TheRealSilk
|
|
February 12, 2015, 07:47:08 PM |
|
A simple question: something changed in the algorithm of forging? Now ... has any influence - how small - the size of account?
There has not changed, to change the system POA we need time
|
|
|
|
GreenDude
|
|
February 12, 2015, 07:57:33 PM |
|
A simple question: something changed in the algorithm of forging? Now ... has any influence - how small - the size of account?
There has not changed, to change the system POA we need time I don't see any reason to change PoA algo.. maybe decrease the 500k Nodes requirement when price goes over 500 satoshis.. but that's it.
|
|
|
|
SavellM
|
|
February 12, 2015, 10:47:36 PM |
|
A simple question: something changed in the algorithm of forging? Now ... has any influence - how small - the size of account?
There has not changed, to change the system POA we need time @TheRealSilk In windows wallet will you manually provide payouts to those that have over 500k? Lastly do we have to do a port forward for 19975/19776 to the machine with the windows wallet?
|
|
|
|
CoinsToDev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
February 12, 2015, 11:01:59 PM |
|
I give this coin my approval, this is a coin to watch out for in the near future.
Well done dev!
|
|
|
|
|
LemonAndFries
|
|
February 12, 2015, 11:04:39 PM |
|
Is anyone having problems syncing the blocks on their VPS?
I'm running Ubuntu VPS, I used a copy of the blockchain but it only was up to block #9980 and now I'm waiting for it to finish syncing.
|
|
|
|
SavellM
|
|
February 12, 2015, 11:30:58 PM |
|
Thanks, do I need to enter anywhere for it? And do I need to port forward? My windows wallet is online with 550k node and online 24/7
|
|
|
|
LemonAndFries
|
|
February 12, 2015, 11:32:40 PM |
|
Thanks, do I need to enter anywhere for it? And do I need to port forward? My windows wallet is online with 550k node and online 24/7 As long as it is always running you should be ok. One of the forum members wrote a script that keeps track of nodes online.
|
|
|
|
Djinou94
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 13, 2015, 12:51:37 AM |
|
There is a Slack group or not?
|
|
|
|
BlackShibe1
|
|
February 13, 2015, 01:19:21 AM |
|
What is the big deal with Nodepay? We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
|
Lisk | . Develop Decentralized Applications & Sidechains in JavaScript with Lisk! Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement! |
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3990
Merit: 5430
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
February 13, 2015, 04:23:27 AM |
|
What a disappointing mess in launching new client What is the problem? The windows client, just take 2 clicks. But 2 fast clicks in a row is exhausting.. cAN always change it to 1 click.
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
DreamSpace
|
|
February 13, 2015, 08:09:43 AM |
|
my node shows since a day in the node-client under "peers" only "check", what does it mean? (linux) also i made a "lib" directory where i copied the .conf file, because the folder was not there.
|
|
|
|
lcharles123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1700
Merit: 1075
|
|
February 13, 2015, 10:53:10 AM |
|
Why my node is not as If the wallet was open, since I put the passphrase in clientConfig.js? Thus this node is forging?
|
You have no power here. -"Bitcoin on Governments"
|
|
|
sava0123
|
|
February 13, 2015, 11:12:46 AM |
|
Why my node is not as If the wallet was open, since I put the passphrase in clientConfig.js? Thus this node is forging? Go to your ip:19775, login there and close page without logging out. clientConfig.js is not working in this version it been asked about many times.
|
|
|
|
sava0123
|
|
February 13, 2015, 11:16:36 AM |
|
How come 12718762868981431936 account forging so often? I see 44 peers at least 30 of them are active. And system can't pick up forger and choose dev's account?
And when will you include blockexplorer back to client? This is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
TheRealSilk
|
|
February 13, 2015, 11:29:04 AM |
|
How come 12718762868981431936 account forging so often? I see 44 peers at least 30 of them are active. And system can't pick up forger and choose dev's account?
And when will you include blockexplorer back to client? This is ridiculous.
There are errors in forging POA. we now monitor these days turn on blockexplorer We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA
|
|
|
|
starik69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 13, 2015, 12:05:07 PM |
|
There are errors in forging POA. we now monitor these days turn on blockexplorer We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA
First Crypti with their failed POT, now Node with failing POA... Something wrong with the devs and their brilliant algorithms when they face real life
|
|
|
|
TheRealSilk
|
|
February 13, 2015, 12:14:04 PM Last edit: February 13, 2015, 12:30:39 PM by TheRealSilk |
|
There are errors in forging POA. we now monitor these days turn on blockexplorer We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA
First Crypti with their failed POT, now Node with failing POA... Something wrong with the devs and their brilliant algorithms when they face real life How many participants were there in the test ? 2.4.5 maximum of 8. When few participants POA works perfect, when we released our clients the day before yesterday, in the beginning no problems. The community does not help us in testing test no, but in a real network without problems We are working on POA, we already know where the error occurs, the following releases POA will be improved
|
|
|
|
starik69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 13, 2015, 12:43:34 PM |
|
Crypti had the same scalability problems. This makes me think that both devs have no math/networking background and code their fantasies by trial and error method
|
|
|
|
|