medusa13
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 453
Merit: 500
hello world
|
|
December 08, 2015, 09:15:20 PM |
|
i did not know this about the viewkey.
doesnt this take all the magic away? i mean maybe i misunderstood, but if you cant see outgoing transactions with the viewkey, how is it usefull at all? the information that something was there once is not enough for auditing.
It isn't sufficient for proof-of-solvency. To do that you need a more interactive protocol where the site moves the coins or discloses key images. It is sufficient for general auditing because you can demand that the owner account for everything that was received. The owner can prove what was spent and can then disclose that proof (either publically or privately to an auditor). wow sorry guys i did not know this... have to say i find the information about this (the picture above or what fluffy sayd in that presentation the other day) very missleading when it comes to this to be honest.. but maybe its also good like that, more like switzerland, declare whatever you like so..if i send the same money to the same account again and again, what balance does the viewkey show? all incoming transactions combined?
|
XMR Monero
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
December 08, 2015, 09:19:14 PM |
|
i did not know this about the viewkey.
doesnt this take all the magic away? i mean maybe i misunderstood, but if you cant see outgoing transactions with the viewkey, how is it usefull at all? the information that something was there once is not enough for auditing.
It isn't sufficient for proof-of-solvency. To do that you need a more interactive protocol where the site moves the coins or discloses key images. It is sufficient for general auditing because you can demand that the owner account for everything that was received. The owner can prove what was spent and can then disclose that proof (either publically or privately to an auditor). wow sorry guys i did not know this... have to say i find the information about this (the picture above or what fluffy sayd in that presentation the other day) very missleading when it comes to this to be honest.. but maybe its also good like that, more like sitzerland, declare whatever you like so..if i send the same money to the same account again and again, what balance does the viewkey show? all incoming transactions combined? Yeah it would show that. View-only wallets really should just disable the balance display instead, or maybe change the label to "Total amount received". It is somewhat misleading the way it is now. I'd say the picture is more confusing than misleading. All of the auditing use cases are still supportable as voluntary transparency. I'm not sure what is meant by the last item about parents monitoring spending though, that seems a bit misplaced.
|
|
|
|
medusa13
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 453
Merit: 500
hello world
|
|
December 08, 2015, 09:25:59 PM |
|
ok when i think about it its not so bad at all, since timestamps are visible no? so if i want to declare my potential xmr salary, it is difficult to fake because i would need to make real transactions every month so it looks plausible, correct? ok it could be the same money all the time..xmr washing machine someone should make a 18 million viewkey on testnet
|
XMR Monero
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
December 08, 2015, 10:06:42 PM |
|
ok when i think about it its not so bad at all, since timestamps are visible no?
Yes. so if i want to declare my potential xmr salary, it is difficult to fake because i would need to make real transactions every month so it looks plausible, correct? Sure but not sure why you would do that. You could also be asked to show where you spent money on mortgage, taxes, etc. If you did that you wouldn't have enough left unaccounted to send the same money back to yourself.
|
|
|
|
luigi1111
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1105
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 08, 2015, 11:26:43 PM |
|
ok when i think about it its not so bad at all, since timestamps are visible no? so if i want to declare my potential xmr salary, it is difficult to fake because i would need to make real transactions every month so it looks plausible, correct? ok it could be the same money all the time..xmr washing machine someone should make a 18 million viewkey on testnet I think this is a really critical point: It is sufficient for general auditing because you can demand that the owner account for everything that was received.
It is still easy to prove and/or require proof for all outputs; it's just not a 1-and-done-for-all-time thing. The needed data is simple enough that I think a good UX should still be completely achievable.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3850
Merit: 5030
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
December 09, 2015, 04:34:16 PM |
|
Is anyone going to be there? http://conference.rt.com/
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
dalistar
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
December 10, 2015, 03:58:24 PM |
|
have the following rig Intel Core i7 6700K Higher clock speed 4 GHz Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm Higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz Better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 32.9 mHash/s Better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 17,241 Better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 8,981 Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,318 Better cinebench r10 32Bit score 36,746 Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.79 GHz this is cpu information they wrote can produce 32.9 mHash/s so according to coinwarz calculater Monero it can make 27 coin per day Huh? is that right how i can make sure before start mining please help me thanks
|
|
|
|
MoneroMooo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1276
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 10, 2015, 04:06:33 PM |
|
Not sure about any of the numbers above, but 32.9 mHash/s (assuming the m stands for M) is higher than the total net hash (last I looked, 11 MH/s, might have moved now), so if you could sustain that you'd be getting maybe 7000 monero a day (order of magnitude). So no. A desktop i7 should be getting you between 50 and 500 hashes a second (order of magnitude again), and 1 monero a day (oom yet again). So 27 seems very wrong.
|
|
|
|
dalistar
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
December 10, 2015, 04:09:17 PM |
|
Not sure about any of the numbers above, but 32.9 mHash/s (assuming the m stands for M) is higher than the total net hash (last I looked, 11 MH/s, might have moved now), so if you could sustain that you'd be getting maybe 7000 monero a day (order of magnitude). So no. A desktop i7 should be getting you between 50 and 500 hashes a second (order of magnitude again), and 1 monero a day (oom yet again). So 27 seems very wrong.
first i also calculated 7000 xmr a day but i didnt believe it I must knew how much exactly i cant get by day before buy this cpu i am confused
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Still wild and free
|
|
December 10, 2015, 04:22:58 PM |
|
Better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 32.9 mHash/s
I don't know what that is but I'd guess SHA256.
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
equipoise
|
|
December 10, 2015, 04:34:27 PM |
|
Not sure about any of the numbers above, but 32.9 mHash/s (assuming the m stands for M) is higher than the total net hash (last I looked, 11 MH/s, might have moved now), so if you could sustain that you'd be getting maybe 7000 monero a day (order of magnitude). So no. A desktop i7 should be getting you between 50 and 500 hashes a second (order of magnitude again), and 1 monero a day (oom yet again). So 27 seems very wrong.
first i also calculated 7000 xmr a day but i didnt believe it I must knew how much exactly i cant get by day before buy this cpu i am confused Monero and Bitcoin use different hash functions and CPU mining Monero produce less H/s. You'll mine with something like 150-400 H/s with this processor. Monero mining thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=653467.0
|
|
|
|
luigi1111
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1105
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 10, 2015, 04:35:23 PM |
|
Not sure about any of the numbers above, but 32.9 mHash/s (assuming the m stands for M) is higher than the total net hash (last I looked, 11 MH/s, might have moved now), so if you could sustain that you'd be getting maybe 7000 monero a day (order of magnitude). So no. A desktop i7 should be getting you between 50 and 500 hashes a second (order of magnitude again), and 1 monero a day (oom yet again). So 27 seems very wrong.
first i also calculated 7000 xmr a day but i didnt believe it I must knew how much exactly i cant get by day before buy this cpu i am confused New CPUs are extremely expensive on a price-per-hash basis. Don't buy it expecting to break even in a reasonable amount of time. Also note that "bitcoin mining score" is an entirely useless measure for mining Monero. I'd guess that CPU to be not faster than 400h/s (300-400 possibly).
|
|
|
|
dalistar
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
December 10, 2015, 04:49:05 PM |
|
Not sure about any of the numbers above, but 32.9 mHash/s (assuming the m stands for M) is higher than the total net hash (last I looked, 11 MH/s, might have moved now), so if you could sustain that you'd be getting maybe 7000 monero a day (order of magnitude). So no. A desktop i7 should be getting you between 50 and 500 hashes a second (order of magnitude again), and 1 monero a day (oom yet again). So 27 seems very wrong.
first i also calculated 7000 xmr a day but i didnt believe it I must knew how much exactly i cant get by day before buy this cpu i am confused New CPUs are extremely expensive on a price-per-hash basis. Don't buy it expecting to break even in a reasonable amount of time. Also note that "bitcoin mining score" is an entirely useless measure for mining Monero. I'd guess that CPU to be not faster than 400h/s (300-400 possibly). if it is 400 h/s so can make 0.33744434 XMR daily are you make sure ?
|
|
|
|
luigi1111
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1105
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 10, 2015, 04:57:10 PM |
|
Not sure about any of the numbers above, but 32.9 mHash/s (assuming the m stands for M) is higher than the total net hash (last I looked, 11 MH/s, might have moved now), so if you could sustain that you'd be getting maybe 7000 monero a day (order of magnitude). So no. A desktop i7 should be getting you between 50 and 500 hashes a second (order of magnitude again), and 1 monero a day (oom yet again). So 27 seems very wrong.
first i also calculated 7000 xmr a day but i didnt believe it I must knew how much exactly i cant get by day before buy this cpu i am confused New CPUs are extremely expensive on a price-per-hash basis. Don't buy it expecting to break even in a reasonable amount of time. Also note that "bitcoin mining score" is an entirely useless measure for mining Monero. I'd guess that CPU to be not faster than 400h/s (300-400 possibly). if it is 400 h/s so can make 0.33744434 XMR daily are you make sure ? Yup, sounds right.
|
|
|
|
dalistar
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
December 10, 2015, 05:04:04 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
megges
|
|
December 10, 2015, 05:11:42 PM |
|
|
tip me! XtSrWch1U3BsTBFBHj7acTTzxFo1fy5BMa
|
|
|
luigi1111
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1105
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 10, 2015, 05:13:59 PM |
|
Decent electricity rates should mean better than BE is easily possible; just don't expect to quickly pay off new hardware. This is no different than any crypto right now (this isn't December 2013!).
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
December 10, 2015, 07:21:48 PM |
|
If you are buying a rig specifically to mine, then GPUs are the way to go, because the hash/$ is much better and you can scale (many GPU cards per rig). Probably some 750ti model is your best bet, especially if you can get a good discounted price.
That's a big if though. As luigi says you probably won't break even on hardware any time soon even if you are profitable in terms of power.
If you are buying computer for some other reason, or already own it, and want to mine, then CPUs are fine. They seem a bit more power-efficient than GPUs in the best case, though probably not the one listed above. The lower-power variants (mostly laptop and server models) are more power-efficient than the high-performance desktop models.
|
|
|
|
dalistar
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
December 11, 2015, 04:26:41 AM |
|
If you are buying a rig specifically to mine, then GPUs are the way to go, because the hash/$ is much better and you can scale (many GPU cards per rig). Probably some 750ti model is your best bet, especially if you can get a good discounted price.
That's a big if though. As luigi says you probably won't break even on hardware any time soon even if you are profitable in terms of power.
If you are buying computer for some other reason, or already own it, and want to mine, then CPUs are fine. They seem a bit more power-efficient than GPUs in the best case, though probably not the one listed above. The lower-power variants (mostly laptop and server models) are more power-efficient than the high-performance desktop models.
Yes what I want to do is renting good dedicated server and start mining .... server cost 159 usd per month ... seems not profitable if this cpu will give 400 hash per second ... what I want is making sure that this cpu can only make 400 hash/s .. because I read cpu information it was 32 mhash/s ... but people here told me this cpu almost 400 hash /s... I want to know how to calculate. ... because this cpu is very huge and big one comparing with other cpus and very expensive too ... so how to calculate cpu can produce how many hash per second
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
December 11, 2015, 04:32:30 AM |
|
If you are buying a rig specifically to mine, then GPUs are the way to go, because the hash/$ is much better and you can scale (many GPU cards per rig). Probably some 750ti model is your best bet, especially if you can get a good discounted price.
That's a big if though. As luigi says you probably won't break even on hardware any time soon even if you are profitable in terms of power.
If you are buying computer for some other reason, or already own it, and want to mine, then CPUs are fine. They seem a bit more power-efficient than GPUs in the best case, though probably not the one listed above. The lower-power variants (mostly laptop and server models) are more power-efficient than the high-performance desktop models.
Yes what I want to do is renting good dedicated server and start mining .... server cost 159 usd per month ... seems not profitable if this cpu will give 400 hash per second ... what I want is making sure that this cpu can only make 400 hash/s .. because I read cpu information it was 32 mhash/s ... but people here told me this cpu almost 400 hash /s... I want to know how to calculate. ... because this cpu is very huge and big one comparing with other cpus and very expensive too ... so how to calculate cpu can produce how many hash per second Rented servers are usually much too expensive to even break even. The cost of rental is usually many times the cost of electricity used to run the server. Of course that makes sense since the rental company has other expenses. Anyway most CPUs will run something like 50-70 hash/thread where threads is cache/2. With that estimate you can work out some numbers.
|
|
|
|
|