eizh
|
|
August 25, 2014, 05:34:10 PM |
|
Is it normal to see such kind of errors? ...
Normal for the time being, yes. These are transactions floating around in the network that miners reject because the old client's fee is too low. It's the recent stopgap patch at work.
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
August 25, 2014, 05:45:43 PM |
|
Update
I'm guessing you're missing about 20% of the log-weighted mass on the tail due to under-reporting by small holders.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
August 25, 2014, 05:47:10 PM |
|
Come over to XC coin, we've got a great community with lots of exciting developments in the works!
How does the XC anonymity feature trump the one of XMR? I think I can safely say that XC holds a lot of "promise". I'm just a bit concerned that this is a brand of margarine. EDIT: I should have held my peace perhaps, but I find my own jokes too amusing sometimes.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
Jungian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 930
Merit: 1010
|
|
August 25, 2014, 05:48:38 PM |
|
Come over to XC coin, we've got a great community with lots of exciting developments in the works!
How does the XC anonymity feature trump the one of XMR? I think I can safely say that XC holds a lot of "promise". I'm just a bit concerned that this is a brand of margarine. What unique features does it have that is not trumped by other coins?
|
|
|
|
krawallmining
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
August 25, 2014, 05:56:50 PM |
|
Normal for the time being, yes. These are transactions floating around in the network that miners reject because the old client's fee is too low. It's the recent stopgap patch at work.
Is it also normal that the bandwidth is so high? It eats up my 5mbit upstream.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 25, 2014, 05:58:55 PM Last edit: August 25, 2014, 06:21:42 PM by smooth |
|
Normal for the time being, yes. These are transactions floating around in the network that miners reject because the old client's fee is too low. It's the recent stopgap patch at work.
Is it also normal that the bandwidth is so high? It eats up my 5mbit upstream. It is something we are working on. Most of it is people downloading the entire blockchain (using poorly behaved code). We encourage people to use the static web downloads but we can't force that. If the bandwidth usage is too much for you to handle, as a work around you can block incoming connections, but we don't encourage this generally because it will make the network unstable if too many people do it.
|
|
|
|
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5272
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
|
|
August 25, 2014, 06:13:10 PM |
|
Come over to XC coin, we've got a great community with lots of exciting developments in the works!
How does the XC anonymity feature trump the one of XMR? I think I can safely say that XC holds a lot of "promise". I'm just a bit concerned that this is a brand of margarine. EDIT: I should have held my peace perhaps, but I find my own jokes too amusing sometimes. I CHALLENGE you to stop the jokes!
|
|
|
|
krawallmining
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
August 25, 2014, 06:52:27 PM |
|
It is something we are working on. Most of it is people downloading the entire blockchain (using poorly behaved code). We encourage people to use the static web downloads but we can't force that.
If the bandwidth usage is too much for you to handle, as a work around you can block incoming connections, but we don't encourage this generally because it will make the network unstable if too many people do it.
Thanks for response. What about limiting TX speed with 3rd party program (e.g. cFosSpeed)?
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 25, 2014, 06:56:14 PM |
|
It is something we are working on. Most of it is people downloading the entire blockchain (using poorly behaved code). We encourage people to use the static web downloads but we can't force that.
If the bandwidth usage is too much for you to handle, as a work around you can block incoming connections, but we don't encourage this generally because it will make the network unstable if too many people do it.
Thanks for response. What about limiting TX speed with 3rd party program (e.g. cFosSpeed)? Yes that should be fine. As long as you aren't solo mining you don't need high speed. Even then you don't need a lot of bandwidth, just low latency. Please report back how it works. Others may benefit from this as well!
|
|
|
|
krawallmining
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
August 25, 2014, 07:38:36 PM |
|
Yes that should be fine. As long as you aren't solo mining you don't need high speed. Even then you don't need a lot of bandwidth, just low latency.
Please report back how it works. Others may benefit from this as well!
Well, I received from Polo instantly, by having daemon tx speed limited to 30kb/s. Can someone please give me noob a template how to transfer to Polo with payment ID? Then I'll also test outgoing transfers.
|
|
|
|
saddambitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1004
|
|
August 25, 2014, 07:42:04 PM |
|
Yes that should be fine. As long as you aren't solo mining you don't need high speed. Even then you don't need a lot of bandwidth, just low latency.
Please report back how it works. Others may benefit from this as well!
Well, I received from Polo instantly, by having daemon tx speed limited to 30kb/s. Can someone please give me noob a template how to transfer to Polo with payment ID? Then I'll also test outgoing transfers. are you using simplewallet? transfer <mixin #> <poloniex address> <XMR amount> <payment ID> use a mixin factor > 1
|
|
|
|
krawallmining
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
August 25, 2014, 07:47:47 PM Last edit: August 25, 2014, 08:00:01 PM by krawallmining |
|
Thanks, the brackets of wallet help for paymentID confused me. I had to set mixing to 0, fees are kinda high and I'm just testing with micro amounts. Wallet reports success so far... Edit: Polo is confirming. Seems like daemon running without issues with limited tx speed. I just set it to 10kb/s and it still seems to be working normally, no problem with communication to wallet apparent.
|
|
|
|
netmonk
|
|
August 25, 2014, 08:07:18 PM |
|
Thanks, the brackets of wallet help for paymentID confused me. I had to set mixing to 0, fees are kinda high and I'm just testing with micro amounts. Wallet reports success so far... Edit: Polo is confirming. Seems like daemon running without issues with limited tx speed. I just set it to 10kb/s and it still seems to be working normally, no problem with communication to wallet apparent. Whoa wonderfull ! you just achieved what a lot of other did !
|
|
|
|
krawallmining
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
August 25, 2014, 08:18:39 PM |
|
Not a big deal, ofc. Blame smooth.
|
|
|
|
netmonk
|
|
August 25, 2014, 09:26:04 PM |
|
if needed i opened to public a bitmonerod instance reachable on host: xmr1.coolmining.club and port 5012. So you can open your wallet like this without the need to run a local bitmonerod instance : on linux : rlwrap ./simplewallet --wallet-file /path/to/wallet/wallet.bin --password '******' --daemon-address xmr1.coolmining.club:5012 on windows should be the same except rlwrap doesnt exist by default on windows. So no more fastidious downloading of the blockchain for people with little connection, they just need to be able to run simplewallet. This service is as is, don't complain about security ! and the blockchain file is in ramfs, so you can always try to save_bc
|
|
|
|
|
sgi02
|
|
August 26, 2014, 12:23:54 AM |
|
I've updated to the latest bitmonerod and simplewallet and now when I try to exit the bitmonerod (with the exit command) it just hangs and I have to manually close the window causing me to have to resync every time I reopen. I deleted the poolstate and p2p files, and the issue still persists. I'm running Windows 64-Bit, any workarounds for this? Thanks!
Can you use the save command? If so use that before force exiting. Just wanted to say thanks, this worked for me. Appreciate the help!
|
|
|
|
Lloydimiller4
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
Monero
|
|
August 26, 2014, 12:34:46 AM |
|
With making offline wallets, is it fine if I continue to use older binaries? My current offline computer is 32-bit, (upgrading in a few weeks) and I wanted to make sure that generating my .bin.keys is -always- fine to do on older binaries. My offline computer is still using binaries dating pre-mnemonic passphrase let me know PS: Dev Donation coming soon Keep up the good work!
|
XMR: 43uAvbYL7z9NrKQig2DswM69XaeDug1Rf8v4Un1ndssb2To51Vojz2uZ21jFumWsCcgvqZ9hPuE3fEr xKoGCkHU8CzqHFiS
|
|
|
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
|
|
August 26, 2014, 01:23:28 AM |
|
Come over to XC coin, we've got a great community with lots of exciting developments in the works!
How does the XC anonymity feature trump the one of XMR? I think I can safely say that XC holds a lot of "promise". I'm just a bit concerned that this is a brand of margarine. Good analogy! XMR is the sweet, creamy butter of anon, made by happy organic cows. XC is Promise margarine, a brand of fake butter. And Cloak is Country Crock, full of nasty hydrogenated stuff. Like all cheap imitations, they're best avoided. Speaking of marketing, who else thinks looking into this might be a good idea (to reach the normal people who find this forum gives them hives)? http://www.deepdotweb.com/advertise-on-deepdotweb/It's probably much less expensive than a Monero booth at TC Disrupt!
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
blaaaaacksuit
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Who cares?
|
|
August 26, 2014, 01:33:07 AM |
|
Come over to XC coin, we've got a great community with lots of exciting developments in the works!
How does the XC anonymity feature trump the one of XMR? I think I can safely say that XC holds a lot of "promise". I'm just a bit concerned that this is a brand of margarine. Good analogy! XMR is the sweet, creamy butter of anon, made by happy organic cows. XC is Promise margarine, a brand of fake butter. And Cloak is Country Crock, full of nasty hydrogenated stuff. Like all cheap imitations, they're best avoided. Speaking of marketing, who else thinks looking into this might be a good idea (to reach the normal people who find this forum gives them hives)? http://www.deepdotweb.com/advertise-on-deepdotweb/It's probably much less expensive than a Monero booth at TC Disrupt! What about BTCD?
|
|
|
|
|