Bitcoin Forum
September 04, 2025, 11:45:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 [473] 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014  (Read 1210836 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Kurrie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2018, 06:21:15 PM
 #9441

Hey. Please tell us what are the communities' ideas about including the BBR as Masternode?
teknohog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 253


555


View Profile WWW
August 23, 2018, 11:33:48 PM
 #9442

Hey. Please tell us what are the communities' ideas about including the BBR as Masternode?
I don't represent the BBR community, but I've been here for a while (see my profile). In my opinion, masternodes are completely against the original ideals of cryptocurrencies, as I explain in the link in my signature. (I probably have enough BBR to be in the "masternode class" of BBR users, but I don't think I should be granted any special privileges for it.)

world famous math art | masternodes are bad, mmmkay?
Every sha(sha(sha(sha()))), every ho-o-o-old, still shines
Sun Sky
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 11


View Profile
August 24, 2018, 04:27:36 PM
 #9443

Hey. Please tell us what are the communities' ideas about including the BBR as Masternode?
I don't represent the BBR community, but I've been here for a while (see my profile). In my opinion, masternodes are completely against the original ideals of cryptocurrencies, as I explain in the link in my signature. (I probably have enough BBR to be in the "masternode class" of BBR users, but I don't think I should be granted any special privileges for it.)
That is a good question. The cryptospace has changed and the market can totally accept masternodes. Boolberry coin have good potential.
teknohog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 253


555


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2018, 03:41:59 PM
 #9444

The cryptospace has changed and the market can totally accept masternodes. Boolberry coin have good potential.
There's one thing I absolutely accept about masternodes. We should totally reward those who maintain stable nodes with good uptime and connectivity. But all the masternode schemes I've seen include a large deposit of money. That's the bit that goes completely against all logic and ideals I've known so far.

In general, I pay people for useful services. I don't pay people just because they already have money. In the real world, rich people don't get richer simply by having all that money, but because they use their money sensibly -- for example, on servers and Internet infrastructure.

Moreover, I don't want a world where you need a hefty deposit in order to be a service provider. I'll rather trust a distributed P2P network than an oligarchy of a few rich players. Isn't that why we have cryptocurrencies in the first place? If you want old-time big-money capitalism, you can already do that outside the crypto world.

world famous math art | masternodes are bad, mmmkay?
Every sha(sha(sha(sha()))), every ho-o-o-old, still shines
gigabyted
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 906
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 28, 2018, 12:54:06 AM
 #9445

The cryptospace has changed and the market can totally accept masternodes. Boolberry coin have good potential.
There's one thing I absolutely accept about masternodes. We should totally reward those who maintain stable nodes with good uptime and connectivity. But all the masternode schemes I've seen include a large deposit of money. That's the bit that goes completely against all logic and ideals I've known so far.

In general, I pay people for useful services. I don't pay people just because they already have money. In the real world, rich people don't get richer simply by having all that money, but because they use their money sensibly -- for example, on servers and Internet infrastructure.

Moreover, I don't want a world where you need a hefty deposit in order to be a service provider. I'll rather trust a distributed P2P network than an oligarchy of a few rich players. Isn't that why we have cryptocurrencies in the first place? If you want old-time big-money capitalism, you can already do that outside the crypto world.


I mostly agree with what you said, but masternode by themself have nothing wrong, its more about how you become one that is an issue (High collateral in most cases).  I also believe that like DPoS a masternode should be only be reward if it provide a stable and outstanding services...
Entusiasta
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 108
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 28, 2018, 09:11:27 AM
 #9446

Hey. Please tell us what are the communities' ideas about including the BBR as Masternode?

If you want BBR coins do your work, and give us the Proof of your Work.
The only solution for Byzantine Generals' Problem is the PoW, so PoS(hit) and masternodes are insecure.
mrp1994
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 138
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 28, 2018, 09:36:33 AM
 #9447

Clint the LMDB version seems to take more time to synchronize with the old version. My took about two days and got stuck in the middle.
teknohog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 253


555


View Profile WWW
August 28, 2018, 12:12:29 PM
 #9448

If you want BBR coins do your work, and give us the Proof of your Work.
The only solution for Byzantine Generals' Problem is the PoW, so PoS(hit) and masternodes are insecure.
Good point. Those who want masternodes should first explain
  • what is the problem that masternodes are trying to solve, and
  • how would masternodes actually solve the problem
instead of running around like Steve Ballmer shouting "masternodes" in place of "developers".

world famous math art | masternodes are bad, mmmkay?
Every sha(sha(sha(sha()))), every ho-o-o-old, still shines
cryptfrog
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 29, 2018, 02:38:23 AM
 #9449

I know there was a lot of talk about Kucoin a while back...anyone know if there are plans to get on an exchange or two that have higher traffic before the next bull run really gets going?  Don't want to miss out on the overall rising tide effect - the price will go up even without development or "good news" just because people will start putting money into all kinds of coins.   Not sure how development is currently funded but if its from boolberry one would suppose riding a bull wave up would help that.   
sowle
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 29, 2018, 11:54:41 PM
 #9450

Clint the LMDB version seems to take more time to synchronize with the old version. My took about two days and got stuck in the middle.
What version of Boolberry are you running?
Did you try using --db-sync-mode command-line option to speed-up synchronization as I suggested above?
gigabyted
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 906
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 31, 2018, 05:12:00 PM
 #9451

Clint the LMDB version seems to take more time to synchronize with the old version. My took about two days and got stuck in the middle.
What version of Boolberry are you running?
Did you try using --db-sync-mode command-line option to speed-up synchronization as I suggested above?

You guys should download the bootstrap and you would only have a few blocks to sync, its available on the boolberry github.  Thats what ive did and it took my minutes to sync...
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
August 31, 2018, 09:08:37 PM
 #9452

    
Code:

    *      
    *  
    *
   ***
    *


crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
August 31, 2018, 09:10:18 PM
 #9453

Hi Folk!

We now started to test a bunch of optimization on synchronization speed (especially for owners of relatively old HDD, spinning ones). It led to massive protocol code changes, so we now testing everything on testnet.
If some of you got bored you can join us with this, by compiling your daemon from git hub branch "sync_optimization" and h  in the testnet-mode:

Code:
git checkout sync_optimization
cmake -D TESTNET=TRUE ..
make -j daemon
src/boolbd


Then run it and see if it finally got synchronized.
You can remove data files (from data dir  which is by default in "C:\Users\username\AppData\Roaming\boolb" on  windows machine or in /Users/roky/Library/Application Support/Boolb on mac machine on Macos) and try to resync it many times, interrupting it, power off the computer or doing something else stressful.
If you see red lines in output which started from word "Error" let me know please!

Thanks for helping us to be better! We appreciate it!

Zoidberg



crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 02, 2018, 09:23:18 PM
 #9454

Lot's of talk of Masternodes, not sure i'm getting this correct here but what is it we would use the master node service for on  BBR? Anyone? Pretty sure we have no need for it.
tybiboune
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 313
Merit: 8


View Profile
September 10, 2018, 01:27:20 PM
 #9455

Hi everybody!
I'm so sorry, but I don't have the energy to read through 400+ pages of contributions... Cheesy
I'm trying to install the wallet and miners on my fresh new Ubuntu 18 install, but I'm facing some issues...

make command gives me a "Cmake error at FindBoost.cmake:1947 : Unable to find de requested Boost libraries."

I installed the boost libraries actually, so I guess I missed something...

Would anyone help, please? Smiley
Thanks in advance!

EDIT : to be precise, the missing libs are the following:
boost_filesystem
boost_thread
boost_date_time
boost_chrono
boost_regex
boost_serialization
boost_atomic
boost_program_options
tybiboune
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 313
Merit: 8


View Profile
September 10, 2018, 02:52:01 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2018, 03:20:47 PM by tybiboune
 #9456

okay I narrowed down to one error.... "could not find boost_atomic"

...using boost 1.54, as recommended
sowle
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 12, 2018, 11:29:55 PM
 #9457

okay I narrowed down to one error.... "could not find boost_atomic"
...using boost 1.54, as recommended
Hi, tybiboune! I'm using Boost 1.66 now on Ubuntu 17.10 with gcc 7.2.0 and Boolberry builds quite well with it. If you didn't solve the issue, I suggest you building Boost 1.66 from sources.
Here's how it can be done:
Code:
wget https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.66.0/source/boost_1_66_0.tar.gz 
tar -xvf boost_1_66_0.tar.gz
cd ~/boost_1_66_0
./bootstrap.sh --with-libraries=system,filesystem,thread,date_time,chrono,regex,serialization,atomic,program_options,locale
./b2
If everything is okay then “The Boost C++ Libraries were successfully built!” message will appear.
Then you need to set BOOST_ROOT environment variable to reflect correct Boost path. For example, you may put this line to your ~/.bashrc file:
Code:
export BOOST_ROOT=/home/user/boost_1_66_0

Make sure it was actually set:
Code:
user@ubuntu:~/boost_1_66_0$ env | grep boost
BOOST_ROOT=/home/user/boost_1_66_0

After that, cmake hopefully will run with no issues.
hashappliance
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2018, 05:53:45 AM
 #9458

Here is the link to the August Dev update on medium:

https://medium.com/@BoolberryBBR/boolberry-bbr-monthly-progress-report-august-391d00e2616a

We are working with a couple of new exchanges, and waiting to get responses.  We will keep you apprised as these discussions progress.  Also, we also have quite a bit of exciting news to announce in the next several weeks, we have code named the next generation of improvements "Project Z."

We will announce on twitter when phase III of the roadmap on boolberry.com is updated, so that everyone is made aware at the same time.

Make sure you follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BoolberryBBR

Cheeers!


JohnnyT
igotek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 646


Online Security & Investment Corporation


View Profile WWW
September 24, 2018, 08:19:24 PM
 #9459

investing Boolbery... I hope it will double and i get $$$$$$$$

I cannot live, I cannot die, trapped in myself.
Hold my breath as I wish for death. Oh please god, help me !
oldcoinguru
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 28, 2018, 04:14:07 AM
 #9460

Here is the link to the August Dev update on medium:

https://medium.com/@BoolberryBBR/boolberry-bbr-monthly-progress-report-august-391d00e2616a

We are working with a couple of new exchanges, and waiting to get responses.  We will keep you apprised as these discussions progress.  Also, we also have quite a bit of exciting news to announce in the next several weeks, we have code named the next generation of improvements "Project Z."

We will announce on twitter when phase III of the roadmap on boolberry.com is updated, so that everyone is made aware at the same time.

Make sure you follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BoolberryBBR

Cheeers!


JohnnyT


Thanks for the update.
Pages: « 1 ... 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 [473] 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!