[ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65%

[BogdanCo]

Hey Cryptonit,

Is the 1000 DMD promotion already activated? If so, how do I participate? Where can I find more info about it?

Thanks in advance and keep up your good work.

Please read https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg14838285#msg14838285

He will give us more info shortly... please be patient

[M1ST3R]

Hey Cryptonit,

Is the 1000 DMD promotion already activated? If so, how do I participate? Where can I find more info about it?

Thanks in advance and keep up your good work.

Please read https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg14838285#msg14838285

He will give us more info shortly... please be patient

HUH?  I already read that thus my questions.

[cryptonit]

there is a problem with stake-boost

affected are legendary and stake boosted addresses

like that one that would have been used for the promotion event

so that event wont happen until we can fix this

[wiser]

there is a problem with stake-boost

affected are legendary and stake boosted addresses

like that one that would have been used for the promotion event

so that event wont happen until we can fix this

Oh ouch. All the best with getting that problem fixed ASAP. Will the fix result in another mandatory wallet update?

The most recent update was very smooth. Thank you very much for keeping it simple.

[edgar]

already over-compensated elites aren't getting their extra-extra pie slices?

[utahjohn]

Looks to me like the stake reward did not send to secondary address like it's supposed to, for example:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?140224.htm
The staked amount was supposed to go to another address leaving original amount alone ...
As I understand it, stake-boosted addresses have to keep exactly 15000, 3000, or 1000 or they will not be eligible for stake boost, thus the need for secondary address to receive boosted stake ...
If this is a simple fix, please point out which source code file needs to be downloaded, I don't want to have to modify another whole source tree to get it to compile on ArmV8 (aarch64), lots of little fixes to get it to compile!

[M1ST3R]

Looks to me like the stake reward did not send to secondary address like it's supposed to, for example:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?140224.htm
The staked amount was supposed to go to another address leaving original amount alone ...
As I understand it, stake-boosted addresses have to keep exactly 15000, 3000, or 1000 or they will not be eligible for stake boost, thus the need for secondary address to receive boosted stake ...
If this is a simple fix, please point out which source code file needs to be downloaded, I don't want to have to modify another whole source tree to get it to compile on ArmV8 (aarch64), lots of little fixes to get it to compile!

Are you one of the legendary 10?

[utahjohn]

Looks to me like the stake reward did not send to secondary address like it's supposed to, for example:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?140224.htm
The staked amount was supposed to go to another address leaving original amount alone ...
As I understand it, stake-boosted addresses have to keep exactly 15000, 3000, or 1000 or they will not be eligible for stake boost, thus the need for secondary address to receive boosted stake ...
If this is a simple fix, please point out which source code file needs to be downloaded, I don't want to have to modify another whole source tree to get it to compile on ArmV8 (aarch64), lots of little fixes to get it to compile!

Are you one of the legendary 10?

Nope

[M1ST3R]

Looks to me like the stake reward did not send to secondary address like it's supposed to, for example:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?140224.htm
The staked amount was supposed to go to another address leaving original amount alone ...
As I understand it, stake-boosted addresses have to keep exactly 15000, 3000, or 1000 or they will not be eligible for stake boost, thus the need for secondary address to receive boosted stake ...
If this is a simple fix, please point out which source code file needs to be downloaded, I don't want to have to modify another whole source tree to get it to compile on ArmV8 (aarch64), lots of little fixes to get it to compile!

Are you one of the legendary 10?

Nope

Aww shuck, I thought you own the address from the link thus one of the legendary 10  my bad

[pazor_true]

Looks to me like the stake reward did not send to secondary address like it's supposed to, for example:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?140224.htm
The staked amount was supposed to go to another address leaving original amount alone ...
As I understand it, stake-boosted addresses have to keep exactly 15000, 3000, or 1000 or they will not be eligible for stake boost, thus the need for secondary address to receive boosted stake ...
If this is a simple fix, please point out which source code file needs to be downloaded, I don't want to have to modify another whole source tree to get it to compile on ArmV8 (aarch64), lots of little fixes to get it to compile!

hey john,
to avoid breakdown the stake-boosted addresses amount of 15k 3k 1k you should enter in the console the command

setscrapeaddress your-staking-address your-secondary-address

[cryptonit]

Looks to me like the stake reward did not send to secondary address like it's supposed to, for example:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?140224.htm
The staked amount was supposed to go to another address leaving original amount alone ...
As I understand it, stake-boosted addresses have to keep exactly 15000, 3000, or 1000 or they will not be eligible for stake boost, thus the need for secondary address to receive boosted stake ...
If this is a simple fix, please point out which source code file needs to be downloaded, I don't want to have to modify another whole source tree to get it to compile on ArmV8 (aarch64), lots of little fixes to get it to compile!

this is not the issue
at the example u provide the owner just forget to set the scrape address
this is easy fixed with coin control
and set a scrape address

[cryptonit]

already over-compensated elites aren't getting their extra-extra pie slices?

explain

that people supported further development

with at least 2btc each

and got no compensation at all until yet

and it was free accessable to everyone to bid for a legendary

i call ur ^over compensated elites^ statement bullshit

at dmd diamond its always clear that there is nothing free

because free stuff have no value

no one will ever get access to a stakeboosted addresses without contribution

[edgar]

sorry, whatever you're trying to convey isnt clear.

like the last dozen or so pages of the thread.

please wait...

coming soon...

promotion event...

stakeboost...

mandatory update...

something wrong...

its just waffle to anyone that isnt in the legendary 10 - and staking seems to be returning far less than it was...

but call it bullshit if you want to. im just curious what is supposed to be going on other than page after page of unintelligible gibberish.


tl;dr - i like the DMD, wtf are you doing to it, and why does it seem to only benefit 10-11 people??

[Galactus]

edgar

legendary addresses the issue has already been discussed. read the topic carefully. there were presented arguments that this will benefit the entire community.
proceeds from the sale will go to the advertising company and the development of ...
I thought that the advertising campaign will start after launch legendary addresses ...
but the developers have decided that the advertising campaign will be after the release of version 3.0 of the wallet.
Now in my opinion the price comes easy decline dmd or plateau. I am more inclined to the first, and this don't like me.
if the price will stay in this range yet a few months, it will be a disappointment for me  

[BogdanCo]

sorry, whatever you're trying to convey isnt clear.

like the last dozen or so pages of the thread.

please wait...

coming soon...

promotion event...

stakeboost...

mandatory update...

something wrong...

its just waffle to anyone that isnt in the legendary 10 - and staking seems to be returning far less than it was...

but call it bullshit if you want to. im just curious what is supposed to be going on other than page after page of unintelligible gibberish.


tl;dr - i like the DMD, wtf are you doing to it, and why does it seem to only benefit 10-11 people??

There is nothing wrong with the POS mechanism it stakes like supposed to do. Yesterday I opened my wallet and staked ~ 1000 DMD like supposed to do.

To be clear again: the auction was open to everybody for some months. If you decided not to buy a L10 address and not to support the development then you have nothing to whine about. Everybody wants "DMD to the moon" but without support from the community I would say it's very hard. It would have been easier for me to use the 2 BTC invested in a L10 address to buy some other coins, but I decided to help the team and support it. For this support I get a boosted address that it's not so much (3000 DMD with 50% POS for now). From the BTC raised they will develop DMD 3.0. Without these funds the development would have been stopped and maybe the price of DMD would have been in decline.
Now tell me again, how can you say that only 10-11 people benefit from this?

[edgar]

sorry, whatever you're trying to convey isnt clear.

like the last dozen or so pages of the thread.

please wait...

coming soon...

promotion event...

stakeboost...

mandatory update...

something wrong...

its just waffle to anyone that isnt in the legendary 10 - and staking seems to be returning far less than it was...

but call it bullshit if you want to. im just curious what is supposed to be going on other than page after page of unintelligible gibberish.


tl;dr - i like the DMD, wtf are you doing to it, and why does it seem to only benefit 10-11 people??

There is nothing wrong with the POS mechanism it stakes like supposed to do. Yesterday I opened my wallet and staked ~ 1000 DMD like supposed to do.

To be clear again: the auction was open to everybody for some months. If you decided not to buy a L10 address and not to support the development then you have nothing to whine about. Everybody wants "DMD to the moon" but without support from the community I would say it's very hard. It would have been easier for me to use the 2 BTC invested in a L10 address to buy some other coins, but I decided to help the team and support it. For this support I get a boosted address that it's not so much (3000 DMD with 50% POS for now). From the BTC raised they will develop DMD 3.0. Without these funds the development would have been stopped and maybe the price of DMD would have been in decline.
Now tell me again, how can you say that only 10-11 people benefit from this?

you bolded my quote and amazingly failed to address the point..

ok

i can see this is worth pursuing /s

to be completely honest, i wasnt 'whining' i was asking, and got a pile of shit like your post in return.

bullshit...

whining...

next i'll be 'trolling' & 'fudding'


re-read your own post and see if you can locate where even more confusion may arise.

if so, please explain how people like myself who are involved with multiple coins for multiple years can even begin to follow whats going on in here when almost every reply is riddled with contradictions & inconsistencies!

if not, nevermind.


tl;suck at reading - my staking returns have diminished, while 'some people' are in the process of getting significant increases


i didnt come here to argue nor defend myself, if you want us peons to just leave you to it, just carry on with the gibberish & belligerence

[crazyivan]

Errr, have the fuck have your staking returns diminished? Stake rate s fixed, its 25% per year. It s like arguing why some people have more DMD then you do, so they can stake more, sell more and affect your price. Is that your line of thinking?

[edgar]

Errr, have the fuck have your staking returns diminished? Stake rate s fixed, its 25% per year. It s like arguing why some people have more DMD then you do, so they can stake more, sell more and affect your price. Is that your line of thinking?

Derrrr.. how the fuck am i supposed to have the answer to that?

isnt that what ive tried to find out?

or is this another shoot the messenger/'bullshit'/'whining' diversionary tactic?

[BogdanCo]

Edgar

When you ask something nicely you can't use the words "bullshit" or "shit" or ....

I bolded you questions and I also answered in my previous post. Here is my address: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?123490.htm. It staked like I've calculated some time ago. What can I explain you more? Show me your staking address and I can show you if it staked like supposed to or not.
Now please ask me what do you want to know more? I would glady answer to you, if not I'm sure there are a lot here who can.

[edgar]

Edgar

 When you ask something nicely you can use the words "bullshit" or "shit" or .... AGAIN, I DONT UNDERSTAND WHATS BEING SAID HERE.

Do you mean cant?? because it was team DMD that used the profanities, not me!! and asking for clarification is deemed 'whining' FFS!!


I bolded you questions and I also answered in my previous post. Here is my address: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?123490.htm. It staked like I've calculated some time ago. What can I explain you more? Show me your staking address and I can show you if it staked like supposed to or not.
Now please ask me what do you want to know more? I would glady answer to you, if not I'm sure there are a lot here who can.

while i appreciate the effort, this isnt kindergarten, we're talking about money people have 'invested' in a coin or coins that are all doing different things.

i have asked multiple questions on multiple occasions and got pretty much nothing in the way of a civilised response!

i am even embarrassed to show my address as im unsure if i have actually staked 'like supposed to' despite repeated requests for clarification

it looks NOTHING like yours!