Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 04:19:33 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 [433] 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 ... 532 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Closed Thread  (Read 677630 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
TheRealSilk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 457
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 07:47:08 PM
 #8641

A simple question: something changed in the algorithm of forging?
Now ... has any influence - how small - the size of account?

There has not changed, to change the system POA we need time

▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ ▇
 
Instant Transactions
 
Non Bloating BlockChain
 

▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ ▇
    ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
1714191573
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714191573

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714191573
Reply with quote  #2

1714191573
Report to moderator
1714191573
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714191573

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714191573
Reply with quote  #2

1714191573
Report to moderator
1714191573
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714191573

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714191573
Reply with quote  #2

1714191573
Report to moderator
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714191573
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714191573

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714191573
Reply with quote  #2

1714191573
Report to moderator
GreenDude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 531
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 07:57:33 PM
 #8642

A simple question: something changed in the algorithm of forging?
Now ... has any influence - how small - the size of account?

There has not changed, to change the system POA we need time

I don't see any reason to change PoA algo.. maybe decrease the 500k Nodes requirement when price goes over 500 satoshis.. but that's it.
SavellM
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 305
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 10:47:36 PM
 #8643

A simple question: something changed in the algorithm of forging?
Now ... has any influence - how small - the size of account?

There has not changed, to change the system POA we need time

@TheRealSilk
In windows wallet will you manually provide payouts to those that have over 500k?

Lastly do we have to do a port forward for 19975/19776 to the machine with the windows wallet?
CoinsToDev
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 11:01:59 PM
 #8644

I give this coin my approval, this is a coin to watch out for in the near future.

Well done dev!
LemonAndFries
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 11:03:23 PM
 #8645

A simple question: something changed in the algorithm of forging?
Now ... has any influence - how small - the size of account?

There has not changed, to change the system POA we need time

@TheRealSilk
In windows wallet will you manually provide payouts to those that have over 500k?

Lastly do we have to do a port forward for 19975/19776 to the machine with the windows wallet?

Please note:

NODES for nodes Rewards (private giveaway)

For Linux VPS:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=590421.msg10248171#msg10248171

For Windows:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=590421.msg10418415#msg10418415
LemonAndFries
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 11:04:39 PM
 #8646

Is anyone having problems syncing the blocks on their VPS?

I'm running Ubuntu VPS, I used a copy of the blockchain but it only was up to block #9980 and now I'm waiting for it to finish syncing.
SavellM
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 305
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 11:30:58 PM
 #8647

A simple question: something changed in the algorithm of forging?
Now ... has any influence - how small - the size of account?

There has not changed, to change the system POA we need time

@TheRealSilk
In windows wallet will you manually provide payouts to those that have over 500k?

Lastly do we have to do a port forward for 19975/19776 to the machine with the windows wallet?

Please note:

NODES for nodes Rewards (private giveaway)

For Linux VPS:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=590421.msg10248171#msg10248171

For Windows:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=590421.msg10418415#msg10418415

Thanks, do I need to enter anywhere for it?
And do I need to port forward?

My windows wallet is online with 550k node and online 24/7
LemonAndFries
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 11:32:40 PM
 #8648


Thanks, do I need to enter anywhere for it?
And do I need to port forward?

My windows wallet is online with 550k node and online 24/7

As long as it is always running you should be ok.

One of the forum members wrote a script that keeps track of nodes online.
Djinou94
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 12:51:37 AM
 #8649

There is a Slack group or not?
BlackShibe1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 260
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 01:19:21 AM
 #8650

What is the big deal with Nodepay?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?

Lisk.
    Develop Decentralized Applications & Sidechains in JavaScript with Lisk!
    Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement!
GreenDude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 531
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 02:04:48 AM
 #8651

What is the big deal with Nodepay?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zDlGZn7sICIA8bUPhe6jPPzGOxA4YgTgi6J4XilFpgs/edit?pli=1
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 4867


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 04:23:27 AM
 #8652

What a disappointing mess in launching new client  Cry

What is the problem? The windows client, just take 2 clicks.

But 2 fast clicks in a row is exhausting..

cAN always change it to 1 click. Smiley

“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
DreamSpace
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 556
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 13, 2015, 08:09:43 AM
 #8653

my node shows since  a day in the node-client under "peers" only "check", what does it mean? (linux)
also i made a "lib" directory where i copied the .conf file, because the folder was not there.

lcharles123
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1697
Merit: 1074


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 10:53:10 AM
 #8654

Why my node is not as If the wallet was open, since I put the passphrase in clientConfig.js?
Thus this node is forging?


You have limited power here. -"Bitcoin on Governments"
sava0123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 11:12:46 AM
 #8655

Why my node is not as If the wallet was open, since I put the passphrase in clientConfig.js?
Thus this node is forging?



Go to your ip:19775, login there and close page without logging out.

clientConfig.js is not working in this version it been asked about many times.
sava0123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 11:16:36 AM
 #8656

How come 12718762868981431936 account forging so often? I see 44 peers at least 30 of them are active. And system can't pick up forger and choose dev's account?

And when will you include blockexplorer back to client? This is ridiculous.
TheRealSilk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 457
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 11:29:04 AM
 #8657

How come 12718762868981431936 account forging so often? I see 44 peers at least 30 of them are active. And system can't pick up forger and choose dev's account?

And when will you include blockexplorer back to client? This is ridiculous.

There are errors in forging POA. we now monitor these days turn on blockexplorer
We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA

▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ ▇
 
Instant Transactions
 
Non Bloating BlockChain
 

▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ ▇
    ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
starik69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 12:05:07 PM
 #8658

There are errors in forging POA. we now monitor these days turn on blockexplorer
We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA
First Crypti with their failed POT, now Node with failing POA...  Roll Eyes
Something wrong with the devs and their brilliant algorithms when they face real life Cry
TheRealSilk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 457
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 12:14:04 PM
Last edit: February 13, 2015, 12:30:39 PM by TheRealSilk
 #8659

There are errors in forging POA. we now monitor these days turn on blockexplorer
We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA
First Crypti with their failed POT, now Node with failing POA...  Roll Eyes
Something wrong with the devs and their brilliant algorithms when they face real life Cry

How many participants were there in the test ? 2.4.5 maximum of 8. When few participants POA works perfect, when we released our clients the day before yesterday, in the beginning no problems. The community does not help us in testing test no, but in a real network without problems

We are working on POA, we already know where the error occurs, the following releases POA will be improved

▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ ▇
 
Instant Transactions
 
Non Bloating BlockChain
 

▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ ▇
    ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
starik69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 13, 2015, 12:43:34 PM
 #8660

Crypti had the same scalability problems. Wink
This makes me think that both devs have no math/networking background and code their fantasies by trial and error method  Angry
Pages: « 1 ... 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 [433] 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 ... 532 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!