Bitcoin Forum
October 31, 2024, 10:49:38 PM *
News: Bitcoin Pumpkin Carving Contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Did you see the new thread?
Yes https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=875651.0
No

Pages: « 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 [99] 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 ... 497 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][SUPERCOIN]First P2p Decentralized Trustless Anonymous Wallet Coming Soon  (Read 473519 times)
supercoindev
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 213
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:42:24 AM
 #1961

my wallet can't display the anno feature.
I have make the conf file and use the testnode as the OP list, but it make no difference.
I am on windows 7 system.





you download the wrong version .

Yes Chinese version works, make sure you download the correct version, the version should be 1.2.1-a. See my screenshot:



Maybe you did not enable the CoinControl feature. To enable, go to Setting->Option->Display, and check the second checkbox (Display coincontrol features (expert only!)). Now go back to Send tab, you will see the above screen.

cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:46:04 AM
 #1962


Maybe you did not enable the CoinControl feature. To enable, go to Setting->Option->Display, and check the second checkbox (Display coincontrol features (expert only!)). Now go back to Send tab, you will see the above screen.


got it!
supercoindev
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 213
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:48:31 AM
 #1963

This is where you enable coincontrol...

apojii
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:50:09 AM
 #1964

This is where you enable coincontrol...

Yeah, it works.
I suggest explain the method in OP, so many people don't know that.
supercointeam (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:53:44 AM
 #1965

This is where you enable coincontrol...

Yeah, it works.
I suggest explain the method in OP, so many people don't know that.
Yes it's updated in OP. Thanks for feedback.
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 05:01:33 AM
 #1966

Yes it's updated in OP. Thanks for feedback.

we are ready to test.

Keep kicking.
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 05:23:52 AM
 #1967

i just did test on testnet.

works fine to me. i can't find sender

sorry for my imcompetence, and hope some one can make a pro video presentation and paste some screenshots.

provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 05:31:19 AM
 #1968

i just did test on testnet.

works fine to me. i can't find sender

sorry for my imcompetence, and hope some one can make a pro video presentation and paste some screenshots.


will do this when back home.
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 05:52:15 AM
 #1969

if polo raise the bar and do retro review. 80% will be delisted, and most new will not be added.
supercointeam (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:08:05 AM
Last edit: June 15, 2014, 06:20:37 AM by supercointeam
 #1970

Can some one review the videos?

Feedback video: http://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/c21ohHnpyH (1 minute)
Take attention to the first 10 SUPER transfer was not anonymous send
12 SUPERs transfer divided 3 parts was anonymous send
55 SUPERs transfer divided 3 parts was anonymous send

Now check this video afters transfer happened & confirmed on network
http://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/c21oh7npyJ
see the lastest 55 SUPERs anonymous send to addresses are different in transaction details but 10 SUPERs transfer which is not anonymous send to address is same as shown at video 1: mx5BkFGaQPrpLwVvTY3PesoD82nhhyNG87

http://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/c21o12npy7 see for more details from other receiver point.

if its good i can add to the OP.

supercointeam (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:14:56 AM
 #1971

i just did test on testnet.

works fine to me. i can't find sender

sorry for my imcompetence, and hope some one can make a pro video presentation and paste some screenshots.




You or community can try to send here this wallet

mrusioLdvJgcbenVh7CTWg5czH8fKiwAB2

so we can confirm it. its better you send it by both normal send and anonymous send and we can share screen of what we received it.

Those who see crashes or not success on anonymous send should pm me for mixer node.
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:18:32 AM
 #1972

i just did test on testnet.

works fine to me. i can't find sender

sorry for my imcompetence, and hope some one can make a pro video presentation and paste some screenshots.




You or community can try to send here this wallet

mrusioLdvJgcbenVh7CTWg5czH8fKiwAB2

so we can confirm it. its better you send it by both normal send and anonymous send and we can share screen of what we received it.

normal way sent 1000 coins.


anonymous send erro. "you have no connection to mixer ......."
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:20:01 AM
 #1973

update from BUSONI

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548

I would like to point out that I did not personally review the code, as many people seem to think. The person who did has very high standards and was not thrilled with what he saw, and he was overzealous in his criticisms. When I made this post, I firmly believed that the maximum supply was inflated. My intention with going public before contacting the devs was to make sure they did not have a chance to cover up the mistake or take advantage of the issue.

It is my responsibility to ensure that these issues are addressed correctly, so no fingers should be pointed anywhere but at me. I see now that I should have had another reviewer confirm the findings, and investigated sufficiently to make sure I understood all of the code myself before proceeding. I apologize for this misstep. There are still some parts of the code we're concerned about, so our investigations will continue, and I will talk to the devs privately about the anon feature.

This whole raising the standards for coins thing is in an early stage, and we are constantly improving our process. We believe strongly in integrity and transparency, and it has always been my intention to use Poloniex's position to improve the quality of crypto.
supercointeam (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:23:03 AM
 #1974

i just did test on testnet.

works fine to me. i can't find sender

sorry for my imcompetence, and hope some one can make a pro video presentation and paste some screenshots.




You or community can try to send here this wallet

mrusioLdvJgcbenVh7CTWg5czH8fKiwAB2

so we can confirm it. its better you send it by both normal send and anonymous send and we can share screen of what we received it.

normal way sent 1000 coins.


anonymous send erro. "you have no connection to mixer ......."


you have no connection to mixer ....... please use the one i'll send in my PM to you soon.
provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:24:04 AM
 #1975

update from BUSONI

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548

I would like to point out that I did not personally review the code, as many people seem to think. The person who did has very high standards and was not thrilled with what he saw, and he was overzealous in his criticisms. When I made this post, I firmly believed that the maximum supply was inflated. My intention with going public before contacting the devs was to make sure they did not have a chance to cover up the mistake or take advantage of the issue.

It is my responsibility to ensure that these issues are addressed correctly, so no fingers should be pointed anywhere but at me. I see now that I should have had another reviewer confirm the findings, and investigated sufficiently to make sure I understood all of the code myself before proceeding. I apologize for this misstep. There are still some parts of the code we're concerned about, so our investigations will continue, and I will talk to the devs privately about the anon feature.

This whole raising the standards for coins thing is in an early stage, and we are constantly improving our process. We believe strongly in integrity and transparency, and it has always been my intention to use Poloniex's position to improve the quality of crypto.
it seems that's the real busoni.
Cohle
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:25:24 AM
 #1976

Looks like busoni (Poloniex) is back-peddling on his SUPER FUD -

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548

The man owes SUPER a public apology through other channels (twitter, announcement on his site).
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:29:03 AM
 #1977

Looks like busoni (Poloniex) is back-peddling on his SUPER FUD -

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548

The man owes SUPER a public apology through other channels (twitter, announcement on his site).

+1. HE is struggling to find more evidence to second his stupid announcement and decision.  give him some time and leave polo alone.

i do suggest BITTREX to do some interface improvement and troll box implementation. BTC-E trading interface is my favorite and POLO did adopted that.

so imagine if BITTREX steadily improves their features.

i don't care where i am trading. as long as coin and dev are legit.

provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:31:07 AM
 #1978

Looks like busoni (Poloniex) is back-peddling on his SUPER FUD -

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548

The man owes SUPER a public apology through other channels (twitter, announcement on his site).

+1. HE is struggling to find more evidence to second his stupid announcement and decision.  give him some time and leave polo alone.

i do suggest BITTREX to do some interface improvement and troll box implementation. BTC-E trading interface is my favorite and POLO did adopted that.

so imagine if BITTREX steadily improves their features.

i don't care where i am trading. as long as coin and dev are legit.


Mintpal and Bter will come out later. Take it easy.
supercointeam (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:35:18 AM
 #1979

Can some one review the videos?

Feedback video: http://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/c21ohHnpyH (1 minute)
Take attention to the first 10 SUPER transfer was not anonymous send
12 SUPERs transfer divided 3 parts was anonymous send
55 SUPERs transfer divided 3 parts was anonymous send

Now check this video afters transfer happened & confirmed on network
http://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/c21oh7npyJ
see the lastest 55 SUPERs anonymous send to addresses are different in transaction details but 10 SUPERs transfer which is not anonymous send to address is same as shown at video 1: mx5BkFGaQPrpLwVvTY3PesoD82nhhyNG87

And this one
http://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/c21o12npy7 see for more details from other receiver point.

if its good enough i can add to the OP.


+1 comment please :-)
Cohle
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 06:36:37 AM
 #1980

I don't give a shit about Polo listing SUPER. I no longer trade at that exchange. busoni needs to publicly apologise though.
Pages: « 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 [99] 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 ... 497 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!