_zoidberg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 941
Merit: 559



View Profile WWW
March 01, 2018, 10:16:15 AM
 #9083

Hello friends!

First of all i would like to thank everyone who contributed to BBR and made possible relaunch project! Especially i would like to say thanks for commitment from hashappliance of 50kBBR, Crypjunkie of 10kBBR and donation from b4h4mu7 20kBBR and for all efforts that he put to bring this project back to the game (we really wish him success with his Dobloon project).

As i was saying earlier - buying coins and investment in the project is a kind of different things for me. Between many many many different coins, especially this days, Boolberry launch was made without any ICO, premine or instamine, absolutely transparent with only 1% of mining tax, which was obviously not enough for funding project active development. With the huge traction of crypto industry that happened in last years everything (not only dev coasts, but also marketing, exchange listing fees etc) became more expensive and at the same time more valuable. For example listing on HitBTC coast about 20BTC, which is about 150kBBR at the current rate. As we counted project funds must be at least 500kBBR which is about 5% of all coins in circulations.

We was approached by group of holders wich is represented by hashappliance and now we in process of finalizing first round of investments. These funds would allow us to dedicate ourselves to this project including both marketing and development efforts.

We really hope that community will continue to support our work with donations on public basis - with new alias and view key published to track amount of raised funds.

We was discussing some ideas of fundraising and there was proposed different ways of getting this, including hard fork with increasing mining fees up to 20% or so one, but i’m pretty sure that this is wrong way and better to go with  the way Monero do this - rising funds from community, and personally believe that community will support this as soon as they see constant active work on the project.

After we finalize agreement on initial round of investment we gonna announce here our roadmap with the plans for 2018 and deploy new website.

I personally would like to say thanks to everyone for interest, patience and support of this project despite long time of my absence!



Zoidberg

iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


Crypto is the separation of Power and State.


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2018, 10:42:11 AM
 #9084

Hello friends!

First of all i would like to thank everyone who contributed to BBR and made possible relaunch project! Especially i would like to say thanks for commitment from hashappliance of 50kBBR, Crypjunkie of 10kBBR and donation from b4h4mu7 20kBBR and for all efforts that he put to bring this project back to the game (we really wish him success with his Dobloon project).

As i was saying earlier - buying coins and investment in the project is a kind of different things for me. Between many many many different coins, especially this days, Boolberry launch was made without any ICO, premine or instamine, absolutely transparent with only 1% of mining tax, which was obviously not enough for funding project active development. With the huge traction of crypto industry that happened in last years everything (not only dev coasts, but also marketing, exchange listing fees etc) became more expensive and at the same time more valuable. For example listing on HitBTC coast about 20BTC, which is about 150kBBR at the current rate. As we counted project funds must be at least 500kBBR which is about 5% of all coins in circulations.

We was approached by group of holders wich is represented by hashappliance and now we in process of finalizing first round of investments. These funds would allow us to dedicate ourselves to this project including both marketing and development efforts.

We really hope that community will continue to support our work with donations on public basis - with new alias and view key published to track amount of raised funds.

We was discussing some ideas of fundraising and there was proposed different ways of getting this, including hard fork with increasing mining fees up to 20% or so one, but i’m pretty sure that this is wrong way and better to go with  the way Monero do this - rising funds from community, and personally believe that community will support this as soon as they see constant active work on the project.

After we finalize agreement on initial round of investment we gonna announce here our roadmap with the plans for 2018 and deploy new website.

I personally would like to say thanks to everyone for interest, patience and support of this project despite long time of my absence!



Zoidberg


Your 1% dev tax should have been enough to continue development, but by abandoning the project you destroyed the value of not only the dev tax but also the donations to the dev fund.

In contrast, Monero's dev fund donations are worth much more than when most of them were donated.  That speaks to their competence plus wise governance, and your lack of those essential qualities.

What happened to Louisd’or?  Wasn't that supposed to support your research into making BBR proof of stake (or PoS/PoW hybrid)?


Hello!
I’m glad to announce our project, that we were working on last weeks and keep working on. This is CryptoNote-based currency with first anonymous PoS engine(that use PoW as well).
This is the part of big project (which have codename Louisd’or), that we do for my friends, so this is just technology announce and first rough implementation of CN-based PoS, and working network, this is more like proposal, so i shared this to get public review and feedback about PoS approach we gonna use.
The “Louisd’or” project itself have a wide feature list and have a lot of development ahead, so we have a great team of talented people who worked on this, and expect to release it in the middle of spring.
 
According to my experience in bitcointalk forum, here is a lot of people who like to criticize my work, especially from Monero clan, so you guys is welcome to fight!
We have about 4-5 BTC of bounties for people who gonna find bugs/flaws in design or implementation: most serious critical flaw gonna get 2 BTC, next less critical 1 BTC, next 0.5 BTC and so on.

Brief description link(mini-whitepaper): http://162.243.101.90/lui_share.pdf
Implementation: https://github.com/cryptobender/lui
Notice: Implementation does not completely reflect mini-whitepaper description, it still in development, so i often do some commits and restart test network every 2-3 days. Atm we have network that running about of couple of days and seems to be okay.

Feel free to post any questions and ideas here or to PM.

Zoidberg

I'm not mining anymore, but still hold some BBR. The long periods of silence with no releases makes me wonder what is cryptozoidberg collecting 1% of all blocks for? Not that it's a lot of money in terms of BTC, but is any work being done on the project to warrant 1% of all coins generated? I was never a fan of this donation/payment model, but I think especially lately it just looks like someone sweeping up loose change just for being (benevolent?) dictator for life.

Work is done on louis d'or. According to Zoidberg as its the same code, work on louis d'or will help BBR in the long run.

Apparently, the problem is lack of funds. Bitcrea used to work for BBR but had to stopped because of this.

Developping a coin is really expensive. THe monero core team put hundreds of bitcoin into it. But They did it from their own pocket.



██████████
█████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████
████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
███████████████████████████
██████
██████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████████████
██████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████
██████████

Monero
"The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine
whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." 
David Chaum 1996
"Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect."  Adam Back 2014
Buy and sell XMR near you
P2P Exchange Network
Buy XMR with fiat
Is Dash a scam?
crypto_zoidberg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 941
Merit: 559



View Profile WWW
March 01, 2018, 11:36:07 AM
 #9085

.....

Hey iCEBREAKER, how's it going ? Glad to see you here again!
Old opponents of BBR from Monero clan are always welcome!

Zoidberg

b4h4mu7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 315


View Profile
March 01, 2018, 12:25:08 PM
 #9086

Let me translate the troll post for everyone:


Hi, I'm Icebreaker. Zoidberg please don't return to work on Boolberry! I don't like competition for Monero.
 Cry Cry Cry

I must say that was quick. Glad to have the Monero spokesperson join the thread!
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 184
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 01, 2018, 01:23:34 PM
 #9087

Let me translate the troll post for everyone:


Hi, I'm Icebreaker. Zoidberg please don't return to work on Boolberry! I don't like competition for Monero.
 Cry Cry Cry

I must say that was quick. Glad to have the Monero spokesperson join the thread!


He's not great with numbers if he believes 1% would be enough to fund development, it wouldn't pay the listing fee's never mind the developers.
b4h4mu7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 315


View Profile
March 01, 2018, 01:41:38 PM
Last edit: March 01, 2018, 01:55:11 PM by b4h4mu7
 #9088

Let me translate the troll post for everyone:


Hi, I'm Icebreaker. Zoidberg please don't return to work on Boolberry! I don't like competition for Monero.
 Cry Cry Cry

I must say that was quick. Glad to have the Monero spokesperson join the thread!


He's not great with numbers if he believes 1% would be enough to fund development, it wouldn't pay the listing fee's never mind the developers.

The problem with people like him is they don't know anything about research, software development or hiring because they've never done anything in their lives but troll forums. Some of the guys I work with are $600/hr +. Given Zoidberg's experience with Cryptonote, familiarity with the codebase and competence as a developer I would be put him in the same category with respect to working on a CN project. At that time, Boolberry was trading for pennies on the dollar. At 1% the burn rate was much too high to keep active on the project and be able to keep his lights on, let alone pay for internet access to make commits. This is probably one of the reasons why he was able to be recruited by the other team to work on the Louis project so that he could earn a steady income.

I'm not standing up for his original decision to leave Boolberry, just saying that people gotta eat and that might be reason why he left the project in the first place.
b4h4mu7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 315


View Profile
March 01, 2018, 02:45:02 PM
 #9089

Here is a script that will help any RoR-based exchange integrate Boolberry into their system. It will also help those exchanges using other language frameworks to view logic needed for integration.

https://github.com/Boolberry/boolberry-exchange-script
proride
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 363
Merit: 255


View Profile
March 01, 2018, 02:48:49 PM
 #9090

Kucoin when?=)

▀    ★★★ LETHEAN ★★★ 
┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊ THE SAFEST WAY TO BE ONLINE: BLOCKCHAIN VPN┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊
█ █ █ █ █ █  Medium Twitter Discord Reddit TelegramFacebook Whitepaper  █ █ █ █ █  
b4h4mu7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 315


View Profile
March 01, 2018, 02:51:27 PM
Last edit: March 01, 2018, 03:02:43 PM by b4h4mu7
 #9091

Kucoin when?=)

Now that we have provided them with this script it should be any moment. I'll let everyone know as soon as we start testing deposits and withdrawals.

In the future, when dealing with any exchanges that possess no prior knowledge of CN integration, send them this script for expediting the process. Also a link to documentation for Boolberry will be helpful: http://dbminer.info/boolberry-rpc/html/
proride
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 363
Merit: 255


View Profile
March 01, 2018, 05:01:48 PM
 #9092

Here is a script that will help any RoR-based exchange integrate Boolberry into their system. It will also help those exchanges using other language frameworks to view logic needed for integration.

https://github.com/Boolberry/boolberry-exchange-script

The script only works if you operate an unsecured wallet (no authentication for interacting with the JSON RPC), and it flat out assumes that each time it loops every 120 seconds it will be precisely 1 block height higher, never the same height or never more than 1 block further ahead.  It also looks like it sleeps for 120 seconds between pushing each transaction to the exchange API? Am I seeing that right? So a block with 10 transactions would take 20 minutes to iterate through and flat out miss the past 20  minutes of blocks? Even if no transactions that block, it still sleeps for 120 seconds and would miss any faster blocks or re-process the same one if the network was slow? I'm not a ruby dev, so please someone tell me I'm insane.

▀    ★★★ LETHEAN ★★★ 
┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊ THE SAFEST WAY TO BE ONLINE: BLOCKCHAIN VPN┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊
█ █ █ █ █ █  Medium Twitter Discord Reddit TelegramFacebook Whitepaper  █ █ █ █ █  
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 499
Merit: 250

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
March 02, 2018, 01:43:34 AM
 #9093

Kucoin when?=)

Now that we have provided them with this script it should be any moment. I'll let everyone know as soon as we start testing deposits and withdrawals.

In the future, when dealing with any exchanges that possess no prior knowledge of CN integration, send them this script for expediting the process. Also a link to documentation for Boolberry will be helpful: http://dbminer.info/boolberry-rpc/html/

How many are running on Ruby? Well, it is easy enough to read and translate, its just interacting with the RPC and daemon in JSON

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  JOIN THE NETWORK
         airdrops available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 499
Merit: 250

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
March 02, 2018, 01:46:37 AM
 #9094

Hm, for anybody that wants to send Pull Requests, should we all change our github upstream to https://github.com/Boolberry/boolberry.git ? instead of crypto-zoidberg's github?

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  JOIN THE NETWORK
         airdrops available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 499
Merit: 250

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
March 02, 2018, 01:59:05 AM
 #9095

General Heads up! Changelly is freezing funds for users converting to Monero.

They do not deliver the funds, and require the user to follow up with the helpdesk where they later email you asking for ID for AML/KYC and still continue to not refund or deliver in any predictable schedule if at all.

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  JOIN THE NETWORK
         airdrops available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
opennext
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 02, 2018, 02:05:51 AM
 #9096

https://btc-alpha.com/ is scam,
no support and no response to any problem.

Btc-Alpha is not a scam, Ive personally used it many times. We have to get out of this habit of calling exchanges scams just because support for them isnt lightning fast. They realistically only have probably 4 or 5 people working on tickets and i imagine they're working on them in the order they were submitted so it just might take a little longer to get to yours.
what's a scam,
deposited 100 bbr on 2/24, but today is 3/2, still not show in my balance, they have no support and never reply to me.
you told me what's a scam??
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


Crypto is the separation of Power and State.


View Profile WWW
March 02, 2018, 03:33:30 AM
 #9097

I must say that was quick. Glad to have the Monero spokesperson join the thread!

He's not great with numbers if he believes 1% would be enough to fund development, it wouldn't pay the listing fee's never mind the developers.

The problem with people like him is they don't know anything about research, software development or hiring because they've never done anything in their lives but troll forums. Some of the guys I work with are $600/hr +. Given Zoidberg's experience with Cryptonote, familiarity with the codebase and competence as a developer I would be put him in the same category with respect to working on a CN project. At that time, Boolberry was trading for pennies on the dollar. At 1% the burn rate was much too high to keep active on the project and be able to keep his lights on, let alone pay for internet access to make commits. This is probably one of the reasons why he was able to be recruited by the other team to work on the Louis project so that he could earn a steady income.

I'm not standing up for his original decision to leave Boolberry, just saying that people gotta eat and that might be reason why he left the project in the first place.

Of all the people to accuse of being unable to research, it's hilarious you would pick me!  I've forgotten the floorplans of more libraries than you'll ever visit, you silly pleb. Smiley

CZ has already accepted my logic in choosing to rebase BBR on the latest Monero release rather than start over from scratch or where he left off.  So IDK why you would believe I "don't know anything about research, software development or hiring."  My input on the Rune rebranding fiasco also carried the day.

I know CZ is a great dev and have been a Wild Keccak fanboy for years.  My posts all over this forum demonstrate that is an unquestionable, well-established fact.

The problem is great devs are hyper-specialists and due to Dunning-Kruger often fail to listen to generalists like me at exactly the crucial times when they most need to defer to those with greater expertise in multidisciplinary areas like economics, linguistics, and marketing.

We all know CZ left BBR for better paying work on Louisd'or.  But nobody except me is asking what happened to that rationale for his abandoning BBR, which resulted in the dev tax and community donations being rendered essentially worthless.  He broke his social contract and the purported advantages of doing so never materialized, and outcome which externalized the costs of his choices and actions to donors and bagholders.

Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Monero all managed to have great success despite (or more probably because of) having a 0% dev tax.  Stop white knighting for CZ; he made this mess and left BBR donors+bagholders twisting in the wind.

Long ago, I offered to help improve the areas where BBR was weakest.  I was prepared to voluntarily serve on a silver platter CZ and the BBR community my incomparably complementary skill set.  But he was either too proud or too stubborn to accept a role as anything other than dictator for life, so BBR remained a stunted vanity project until he eventually left it relegated to abandonware status.

Let's all note how tacky and evasive it is for CZ to respond to my pertinent inquiry regarding the Louisd'or code with an aggressive ad-hom deflection unfairly and dishonestly referring to me as an "old opponent of BBR from Monero clan."

Here's an olive branch.  I have a designed a truly 3rd generation Cryptonote coin based on everything that has happened with BBR/XMR/etc. so far and which thus benefits from all those lessons and all that hindsight.

I'll share the whitepaper with CZ and let him be the lead dev for the project, provided he stops his suspiciously flaky on-again/off-again relationship with BBR (and Louisd'or), which only serves to string along long-suffering BBR bagholders and further cement his reputation as a competent yet inexplicably shifty developer/cryptographer.

Due to all this past drama and sketchiness, BBR will never achieve its goal of being the Litecoin to Monero.  The only viable path forward is to start over with an apology and a clean slate.  Otherwise, BBR will wind up being the Dash of the Cryptonote family and be related to 3rd or 4th place, behind Aeon, Bytecoin, and DigitalNote.


██████████
█████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████
████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
███████████████████████████
██████
██████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████████████
██████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████
██████████

Monero
"The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine
whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." 
David Chaum 1996
"Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect."  Adam Back 2014
Buy and sell XMR near you
P2P Exchange Network
Buy XMR with fiat
Is Dash a scam?
b4h4mu7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 315


View Profile
March 02, 2018, 03:40:24 AM
Last edit: March 02, 2018, 04:06:39 AM by b4h4mu7
 #9098

Great news everyone!

A few of my research colleagues held a presentation today at fc18 (http://fc18.ifca.ai/). For those unaware, this is the most prestigious cryptography conference of the year in cooperation with The International Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR). A portion of the presentation was reserved for the advancements we've made in our new Boolberry V2 research paper. It's been getting quite a bit of interest from the cryptography community and as a result has given the project massive exposure to the general academic community. Due to the amount of interest generated from the conference, we're aiming to have the paper published very soon.

Here are the slides from the conference:
docdro.id/q4GQMFV
hashappliance
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 02, 2018, 07:58:50 AM
 #9099

Hello Everyone:

As most of you are aware, there have been development efforts on Boolberry over the course of the past 8 months.  This path has been riddled with uncertainty surrounding crypto_zoidberg, his commitment, his availability and the best path forward for Boolberry. 

A second external attempt to bring life back to Boolberry began with B4h4mu7 hiring a slew of developers, and cryptographers to get acclimated to the CryptoNote codebase.  After several months of research and deliberation, they introduced the concept of forking the recently released Bytecoin 2.0 codebase, a new mining algorithm, whitepaper, among other improvements. 

All this work and investment was done without any reliance on crypto_zoidberg being available.  The support for the fork was unanimous, and really illustrated the desire of the community to have committed leadership, active development, and a clear direction forward. 

Shortly after the community had signaled its support for a fork, crypto_zoidberg reached out and articulated his conundrum. 


Here is an overview of what he communicated: 

1.   Having been the original creator of Boolberry and Wild Keccak, he expressed a strong desire to see the project achieve its full potential and regain status as one of the top privacy coins.

Original Project announcement:      
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.0

2.   He explained how different things are now, where new forks / ICOs have built-in development funds, but when Boolberry was created, it was a fair launch and that in 2014, anything else was frowned upon, if not flatly rejected by the market.  He described the current high demand and cost of top developers.  He admittedly regrets putting such a low mining tax, of 1% (which is split among multiple contributors) and acknowledged this miscalculation as not being sufficient to attract and maintain top developers, as well as have resources for marketing, PR, exchange fees etc.

Here is a post from 2014, which illustrates that the 1% mining tax, at that time, equated to about $750 per month, which was clearly insufficient.  To eliminate any debate on this topic, even at today’s rates, 1% is equal to just under $2,000 per month, which remains clearly insufficient.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.msg9111378#msg9111378

3.   Importantly, he communicated his availability, as he has completed all prior obligations, and this was primarily in response to inquiring about a CryptoNote hybrid PoS / PoW project that he announced in December of 2014.

4.   He described how Monero really got traction from early adopters, namely Risto Pietilla, and the support he provided not only through supporting the market as an investor, but also as a top contributor to help fund their early development and the formation of a core team.

Here is an insightful article about Risto:

https://cointelegraph.com/news/finnish-investor-plans-to-turn-estonian-castle-into-a-bitcoin-center

5.   He shared his vision and strategy for catapulting Boolberry back to its prior rank in the privacy coin vertical.  (At one point, it was a top 30 overall market cap coin, which now requires a market cap in excess of $800,000,000.) 

6.   Except for having adequate funding, he has a top-notch team in place, that has a history of working together on a prior project.

7.   He concluded by communicating that he and his team are ready, willing, and able but need support for fundraising and community outreach.


It didn't take much time, after having these discussions, to realize exactly where we needed to focus our efforts to be most effective in facilitating his return and empowering him and the team to show what they are capable of, and finally unlocking the tremendous value that sits before us all.

 I have been working diligently to coordinate with a large group of long-time holders to help coordinate a first round of fund raising that will provide an important bridge for the project.  It will afford us the focus and commitment of crypto_zoidberg and his team and give him the opportunity to earn back / restore the trust within the community. 

My hope (and candidly, my expectation) is that subsequent fundraising will ensue as progress is made, milestones are met, and confidence and trust are both restored.


I want to start by giving some of the newer investors a brief overview of the history and legacy of Boolberry:


1.   Boolberry was announced on April 20th, 2014 and launched on May 17th, 2014

2.   During this short window, crypto_zoidberg was working at a brisk pace to implement unique features that set it apart from other forks around that same time including Monero, among others.

3.   In a span of just over 3 weeks, he added the alias features, a pruning mechanism to manage bloat, and a new SHA-3 (keccak) derived PoW Algorithm called Wild Keccak, which has never been shown to have any unfair advantage as compared to CryptoNight.  (see link below)

https://da-data.blogspot.com/2014/08/minting-money-with-monero-and-cpu.html

4.   Following the release of this new CryptoNote family of coins, there were very high expectations for Boolberry relative to its peers.  According to coinmarketcap.com Boolberry on its first day of trading (June 4th, 2014) was at 185k sat, and about 3 months later on September 5th, 2014, BBR hit 120k sat.  As an aside, Polinex voluntarily listed Boolberry without any request.

5.   On December 9th, 2014, crypto_zoidberg announced a new CryptoNote project with hybrid PoS / PoW consensus.  This has been his primary focus for the past several years, and he has fulfilled his obligations to that project, but him and his team have never stopped innovating.

6.   Having shifted his focus to this new project, Boolberry was somewhat abandoned.  There was a period of almost 2 years with minimal commits to the GitHub repo.  Prices fell accordingly, and in September 2016 there was an announcement by 1blockologist of some “grassroots” attempt to bring Boolberry back to the limelight.  After 6 months of efforts, for reasons that are conjecture at best, their efforts ceased.  This transitory pique in interest followed by a lack of development, arguably precipitated multiple delisting’s, from both Polinex and Bittrex, among others.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1611499.0

7.   As the grass roots efforts were winding down, crypto_zoidberg made a post that he would return to Boolberry in late 2017, but also highlighted the difference between buying a coin, and investing in a development team, and the need and importance for them to co-exist.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.msg17761651#msg17761651


This brings us back to where I had started up above.

In summary, crypto_zoidberg and his team reached out and reiterated their intention and desire to return to the Boolberry project along with the challenges relative to funding as described above.  After extensive conversation, there is a consensus that the best path forward is for us to join efforts in reaching out to the community for project funding that will enable a team led by crypto_zoidberg to commit on a full-time basis going forward.  He will lead a team of developers, and will also have the support of a well experienced marketing / PR team to manage non-technical aspects and community outreach.

I have personally reached out to many long-time supporters and holders of Boolberry, at first, I got somewhat of a mixed initial reaction. 

Some people were so enthusiastic about the prospect of his return that their support was unconditional, and others have shared their concern that he has let them down in the past with unkept promises of his return. 

Even the people that were skeptical at first, have committed to be supportive after they see that he is active, certain improvements have been implemented (LMDB in particular) and the trust has been restored that this is his full-time focus as would be evidenced by the GitHub activity.

https://github.com/cryptozoidberg


I have taken the initiative in leading a community effort to raise funds for this project.  I think the value proposition is clear.  I will keep everyone informed as progress is made.  CZ will be creating a new BBR project funding address along with a viewkey on the donation address, so everyone can see contributions in real-time. 

I expect the first round of funding to be completed in the next 7-10 days (at the latest), and we will be releasing the new website, roadmap, and a reveal of the team / contributors shortly thereafter.  In the meantime, progress is being made each day as CZ and his team are working tirelessly, to make up for lost time, and then focus on innovation and re-establishing Boolberry as a contender to be a top privacy coin.


If anyone has any questions or comments, please feel free to comment here or send me a PM. 

Additionally, I want to be clear on this important point: 

Even though, I have emphasized the importance of large holders during this initial fundraising phase, we want to hear from everyone here.  I do not want anyone to ever feel like they aren't a big enough holder to matter.  This is a community effort, everyone matters, and we implore you all to share your thoughts and feelings regarding the aforementioned direction.   

Until the new webiste is released with a new contribution address / public viewkey, please make all contributions to support our efforts to @zoidberg along with a PM if you wish to be acknowledged on the contributors page.


Thank you everyone for your presence, your interest, and we are excited to share the vision and our plans for
Boolberry in the near future.  Your patience will be rewarded, as it often is. Smiley


I'll leave you with a favorite quote of mine by Wayne Gretzky: "Skate to where the puck is going, not to where it is"


Cheers!!
b4h4mu7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 315


View Profile
March 02, 2018, 03:24:21 PM
Last edit: March 02, 2018, 04:39:18 PM by b4h4mu7
 #9100

 @hashappliance Excellent summary!

My suggestion would be to have Zoidberg&Co release an interim roadmap and/or the new website (if ready) while you complete your fundraising round. This will provide everyone with a clear picture of what they're working on, respective release timetables and the overall commitment of Zoidberg&Co to this project. This will also have the added benefit of motivating the general community here to participate in the fundraising.

I would advise releasing an interim roadmap as soon as possible that covers the immediate goals i.e. critical fixes to Boolberry core; after those milestones are met then it can be updated to cover future improvements. The reason for an interim roadmap is one cannot accurately estimate future milestones until the core issues are resolved. In software development, you can either have clean code or deadlines, so one must chose between realistic short term goals vs fantastic long term ones with missed deadlines.

In addition, the project cannot afford another 7-10 days for a roadmap while the disparity in marketcap with competitors grows wider each day.. It's been a month now since the delay with the new website and it's had a negative effect within the community. We just had the project in front of one of the most influential crowds in this industry and the lack of decent website and roadmap hinder that exposure. This needs to be resolved as soon as possible.

Things move really fast in the cryptocurrency space and everyday that goes by without progress is a day lost for everyone and missed opportunities.

Lastly, I would suggest Zoidberg move all future development to the https://github.com/boolberry repository. I've sent him an owner invite to the Boolberry organization. Working out of an organization repo vs a user repo allows for better project structure, organization, decentralization and motivates developers to become part of the Boolberry community.

All that said, I have the utmost confidence in your ability to help steer this project where it needs to go. I hope the community here will take that statement as a vote of confidence in your commitment to this project and it's long term vision. My team and I will be available for advisement and resources where ever needed.
Pages: « 1 ... 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 [455] 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!