[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[Zer0Sum]

"Massive" buy wall at 280 of 30 BTC... nice to see 

[1614541989]

1614541989

[1614541989]

1614541989

[cAPSLOCK]

"Massive" buy wall at 280 of 30 BTC... nice to see 

Wonder if Risto is adding a Monero wing to the castle...

[blaaaaacksuit]

"Massive" buy wall at 280 of 30 BTC... nice to see 

It's gone again, and it never got filled, just some fake out.  Then somebody throws up a 27BTC sell wall.

[Spekulatius]

lol 27 BTC sell wall on 0.0031, 12 BTC BUY wall at 0.0018  PING PONG TIME!

[blaaaaacksuit]

lol 27 BTC sell wall on 0.0031, 12 BTC BUY wall at 0.0018  PING PONG TIME!

It's all sells now.  Sometimes I think this is just DRK whales.

[coine_smithe]

Hey guys, is there any way for investors to see what point you are at on the emission curve? The PoW is killing the price and there's no point from an investor's point of view to buy this coin right now. I like the technology though.

[smooth]

i am not in the irc chat - is there something fundamentally broken or other fud? or is this just market madness?

There is FUD at the moment going on about Bytecoin, that CryptoNote based coins have a backdoor.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=512747.msg7018325#msg7018325

Personally I think this is a load of rubbish, many people here have read the entire codebase [1] of Monero (that is mostly the original CryptoNote implementation) and there seems to be no evidence of these special keys.

[1] I am sure I heard that some of the Monero developers have been over the code. I wouldn't mind this being confirmed again.

Seriously? Do not believe anything that comes from a troll box. And this one doesn't even come from the trollbox, it comes from someone claiming to have seen it in a troll box. What a joke.

[blaaaaacksuit]

i am not in the irc chat - is there something fundamentally broken or other fud? or is this just market madness?

There is FUD at the moment going on about Bytecoin, that CryptoNote based coins have a backdoor.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=512747.msg7018325#msg7018325

Personally I think this is a load of rubbish, many people here have read the entire codebase [1] of Monero (that is mostly the original CryptoNote implementation) and there seems to be no evidence of these special keys.

[1] I am sure I heard that some of the Monero developers have been over the code. I wouldn't mind this being confirmed again.

Seriously? Do not believe anything that comes from a troll box. And this one doesn't even come from the trollbox, it comes from someone claiming to have seen it in a troll box. What a joke.

People actually dumped coins over this? LOL

[Keyboard-Mash]

Seriously? Do not believe anything that comes from a troll box. And this one doesn't even come from the trollbox, it comes from someone claiming to have seen it in a troll box. What a joke.

People actually dumped coins over this? LOL

Yeah, shows up in troll box, and then someone shows up who claims to have mined only 500 million in an entire year. Then basically says he hasn't done anything with them because "he checked and they're still there", but there are services he can't share that he probably uses all the time.

Troll box pump attempt for sure! They're getting creative now though, usually they stay contained in the box but now they're all over the place.


edit: Also, that site ... there's no pgp keys to verify the author of the site. Don't know what's up but that's a flag for me.

[darlidada]

I get this error while trying to use the latest x64 binaries:

2014-May-31 07:21:07.329516 bitmonero v0.8.8.1(0.1-g328a52a)
2014-May-31 07:21:07.331516 Module folder: C:\Users\Bali\Downloads\monero.win.x64.latest(2)\bitmonerod.exe
2014-May-31 07:21:07.337516 Initializing p2p server...
2014-May-31 07:21:07.340516 ERROR c:\temp\monero\git-experimental\bitmonero-0.8.8update-x64\src\p2p\net_node.inl:82 Exception at [node_server::init_config], what=invalid signature
2014-May-31 07:21:07.347517 ERROR c:\temp\monero\git-experimental\bitmonero-0.8.8update-x64\src\p2p\net_node.inl:204 Failed to init config.
2014-May-31 07:21:07.352517 ERROR ..\..\src\daemon\daemon.cpp:148 Failed to initialize p2p server.
2014-May-31 07:21:07.356517 Mining has been stopped, 0 finished

Am i the only one?

[tukernun]

When i trying transfer moneros on poloniex, there is an error: transfer is too big. 8 or 6 or 4 or 3 monero- it does not matter- always error. what i am doing wrong for this time?
Smth like this:

Error: transaction <def7135a464822e763be5ca8764b228acc1f33fb8a07bf0670a939ed71dad266> is too big. Transaction size: 84683 bytes, transaction size limit: 24400 bytes

[Keyboard-Mash]

When i trying transfer moneros on poloniex, there is an error: transfer is too big. 8 or 6 or 4 or 3 monero- it does not matter- always error. what i am doing wrong for this time?

Have you tried really small amounts? The transfer being too big is cause by many small inputs coming together. Like in effect, if someone sent you 3 moneros and then sent those same 3 to someone else, then the transfer would be relatively small in size (bytes). But, if someone sent you .01 moneros 300 times, to make 3 moneros then your transfer would be really big in size (bytes). It's just how the protocol works for now. There's usually nothing you're doing wrong. Have you tried sending extremely small transaction sizes? like .1 MRO? Also, are you trying to send to or from poloniex?

[tukernun]

When i trying transfer moneros on poloniex, there is an error: transfer is too big. 8 or 6 or 4 or 3 monero- it does not matter- always error. what i am doing wrong for this time?

Have you tried really small amounts? The transfer being too big is cause by many small inputs coming together. Like in effect, if someone sent you 3 moneros and then sent those same 3 to someone else, then the transfer would be relatively small in size (bytes). But, if someone sent you .01 moneros 300 times, to make 3 moneros then your transfer would be really big in size (bytes). It's just how the protocol works for now. There's usually nothing you're doing wrong. Have you tried sending extremely small transaction sizes? like .1 MRO? Also, are you trying to send to or from poloniex?

It was to poloniex. Ty a lot- 3 moneros too big, 2 moneros and less was send succesfully.  

But if transfer fee are always 0.05- it is not good, that monero use that fee  every time when i send 0.1 and 0.2 moneros because of wallet feature  

[Keyboard-Mash]

It was to poloniex. Ty for your support- 3 moneros too big, 2 moneros and less was send succesfully.  

But if transfer fee are always 0.05- it is not good, that monero use that fee  every time when i send 0.1 and 0.2 moneros because of wallet feature  

I agree with you, were you mining to that wallet from a pool? I think a good way to find a middle ground in the situation is to have pools use a minimum payout per address (like 1 MRO maybe?). It could, if done correctly, take care of blockchain bloat and keep you from having to pay unnecessary transaction fees by having to send multiple payments, now that the block size limit is decreased. I don't think that the pools currently support a minimum payout yet, so maybe someone else has ideas about this?

Also, I thought the fee was .0005? Am I wrong?

[tukernun]

It was to poloniex. Ty for your support- 3 moneros too big, 2 moneros and less was send succesfully.  

But if transfer fee are always 0.05- it is not good, that monero use that fee  every time when i send 0.1 and 0.2 moneros because of wallet feature  

I agree with you, were you mining to that wallet from a pool? I think a good way to find a middle ground in the situation is to have pools use a minimum payout per address (like 1 MRO maybe?). It could, if done correctly, take care of blockchain bloat and keep you from having to pay unnecessary transaction fees by having to send multiple payments, now that the block size limit is decreased. I don't think that the pools currently support a minimum payout yet, so maybe someone else has ideas about this?

Yeah, i thought that http://moneropool.com/ is the best choice because of very high hash rate, i was mistaken   Hope, that pool owners will read your post and  will set minimum payouts- it will be useful for miners  

Error: not enough money to transfer, available only 0.907273924654, transaction amount 0.912273924654 = 0.907273924654 + 0.005000000000 (fee)

[polecrab]

It was to poloniex. Ty for your support- 3 moneros too big, 2 moneros and less was send succesfully.  

But if transfer fee are always 0.05- it is not good, that monero use that fee  every time when i send 0.1 and 0.2 moneros because of wallet feature  

I agree with you, were you mining to that wallet from a pool? I think a good way to find a middle ground in the situation is to have pools use a minimum payout per address (like 1 MRO maybe?). It could, if done correctly, take care of blockchain bloat and keep you from having to pay unnecessary transaction fees by having to send multiple payments, now that the block size limit is decreased. I don't think that the pools currently support a minimum payout yet, so maybe someone else has ideas about this?

Yeah, i thought that http://moneropool.com/ is the best choice because of very high hash rate, i was mistaken   Hope, that pool owners will read your post and  will set minimum payouts- it will be useful for miners  

Error: not enough money to transfer, available only 0.907273924654, transaction amount 0.912273924654 = 0.907273924654 + 0.005000000000 (fee)

Minimum payout with direct to wallet address pools based on node-cryptonote-pool would require some development of node-cryptonote-pool by the author, not config by the pool owners.

[Febo]

When i trying transfer moneros on poloniex, there is an error: transfer is too big. 8 or 6 or 4 or 3 monero- it does not matter- always error. what i am doing wrong for this time?

Have you tried really small amounts? The transfer being too big is cause by many small inputs coming together. Like in effect, if someone sent you 3 moneros and then sent those same 3 to someone else, then the transfer would be relatively small in size (bytes). But, if someone sent you .01 moneros 300 times, to make 3 moneros then your transfer would be really big in size (bytes). It's just how the protocol works for now. There's usually nothing you're doing wrong. Have you tried sending extremely small transaction sizes? like .1 MRO? Also, are you trying to send to or from poloniex?

It was to poloniex. Ty a lot- 3 moneros too big, 2 moneros and less was send succesfully.  

But if transfer fee are always 0.05- it is not good, that monero use that fee  every time when i send 0.1 and 0.2 moneros because of wallet feature  

I think, well as i read, people use second wallet, they transfer in 1 or 2 Moneros batch there, from their mining wallet. That will allow you to transfer from that second wallet in higher numbers. But i might read it wrong, i am way from there yet. 

[ellen.yan]

lol 27 BTC sell wall on 0.0031, 12 BTC BUY wall at 0.0018  PING PONG TIME!

when occur??

[equipoise]

^About 17-18 hours ago. Some are playing games so I don't believe in any wall.

[othe]

^About 17-18 hours ago. Some are playing games so I don't believe in any wall.

That wall at 18 was from me, it was the price that was reached earlier that day already so i thought i might be lucky to buy some cheap coins - didnt work.

There was absolutely no "manipulation" involved, that sell wall wasn't from me tho - and we talked about that in irc.