WheresMyWallet
Member
 Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 19, 2014, 11:51:59 PM |
|
Yes it is isn't it jwinterm, that's why he is the dev, doing exactly what he should be doing.
Carry on coding Mindfox, some people just have nothing better to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
knightlife999
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:53:09 PM |
|
Exactly. Would you expect him to give you the code, risking it being passed on to another coin's dev working on anon features?
|
|
|
|
|
mindfox
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:54:33 PM |
|
Is it dodging that I do not let you lead me to a conversation just the way you want it?
I'm not playing games, I asked a legit question. Simple question also.
You're the dev. This is your coin now. What's the plan for it? Do you just not have one? You did not answer my simple question that would allow me to continue the discussion with you. Regarding plans for the coin, I believe the leading dev (it's not my coin, nor I'm "the dev" as you say) has made posts regarding what you are asking. |
|
|
|
|
WheresMyWallet
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:55:31 PM |
|
Exactly. Would you expect him to give you the code, risking it being passed on to another coin's dev working on anon features?
Sounds like that's what Bitcycle wants too. "Whats you plan, give me every bit of information I need now, let me show everyone here I'm FUDing you out" Glad its just 1 more weak hand out the door. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:56:58 PM |
|
Regarding plans for the coin, I believe the leading dev (it's not my coin, nor I'm "the dev" as you say) has made posts regarding what you are asking.
Please note, contrary to some post, Mindfox says he is not "the dev", nor is this his coin. He also has no plans regarding anonymity for this coin. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:59:04 PM |
|
Exactly. Would you expect him to give you the code, risking it being passed on to another coin's dev working on anon features?
Sounds like that's what Bitcycle wants too. "Whats you plan, give me every bit of information I need now, let me show everyone here I'm FUDing you out" Glad its just 1 more weak hand out the door. The one published whitepaper for this coin is a complete joke. I ask what the new plan is and I get nothing but dodges. Well, feel free to believe in........nothing. It's your money. |
|
|
|
|
|
mindfox
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:59:18 PM |
|
Regarding plans for the coin, I believe the leading dev (it's not my coin, nor I'm "the dev" as you say) has made posts regarding what you are asking.
Please note, contrary to some post, Mindfox says he is not "the dev", nor is this his coin. He also has no plans regarding anonymity for this coin. You're the dev. This is your coin now. What's the plan for it?
Do you just not have one?
It's not fair to add words to a post after you made it and someone replied to it, is it? |
|
|
|
|
MsCollec
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:00:37 AM
Last edit: June 20, 2014, 12:11:53 AM by MsCollec |
|
I am still interested to know the following;
how you intended to prevent DDOS since there's no masternode ?
Protect the recipient's addresses ?
|
|
|
|
|
WheresMyWallet
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:00:41 AM |
|
Regarding plans for the coin, I believe the leading dev (it's not my coin, nor I'm "the dev" as you say) has made posts regarding what you are asking.
Please note, contrary to some post, Mindfox says he is not "the dev", nor is this his coin. He also has no plans regarding anonymity for this coin. It isn't his coin. It never was his coin. Everyone KNOWS it isn't his coin. He is "a dev" on the coin There are more than 1 There is no "the dev" Have you even read the rest of this post??? |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:01:03 AM |
|
Regarding plans for the coin, I believe the leading dev (it's not my coin, nor I'm "the dev" as you say) has made posts regarding what you are asking.
Please note, contrary to some post, Mindfox says he is not "the dev", nor is this his coin. He also has no plans regarding anonymity for this coin. You're the dev. This is your coin now. What's the plan for it?
Do you just not have one?
It's not fair to add words to a post after you made it and someone replied to it, is it? I have edited nothing. Best of luck to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
mindfox
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:03:00 AM |
|
Regarding plans for the coin, I believe the leading dev (it's not my coin, nor I'm "the dev" as you say) has made posts regarding what you are asking.
Please note, contrary to some post, Mindfox says he is not "the dev", nor is this his coin. He also has no plans regarding anonymity for this coin. You're the dev. This is your coin now. What's the plan for it?
Do you just not have one?
It's not fair to add words to a post after you made it and someone replied to it, is it? I have edited nothing. Best of luck to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
knightlife999
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:03:25 AM |
|
Regarding plans for the coin, I believe the leading dev (it's not my coin, nor I'm "the dev" as you say) has made posts regarding what you are asking.
Please note, contrary to some post, Mindfox says he is not "the dev", nor is this his coin. He also has no plans regarding anonymity for this coin. Let me break it down for you. He is working on the anon feature of the wallet. He is a dev working on the coin, not "the dev", meaning not the primary dev. You have no way of knowing that he isn't working on the anon functions. That's a ridiculous statement to make based on emotion. He didn't answer your question. The primary dev has given a general idea of what they are working towards multiple times in this thread. It's really irritating to see how much hand holding people need. This is proprietary information. Would you expect Apple to let you peruse iOS8 before they release it? |
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:07:37 AM |
|
All I did was ask what the plan for anonymity was. I didn't ask for code. I asked for the plan.
I didn't get a plan.
I got a song and dance.
Tipping my fedora and moving on.
|
|
|
|
|
MsCollec
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:12:05 AM |
|
can you see it now  I am still interested to know the following;
how you intended to prevent DDOS since there's no masternode ?
Protect the recipient's addresses ? |
|
|
|
|
WheresMyWallet
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:19:22 AM |
|
Yes we can see it, and yes we are still ignoring it.
|
|
|
|
|
MsCollec
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:21:30 AM |
|
Yes we can see it, and yes we are still ignoring it.
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptowest
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:26:11 AM |
|
since I spend over an hour reading, I would like first to say that I'm a plain man, not super smart, I do not transform during full moon, I just do what I was hired to do: implement my idea.
Now, regarding some of the technical concerns expressed are valid, but I would love to see the real person behind them.
Since I did not hide using a different nick, why would you?
Regarding anonymity, I would like someone to define the term to me.
Is it to make the addresses in a transaction invisible or prove that all addresses come from the same wallet/coin holder?
As I said many times, personally I do not trust my coins being in another wallet/master node/call it how you like, to forward my coins. Besides, even if you use a mixer, aren't the coins going to the same address?
Isn't the "taint analysis" going to reveal the coins that an address had, even for a single instance?
You mix the source and you reveal the destination. Or perhaps I didn't read it well.
Also, regarding the ability to learn the IP from a wallet that is not connectable can't be completely accurate. Just remember that transaction messages are re-broadcasted by wallets. Connectable or not.
So, as I mentioned in one of my posts, there are many different ideas and implementation and I respect everyone for the hard work and effort they put in order to make it (or made it) happen.
Also, all ideas in early stage have plenty of room for expansion.
I strongly believe that if those who go through the effort to go through technical analysis (which means that they are skilled either in coding or in googling - I would like to believe the first) can offer more than just "stay away from this coin - the dev is a scammer".
http://mannybutun.ytmnd.com/  |
|
|
|
|
|
mindfox
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:33:22 AM |
|
can you see it now I am still interested to know the following; how you intended to prevent DDOS since there's no masternode ? Protect the recipient's addresses ? I tried to politely avoid it as you might took my answer as arrogant and I am not. Your question is not a technical question but a multiplex of technical terms appended with a ? Let me explain: DDoS: Distributed Denial of Service. Used against servers (in protocol or application layer - mostly the latter) in order to overload it and make it unresponsive. In other words: Many are targeting against one. You are asking me how to prevent a technique used in centralized model against something that can't be DDoS'ed (at least not the way you ask for it). Please don't get me wrong, I do not want to offend you. But you have to admit that you came on me hard for no reason. Also, in Greece, time is 3:33 am. Should I be asleep all night long to respond to all questions the minute they are posted? |
|
|
|
|
pbremen01
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:36:28 AM |
|
Regarding anonymity, I would like someone to define the term to me.
Is it to make the addresses in a transaction invisible or prove that all addresses come from the same wallet/coin holder?
I don't think you're a scammer, but I also don't see a workable plan for anonymity here. What do you have in mind for it? The CRYPT original whitepaper provide no advantage, so I assume you're working on a new plan. What is it? I left the part where I ask how each individual defines anonymity. What is your definition of it? Mindfox, let me ask the same question. What is the definition of anonymity that CRYPT claims to deliver? The current whitepaper offers no anonymity, even in very broad sense. BTW, Mindfox did you see this: http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/28kea5/what_do_we_know_about_anonymous_coin_developers/Can you provide some info that can be posted here? Or even better - post the info for yourself? |
|
|
|
|
tylerderden
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1025
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:45:06 AM |
|
Why would he reveal any info to pacify people not involved in the developement of the coin? I know some of the people asking are working on anon features for their own coin so why in the hell would mindfox share info with them? Don't take the bait man, they're only trolling for their own gain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
