Bitcoin Forum
May 21, 2024, 06:37:39 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 100 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GOP - Rand Paul's Presidential Highlight Reel w/ his Libertarian Twist  (Read 205766 times)
bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3668
Merit: 1217


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 10:23:54 AM
 #101

lol... another one from Rand Paul.

Rand Paul: Let's trade 5 Democrats, not 5 Taliban

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/06/06/rand-paul-lets-trade-5-democrats-not-5-taliban/
tins
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 04:06:59 PM
 #102


considering what they've done to the palestinians, i'm thinking "national security" is just a euphemism for "fucking over the poor people." it's like how we enter other countries, depose their government, and call it "the defense industry."

www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJCrWmtpNrM

The suggestion that anything Israel does is A-OK because other Middle Eastern countries do shitty things is weak sauce.  Especially because we give more money to Israel than probably all those countries combined.

It pisses me off to no end that an American citizen was executed in cold blood by Israeli commandos on the deck of the Mari Marvera and not a single one of our politicians had the guts to say jack shit about it.  In international waters carrying only humanitarian aid and with only unarmed civilians aboard.

The thing that blows my mind is the strategy of starving the people of Gaza for protein through import restrictions.  Then destroying the sewage treatment plant so raw sewage is dumped into the ocean.  The forcing the fishermen to stay within the contaminated zone for their catch.  The Palestinians who survive are going to be some strong and tough people through the process of survival of the fittest.  There is a special place in hell for those who thought up and implemented such a strategy, and Himmler will have to scoot over to make some more room.

The whole world knows what Israel under it's stream of right-wing leaderships are up to and what Zionism is all about.  Fewer in the U.S. due to the extra level of propaganda effort among other factors, but plenty even here know the score.

We (the U.S.A) give more money to Israel because they are our staunchest ally in the Mid-East. We participate in war games, elite tactical training, and counter-terrorism techniques. The U.S. is the only country in which Israel shares their covert information. I would be in complete favor of cutting off all foreign aid, including that to Israel. No reason to continue going deeper into debt when our country is broke. But, to not understand why Israel receives the majority of our aid in that region is ludicrous.
This American citizen that was "executed" was participating in an act of war against Israel and Israel (any country for that matter) has every right to protect itself. You can find the full clips on Youtube (you know, the non edited ones) showing the terrorists on the flotilla attacking the Israeli soldiers that were only protecting their waters, as any country has the right to do. Also, a few years back, there was another American citizen that jumped in front of a bulldozer as it was demolishing a terrorist's home in Gaza. That American citizen died as well. It's insane to blame Israel, you can't jump in front of a 30,000 pound vehicle and expect to walk away unscathed. What person in their right mind does these things?

It amazes me how up in arms people become over Israel wanting to be secure. I believe every country deserves the right to protect itself. The only reason Israel receives the criticism and hatred that it does is because it is the only free country in the Middle East. They allow freedom of press. Freedom of organized rallies. Yes, once religion is involved, those become more inflamed than anything we see in the United States. In addition, it seems to have become a political issue in the United States. Liberals hate Israel, Conservatives love Israel. As political rhetoric in the U.S. steps up, so do views towards their agendas. Obviously, it has less to do with the foreign entity, more with the division happening in the United States. Only focusing on the shortcoming of this one democracy in a region filled with apartheid states and brutal regimes seems less to do with Israel itself and more of political posturing (or something more deep seeded).
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
June 09, 2014, 05:33:14 PM
 #103

Where is Ben Carson?
Carson has shown no interest in running for President other than speaking at a few functions which is meaningless since everybody does it. There is, however, some campaign to raise funds to get him to run as some see him as the only person that can take on Hillary. Roll Eyes It annoys the hell out of me when some conservatives think they have to use race to push an agenda. Plus, this money that is being raised stays w/ the organizers. They know they have a gold mine when they can push some non-white, non-politician that no one is beating up on as the next savior of the GOP and make a killing off of it from well-meaning but gullible conservatives. Not saying he wouldn't make a good VP but I want someone I trust at the top of the ticket and that is Rand. Rand is too clever for Hillary or whomever.
vokain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
June 09, 2014, 06:34:42 PM
 #104

"And it all starts to make sense..."





"...It's difficult to say exactly what to do
But the change begins with me and I reflect it back to you
And you and you and you, use your ability to choose"
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 06:40:50 PM
 #105


considering what they've done to the palestinians, i'm thinking "national security" is just a euphemism for "fucking over the poor people." it's like how we enter other countries, depose their government, and call it "the defense industry."

www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJCrWmtpNrM

The suggestion that anything Israel does is A-OK because other Middle Eastern countries do shitty things is weak sauce.  Especially because we give more money to Israel than probably all those countries combined.

It pisses me off to no end that an American citizen was executed in cold blood by Israeli commandos on the deck of the Mari Marvera and not a single one of our politicians had the guts to say jack shit about it.  In international waters carrying only humanitarian aid and with only unarmed civilians aboard.

The thing that blows my mind is the strategy of starving the people of Gaza for protein through import restrictions.  Then destroying the sewage treatment plant so raw sewage is dumped into the ocean.  The forcing the fishermen to stay within the contaminated zone for their catch.  The Palestinians who survive are going to be some strong and tough people through the process of survival of the fittest.  There is a special place in hell for those who thought up and implemented such a strategy, and Himmler will have to scoot over to make some more room.

The whole world knows what Israel under it's stream of right-wing leaderships are up to and what Zionism is all about.  Fewer in the U.S. due to the extra level of propaganda effort among other factors, but plenty even here know the score.

We (the U.S.A) give more money to Israel because they are our staunchest ally in the Mid-East. We participate in war games, elite tactical training, and counter-terrorism techniques. The U.S. is the only country in which Israel shares their covert information. I would be in complete favor of cutting off all foreign aid, including that to Israel. No reason to continue going deeper into debt when our country is broke. But, to not understand why Israel receives the majority of our aid in that region is ludicrous.
This American citizen that was "executed" was participating in an act of war against Israel and Israel (any country for that matter) has every right to protect itself. You can find the full clips on Youtube (you know, the non edited ones) showing the terrorists on the flotilla attacking the Israeli soldiers that were only protecting their waters, as any country has the right to do. Also, a few years back, there was another American citizen that jumped in front of a bulldozer as it was demolishing a terrorist's home in Gaza. That American citizen died as well. It's insane to blame Israel, you can't jump in front of a 30,000 pound vehicle and expect to walk away unscathed. What person in their right mind does these things?

It amazes me how up in arms people become over Israel wanting to be secure. I believe every country deserves the right to protect itself. The only reason Israel receives the criticism and hatred that it does is because it is the only free country in the Middle East. They allow freedom of press. Freedom of organized rallies. Yes, once religion is involved, those become more inflamed than anything we see in the United States. In addition, it seems to have become a political issue in the United States. Liberals hate Israel, Conservatives love Israel. As political rhetoric in the U.S. steps up, so do views towards their agendas. Obviously, it has less to do with the foreign entity, more with the division happening in the United States. Only focusing on the shortcoming of this one democracy in a region filled with apartheid states and brutal regimes seems less to do with Israel itself and more of political posturing (or something more deep seeded).

i'm sure it's a complicated story, but i'm sure israel is no innocent party here. they control all the utilities, which include electricity, water, internet, etc.. and they just use it to the advantage to fuck over the palestinians. and then the worse thing they do is.. they call that "protecting our right for security." american politicians do a lot more "business" with them, so if anyone speaks up against israel, they will be labelled an anti-semite.
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 06:58:45 PM
 #106

Hillary and Bill had several scandals prior to becoming Pres (i.e Whitewater being the most famous); If she wins I'm smashing the TV and radio so I don't have to hear her for 4 or 8 years. Just say NO to Hillary!

The ethnic vote will propel her to victory. She is sure to receive ~96% of the black vote, in addition to ~80% of the Latino and ~75% of the Asian vote. Even if she manages to win only 30% of the white vote, she will win.

Nooooooooo!
Smashing the TV will be fun, but I still like my radio.

You "forgot" to mention the votes from woman:
I think it is still possible for a Republican to win the Big office (like W did twice), despite the minority votes for Dems. Adding in a number of "conservative" women who switch to vote for Hillary (to have the 1st woman Pres) could be really hard to overcome.

Rands best shot is if he is running against an evil individual whose crimes are easy to expose...
Oh wait...this might work out really well.  Smiley

Marlo Stanfield
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 280



View Profile
June 09, 2014, 07:01:31 PM
 #107

It would be hilarious if the GOP nominated Rand Paul. Oh my god the entertainment factor would be through the roof!

Stay crazy Republicans.
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 07:07:26 PM
 #108


i'm sure it's a complicated story, but i'm sure israel is no innocent party here. they control all the utilities, which include electricity, water, internet, etc.. and they just use it to the advantage to fuck over the palestinians. and then the worse thing they do is.. they call that "protecting our right for security." american politicians do a lot more "business" with them, so if anyone speaks up against israel, they will be labelled an anti-semite.

I'm comfortable with my understandings of the terms 'Israeli', 'Likud', 'Zionism', 'Jew', etc.  I know why I hold the various opinions I do about the affairs in and around Israel, and more importantly to me as an American, why I feel as I do about our entanglements in that sphere of influence.

This level of comfort leads me not give two shits if someone calls me an 'anit-semite'.  In the same way it doesn't bother me at all when someone calls me a 'communist'.  The two terms have been equally abused and are equally ending up in the pathetic joke category that reflect much more on the person making the assertion than he who against whom the assertion is made.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 07:22:06 PM
 #109


i'm sure it's a complicated story, but i'm sure israel is no innocent party here. they control all the utilities, which include electricity, water, internet, etc.. and they just use it to the advantage to fuck over the palestinians. and then the worse thing they do is.. they call that "protecting our right for security." american politicians do a lot more "business" with them, so if anyone speaks up against israel, they will be labelled an anti-semite.

I'm comfortable with my understandings of the terms 'Israeli', 'Likud', 'Zionism', 'Jew', etc.  I know why I hold the various opinions I do about the affairs in and around Israel, and more importantly to me as an American, why I feel as I do about our entanglements in that sphere of influence.

This level of comfort leads me not give two shits if someone calls me an 'anit-semite'.  In the same way it doesn't bother me at all when someone calls me a 'communist'.  The two terms have been equally abused and are equally ending up in the pathetic joke category that reflect much more on the person making the assertion than he who against whom the assertion is made.



yeah, the problem is that people are quick (even people here) to point at you if you don't follow along their ideologies.. that's extremism to me. i don't like it.
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 07:24:05 PM
 #110

It would be hilarious if the GOP nominated Rand Paul. Oh my god the entertainment factor would be through the roof!

Stay crazy Republicans.

The USA Constitution (which can be amended) is the law of the land and should be followed, not ignored.
What is so "hilarious" about finally having a major candidate who speaks those words?

TheButterZone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1031


RIP Mommy


View Profile WWW
June 09, 2014, 07:48:45 PM
 #111

It's hilarious to think that the least possible evil will ever have his winning amount of votes counted and not simply shredded.

Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 07:59:22 PM
 #112

It would be hilarious if the GOP nominated Rand Paul. Oh my god the entertainment factor would be through the roof!

Stay crazy Republicans.

The USA Constitution (which can be amended) is the law of the land and should be followed, not ignored.
What is so "hilarious" about finally having a major candidate who speaks those words?

probably because rand sees an opportunity for appeal to sanity.. because, you know, his party is so batshit crazy. he's the next chris christie - say what people actually want to hear, but do otherwise.
Ron~Popeil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 09, 2014, 08:32:21 PM
 #113

It would be hilarious if the GOP nominated Rand Paul. Oh my god the entertainment factor would be through the roof!

Stay crazy Republicans.

Another true believer. Enjoy the yes we can rallies and broken promises. 

beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 08:35:42 PM
 #114

It would be hilarious if the GOP nominated Rand Paul. Oh my god the entertainment factor would be through the roof!

Stay crazy Republicans.

Another true believer. Enjoy the yes we can rallies and broken promises.  

see, i hate this bullshit. just because someone thinks the GOP is crazy does not mean you are an obama nuthugger. the GOP says way more crazy shit than the democrats, but that doesn't mean i am one. it could be reciprocated that you are a conservative/republican.
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 10:06:53 PM
 #115

It would be hilarious if the GOP nominated Rand Paul. Oh my god the entertainment factor would be through the roof!

Stay crazy Republicans.

Another true believer. Enjoy the yes we can rallies and broken promises.  

see, i hate this bullshit. just because someone thinks the GOP is crazy does not mean you are an obama nuthugger. the GOP says way more crazy shit than the democrats, but that doesn't mean i am one. it could be reciprocated that you are a conservative/republican.

Absolutely true.  A sober analysis leads one to conclude that the Obama administration has exceeded the achievements of the Cheney admin in damaging the fabric of our nation and it has accelerated our march toward fascism.  It could be argued that they achieved this by being handed a running start, but at the end of the day it was indeed how they played their hand.  It is a perfectly fair argument that Cheney was handed a running start in a lot of ways from B. Clinton, and that is particularly true of the very important financial sector influence.  Both administrations were prototypical Democrat and Republican respectively (which at this point is the same as saying that neither admin mapped to either Liberal/Progressive or Conservative/Reactionary.)

I generally prefer the social policies of the Democrats so the 'lesser of two evils' argument does hold some water, but only a fairly small amount.  Rand Paul being flown to Israel for his duties by the bankroll of the Christian Right is hardly what I would consider a promising endorsement.  Even if he talked smack about them, a more appropriate response would have been to throw his plane ticket into the round file if he really feels as he claims to feel about supporting the Israeli's projects with my tax dollars.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
Swordsoffreedom
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1115


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
June 09, 2014, 10:13:22 PM
 #116

"And it all starts to make sense..."





"...It's difficult to say exactly what to do
But the change begins with me and I reflect it back to you
And you and you and you, use your ability to choose"

I agree pipeline security is a giant factor in Middle East Politics
The Pipeline from Iran to the Gulf Strait was considered seriously important a few years back before the wars
Good old Yergin revealed this clearly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioazMpe1SHE

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 10:15:53 PM
 #117

It would be hilarious if the GOP nominated Rand Paul. Oh my god the entertainment factor would be through the roof!

Stay crazy Republicans.

Another true believer. Enjoy the yes we can rallies and broken promises.  

see, i hate this bullshit. just because someone thinks the GOP is crazy does not mean you are an obama nuthugger. the GOP says way more crazy shit than the democrats, but that doesn't mean i am one. it could be reciprocated that you are a conservative/republican.

Absolutely true.  A sober analysis leads one to conclude that the Obama administration has exceeded the achievements of the Cheney admin in damaging the fabric of our nation and it has accelerated our march toward fascism.  It could be argued that they achieved this by being handed a running start, but at the end of the day it was indeed how they played their hand.  It is a perfectly fair argument that Cheney was handed a running start in a lot of ways from B. Clinton, and that is particularly true of the very important financial sector influence.  Both administrations were prototypical Democrat and Republican respectively (which at this point is the same as saying that neither admin mapped to either Liberal/Progressive or Conservative/Reactionary.)

I generally prefer the social policies of the Democrats so the 'lesser of two evils' argument does hold some water, but only a fairly small amount.  Rand Paul being flown to Israel for his duties by the bankroll of the Christian Right is hardly what I would consider a promising endorsement.  Even if he talked smack about them, a more appropriate response would have been to throw his plane ticket into the round file if he really feels as he claims to feel about supporting the Israeli's projects with my tax dollars.



i feel the same about obama.. it seems he wants government to have near unlimited power. but that doesn't make republicans our champions.. they say way more crazy shit, and i'm sure they'd do similar shit if they held office.
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 10:45:47 PM
 #118


i feel the same about obama.. it seems he wants government to have near unlimited power. but that doesn't make republicans our champions.. they say way more crazy shit, and i'm sure they'd do similar shit if they held office.

Cheney and Obama are very much in agreement about the desirability of very high degrees of power being bestowed to the executive branch.  Near absolute in areas where it actually matters much.

The big difference is that Cheney was totally up-front about where he stood on the issue.  Obama is the opposite.  He spouted reasonably eloquent nonsense about the dangers of such a thing and promises that his administration would fight against it.  When the rubber met the road he did the exact opposite of what he claimed to be for and was even worse than Cheney in a lot of respects.

Cheney is as close to pure evil as anyone of significance than I can think of in recent times (in terms of political leadership) but I have an odd respect for the guy's honesty.  Obama is nothing more then a sorry lying sack of shit in my book.  For a few year I thought he was just a pussy but by this time I believe he knows exactly what he's doing and he's doing what he believes in.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 10:54:17 PM
 #119


i feel the same about obama.. it seems he wants government to have near unlimited power. but that doesn't make republicans our champions.. they say way more crazy shit, and i'm sure they'd do similar shit if they held office.

Cheney and Obama are very much in agreement about the desirability of very high degrees of power being bestowed to the executive branch.  Near absolute in areas where it actually matters much.

The big difference is that Cheney was totally up-front about where he stood on the issue.  Obama is the opposite.  He spouted reasonably eloquent nonsense about the dangers of such a thing and promises that his administration would fight against it.  When the rubber met the road he did the exact opposite of what he claimed to be for and was even worse than Cheney in a lot of respects.

Cheney is as close to pure evil as anyone of significance than I can think of in recent times (in terms of political leadership) but I have an odd respect for the guy's honesty.  Obama is nothing more then a sorry lying sack of shit in my book.  For a few year I thought he was just a pussy but by this time I believe he knows exactly what he's doing and he's doing what he believes in.



yeah i thought he was a pussy too, but i can't really defend the guy anymore. he's done the opposite of what he promised - transparency. made he had to concede a lot of shit when he got the obama care to pass. roberts was the tiebreaker in the supreme court too. it is extremely unusual that a a republican supreme court justice would vote with the democrats, especially when ti's 5 republicans and 4 democrats. he must have been offered something really savory.
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276


View Profile
June 09, 2014, 11:16:43 PM
 #120


yeah i thought he was a pussy too, but i can't really defend the guy anymore. he's done the opposite of what he promised - transparency. made he had to concede a lot of shit when he got the obama care to pass. roberts was the tiebreaker in the supreme court too. it is extremely unusual that a a republican supreme court justice would vote with the democrats, especially when ti's 5 republicans and 4 democrats. he must have been offered something really savory.

No great mystery to me.  Roberts is first and foremost a corporatist.  'Obamacare' is a total gift to the health care industry.  It did zilch to bring costs down for people who actually pay for service.  The industry may have taken a small hit by treating more people, but the tradeoff is to keep the same old game and huge profits going for another decade or two before complete implosion.

When Obama couldn't even get the public option (much less single payer) going and gave it away without a fight I knew he was a huckster (fairly clear already by that time.)

Most corprotists (e.g., most Dems and Repubs) know what's going on so the 'Obamacare' sham is not and never was in any danger.  Of course the Repubs are going to milk the false issue for political advantage, but they'd be rushing to the Obamacare's defense if a real solution seemed like it might get traction.  Same deal with Abortion.  It's the gift that keeps on giving for the reactionaries.  No way they would let that well producing cow die by actually letting Roe V. Wade or whatever be reversed.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 100 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!