smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 13, 2014, 01:19:35 AM |
|
Hi dev, have tou seen the last news about bytecoin, news in the dev seems interesting, will it be incorporated in monero soon ?
Our strategy is always to evaluate changes and features from the other cryptonote-derived coins and decide ourselves whether to incorporate those changes more or less unchanged, incorporate them in modified form, or not incorporate them at all.
|
|
|
|
gwada971
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 10
|
|
August 13, 2014, 01:24:19 AM |
|
For sure, but will take a look at what incorporated trade escrow service is promising
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 13, 2014, 01:50:57 AM |
|
For sure, but will take a look at what incorporated trade escrow service is promising
If you are referring to multisig which enables on-chain escrow, that will definitely be supported in Monero. Whether or not the other project's code turns out to be useful or if we implement it another way remains to be seen. If you are referring to something other than multisig, please explain because I'm not aware of a specific trade escrow feature being promised.
|
|
|
|
cinnamon_carter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!
|
|
August 13, 2014, 01:54:22 AM |
|
I want to study this further...
I get concerned with quick changes and 'mandatory' updates....
With good reason based on experience.
|
Check out my coin Photon Merge Mine 5 other Blake 256 coins - 6x your hash power https://www.blakecoin.org/The obvious choice is not always the best choice. LOOK DEEPER - Look into the Blake 256 Family -- CC
|
|
|
generalt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1096
Merit: 1021
|
|
August 13, 2014, 02:07:05 AM |
|
Wow what happened to the hashrate on moneropool.com? From their front page: 08-13: Pool upgrade in progress. Mining works fine in background. Stats back at ~ 03:00 UTC. LOL I'm such an idiot for not checking the main page. Thanks for the info!
|
BTC: 1GENERALrtBAjEv2Ps5cmEW1FADnXh1bCZ
|
|
|
xulescu
|
|
August 13, 2014, 02:57:33 AM |
|
I want to study this further...
I get concerned with quick changes and 'mandatory' updates....
With good reason based on experience.
The mandatory update is pretty old now. It is mandatory because the old versions used a fixed TX fee much too small to prevent dust and spamming. If you tried to use an old version, no miner would take your transaction. This also helps blockchain size.
|
|
|
|
|
HashInvest
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
Pools: XMR.HashInvest.net
|
|
August 13, 2014, 08:20:17 AM |
|
I want to study this further...
I get concerned with quick changes and 'mandatory' updates....
With good reason based on experience.
The mandatory update is pretty old now. It is mandatory because the old versions used a fixed TX fee much too small to prevent dust and spamming. If you tried to use an old version, no miner would take your transaction. This also helps blockchain size. Many people still running outdated clients. I see such transactions in daemon logs several times per day so far.
|
|
|
|
NeuroticFish
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 6596
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
|
|
August 13, 2014, 10:51:15 AM |
|
It's not the first currency where I tell this: one of the first features of a wallet should be to check, at least at start-up, if it's outdated and tell the user to update. There will always be 2 version numbers available: last known version and last mandatory version. It's not difficult to implement and even the command line wallet can have that check. Ohwell, maybe in the next version
|
|
|
|
fluffypony
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
|
|
August 13, 2014, 11:20:07 AM |
|
It's not the first currency where I tell this: one of the first features of a wallet should be to check, at least at start-up, if it's outdated and tell the user to update. There will always be 2 version numbers available: last known version and last mandatory version. It's not difficult to implement and even the command line wallet can have that check. Ohwell, maybe in the next version Well, the thing is, we don't want the daemon making non-p2p connections unless explicitly allowed by the user, so checking via the web is a no-go. What we *can* do is add functionality where if > 58% of connected peers (ie. 7 of the standard 12 max) are on a newer version, notify the user that a new version is available. Peers can indicate the last mandatory version, too, and if you're on a version < that version the daemon can pump out lots of warnings, and simplewallet can have an additional confirmation dialog for every transaction before sending.
|
|
|
|
NeuroticFish
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 6596
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
|
|
August 13, 2014, 11:26:36 AM |
|
Well, the thing is, we don't want the daemon making non-p2p connections unless explicitly allowed by the user, so checking via the web is a no-go.
Ah, OK. You know better... What we *can* do is add functionality where if > 58% of connected peers (ie. 7 of the standard 12 max) are on a newer version, notify the user that a new version is available. Peers can indicate the last mandatory version, too, and if you're on a version < that version the daemon can pump out lots of warnings, and simplewallet can have an additional confirmation dialog for every transaction before sending.
So there are possible solutions I'm impressed of the fast response and the fact you indeed thought of possible solutions. WTG!
|
|
|
|
OmarGsPools
|
|
August 13, 2014, 08:04:13 PM |
|
I'm having issues compiling monerod. This is what it spits out after compiling using Ubuntu VM 14.04 with boost 1.56. It fully compiled but running ./bitmonerod gives me this:
2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.519609 Starting... 2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.520657 bitmonero v0.8.8.1() 2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.520777 Module folder: ./bitmonerod 2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.521277 Initializing p2p server... Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Any ideas? I had no issues when on Ubuntu 13 but after the update it was complaining about 1.53 and I know the stock 1.54 boost wasn't compatible with bitmonero and other cryptonote coins.
|
|
|
|
Atrides
|
|
August 13, 2014, 08:12:10 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
From Above
|
|
August 13, 2014, 08:14:29 PM |
|
How is Monero doing these days? had sold all at the peak.
~CfA~
|
|
|
|
Spaceman_Spiff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
|
|
August 13, 2014, 08:38:47 PM Last edit: August 13, 2014, 09:47:32 PM by Spaceman_Spiff |
|
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
You still haven't addressed the issue I brought above concerning go wish upthread. It is impossible for far go to sustain orthogonal relationships with technological irregularities above the limit of up decided one to have used it or not. I have already solved the problem on that goes until. But I am far too busy to elucidate where half as much will go from far decision space on a parabolic axis. - Far to go more.
- Power consumtion not you?
- Orthagonal elucidation.
- I already did it!
Alas I must rest for a week now, but before I go I want to remind you not to forget what I haven't talked about yet. I think you're missing the point. there are indices yet to address which we need to factor into the vertex manipulation which will no doubt result in a bilateral view of this whole predicament. In layman's terms, we should direct our energy toward the pruning of such ridiculous hyperbole from an otherwise unique technical and scientific standpoint in order to progress and further our collective understanding of each node of an otherwise complex and fragmented system element. I think what you are saying is we may have drifted a little too far off topic. And I think this is true. That was an artful double troll up there though. Or you could just keep on going and become the second meme-speak-coin after Doge.... (Honestly, this chaos-talk is pretty fun )
|
|
|
|
Febo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
|
|
August 13, 2014, 09:07:35 PM |
|
How is Monero doing these days? had sold all at the peak.
~CfA~
Which peak?
|
|
|
|
rpietila
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
|
|
August 13, 2014, 09:36:17 PM |
|
How is Monero doing these days? had sold all at the peak.
~CfA~
Many are willing to buy in but do not understand that when the turn comes, they may not have the opportunity. The ones who waited in 0.002315 are still waiting to buy in. I would forecast that the definite turn happens next week. My original forecast was Sunday, this week, but today's action was weak and vwap was lower than yesterday, hence the delay. Technically etc., the coin is doing fine. So I am afraid the boom mentioned in the first paragraph may start happening already this week. (My forecast is still next week.) 0.00334 looks like it is close but will prove to be strong as a wall, making this the last cheap entry.
|
HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
|
|
|
blaaaaacksuit
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Who cares?
|
|
August 13, 2014, 10:05:49 PM |
|
How is Monero doing these days? had sold all at the peak.
~CfA~
Many are willing to buy in but do not understand that when the turn comes, they may not have the opportunity. The ones who waited in 0.002315 are still waiting to buy in. I would forecast that the definite turn happens next week. My original forecast was Sunday, this week, but today's action was weak and vwap was lower than yesterday, hence the delay. Technically etc., the coin is doing fine. So I am afraid the boom mentioned in the first paragraph may start happening already this week. (My forecast is still next week.) 0.00334 looks like it is close but will prove to be strong as a wall, making this the last cheap entry. Why do you believe this?
|
|
|
|
perl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1190
|
|
August 13, 2014, 10:28:11 PM |
|
Please, you can remove "Currently Ddos'd" off monero.crypto-pool.fr . I have not DDOS'd
And if DDOS begining And DDOS clasic TCP/UDP is perfectly under control with arbor and Architecture network/system And DDOS stratum is perfectly under control now if rebegining with new version of script monitoring .
Last day impact is very lower . Pool as good resisted only 15 minutes perturbation
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
statdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 13, 2014, 10:35:54 PM |
|
How is Monero doing these days? had sold all at the peak.
~CfA~
Why don't you donate Jojaetok the 5,000 xmr offered then we'll talk ?
|
|
|
|
|