[ANN] [SFR] SaffronCoin | Latest Version - 1.4.2/2.6.2 | Mandatory Wallet Update

[Golftech]

Hi everyone !
Have a nice day

well same to you mate hope to see more progress coming from here. just looking around to learn about this project

[ComputerGenie]

Ahhh i missed bitcointalk. Missed all the FUD and nonsensical posts.

It's not "fud" when it's fact.  

All coins are worthless when there's noting to do with them!

Absent some system to value a coin (and SaffronCoin is no exception), the value of that coin is nothing.

When there are no sites that accept SaffronCoin as payment, the main site for the coin is defunct, the wallet is broken, and there is nothing to do with the coin (beyond pointlessly mining more of them), then that coin becomes of negative value to the cryptocoin world.
It's fact to say that with no mechanism to set the value of a currency, then the value of mining that currency is nothing more than a power suck.

You let the coin die and you don't get to magically reappear, after it's dead, and say it's "fud" and/or "nonsense" when people say "It's dead, let it go!"

It's nothing to be ashamed of, Wampum is dead as a currency too!

[AngryDwarf]

Ahhh i missed bitcointalk. Missed all the FUD and nonsensical posts.

Woohoo, welcome to the internet and bitcointalk where to get a comment deleted by a moderator makes Lucifer look like a saint!

I've raised an issue about qmake not making a very Ubuntu friendly Makefile, and submitted a pull request for fixing compilation against libboost 1.58 which comes with Ubuntu 16.04. The libboost fix is applied against bitcoin:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6114/files

Unfortunately not familiar with qmake to suggest how to fix it, but would be happy to test any fixes you make on Ubuntu 16.04.

[ComputerGenie]

I've raised an issue about qmake not making a very Ubuntu friendly Makefile, and submitted a pull request for fixing compilation against libboost 1.58 which comes with Ubuntu 16.04. The libboost fix is applied against bitcoin:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6114/files

Unfortunately not familiar with qmake to suggest how to fix it, but would be happy to test any fixes you make on Ubuntu 16.04.

This isn't a qmake issue, this is an issue of updates (or the lack thereof).
The "short" answer is:
The usage of double declaration was deemed pointless by the programming community, and thus support for such things was dropped from subsequent versions of many things. When you couple that with the fact that 15 Linux distros have 15 different views on what is "stable" and 2 1/2 years of no dev support, you're bound to have issues.

*also of note: if you look carefully, you'll see that the pull request you linked to was moot when it was initially posted, as the Bitcoin devs had fixed the issue the week before (over a year and a half ago). Again, making such issues the dev's fault and not that of Ubuntu (or any other distro), QT, boost, or anything else.

[AngryDwarf]

@ComputerGenie

I agree with many of the points you have made.

Lets see if the developer can be bothered to even make a minor patch release.

Although with cryptsy goxed and the coin delisted on Bittrex, some of the 2.6.2 wallets will have broken functionality I imagine.

[@boutiuqe]

Dev you took all the money ?
why bother to come back here, every one knows you involved many scam )
No matter Indian or Chinese shit, you are all try to scammmmmmmmmmm,

[SwedishGirl]

Anybody managed to withdraw from Bittrex?

[AngryDwarf]

Anybody managed to withdraw from Bittrex?

Yes, although my second withdraw from Bittrex was marked as completed, didn't appear in the blockchain/mempool and took over 24 hours to turn up.

[ComputerGenie]

...didn't appear in the blockchain/mempool and took over 24 hours to turn up.

That tends to happen when the mining rate drops by ~40%

[AngryDwarf]

...didn't appear in the blockchain/mempool and took over 24 hours to turn up.

That tends to happen when the mining rate drops by ~40%

Nothing to do with the mining rate. If the transaction does not appear in the mempool when it is not in the blockchain its a network propagation issue.

[ComputerGenie]

Nothing to do with the mining rate. If the transaction does not appear in the mempool when it is not in the blockchain its a network propagation issue.

While that's essentially true, it ignores that many (if not most) nodes are run by miners. When you have 40% less mining rate* (the overall number of nodes run by/for miners), you have 40% less network infrastructure.





*not to be confused with hashrate

[jevels]

I retired from Bittrex but could not withdraw bitcoins so exchanged it doge and then I was able to withdraw.

I still question whether Saffroncoin still working (dead?), If so, where it can sell? Give a page?

Regards.

[AngryDwarf]

I still question whether Saffroncoin still working (dead?), If so, where it can sell? Give a page?

Regards.

Blockchain still moving along, but no idea if the dev is working on the coin still, or if it will get relisted anywhere.

[jevels]

I still question whether Saffroncoin still working (dead?), If so, where it can sell? Give a page?

Regards.

Blockchain still moving along, but no idea if the dev is working on the coin still, or if it will get relisted anywhere.

I understand and thank you.

[kid_brook]

will only support 3 from this IP's beyond end of December.


#addnode=23.229.124.34:19717
addnode=23.95.112.227:19717
addnode=23.95.112.218:19717
addnode=23.95.112.228:19717
addnode=198.46.156.221:19717
addnode=23.95.112.219:19717
#addnode=192.23.226.58:19717
addnode=172.245.56.167:19717
addnode=192.210.135.149:19717
#addnode=23.94.7.146:19717
addnode=23.94.215.191:19717
addnode=192.99.169.228:19717
 
I hate to let them go but it needs to be done, due to financial reason.
I am an old retiree, no job at all.

not even mining on those nodes. here's sample:

venet0:0  Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
          inet addr:23.95.112.227  P-t-P:23.95.112.227  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.255
          UP BROADCAST POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1

root@ns2:~# saffroncoind getinfo
{
    "version" : 1040200,
    "protocolversion" : 90002,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 672676,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 28,
    "proxy" : "",
    "pow_algo_id" : 0,
    "pow_algo" : "sha256d",
    "difficulty" : 94568.03241148,
    "difficulty_sha256d" : 94568.03241148,
    "difficulty_scrypt" : 1.76169355,
    "difficulty_groestl" : 10.09155019,
    "difficulty_x11" : 26.78763203,
    "difficulty_blake" : 103.09120739,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1417539032,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}

and this is me as a Linux User.

https://www.linuxcounter.net/cert/74337.png

[ComputerGenie]

..
I hate to let them go but it needs to be done
...

That's about the 1st logical thing you've posted on this topic. 

[worth]

Man, given what's going on in India with the currency right now, Saffroncoin would be pumping like mad if it was still on an exchange...

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37933233

[AngryDwarf]

Man, given what's going on in India with the currency right now, Saffroncoin would be pumping like mad if it was still on an exchange...

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37933233

dev doesn't appear to have done anything more than call on the community to pester bittrex to relist it.

[Wasda]

Man, given what's going on in India with the currency right now, Saffroncoin would be pumping like mad if it was still on an exchange...

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37933233

dev doesn't appear to have done anything more than call on the community to pester bittrex to relist it.

what a shame

[spartak_t]

Roshan is a douche and I regret that I have put my trust in him. Just leave this to die, no matter what he tries to explain in future. Forget about your loss and stop being hypocrites, thinking that there could be a "final push" to dump your bags on some noobs.