|
othe
|
 |
June 09, 2014, 01:18:20 PM |
|
Hello everybody, This is my first post here in bitcointalk (but i have been following it for some times now ..). As I really love monero, i decided to start my involvement in it by setting up a pool. Fees are 0% ! The pool is hosted on an 8-core dedicated VPS, hosted in France and is available to this address : http://monero.chickenkiller.comThanks to everybody for helping me launching the pool  See ya ! Edit : template and adding pool location  Can anyone explain this odd discrepancy (my first three hashes submitted to monero.chickenkiller.com:8080)? One screenshot shows the sharediff - the other your total amount of hashes. They have nothing todo with each other. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Little_boo
|
|
June 09, 2014, 01:29:50 PM |
|
There is a list of those who received the Giveaway? The wallet is not clear where the coins with a pool, and where Giveaway.
|
|
|
|
|
zechiel
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
June 09, 2014, 01:42:21 PM |
|
One screenshot shows the sharediff - the other your total amount of hashes. They have nothing todo with each other. Hmm, OK. How is the number on the web page calculated, then? That's the one that counts when it comes to payout, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Febo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
|
|
June 09, 2014, 02:12:25 PM |
|
Can anyone explain this odd discrepancy (my first three hashes submitted to monero.chickenkiller.com:8080)? One screenshot shows the sharediff - the other your total amount of hashes. They have nothing to do with each other. Hmm, OK. How is the number on the web page calculated, then? That's the one that counts when it comes to payout, right? Total Hashes submitted are Your Hash Rate * seconds you were mining. But that hash rate jumps up and down a lot. At least to me. Bot on IRC did not give me answer how much you could mine with your 26 hash/s per day, but i found when i answered one in this thread before. "With 175 H/s you should get 1.19 MRO per Day" |
|
|
|
|
metacrap
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
June 09, 2014, 03:51:31 PM |
|
WTB XMR for 0,5BTC. please PM offers
|
|
|
|
|
surfer43
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
|
|
June 09, 2014, 03:54:48 PM |
|
Total Hashes submitted are Your Hash Rate * seconds you were mining. But that hash rate jumps up and down a lot. At least to me.
Bot on IRC did not give me answer how much you could mine with your 26 hash/s per day, but i found when i answered one in this thread before.
"With 175 H/s you should get 1.19 MRO per Day"
No, the calculation is Total hashes submitted = Total value of all shares submitted to the pool with that address |
|
|
|
|
GreekBitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
getmonero.org
|
|
June 09, 2014, 03:59:58 PM |
|
WTB XMR for 0,5BTC. please PM offers
Try poloniex  |
|
|
|
|
|
celestio
|
|
June 09, 2014, 04:17:12 PM |
|
Hello, I'm glad to finally be a part of the beginnings of Monero. I see huge potential, and can't wait for it to be fully unleashed! Mintpal voting here I come: https://www.mintpal.com/voting#XMR |
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime" - Satoshi Nakamoto, June 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
David Latapie
|
|
June 09, 2014, 04:21:14 PM |
|
Hello, I'm glad to finally be a part of the beginnings of Monero. I see huge potential, and can't wait for it to be fully unleashed! Mintpal voting here I come: https://www.mintpal.com/voting#XMR151 votes, we are almost in the middle of the list now. |
|
|
|
|
uvt9
|
|
June 09, 2014, 04:29:41 PM |
|
Hmm strange, not long ago Mintpal repeatly denied to have XMR on voting list just because of totally new protocol. Does this mean their platform is technically ready for CryptoNote now ?
Btw i don't like the part "Vote on Mintpal" of new title, it sounds like a random pump and dump coin. I love the old title "A anonymous currency based on ring signatures" - it look more professional and unique.
|
|
|
|
|
surfer43
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
|
|
June 09, 2014, 04:32:04 PM |
|
Hmm strange, not long ago Mintpal repeatly denied to have XMR on voting list just because of totally new protocol. Does this mean their platform is technically ready for CryptoNote now ?
Probably not, or else they would just add it immediately.. Btw i don't like the part "Vote on Mintpal" of new title, it sounds like a random pump and dump coin. I love the old title "A anonymous currency based on ring signatures" - it look more professional and unique.
Yeah, we don't need that in the title.. |
|
|
|
|
|
David Latapie
|
|
June 09, 2014, 04:34:42 PM |
|
Btw i don't like the part "Vote on Mintpal" of new title, it sounds like a random pump and dump coin. I love the old title "A anonymous currency based on ring signatures" - it look more professional and unique. That may be changed if enough of you want it out. Who wants it out? Who wants to keep it? |
|
|
|
|
celestio
|
|
June 09, 2014, 04:38:40 PM |
|
Hmm strange, not long ago Mintpal repeatly denied to have XMR on voting list just because of totally new protocol. Does this mean their platform is technically ready for CryptoNote now ?
If Poloniex and Bittrex have it, I'm not sure why Mintpal( a much bigger and widely known exchange) couldn't add it as well. |
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime" - Satoshi Nakamoto, June 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
uvt9
|
|
June 09, 2014, 04:44:43 PM |
|
Hmm strange, not long ago Mintpal repeatly denied to have XMR on voting list just because of totally new protocol. Does this mean their platform is technically ready for CryptoNote now ?
If Poloniex and Bittrex have it, I'm not sure why Mintpal( a much bigger and widely known exchange) couldn't add it as well. But these exchanges have problem on making Monero work correctly, automatic withdrawals occasionally fail. I think exchanges want new API, something similar to Bitcoin Payment Protocol for CryptoNote. p.s: some Monero investors are so generous, 2 transactions worth of 0.35 BTC was sent to Mintpal voting address. |
|
|
|
|
Febo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
|
|
June 09, 2014, 04:49:01 PM |
|
Hmm strange, not long ago Mintpal repeatly denied to have XMR on voting list just because of totally new protocol. Does this mean their platform is technically ready for CryptoNote now ?
If Poloniex and Bittrex have it, I'm not sure why Mintpal( a much bigger and widely known exchange) couldn't add it as well. Maybe they are to fat and lazzy to do things fast. |
|
|
|
|
|
WilliamLie2
|
|
June 09, 2014, 05:05:34 PM |
|
For example if 556.44 XMR are sent, the protocol will break it down into 500 + 50 + 6 + 0.4 + 0.04 Why does monero split amounts to power of 10? Why not power of 2? Are there any differences or trade offs in using different bases for this process? |
|
|
|
|
|
uvt9
|
|
June 09, 2014, 05:10:38 PM |
|
For example if 556.44 XMR are sent, the protocol will break it down into 500 + 50 + 6 + 0.4 + 0.04 Why does monero split amounts to power of 10? Why not power of 2? Are there any differences or trade offs in using different bases for this process? Spliting amount to power of 2 would results in too many inputs and increase transaction size enormously i think. |
|
|
|
|
expert-lister
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 302
Merit: 250
Imagine a world without hate and oppression
|
|
June 09, 2014, 05:32:24 PM |
|
Congratulations all (for MintPal)!  |
Liberty...
|
|
|
|
nakaone
|
|
June 09, 2014, 06:23:29 PM |
|
Hello, I'm glad to finally be a part of the beginnings of Monero. I see huge potential, and can't wait for it to be fully unleashed! Mintpal voting here I come: https://www.mintpal.com/voting#XMR151 votes, we are almost in the middle of the list now. is this bs really neccessary? - I mean seriously how do all these sh..coins get so many votes? maybe monero should wait until mintpal adds them by themselves I also think it is not neccessary to get this in the title |
|
|
|
|
|
