How are you not banned from posting, wast of time
Because the people who make such decisions recognize that my words are grains of universal truths, and despite my verbal dressing-downs they realize I am not nearly as much of a problem as the evil shitheads currently working overtime to sully the reputation of cryptocurrency, ala your fearless leaders who are so easily lacerated by the truth.
or you forget to take your med's.
but I am open to learning and understanding, perhaps you can send links of videos to watch or articles to read. As in, can you support any of the shit you say with real life data, and no the the voices in your head do not count.
Do you know that your dev Bryan Kelly is 100% pro-federal and state regulation of bitcoin and the entire cryptocurrency sphere?
http://www.c[Suspicious link removed]m/id/101849169
Don't you think this stance is the least bit ironic to bitcoin's core principles of decentralization and freedom from regulation?
If bitcoin is regulated, taxed and supervised, what advantages will it continue to offer over the dollar and traditional forms of fiat transfer?
Do you really support Brian Kelly's notion that bitcoin should be completely regulated by the government? If so, who do you think is more likely to end up writing that legislation, the banks and Wall Street or "the people." ?? Whose outcome do you think said regulation will more likely be a financial benefit to, yours, or Wall Streets?
Quote from: FlyingMongoose on July 28, 2014, 08:29:57 PM
Quote from: BTCrawl on July 28, 2014, 08:07:53 PM
I think it's a good idea to re-post this part of BKs last post to outweigh some of the misinformation:
"Regulation - Whether we like it or not regulation is coming. I am a free market capitalist at heart and therefore believe in as little regulation as possible...but I also understand that I must work within the constraints of reality. Therefore, I think it is better to be involved in regulation so that we can shape how it is formed."
Thanks BTCrawl, allow me to break it down and translate it;
"Whether we like it or not regulation is coming." - He is accepting the inevitable attempt at regulation by governing bodies.
"I am a free market capitalist at heart and therefore believe in as little regulation as possible...but I also understand that I must work within the constraints of reality." - Here he is pointing out he dislikes regulation as much as the next guy, and would have no interest on enforcing regulation, however, it is an inevitability, so he will have to accept it when it comes.
"Therefore, I think it is better to be involved in regulation so that we can shape how it is formed." - Allow the crypto community to write the policies on that regulation, instead of the governing bodies.
I hope my translations make sense to people, because it's really not possible to get any clearer than that, though I can dumb it it down; "Crypto good, regulation bad, but will happen anyway, might as well work with it."
Exactly!
So in summary please troll away somewhere else