halfcab123
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:41:33 AM |
|
The reality is Cryptcoin is recovering, Attious has been exposed, and plans are continuing on. If anything these fudders are just helping us with our page count. Thanks guys ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) We really appreciate the leg work. So keep posting and you all have an excellent day. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
DayTrade with less exposure to risk, by setting buy and sell spreads with CabTrader v2, buy now @ crypto-folio.com
|
|
|
Bobsurplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:42:03 AM |
|
The fud really makes cloak look bad. lol. Desperate fucks.
I agree wholeheartedly. Agree all you want... Cloak has no rogue devs running wild on github and the OP, it also has a working decentralized anon feature and a whole lot more promise then crypt in my investing eyes.
|
|
|
|
knightlife999
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:42:40 AM |
|
This is disgusting.. now I know for sure, this dev team was in on it http://pastebin.com/cHJjW1LU<Attious> please ban me <Attious> Has to look good <cryptowest> hey lol now youre making it sound like i had something to do with it <cryptowest> cmon <cryptowest> im just trying to be peaceable about it ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Too much behind the scenes manipulation going on. Last night, I spoke with "gudcrypt" (cryptcoin dev) on irc. He told me that he hadn't heard of any rumors about BTC-e picking the coin up. I was shocked, and wondered why a primary dev was out of the loop. Now I think they all have their own agendas. Can't advocate any trust for this now. You guys know that I was a true believer in this coin and fought hard against FUD the past week. Tonight's events just were too much. Either these guys were in on it, or they were so irresponsible as to allow a destructive partner harm the coin. Wouldn't you change the passwords if you removed a bad person from your team? Why didn't they? Suspicious.
|
|
|
|
DiCE1904
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1118
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:42:58 AM |
|
The reality is Cryptcoin is recovering, Attious has been exposed, and plans are continuing on. If anything these fudders are just helping us with our page count. Thanks guys ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) We really appreciate the leg work. So keep posting and you all have an excellent day. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=618377.msg7430190#msg7430190
|
|
|
|
Bobsurplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:44:37 AM |
|
This is disgusting.. now I know for sure, this dev team was in on it http://pastebin.com/cHJjW1LU<Attious> please ban me <Attious> Has to look good <cryptowest> hey lol now youre making it sound like i had something to do with it <cryptowest> cmon <cryptowest> im just trying to be peaceable about it ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Too much behind the scenes manipulation going on. Last night, I spoke with "gudcrypt" (cryptcoin dev) on irc. He told me that he hadn't heard of any rumors about BTC-e picking the coin up. I was shocked, and wondered why a primary dev was out of the loop. Now I think they all have their own agendas. Can't advocate any trust for this now. You my friend are not a sheep! The rest are though! Anyone buying now will be crying in the coming hours/days.
|
|
|
|
DiCE1904
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1118
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:46:47 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
knightlife999
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:47:58 AM |
|
This is disgusting.. now I know for sure, this dev team was in on it http://pastebin.com/cHJjW1LU<Attious> please ban me <Attious> Has to look good <cryptowest> hey lol now youre making it sound like i had something to do with it <cryptowest> cmon <cryptowest> im just trying to be peaceable about it ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Too much behind the scenes manipulation going on. Last night, I spoke with "gudcrypt" (cryptcoin dev) on irc. He told me that he hadn't heard of any rumors about BTC-e picking the coin up. I was shocked, and wondered why a primary dev was out of the loop. Now I think they all have their own agendas. Can't advocate any trust for this now. You my friend are not a sheep! The rest are though! Anyone buying now will be crying in the coming hours/days. Thanks. I support coins with devs that I feel are trustworthy. I thought that was the case with this coin, but tonight proved otherwise. I'm going to move my BTC to another anon coin with no major issues and a lot of promise.
|
|
|
|
smokim87
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:48:45 AM |
|
Wondering guys checked the chatlog out who is that moosa character? Mod off of btc-e by any chance?
|
|
|
|
OnCrypto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:49:37 AM |
|
Someone please explain... with regard to the dev/user ccryptcoin... his username released the news regarding BTCE, then the same user seemingly released FUD about the hidden block etc, and now it is the same user that has the front page release announcing that all is fixed and that the BTCE news is still possibly real. Nowhere in the posts following the start of the FUD has ANYONE from the team actually come out and stated that ccryptcoin's account was highjacked. Have I missed something here? When they say ANN was highjacked do they mean all main accounts including the ccryptcoin account were under the control of the ousted dev? IF the answer is then the mess makes sense, so to speak. If the answer is no, then how is it possible that the same username is bringing good news, then bad news, and then 'all is fixed news' again. What am I missing here? Please help to alleviate my confusion here. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
|
|
|
|
Bobsurplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:50:46 AM |
|
This is disgusting.. now I know for sure, this dev team was in on it http://pastebin.com/cHJjW1LU<Attious> please ban me <Attious> Has to look good <cryptowest> hey lol now youre making it sound like i had something to do with it <cryptowest> cmon <cryptowest> im just trying to be peaceable about it ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Too much behind the scenes manipulation going on. Last night, I spoke with "gudcrypt" (cryptcoin dev) on irc. He told me that he hadn't heard of any rumors about BTC-e picking the coin up. I was shocked, and wondered why a primary dev was out of the loop. Now I think they all have their own agendas. Can't advocate any trust for this now. You my friend are not a sheep! The rest are though! Anyone buying now will be crying in the coming hours/days. Thanks. I support coins with devs that I feel are trustworthy. I thought that was the case with this coin, but tonight proved otherwise. I'm going to move my BTC to another anon coin with no major issues and a lot of promise. No problem, its just the truth! If I can recommend a coin I would recommend cloak. I do have to admit I'm not up to specs with all the anon coins, but cloak to me looks like a real winner with a great team, working anon and so much more. Good luck anyway though.
|
|
|
|
ccryptcoin (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
CRYPT Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:51:33 AM |
|
This is disgusting.. now I know for sure, this dev team was in on it http://pastebin.com/cHJjW1LU<Attious> please ban me <Attious> Has to look good <cryptowest> hey lol now youre making it sound like i had something to do with it <cryptowest> cmon <cryptowest> im just trying to be peaceable about it ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Dev team wasn't in on it. Dev team knew that if he wasnt dealt with amicibly, he could have done more damage, kept control of the btctalk accounts, and perhaps done some nasty things through the github. CRYPT was in line to be added to BTC-E. We will release logs after their decision. There is still a good chance we will get on, but why in the hell would we damage the coin by creating some BS like this. I understand your skepticism... I would be unsure too. But the last thing we wanted to do was hurt the coin. I personally wasnt even home when this happened, I came back to see 50k sat and was in shock. Luckily we regained control as quickly as possible. I'm sorry that the friendliness makes you uneasy, but we felt it was the best way to deal with the situation. Otherwise those logs would not have been posted - they are private messages, not public chat.
|
|
|
|
3ham3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:51:53 AM |
|
This is disgusting.. now I know for sure, this dev team was in on it http://pastebin.com/cHJjW1LU<Attious> please ban me <Attious> Has to look good <cryptowest> hey lol now youre making it sound like i had something to do with it <cryptowest> cmon <cryptowest> im just trying to be peaceable about it ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Too much behind the scenes manipulation going on. Last night, I spoke with "gudcrypt" (cryptcoin dev) on irc. He told me that he hadn't heard of any rumors about BTC-e picking the coin up. I was shocked, and wondered why a primary dev was out of the loop. Now I think they all have their own agendas. Can't advocate any trust for this now. You my friend are not a sheep! The rest are though! Anyone buying now will be crying in the coming hours/days. Thanks. I support coins with devs that I feel are trustworthy. I thought that was the case with this coin, but tonight proved otherwise. I'm going to move my BTC to another anon coin with no major issues and a lot of promise. Tonight has really brought forward how devs have their own agenda and the lengths they go too, to manipulate the "sheep"
|
|
|
|
Bobsurplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:52:07 AM |
|
Someone please explain... with regard to the dev/user ccryptcoin... his username released the news regarding BTCE, then the same user seemingly released FUD about the hidden block etc, and now it is the same user that has the front page release announcing that all is fixed and that the BTCE news is still possibly real. Nowhere in the posts following the start of the FUD has ANYONE from the team actually come out and stated that ccryptcoin's account was highjacked. Have I missed something here? When they say ANN was highjacked do they mean all main accounts including the ccryptcoin account were under the control of the ousted dev? IF the answer is then the mess makes sense, so to speak. If the answer is no, then how is it possible that the same username is bringing good news, then bad news, and then 'all is fixed news' again. What am I missing here? Please help to alleviate my confusion here. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=618377.msg7430370#msg7430370
|
|
|
|
DiCE1904
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1118
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:52:28 AM |
|
Wondering guys checked the chatlog out who is that moosa character? Mod off of btc-e by any chance?
Yea its the Mod on BTCE MoosaNYC
|
|
|
|
tristartek
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:54:38 AM |
|
The fud really makes cloak look bad. lol. Desperate fucks.
I agree wholeheartedly. Agree all you want... Cloak has no rogue devs running wild on github and the OP, it also has a working decentralized anon feature and a whole lot more promise then crypt in my investing eyes. Then go back to that thread please. If you want I can go fud the shit out of cloak all day long to. Will that make you happy? I got nothing better to do right now.
|
BTC: 1KTg6RkiHjovXqVfVB1a74NPPXLnoL1HNf
|
|
|
Bobsurplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:55:48 AM |
|
This is disgusting.. now I know for sure, this dev team was in on it http://pastebin.com/cHJjW1LU<Attious> please ban me <Attious> Has to look good <cryptowest> hey lol now youre making it sound like i had something to do with it <cryptowest> cmon <cryptowest> im just trying to be peaceable about it ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Dev team wasn't in on it. Dev team knew that if he wasnt dealt with amicibly, he could have done more damage, kept control of the btctalk accounts, and perhaps done some nasty things through the github. CRYPT was in line to be added to BTC-E. We will release logs after their decision. There is still a good chance we will get on, but why in the hell would we damage the coin by creating some BS like this. I understand your skepticism... I would be unsure too. But the last thing we wanted to do was hurt the coin. I personally wasnt even home when this happened, I came back to see 50k sat and was in shock. Luckily we regained control as quickly as possible. I'm sorry that the friendliness makes you uneasy, but we felt it was the best way to deal with the situation. Otherwise those logs would not have been posted - they are private messages, not public chat. While your reasons do make some sense you also must know that in the world of anonymous crypto situations like this are the end of a coin. I personally believe this btc-e fud is just that. I have been using them toooooo long to know that crypt wont be added any time soon!! I dont buy it!
|
|
|
|
trademark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:56:10 AM |
|
If this account was hijacked. How did you gain access to it so fast? This is disgusting.. now I know for sure, this dev team was in on it http://pastebin.com/cHJjW1LU<Attious> please ban me <Attious> Has to look good <cryptowest> hey lol now youre making it sound like i had something to do with it <cryptowest> cmon <cryptowest> im just trying to be peaceable about it ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Dev team wasn't in on it. Dev team knew that if he wasnt dealt with amicibly, he could have done more damage, kept control of the btctalk accounts, and perhaps done some nasty things through the github. CRYPT was in line to be added to BTC-E. We will release logs after their decision. There is still a good chance we will get on, but why in the hell would we damage the coin by creating some BS like this. I understand your skepticism... I would be unsure too. But the last thing we wanted to do was hurt the coin. I personally wasnt even home when this happened, I came back to see 50k sat and was in shock. Luckily we regained control as quickly as possible. I'm sorry that the friendliness makes you uneasy, but we felt it was the best way to deal with the situation. Otherwise those logs would not have been posted - they are private messages, not public chat.
|
|
|
|
smokim87
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:56:45 AM |
|
Wondering guys checked the chatlog out who is that moosa character? Mod off of btc-e by any chance?
Yea its the Mod on BTCE MoosaNYC Interesting, so he was in on it too? I think the community here should take over this coin, the devs are way too shady, not sure who to believe.
|
|
|
|
Bobsurplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:56:53 AM |
|
The fud really makes cloak look bad. lol. Desperate fucks.
I agree wholeheartedly. Agree all you want... Cloak has no rogue devs running wild on github and the OP, it also has a working decentralized anon feature and a whole lot more promise then crypt in my investing eyes. Then go back to that thread please. If you want I can go fud the shit out of cloak all day long to. Will that make you happy? I got nothing better to do right now. Fuckoff.. I own a few crypt so I have a right as an investor to be here. FUCKER! EDIT: please fud cloak, lets see what damage you can do, I dont mind picking up more anyway, so the lower the price the better!
|
|
|
|
3ham3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 06:57:41 AM |
|
This is disgusting.. now I know for sure, this dev team was in on it http://pastebin.com/cHJjW1LU<Attious> please ban me <Attious> Has to look good <cryptowest> hey lol now youre making it sound like i had something to do with it <cryptowest> cmon <cryptowest> im just trying to be peaceable about it ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Dev team wasn't in on it. Dev team knew that if he wasnt dealt with amicibly, he could have done more damage, kept control of the btctalk accounts, and perhaps done some nasty things through the github. CRYPT was in line to be added to BTC-E. We will release logs after their decision. There is still a good chance we will get on, but why in the hell would we damage the coin by creating some BS like this. I understand your skepticism... I would be unsure too. But the last thing we wanted to do was hurt the coin. I personally wasnt even home when this happened, I came back to see 50k sat and was in shock. Luckily we regained control as quickly as possible. I'm sorry that the friendliness makes you uneasy, but we felt it was the best way to deal with the situation. Otherwise those logs would not have been posted - they are private messages, not public chat. While your reasons do make some sense you also must know that in the world of anonymous crypto situations like this are the end of a coin. I personally believe this btc-e fud is just that. I have been using them toooooo long to know that crypt wont be added any time soon!! I dont buy it! Oh it is the end of the coin, Like BTC-E will add it now...
|
|
|
|
|