Kurrie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 22, 2018, 06:21:15 PM |
|
Hey. Please tell us what are the communities' ideas about including the BBR as Masternode?
|
|
|
|
teknohog
|
 |
August 23, 2018, 11:33:48 PM |
|
Hey. Please tell us what are the communities' ideas about including the BBR as Masternode?
I don't represent the BBR community, but I've been here for a while (see my profile). In my opinion, masternodes are completely against the original ideals of cryptocurrencies, as I explain in the link in my signature. (I probably have enough BBR to be in the "masternode class" of BBR users, but I don't think I should be granted any special privileges for it.)
|
|
|
|
Sun Sky
Member

Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 11
|
 |
August 24, 2018, 04:27:36 PM |
|
Hey. Please tell us what are the communities' ideas about including the BBR as Masternode?
I don't represent the BBR community, but I've been here for a while (see my profile). In my opinion, masternodes are completely against the original ideals of cryptocurrencies, as I explain in the link in my signature. (I probably have enough BBR to be in the "masternode class" of BBR users, but I don't think I should be granted any special privileges for it.) That is a good question. The cryptospace has changed and the market can totally accept masternodes. Boolberry coin have good potential.
|
|
|
|
teknohog
|
 |
August 25, 2018, 03:41:59 PM |
|
The cryptospace has changed and the market can totally accept masternodes. Boolberry coin have good potential.
There's one thing I absolutely accept about masternodes. We should totally reward those who maintain stable nodes with good uptime and connectivity. But all the masternode schemes I've seen include a large deposit of money. That's the bit that goes completely against all logic and ideals I've known so far. In general, I pay people for useful services. I don't pay people just because they already have money. In the real world, rich people don't get richer simply by having all that money, but because they use their money sensibly -- for example, on servers and Internet infrastructure. Moreover, I don't want a world where you need a hefty deposit in order to be a service provider. I'll rather trust a distributed P2P network than an oligarchy of a few rich players. Isn't that why we have cryptocurrencies in the first place? If you want old-time big-money capitalism, you can already do that outside the crypto world.
|
|
|
|
gigabyted
|
 |
August 28, 2018, 12:54:06 AM |
|
The cryptospace has changed and the market can totally accept masternodes. Boolberry coin have good potential.
There's one thing I absolutely accept about masternodes. We should totally reward those who maintain stable nodes with good uptime and connectivity. But all the masternode schemes I've seen include a large deposit of money. That's the bit that goes completely against all logic and ideals I've known so far. In general, I pay people for useful services. I don't pay people just because they already have money. In the real world, rich people don't get richer simply by having all that money, but because they use their money sensibly -- for example, on servers and Internet infrastructure. Moreover, I don't want a world where you need a hefty deposit in order to be a service provider. I'll rather trust a distributed P2P network than an oligarchy of a few rich players. Isn't that why we have cryptocurrencies in the first place? If you want old-time big-money capitalism, you can already do that outside the crypto world. I mostly agree with what you said, but masternode by themself have nothing wrong, its more about how you become one that is an issue (High collateral in most cases). I also believe that like DPoS a masternode should be only be reward if it provide a stable and outstanding services...
|
|
|
|
Entusiasta
Member

Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 28, 2018, 09:11:27 AM |
|
Hey. Please tell us what are the communities' ideas about including the BBR as Masternode?
If you want BBR coins do your work, and give us the Proof of your Work. The only solution for Byzantine Generals' Problem is the PoW, so PoS(hit) and masternodes are insecure.
|
|
|
|
mrp1994
Member

Offline
Activity: 138
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 28, 2018, 09:36:33 AM |
|
Clint the LMDB version seems to take more time to synchronize with the old version. My took about two days and got stuck in the middle.
|
|
|
|
teknohog
|
 |
August 28, 2018, 12:12:29 PM |
|
If you want BBR coins do your work, and give us the Proof of your Work. The only solution for Byzantine Generals' Problem is the PoW, so PoS(hit) and masternodes are insecure.
Good point. Those who want masternodes should first explain - what is the problem that masternodes are trying to solve, and
- how would masternodes actually solve the problem
instead of running around like Steve Ballmer shouting "masternodes" in place of "developers".
|
|
|
|
cryptfrog
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 29, 2018, 02:38:23 AM |
|
I know there was a lot of talk about Kucoin a while back...anyone know if there are plans to get on an exchange or two that have higher traffic before the next bull run really gets going? Don't want to miss out on the overall rising tide effect - the price will go up even without development or "good news" just because people will start putting money into all kinds of coins. Not sure how development is currently funded but if its from boolberry one would suppose riding a bull wave up would help that.
|
|
|
|
sowle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 29, 2018, 11:54:41 PM |
|
Clint the LMDB version seems to take more time to synchronize with the old version. My took about two days and got stuck in the middle.
What version of Boolberry are you running? Did you try using --db-sync-mode command-line option to speed-up synchronization as I suggested above?
|
|
|
|
gigabyted
|
 |
August 31, 2018, 05:12:00 PM |
|
Clint the LMDB version seems to take more time to synchronize with the old version. My took about two days and got stuck in the middle.
What version of Boolberry are you running? Did you try using --db-sync-mode command-line option to speed-up synchronization as I suggested above? You guys should download the bootstrap and you would only have a few blocks to sync, its available on the boolberry github. Thats what ive did and it took my minutes to sync...
|
|
|
|
|
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
|
 |
August 31, 2018, 09:10:18 PM |
|
Hi Folk!
We now started to test a bunch of optimization on synchronization speed (especially for owners of relatively old HDD, spinning ones). It led to massive protocol code changes, so we now testing everything on testnet. If some of you got bored you can join us with this, by compiling your daemon from git hub branch "sync_optimization" and h in the testnet-mode:
git checkout sync_optimization cmake -D TESTNET=TRUE .. make -j daemon src/boolbd
Then run it and see if it finally got synchronized. You can remove data files (from data dir which is by default in "C:\Users\username\AppData\Roaming\boolb" on windows machine or in /Users/roky/Library/Application Support/Boolb on mac machine on Macos) and try to resync it many times, interrupting it, power off the computer or doing something else stressful. If you see red lines in output which started from word "Error" let me know please!
Thanks for helping us to be better! We appreciate it!
Zoidberg
|
|
|
|
crypjunkie
|
 |
September 02, 2018, 09:23:18 PM |
|
Lot's of talk of Masternodes, not sure i'm getting this correct here but what is it we would use the master node service for on BBR? Anyone? Pretty sure we have no need for it.
|
|
|
|
tybiboune
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 313
Merit: 8
|
 |
September 10, 2018, 01:27:20 PM |
|
Hi everybody! I'm so sorry, but I don't have the energy to read through 400+ pages of contributions...  I'm trying to install the wallet and miners on my fresh new Ubuntu 18 install, but I'm facing some issues... make command gives me a "Cmake error at FindBoost.cmake:1947 : Unable to find de requested Boost libraries." I installed the boost libraries actually, so I guess I missed something... Would anyone help, please?  Thanks in advance! EDIT : to be precise, the missing libs are the following: boost_filesystem boost_thread boost_date_time boost_chrono boost_regex boost_serialization boost_atomic boost_program_options
|
|
|
|
tybiboune
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 313
Merit: 8
|
 |
September 10, 2018, 02:52:01 PM Last edit: September 10, 2018, 03:20:47 PM by tybiboune |
|
okay I narrowed down to one error.... "could not find boost_atomic"
...using boost 1.54, as recommended
|
|
|
|
sowle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 12, 2018, 11:29:55 PM |
|
okay I narrowed down to one error.... "could not find boost_atomic" ...using boost 1.54, as recommended
Hi, tybiboune! I'm using Boost 1.66 now on Ubuntu 17.10 with gcc 7.2.0 and Boolberry builds quite well with it. If you didn't solve the issue, I suggest you building Boost 1.66 from sources. Here's how it can be done: wget https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.66.0/source/boost_1_66_0.tar.gz tar -xvf boost_1_66_0.tar.gz cd ~/boost_1_66_0 ./bootstrap.sh --with-libraries=system,filesystem,thread,date_time,chrono,regex,serialization,atomic,program_options,locale ./b2
If everything is okay then “The Boost C++ Libraries were successfully built!” message will appear. Then you need to set BOOST_ROOT environment variable to reflect correct Boost path. For example, you may put this line to your ~/.bashrc file: export BOOST_ROOT=/home/user/boost_1_66_0 Make sure it was actually set: user@ubuntu:~/boost_1_66_0$ env | grep boost BOOST_ROOT=/home/user/boost_1_66_0
After that, cmake hopefully will run with no issues.
|
|
|
|
hashappliance
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 21, 2018, 05:53:45 AM |
|
Here is the link to the August Dev update on medium: https://medium.com/@BoolberryBBR/boolberry-bbr-monthly-progress-report-august-391d00e2616aWe are working with a couple of new exchanges, and waiting to get responses. We will keep you apprised as these discussions progress. Also, we also have quite a bit of exciting news to announce in the next several weeks, we have code named the next generation of improvements "Project Z." We will announce on twitter when phase III of the roadmap on boolberry.com is updated, so that everyone is made aware at the same time. Make sure you follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BoolberryBBRCheeers! JohnnyT
|
|
|
|
igotek
|
 |
September 24, 2018, 08:19:24 PM |
|
investing Boolbery... I hope it will double and i get $$$$$$$$
|
I cannot live, I cannot die, trapped in myself. Hold my breath as I wish for death. Oh please god, help me !
|
|
|
oldcoinguru
|
 |
September 28, 2018, 04:14:07 AM |
|
Here is the link to the August Dev update on medium: https://medium.com/@BoolberryBBR/boolberry-bbr-monthly-progress-report-august-391d00e2616aWe are working with a couple of new exchanges, and waiting to get responses. We will keep you apprised as these discussions progress. Also, we also have quite a bit of exciting news to announce in the next several weeks, we have code named the next generation of improvements "Project Z." We will announce on twitter when phase III of the roadmap on boolberry.com is updated, so that everyone is made aware at the same time. Make sure you follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BoolberryBBRCheeers! JohnnyT Thanks for the update.
|
|
|
|
|