steady712
|
|
June 13, 2014, 08:28:36 PM |
|
It probably will. Be patient, you can't expect these things to happen overnight if you want the growth to be sustainable. +1. And I for one, would love to be part of a stable coin for once. There aren't too many out there (BTC, BC, VTC). The notion of being able to set it and forget it would be awesome, instead of having to check every day to make sure that the coin hasn't lost 80% of it's value. I agree with you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
poornamelessme
|
|
June 13, 2014, 08:28:47 PM |
|
+1. And I for one, would love to be part of a stable coin for once. There aren't too many out there (BTC, BC, VTC). The notion of being able to set it and forget it would be awesome, instead of having to check every day to make sure that the coin hasn't lost 80% of it's value.
I'd probably expect some instability for now, but if it gets 2x ipo prices with decent volume, I'd hope it could be stable for a while. We'll find out. I get what you mean about checking coins to make sure they are still worth something. I used to just put my spare btc (which wasn't very much) into Drk, which was stable for months on end (less stable now, but primarily upwards movement). It was nice not worrying that a coin's value would fall apart. For everything else though, I have this dread whenever I check the exchanges each day.
|
|
|
|
Wallenstein
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 13, 2014, 08:41:06 PM |
|
+1. And I for one, would love to be part of a stable coin for once. There aren't too many out there (BTC, BC, VTC). The notion of being able to set it and forget it would be awesome, instead of having to check every day to make sure that the coin hasn't lost 80% of it's value.
I'd probably expect some instability for now, but if it gets 2x ipo prices with decent volume, I'd hope it could be stable for a while. We'll find out. I get what you mean about checking coins to make sure they are still worth something. I used to just put my spare btc (which wasn't very much) into Drk, which was stable for months on end (less stable now, but primarily upwards movement). It was nice not worrying that a coin's value would fall apart. For everything else though, I have this dread whenever I check the exchanges each day. Well, the crazy thing is that every day new coins are released and about 90% of them seem to have a shelf-life of 2-3 weeks with a single pump (followed by a dump) comprising the bulk of their activity after which they sort of fade out. It is this reason why I'm convinced that a well-executed, long-term strategy can bring mad value to investors (as supposed to day traders). This is our goal with DCM and XBC and we'll work hard to make it happen.
|
|
|
|
poornamelessme
|
|
June 13, 2014, 08:50:40 PM |
|
Well, the crazy thing is that every day new coins are released and about 90% of them seem to have a shelf-life of 2-3 weeks with a single pump (followed by a dump) comprising the bulk of their activity after which they sort of fade out.
It is this reason why I'm convinced that a well-executed, long-term strategy can bring mad value to investors (as supposed to day traders). This is our goal with DCM and XBC and we'll work hard to make it happen.
Hopefully. XBC was of course pumped and dumped, however, but it's still hanging in there. One thing I didn't pay much attention to previously, but price manipulation is so much more evident on smaller exchanges than larger ones. It's like you see some orders or behavior that almost have neon signs on them saying: 'fake buy/sell order'... pump incoming (or dump w/plan to scoop up cheap coins, repeat process). And yep, it is sort of amusing in a way how many new coins get released simply for the short term, and for quick pumps. Just watching the polo trollbox a short time one can see how people jump from coin to coin... no real logic behind some trends or pumps either. So long as it keeps making money (for some people), it'll continue.
|
|
|
|
steady712
|
|
June 13, 2014, 09:17:37 PM |
|
In case anyone did not see it: We have purchased a fund of DCM to be used for development purposes - Translations: 300 DCM
Chinese Write us if you are capabale of translating to other languages to establish the bounty, we will not accept simple translator app writeups. - Games: (Casino's/Dice) 500 DCM
- Marketing/fanart images: 10-100 DCM (depending on quality)
- First Faucet: 250 DCM
- Articles: 350-800 DCM (Coin Blogs 350 large media 800)
- Merchants and services: Variable 1-2000 DCM depending on site quality/services)
- Wiki: 900 DCM
- Mobile App: 1000 DCM
|
|
|
|
Wallenstein
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 13, 2014, 09:41:24 PM |
|
Well, the crazy thing is that every day new coins are released and about 90% of them seem to have a shelf-life of 2-3 weeks with a single pump (followed by a dump) comprising the bulk of their activity after which they sort of fade out.
It is this reason why I'm convinced that a well-executed, long-term strategy can bring mad value to investors (as supposed to day traders). This is our goal with DCM and XBC and we'll work hard to make it happen.
Hopefully. XBC was of course pumped and dumped, however, but it's still hanging in there. Actually XBC is doing much better than the current price would have you think. We have a solid team in place, processes established and have covered a lot of ground towards our next deliverables. Also, the XBC community, while not huge is large enough and dedicated enough to get stuff done and has generated an amazing amount of good ideas for us. Of course, now DCM gets to leverage most of that ... so it could work out really well. I am convinced that if we simply keep up delivering good work, our day in the sun will come; it's just sort of impossible to predict *when* that will be.
|
|
|
|
poornamelessme
|
|
June 13, 2014, 10:59:04 PM |
|
Actually XBC is doing much better than the current price would have you think. We have a solid team in place, processes established and have covered a lot of ground towards our next deliverables. Also, the XBC community, while not huge is large enough and dedicated enough to get stuff done and has generated an amazing amount of good ideas for us. Of course, now DCM gets to leverage most of that ... so it could work out really well.
I am convinced that if we simply keep up delivering good work, our day in the sun will come; it's just sort of impossible to predict *when* that will be.
I still have some XBC and have posted over there, and in the official forums too. The price is lower than I would expect right now, not only because of the team, but mostly because of MP. It's nearing the top 5 in voting, so it appears to just be a matter of time before they get to the top spot. But I guess because any rewards won't be immediate, people don't look at it that way, so the price, although stable-ish, isn't really that high. Once it gets to the top 3, I'd expect to see some movement.
|
|
|
|
CommanderVenus
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
Zoinks! Its the Miner Miner Forty-Niner!
|
|
June 14, 2014, 12:41:12 AM |
|
Is the wallet containing the #1 address on the rich list holding 914,627.42 DCM unlocked and minting? Answered.
I was wondering how the weight works. The network weight is 181. Does this mean that everyone that has an unlocked wallet get a portion of that cumulative weight? Or is 181 the average weight meaning that some wallets have higher than 181 and some have lower?
Also, does having multiple addresses with different balances help or hurt your chances of minting? Does your weight reflect your entire balance or just one of your addresses?
Also please stop replying to people that are here to do nothing but hinder growth of DCM.
EDIT: Also, i hope that the developers saw my wallet review.
So Bittrex does not mint. Lets assume all other addresses are minting on the network. 1,350,353 total DCM exist - 897,627.42 DCM in Bittrexs address = 452,725.58 total DCM minting on the network The network has a weight of 181. 452,725.58 total DCM minting on the network / 181 network weight = 4,482.43149 DCM per 1% of network weight Hmm.. this math doesnt make any sense. I would need to know the total amount of DCM being minting to figure out if this is actually how the network works.
|
BTC: 1VenusEubcLC9W7ykckHbdEzo5MVhPmCb NXT: 15182624396855992605 BTQ: 14b2QFPwFtBC3tcRW9F61aaRXP2ns3fh1m
|
|
|
From Above
|
|
June 14, 2014, 12:42:56 AM |
|
as far as i can observe this was a good bang for the buck IPO for the devs. But sorry for the userbase indeed.
|
|
|
|
merk475
|
|
June 14, 2014, 01:00:34 AM |
|
Is the wallet containing the #1 address on the rich list holding 914,627.42 DCM unlocked and minting? Answered.
I was wondering how the weight works. The network weight is 181. Does this mean that everyone that has an unlocked wallet get a portion of that cumulative weight? Or is 181 the average weight meaning that some wallets have higher than 181 and some have lower?
Also, does having multiple addresses with different balances help or hurt your chances of minting? Does your weight reflect your entire balance or just one of your addresses?
Also please stop replying to people that are here to do nothing but hinder growth of DCM.
EDIT: Also, i hope that the developers saw my wallet review.
So Bittrex does not mint. Lets assume all other addresses are minting on the network. 1,350,353 total DCM exist - 897,627.42 DCM in Bittrexs address = 452,725.58 total DCM minting on the network The network has a weight of 181. 452,725.58 total DCM minting on the network / 181 network weight = 4,482.43149 DCM per 1% of network weight Hmm.. this math doesnt make any sense. I would need to know the total amount of DCM being minting to figure out if this is actually how the network works. The total coins in the network now, according to the blockchain (Mintpal + wallets) = 1,347,128.44. The initial distribution was 1.35 million. What happened to the other: 2871.56 that isn't showing up in the blockchain?
|
|
|
|
dCom (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 01:25:40 AM |
|
Is the wallet containing the #1 address on the rich list holding 914,627.42 DCM unlocked and minting? Answered.
I was wondering how the weight works. The network weight is 181. Does this mean that everyone that has an unlocked wallet get a portion of that cumulative weight? Or is 181 the average weight meaning that some wallets have higher than 181 and some have lower?
Also, does having multiple addresses with different balances help or hurt your chances of minting? Does your weight reflect your entire balance or just one of your addresses?
Also please stop replying to people that are here to do nothing but hinder growth of DCM.
EDIT: Also, i hope that the developers saw my wallet review.
So Bittrex does not mint. Lets assume all other addresses are minting on the network. 1,350,353 total DCM exist - 897,627.42 DCM in Bittrexs address = 452,725.58 total DCM minting on the network The network has a weight of 181. 452,725.58 total DCM minting on the network / 181 network weight = 4,482.43149 DCM per 1% of network weight Hmm.. this math doesnt make any sense. I would need to know the total amount of DCM being minting to figure out if this is actually how the network works. The total coins in the network now, according to the blockchain (Mintpal + wallets) = 1,347,128.44. The initial distribution was 1.35 million. What happened to the other: 2871.56 that isn't showing up in the blockchain? http://dcm.blockexplorer.cc/chain/DCM?count=2016&hi=12227Block Approx. Time Transactions Value Out Difficulty Outstanding Average Age Chain Age % CoinDD 12227 2014-06-13 03:13:51 1 0.00001 0.214 1350309.194129 1.75603 16.7452 82.9858%
|
|
|
|
merk475
|
|
June 14, 2014, 01:39:32 AM |
|
Ah....my bad. I was looking at the total coins from the rich list and not the block explorer. Forgot to switch back.
|
|
|
|
|
Wallenstein
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 09:32:13 AM |
|
This just in Vendor Portal List View Design Our designer has come back to us with the updated design for the default product list view. Please see the image below for an impression of what we have planned. http://dc-altcoin.com/userdata/Media/StoreDesign_ListProductFull.pngYour opinions and suggestions are of course appreciated and will be given due consideration.
|
|
|
|
|
From Above
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:24:48 AM |
|
as far as i can observe this was a good bang for the buck IPO for the devs. But sorry for the userbase indeed.
Btc Collection Party :-D
|
|
|
|
Bobsurplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:38:30 AM |
|
This just in Vendor Portal List View Design Our designer has come back to us with the updated design for the default product list view. Please see the image below for an impression of what we have planned. Your opinions and suggestions are of course appreciated and will be given due consideration. Really, this is what you're coming up with to add value to the coin? First of all, a marketplace like your showing can be built for a few K, max 5 grand. Second.. how in the world can someone take payment in DCM for anything, let alone a high ticket item like a tv. If I wanted to sell $500 of my DCM I'd tank the market. You guys are a massive fail!
|
|
|
|
Geenstijl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:57:17 AM |
|
This just in Vendor Portal List View Design Our designer has come back to us with the updated design for the default product list view. Please see the image below for an impression of what we have planned. Your opinions and suggestions are of course appreciated and will be given due consideration. It looks good imo.
|
|
|
|
telostia
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 12:18:45 PM |
|
The collaboration of the two coins DCM and XBC is a good one. It makes reaching for the goal of vendor adoption much quicker with more people added to the workforce. The Vendor portal looks great so far so keep up the great work. These are the kinda news we look forward to, not some battle between whos better at fudding and defending. If the action of a certain person here keeps coming back with stupid comments, I would suggest(and alot of others will agree to) an updated moderated thread to combat this nonsense.
|
|
|
|
GTO73
|
|
June 14, 2014, 12:29:54 PM |
|
I sell al my coins, lose a half of invetment, the dev follow same strange direction, and the designer , i mean, days for this basical things..
|
|
|
|
|