Bitcycle
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:01:31 AM |
|
CRYPT is literally half of Mintpal's 24 hr volume.
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:01:42 AM |
|
Im holding both Artoodeetoo. It wouldnt hurt to hedge your bets tho my man. The good news is that at this price nobodys gonna liquidate XC for CRYPT p.s. they DO share an AMAZING TEAM
|
|
|
|
Artoodeetoo
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:05:59 AM |
|
Im holding both Artoodeetoo. It wouldnt hurt to hedge your bets tho my man. The good news is that at this price nobodys gonna liquidate XC for CRYPT p.s. they DO share an AMAZING TEAM 100% agree, although I hate the posters, I do hold some DRK, would be stupid not to.... I "did" hold some crypt but have liquidated... 5x rise is just too fast ...
|
DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:08:51 AM |
|
Im holding both Artoodeetoo. It wouldnt hurt to hedge your bets tho my man. The good news is that at this price nobodys gonna liquidate XC for CRYPT p.s. they DO share an AMAZING TEAM 100% agree, although I hate the posters, I do hold some DRK, would be stupid not to.... I "did" hold some crypt but have liquidated... 5x rise is just too fast ... The rise of DRK was equally fast… im not sure selling now without the intention of buying back in soon is a good move…
|
|
|
|
zkaraca
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
BTC
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:10:22 AM |
|
I will sell half of my CRYPT at 0.027 and the rest I will hold. This might hit 0.05-0.1 range on the long term
|
|
|
|
pbremen01
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:10:53 AM |
|
He has stated that he can't give a public update at this time, stating that if he deflects concerns, he will reveal the design. Target release is still late June.
Every security/privacy related software should be reviewed by others. If it is not, then the software is at least shady in my opinion. In case of open source even the ideas about feature of such software need to be open and transparent. It dev starts coding his/her ideas without having his/hers ideas reviewed by broader community and security analysts/cryptographers, then it will probably waste his/hers time for two reason: - his/her ideas will probably contain serious security holes
- his implementation (of software that implements his ideas) will probably contain some additional security holes
We know nothing about the dev, except that is supposed to be very good. Well, sorry, but that doesn't mean that he has any clue about writing security related software. Writing security/privacy related software requires completely different level of skills and training that are needed for writing regular business software.
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:15:53 AM |
|
He has stated that he can't give a public update at this time, stating that if he deflects concerns, he will reveal the design. Target release is still late June.
Every security/privacy related software should be reviewed by others. If it is not, then the software is at least shady in my opinion. In case of open source even the ideas about feature of such software need to be open and transparent. It dev starts coding his/her ideas without having his/hers ideas reviewed by broader community and security analysts/cryptographers, then it will probably waste his/hers time for two reason: - his/her ideas will probably contain serious security holes
- his implementation (of software that implements his ideas) will probably contain some additional security holes
We know nothing about the dev, except that is supposed to be very good. Well, sorry, but that doesn't mean that he has any clue about writing security related software. Writing security/privacy related software requires completely different level of skills and training that are needed for writing regular business software. another expert Newbie FUDster
|
|
|
|
pbremen01
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:27:44 AM |
|
another expert Newbie FUDster
Yeah, I am forum newbie and you could consider this a FUD. But the points are still valid.
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:30:10 AM |
|
He has stated that he can't give a public update at this time, stating that if he deflects concerns, he will reveal the design. Target release is still late June.
Every security/privacy related software should be reviewed by others. If it is not, then the software is at least shady in my opinion. In case of open source even the ideas about feature of such software need to be open and transparent. It dev starts coding his/her ideas without having his/hers ideas reviewed by broader community and security analysts/cryptographers, then it will probably waste his/hers time for two reason: - his/her ideas will probably contain serious security holes
- his implementation (of software that implements his ideas) will probably contain some additional security holes
We know nothing about the dev, except that is supposed to be very good. Well, sorry, but that doesn't mean that he has any clue about writing security related software. Writing security/privacy related software requires completely different level of skills and training that are needed for writing regular business software. another expert Newbie FUDster There's nothing FUD about it. "Secret" code is a giant warning flag, particularly since the paper for this coin proposes something that won't work.
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:48:40 AM |
|
He has stated that he can't give a public update at this time, stating that if he deflects concerns, he will reveal the design. Target release is still late June.
Every security/privacy related software should be reviewed by others. If it is not, then the software is at least shady in my opinion. In case of open source even the ideas about feature of such software need to be open and transparent. It dev starts coding his/her ideas without having his/hers ideas reviewed by broader community and security analysts/cryptographers, then it will probably waste his/hers time for two reason: - his/her ideas will probably contain serious security holes
- his implementation (of software that implements his ideas) will probably contain some additional security holes
We know nothing about the dev, except that is supposed to be very good. Well, sorry, but that doesn't mean that he has any clue about writing security related software. Writing security/privacy related software requires completely different level of skills and training that are needed for writing regular business software. another expert Newbie FUDster There's nothing FUD about it. "Secret" code is a giant warning flag, particularly since the paper for this coin proposes something that won't work. I am sure in time it will be open sourced as it must be to be trusted by the community. In the meantime working behind closed doors is fine by me
|
|
|
|
solid12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 18, 2014, 10:59:45 AM |
|
I am sure in time it will be open sourced as it must be to be trusted by the community. In the meantime working behind closed doors is fine by me
My issue is that is all fine and dandy but how does that make a coin worth a dollar and probably by all estimate on its way to several dollars? This is just Koolio and co. manipulating the community because he is pissed his precious Litecoin and Feathercoin are not doing so well. Trust me he'll go abandon this coin too the minute it becomes unprofitable. I personally think he and fontas and moosa can go fuck themselves, I'm not giving them a dime.
|
|
|
|
AngusCanine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1001
To weird to live To rare to die
|
|
June 18, 2014, 11:01:13 AM |
|
Damn i once thought the best ride of my life was when I was fucking my wife and told her i just fucked her sister and she tried to buck me off like a wild bull. No no...this CRYPT ride is MUUUCH better!!!
Really . LOL ....
|
|
|
|
VladMaster
|
|
June 18, 2014, 11:03:45 AM |
|
I still remember my self selling CRY for 30k each But 3m market cap , and 3,5m 24hr volume tells me, its gonna grow lot more. So Im in now, better late than never.
|
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
June 18, 2014, 11:20:57 AM |
|
all I know is that the white paper is under revision and that MacGyver is working on it. and that the aim is decentralized and anonymous ( = holy grail )
|
|
|
|
reviks
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
June 18, 2014, 11:35:27 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
david1365
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 18, 2014, 11:37:13 AM |
|
Is there any chance price reach to 0.005, today?
|
|
|
|
TenaciousC
|
|
June 18, 2014, 11:46:40 AM |
|
Is there any chance price reach to 0.005, today?
It's crypto, everything is possible, look at last run that started at 0.00070 upto 0.0027... Many action still, look at volumes, much coins are being bought at high price stilll, I would expect another run up, my guess wuld be to 0.0035 today. And who knows, with dev announcing he's finished we might see 0.01 within a few days, but that's pure speculation
|
|
|
|
asemov
|
|
June 18, 2014, 11:53:12 AM |
|
http://CRYPT.HASHLINK.EUSpread some hash! - 1% Fee on all pools - PROP Payout system - Dedicated Servers - Multicoin Pool - High performance NODE.js backend - User friendly MPOS interface - STRATUM - VARDIFF - Skilled admins - Support Forum
|
|
|
|
VladMaster
|
|
June 18, 2014, 11:53:41 AM |
|
Is there any chance price reach to 0.005, today?
It's crypto, everything is possible, look at last run that started at 0.00070 upto 0.0027... Many action still, look at volumes, much coins are being bought at high price stilll, I would expect another run up, my guess wuld be to 0.0035 today. And who knows, with dev announcing he's finished we might see 0.01 within a few days, but that's pure speculation What he currently working on?
|
|
|
|
|