Bitcoin Forum
October 31, 2024, 09:43:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 [143] 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 ... 212 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [OLD][CSC]CasinoCoin ♠ A Digital Currency For The Regulated Online Gaming Sector  (Read 343075 times)
casinocoin (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 849
Merit: 1050


CasinoCoin


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2016, 07:41:34 PM
 #2841

BTW: now it is necessary to make changes in the wallet API, right? To show the prices in Alcurex.com instead of Alcurex.org ....

Andre will change it soon, it may take a day or so to fully change everything in the CSC-API since their API may have changed, if not it should be simple.
GoldSeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 10, 2016, 11:03:24 PM
 #2842

BTW: now it is necessary to make changes in the wallet API, right? To show the prices in Alcurex.com instead of Alcurex.org ....

Andre will change it soon, it may take a day or so to fully change everything in the CSC-API since their API may have changed, if not it should be simple.

we're testing a wallet build now. 

Moving to Puerto Rico...
casinocoin (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 849
Merit: 1050


CasinoCoin


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2016, 11:04:29 PM
 #2843

BTW: now it is necessary to make changes in the wallet API, right? To show the prices in Alcurex.com instead of Alcurex.org ....

Andre will change it soon, it may take a day or so to fully change everything in the CSC-API since their API may have changed, if not it should be simple.

we're testing a wallet build now. 
Yes I've got it as well, you should really join the slack!
ugabuga
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 316
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2016, 11:07:45 PM
 #2844

BTW: now it is necessary to make changes in the wallet API, right? To show the prices in Alcurex.com instead of Alcurex.org ....

Andre will change it soon, it may take a day or so to fully change everything in the CSC-API since their API may have changed, if not it should be simple.

Thanks. Good work as always.

       ▀
   ▄▄▄   ▄▀
   ███ ▄▄▄▄  ██
       ████
    ▄  ▀▀▀▀
▄▄
      ██    ▀▀
██▄█▄▄▄████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀███▀▀▀
██████████████████
████▄▀▄▀▄▀███▀▀▀▀▀
████▄▀▄▀▄▀███ ▀
████▄▀▄▀▄▀████████
▀█████████████████
]
CoinPayments
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
ugabuga
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 316
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2016, 11:07:59 PM
 #2845

Well, I think you guys should take a stand about future changes.

If you are going to reduce from 10 to 1, make it public.

Also it was good to know when the new wallet will be launched, but it must be on simultaneously with the changes, right?

Where launch ideas, prices go up .... then everything is suspended in time, and prices fall .... so can not be!

       ▀
   ▄▄▄   ▄▀
   ███ ▄▄▄▄  ██
       ████
    ▄  ▀▀▀▀
▄▄
      ██    ▀▀
██▄█▄▄▄████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀███▀▀▀
██████████████████
████▄▀▄▀▄▀███▀▀▀▀▀
████▄▀▄▀▄▀███ ▀
████▄▀▄▀▄▀████████
▀█████████████████
]
CoinPayments
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
dukester99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 440
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 11, 2016, 10:36:01 PM
 #2846

Well, I think you guys should take a stand about future changes.

If you are going to reduce from 10 to 1, make it public.

Also it was good to know when the new wallet will be launched, but it must be on simultaneously with the changes, right?

Where launch ideas, prices go up .... then everything is suspended in time, and prices fall .... so can not be!

Let's at lease put it up for a vote. 10 to 1 seems drastic
GoldSeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 12, 2016, 01:58:39 AM
 #2847

Well, I think you guys should take a stand about future changes.

If you are going to reduce from 10 to 1, make it public.

Also it was good to know when the new wallet will be launched, but it must be on simultaneously with the changes, right?

Where launch ideas, prices go up .... then everything is suspended in time, and prices fall .... so can not be!

Let's at lease put it up for a vote. 10 to 1 seems drastic

From the discussion last week, the majority of community members seem behind it.

Moving to Puerto Rico...
CartmanSPC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 12, 2016, 08:24:23 AM
 #2848

Will be interesting to see what happens to the hashrate if/when the reward gets reduced.

Currently it hovers around 2-4 Gh/s. If that is reduced by 1/10 it may be in the 200-400 Mh/s range. With about 3 BTC of buy support (as of now) it is probably too little for anyone to bother attacking but the potential is there. If there was a significant amount of buy support I would definitely be worried. It would be way too tempting for someone to pass up by doing a double spend attack.

I think people are asking about the reduction because it really hasn't been made clear if a decision has been made. From this thread it appears as it is still being considered/discussed but from the GitHub commits it seems as the people in control of the source intend to go forward with it.

It should also be taken into consideration the this coin does not having much use or function at the moment so people invested in it may not be following developments closely. I know how frustrating that situation can be for developers, etc but it is reality. I applaud the devs for their commitment and wish them the best of luck with this decision.

One nice thing about BTC is that I can invest in it and be assured that the specs of the coin will never change. I suppose that is one reason why so many BTC purists consider Alts worthless.


GoldSeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 12, 2016, 10:29:29 PM
 #2849

casinocoin, there seems to be a broken image in the OP. Can you check it?

Moving to Puerto Rico...
ugabuga
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 316
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 13, 2016, 04:15:46 PM
 #2850

Will be interesting to see what happens to the hashrate if/when the reward gets reduced.

Currently it hovers around 2-4 Gh/s. If that is reduced by 1/10 it may be in the 200-400 Mh/s range. With about 3 BTC of buy support (as of now) it is probably too little for anyone to bother attacking but the potential is there. If there was a significant amount of buy support I would definitely be worried. It would be way too tempting for someone to pass up by doing a double spend attack.

I think people are asking about the reduction because it really hasn't been made clear if a decision has been made. From this thread it appears as it is still being considered/discussed but from the GitHub commits it seems as the people in control of the source intend to go forward with it.

It should also be taken into consideration the this coin does not having much use or function at the moment so people invested in it may not be following developments closely. I know how frustrating that situation can be for developers, etc but it is reality. I applaud the devs for their commitment and wish them the best of luck with this decision.

One nice thing about BTC is that I can invest in it and be assured that the specs of the coin will never change. I suppose that is one reason why so many BTC purists consider Alts worthless.




I also think it's very bold ...

Maybe developers have more information than the information available to the public.

Personally I think it was "safer" reduce the reward gradually (even if it was in one CSC / month). So we would enter in July, and if the roadmap Prypto is correct this time, would see a lot of network to give security.

By reducing to 1 at once, and taking for example mining this point, and assuming that the CSC will reach $ 1USD that day will have about, 20Ghash mining.

These values are easily rented, so you do fork ... and then I think we have problems ...

But in about 22 ~ 27 days, when we get to the small block whichis 10 to 1, we find out what happens ...

       ▀
   ▄▄▄   ▄▀
   ███ ▄▄▄▄  ██
       ████
    ▄  ▀▀▀▀
▄▄
      ██    ▀▀
██▄█▄▄▄████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀███▀▀▀
██████████████████
████▄▀▄▀▄▀███▀▀▀▀▀
████▄▀▄▀▄▀███ ▀
████▄▀▄▀▄▀████████
▀█████████████████
]
CoinPayments
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
Camus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 13, 2016, 04:24:49 PM
 #2851

Need more positive information about csc, then just praying for the next great coin
ugabuga
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 316
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 13, 2016, 04:43:49 PM
Last edit: June 13, 2016, 07:23:03 PM by ugabuga
 #2852

By the way, I miss the comment of a specific user, about the halving of CSC 10 to 1 and network security ...

I miss the comment of GammingCoins, about all of this ... After the project of him (or Prypto) are currently the major CSC booster, right?

       ▀
   ▄▄▄   ▄▀
   ███ ▄▄▄▄  ██
       ████
    ▄  ▀▀▀▀
▄▄
      ██    ▀▀
██▄█▄▄▄████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀███▀▀▀
██████████████████
████▄▀▄▀▄▀███▀▀▀▀▀
████▄▀▄▀▄▀███ ▀
████▄▀▄▀▄▀████████
▀█████████████████
]
CoinPayments
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
GoldSeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 13, 2016, 10:34:57 PM
 #2853

There are several things going on right now. I wouldn't expect a flow of news designed to bolster the price. You'll all find out about things as the are rolled out.

Moving to Puerto Rico...
GoldSeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 13, 2016, 10:37:58 PM
 #2854

Will be interesting to see what happens to the hashrate if/when the reward gets reduced.

Currently it hovers around 2-4 Gh/s. If that is reduced by 1/10 it may be in the 200-400 Mh/s range. With about 3 BTC of buy support (as of now) it is probably too little for anyone to bother attacking but the potential is there. If there was a significant amount of buy support I would definitely be worried. It would be way too tempting for someone to pass up by doing a double spend attack.

I think people are asking about the reduction because it really hasn't been made clear if a decision has been made. From this thread it appears as it is still being considered/discussed but from the GitHub commits it seems as the people in control of the source intend to go forward with it.

It should also be taken into consideration the this coin does not having much use or function at the moment so people invested in it may not be following developments closely. I know how frustrating that situation can be for developers, etc but it is reality. I applaud the devs for their commitment and wish them the best of luck with this decision.

One nice thing about BTC is that I can invest in it and be assured that the specs of the coin will never change. I suppose that is one reason why so many BTC purists consider Alts worthless.




I also think it's very bold ...

Maybe developers have more information than the information available to the public.

Personally I think it was "safer" reduce the reward gradually (even if it was in one CSC / month). So we would enter in July, and if the roadmap Prypto is correct this time, would see a lot of network to give security.

By reducing to 1 at once, and taking for example mining this point, and assuming that the CSC will reach $ 1USD that day will have about, 20Ghash mining.

These values are easily rented, so you do fork ... and then I think we have problems ...

But in about 22 ~ 27 days, when we get to the small block whichis 10 to 1, we find out what happens ...

Hash rate will decrease sharply, but the coin should function normally. it's time to clip the wings from the auto-selling crowd.

Moving to Puerto Rico...
casinocoin (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 849
Merit: 1050


CasinoCoin


View Profile WWW
June 14, 2016, 12:35:41 AM
 #2855

Will be interesting to see what happens to the hashrate if/when the reward gets reduced.

Currently it hovers around 2-4 Gh/s. If that is reduced by 1/10 it may be in the 200-400 Mh/s range. With about 3 BTC of buy support (as of now) it is probably too little for anyone to bother attacking but the potential is there. If there was a significant amount of buy support I would definitely be worried. It would be way too tempting for someone to pass up by doing a double spend attack.

I think people are asking about the reduction because it really hasn't been made clear if a decision has been made. From this thread it appears as it is still being considered/discussed but from the GitHub commits it seems as the people in control of the source intend to go forward with it.

It should also be taken into consideration the this coin does not having much use or function at the moment so people invested in it may not be following developments closely. I know how frustrating that situation can be for developers, etc but it is reality. I applaud the devs for their commitment and wish them the best of luck with this decision.

One nice thing about BTC is that I can invest in it and be assured that the specs of the coin will never change. I suppose that is one reason why so many BTC purists consider Alts worthless.




I also think it's very bold ...

Maybe developers have more information than the information available to the public.

Personally I think it was "safer" reduce the reward gradually (even if it was in one CSC / month). So we would enter in July, and if the roadmap Prypto is correct this time, would see a lot of network to give security.

By reducing to 1 at once, and taking for example mining this point, and assuming that the CSC will reach $ 1USD that day will have about, 20Ghash mining.

These values are easily rented, so you do fork ... and then I think we have problems ...

But in about 22 ~ 27 days, when we get to the small block whichis 10 to 1, we find out what happens ...

Hash rate will decrease sharply, but the coin should function normally. it's time to clip the wings from the auto-selling crowd.

I agree, the risk of a double spend may exist but if you look at the hash rate of other coins on Coinwarz it is very possible with other alts as well. Considering the hash rate is at 2.5 gh atm anyone with the majority of that could attempt a double spend and in the grand scheme of things 2.5gh is still not a lot..
GoldSeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 14, 2016, 06:11:35 AM
 #2856

Will be interesting to see what happens to the hashrate if/when the reward gets reduced.

Currently it hovers around 2-4 Gh/s. If that is reduced by 1/10 it may be in the 200-400 Mh/s range. With about 3 BTC of buy support (as of now) it is probably too little for anyone to bother attacking but the potential is there. If there was a significant amount of buy support I would definitely be worried. It would be way too tempting for someone to pass up by doing a double spend attack.

I think people are asking about the reduction because it really hasn't been made clear if a decision has been made. From this thread it appears as it is still being considered/discussed but from the GitHub commits it seems as the people in control of the source intend to go forward with it.

It should also be taken into consideration the this coin does not having much use or function at the moment so people invested in it may not be following developments closely. I know how frustrating that situation can be for developers, etc but it is reality. I applaud the devs for their commitment and wish them the best of luck with this decision.

One nice thing about BTC is that I can invest in it and be assured that the specs of the coin will never change. I suppose that is one reason why so many BTC purists consider Alts worthless.




I also think it's very bold ...

Maybe developers have more information than the information available to the public.

Personally I think it was "safer" reduce the reward gradually (even if it was in one CSC / month). So we would enter in July, and if the roadmap Prypto is correct this time, would see a lot of network to give security.

By reducing to 1 at once, and taking for example mining this point, and assuming that the CSC will reach $ 1USD that day will have about, 20Ghash mining.

These values are easily rented, so you do fork ... and then I think we have problems ...

But in about 22 ~ 27 days, when we get to the small block whichis 10 to 1, we find out what happens ...

Hash rate will decrease sharply, but the coin should function normally. it's time to clip the wings from the auto-selling crowd.

I agree, the risk of a double spend may exist but if you look at the hash rate of other coins on Coinwarz it is very possible with other alts as well. Considering the hash rate is at 2.5 gh atm anyone with the majority of that could attempt a double spend and in the grand scheme of things 2.5gh is still not a lot..

yeah a large scrypt mining pool could whack it at that level but given the price, we're not much of a target right now. After  amajor price increase, hashing will go up and this will become irrelevant.

Moving to Puerto Rico...
GoldSeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 14, 2016, 09:10:35 AM
 #2857

Originally I wanted to drop the block reward from 50 to 2 a few years back and instead we went to 10. Going to 1 permanently gives us a long tail and kicks out the miners that cannibalize the coin. I think it a move to protect those who have invested in the coin and it also helps helps create some value for our partners that frankly will be the ones that get us to $1 and much higher.

Moving to Puerto Rico...
GoldSeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 14, 2016, 09:21:20 AM
 #2858

Hey, did you guys see the isle of man news two weeks ago:
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-gambling-approved-in-isle-of-man-by-regulator/

Moving to Puerto Rico...
gravitate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 14, 2016, 09:23:46 AM
 #2859

Originally I wanted to drop the block reward from 50 to 2 a few years back and instead we went to 10. Going to 1 permanently gives us a long tail and kicks out the miners that cannibalize the coin. I think it a move to protect those who have invested in the coin and it also helps helps create some value for our partners that frankly will be the ones that get us to $1 and much higher.

So have you deceided block reward to 1 then?

To peel or not to peel.
ugabuga
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 316
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 14, 2016, 10:34:01 AM
 #2860

Originally I wanted to drop the block reward from 50 to 2 a few years back and instead we went to 10. Going to 1 permanently gives us a long tail and kicks out the miners that cannibalize the coin. I think it a move to protect those who have invested in the coin and it also helps helps create some value for our partners that frankly will be the ones that get us to $1 and much higher.

I understand your concerns. I know that probably there is no one so committed to the currency is a huge success, as the developers who put their time without gaining anything in return (well, the information until worth money ... Smiley).
I understand that the partners also have to protect the currency (and automatically their investment) through currency stability, preferably without PUMP AND DUMP.

I think the remedy suggested may be "too strong."

We run the risk of "the patient does not die from the disease, and die of healing ..."

Why not, now reduces to half, until the "PRYPTO" project, and once we get into the project, so then yes,  reward CSC for 2 or 1 ....

The idea of all people, I think it's the same: to protect the currency and the network in which circulates. The only way to get there is what has been different. to many ways....

On the other hand, if the reduction of 10 to 1 is an imposition of the partners, so I think the community should be aware that ... after all affects everyone.

And as for me, blame the AUTO-SELL miners, let me some doubts. After all, from what I know, neither Cryptotopia neither Alcurex has the function "AUTO-SELL" as existed for example in Cryptsy.

       ▀
   ▄▄▄   ▄▀
   ███ ▄▄▄▄  ██
       ████
    ▄  ▀▀▀▀
▄▄
      ██    ▀▀
██▄█▄▄▄████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀███▀▀▀
██████████████████
████▄▀▄▀▄▀███▀▀▀▀▀
████▄▀▄▀▄▀███ ▀
████▄▀▄▀▄▀████████
▀█████████████████
]
CoinPayments
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
█████
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████ ██
█████
Pages: « 1 ... 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 [143] 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 ... 212 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!