Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 01:28:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [RE-ANN] GrowthCoin PoW/PoS - 100% per year - Version 1.3.0.1  (Read 66159 times)
unick (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
July 14, 2014, 08:31:02 PM
 #301

Strange things happening....

I'm on the right blockchain, i used the getblockhash command. Thanks Unick!

Current shows: getblockhash 592973 - 0000000cd886aa4eb844f5354e21cdc3a2e9af26cea2f18c7db09e904ca31aa8

Using the betaclient from here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/5xkk8npt6enabuk/GrowthCoin-Qt.zip
"version" : "v1.3.0.0-beta",
"protocolversion" : 60007,
"walletversion" : 60000,

But I'm only getting orphans when staking. Some go up to 10 confirmations and then get rejected.



this is the wrong version

you should have protocol 70001

please download the pre-release version (1.3.1.0) from this link https://github.com/iamunick/growthcoin/releases

the version you should read in your client is 1.3.0.1

I just grabbed the Qt from the github link, and I get

Code:
"version" : "v1.3.0.0-beta",
"protocolversion" : 60007,
"walletversion" : 60001,




Hum, let me check then.

it's supposed to be protocol 70001

Awesome Explorers for Awesome Coins | Show some BTC love here: 1AAYAZgaz2me7hyumexUZzcyGRZEYtCx5C
HoboNickels: hbn.blockx.info | BottleCaps: cap.blockx.info | GrowthCoin: grw.blockx.info
1714786124
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714786124

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714786124
Reply with quote  #2

1714786124
Report to moderator
1714786124
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714786124

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714786124
Reply with quote  #2

1714786124
Report to moderator
1714786124
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714786124

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714786124
Reply with quote  #2

1714786124
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714786124
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714786124

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714786124
Reply with quote  #2

1714786124
Report to moderator
Alex_Koekie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 14, 2014, 08:34:06 PM
 #302

Same here, followed your link and it shows:

"version" : "v1.3.0.0-beta",
"protocolversion" : 60007,
"walletversion" : 60000,

unick (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
July 14, 2014, 08:35:48 PM
 #303

you guys are right,  

I'm going to ask Presstab to build the Qt client for windows. I'm on a Mac and can't do it since my virtualbox is not configured properly yet.

sorry about that

Awesome Explorers for Awesome Coins | Show some BTC love here: 1AAYAZgaz2me7hyumexUZzcyGRZEYtCx5C
HoboNickels: hbn.blockx.info | BottleCaps: cap.blockx.info | GrowthCoin: grw.blockx.info
scryptographer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 143
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 14, 2014, 08:38:20 PM
 #304

you guys are right,  

I'm going to ask Presstab to build the Qt client for windows. I'm on a Mac and can't do it since my virtualbox is not configured properly yet.

sorry about that

No worries. I still got 10 hours till my next block stakes (:

unick (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
July 14, 2014, 08:44:04 PM
 #305

Same here, followed your link and it shows:

"version" : "v1.3.0.0-beta",
"protocolversion" : 60007,
"walletversion" : 60000,



also, the network shouldn't reject blocks from protocol version 60007, so if you can share your debug.log when the rejection occcurs, I would like to take a look at it.


thanks

Awesome Explorers for Awesome Coins | Show some BTC love here: 1AAYAZgaz2me7hyumexUZzcyGRZEYtCx5C
HoboNickels: hbn.blockx.info | BottleCaps: cap.blockx.info | GrowthCoin: grw.blockx.info
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


Blockchain Developer


View Profile
July 14, 2014, 09:10:12 PM
 #306

Sorry for the confusion everyone here is the latest build - confirmed that it is 1.3.0.1

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v95nuqz1lg3xbw4/GrowthCoin-Qt.exe

Projects I Contribute To: libzerocoin | Veil | PIVX | HyperStake | Crown | SaluS
noise23
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 967
Merit: 1002



View Profile
July 14, 2014, 09:11:30 PM
 #307

It seems like we just got another fork -
right now grw.acidpool.com and grw.blockx.info are at 593090
getblockhash 593090
000000011be8c3e99e0baffb7100161e7568a5cf787cbbe7d6045678b40de8b5

my home pc win wallet and grw.multi-pool.info are at 593107
from my pc wallet -
getblockhash 593090
3c56abc5208295cbc2c6cfa27d5ff282d1554a94b4e5bd054b8c661f66fcb099
unick (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
July 14, 2014, 09:20:02 PM
 #308

Sorry for the confusion everyone here is the latest build - confirmed that it is 1.3.0.1

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v95nuqz1lg3xbw4/GrowthCoin-Qt.exe

thanks for the quick reply Smiley

Awesome Explorers for Awesome Coins | Show some BTC love here: 1AAYAZgaz2me7hyumexUZzcyGRZEYtCx5C
HoboNickels: hbn.blockx.info | BottleCaps: cap.blockx.info | GrowthCoin: grw.blockx.info
Alex_Koekie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 14, 2014, 09:21:56 PM
 #309

Same here, followed your link and it shows:

"version" : "v1.3.0.0-beta",
"protocolversion" : 60007,
"walletversion" : 60000,



also, the network shouldn't reject blocks from protocol version 60007, so if you can share your debug.log when the rejection occcurs, I would like to take a look at it.


thanks

Your 1.3.0.0 github version does seems to stake, now up to 35 confirms, didn't get that with the old 1.3.0.0 dropbox version.
Don't know if its relevant, but I remember it showed networkweight of 5000 while my walletweight alone is 17k+
The github 1.3.0.0 version shows more realistic numbers: wallet 17k and networkweight 57065.4

Will try the new wallet from presstab now.

BTW the new wallet looks great! :-)
unick (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
July 14, 2014, 09:22:13 PM
 #310

It seems like we just got another fork -
right now grw.acidpool.com and grw.blockx.info are at 593090
getblockhash 593090
000000011be8c3e99e0baffb7100161e7568a5cf787cbbe7d6045678b40de8b5

my home pc win wallet and grw.multi-pool.info are at 593107
from my pc wallet -
getblockhash 593090
3c56abc5208295cbc2c6cfa27d5ff282d1554a94b4e5bd054b8c661f66fcb099



this should not be a problem,

the block your home pc and multi-pool are on is a PoS block, if that chains wins to be the longest, it should reorganize and sync for all the network.  But I'll still keep an eye on it

Awesome Explorers for Awesome Coins | Show some BTC love here: 1AAYAZgaz2me7hyumexUZzcyGRZEYtCx5C
HoboNickels: hbn.blockx.info | BottleCaps: cap.blockx.info | GrowthCoin: grw.blockx.info
unick (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
July 14, 2014, 09:25:43 PM
 #311

Same here, followed your link and it shows:

"version" : "v1.3.0.0-beta",
"protocolversion" : 60007,
"walletversion" : 60000,



also, the network shouldn't reject blocks from protocol version 60007, so if you can share your debug.log when the rejection occcurs, I would like to take a look at it.


thanks

Your 1.3.0.0 github version does seems to stake, now up to 35 confirms, didn't get that with the old 1.3.0.0 dropbox version.
Don't know if its relevant, but I remember it showed networkweight of 5000 while my walletweight alone is 17k+
The github 1.3.0.0 version shows more realistic numbers: wallet 17k and networkweight 57065.4

Will try the new wallet from presstab now.

BTW the new wallet looks great! :-)


ok, thanks for the heads up, orphans are normal when staking, it is still based on luck so that might just have been the issue.  Glad to know it's working then Smiley


netstakeweight and your wallet weight are surprisingly not related. They are 2 metrics calculated differently.  while your wallet weight is based on your blocks age, the netstakeweight is based on the last few blocks of stake generated.

hope this makes it a little bit more sense

Awesome Explorers for Awesome Coins | Show some BTC love here: 1AAYAZgaz2me7hyumexUZzcyGRZEYtCx5C
HoboNickels: hbn.blockx.info | BottleCaps: cap.blockx.info | GrowthCoin: grw.blockx.info
Alex_Koekie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 14, 2014, 10:25:58 PM
 #312

Same here, followed your link and it shows:

"version" : "v1.3.0.0-beta",
"protocolversion" : 60007,
"walletversion" : 60000,



also, the network shouldn't reject blocks from protocol version 60007, so if you can share your debug.log when the rejection occcurs, I would like to take a look at it.


thanks

Your 1.3.0.0 github version does seems to stake, now up to 35 confirms, didn't get that with the old 1.3.0.0 dropbox version.
Don't know if its relevant, but I remember it showed networkweight of 5000 while my walletweight alone is 17k+
The github 1.3.0.0 version shows more realistic numbers: wallet 17k and networkweight 57065.4

Will try the new wallet from presstab now.

BTW the new wallet looks great! :-)


ok, thanks for the heads up, orphans are normal when staking, it is still based on luck so that might just have been the issue.  Glad to know it's working then Smiley


netstakeweight and your wallet weight are surprisingly not related. They are 2 metrics calculated differently.  while your wallet weight is based on your blocks age, the netstakeweight is based on the last few blocks of stake generated.

hope this makes it a little bit more sense


New wallet working correctly.

Shows version:
 "version" : "v1.3.0.1-beta",
"protocolversion" : 70001,
"walletversion" : 60000,

And stakes without orphans, already 6 pos stakes complete, 50+ confirms!

I did lose all my old stakes of tonight, but i suppose it was because i was on the wrong fork as well as noise23.
My wallet now shows: getblockhash 593090 - 000000011be8c3e99e0baffb7100161e7568a5cf787cbbe7d6045678b40de8b5

But with my old stakes (those who disappeared), it showed getblockhash 593090 - 3c56abc5208295cbc2c6cfa27d5ff282d1554a94b4e5bd054b8c661f66fcb099

I guess getblockhash 593090 - 000000011be8c3e99e0baffb7100161e7568a5cf787cbbe7d6045678b40de8b5 it the current and correct chain, am i correct?

BTW your explanation of walletweight i understand, i guess that the comparison of both weights it is also the way the "next stake in xxx days" message is calculated.
BTW2....... Are the download links on the grw site and github updated? This to prevent new users from installing the old client.

Thanks for all the replies, I hope my information is perceived as helpful and not as complaining, you and all others are doing a great job!

SolidStateSurvivor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 553
Merit: 500


Solo Miner Legend


View Profile WWW
July 14, 2014, 10:43:50 PM
 #313

Sorry for the confusion everyone here is the latest build - confirmed that it is 1.3.0.1

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v95nuqz1lg3xbw4/GrowthCoin-Qt.exe

Yes, I should have said something, I check them both and they were exactly the same size, but I thought not to, I even wrote this without posting it:

Quote
Is this one really new? It's identical with the https://www.dropbox.com/s/v95nuqz1lg3xbw4/GrowthCoin-Qt.exe from the 11th, even in size. (both files are exactly are 19 016 192 bytes). Just asking
(That is talking about the new one posted earlier today.) Also when version 1.3.0.1 didn't show up, I was a little curious.

Founding member of Hashmeisters Inc...
SolidStateSurvivor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 553
Merit: 500


Solo Miner Legend


View Profile WWW
July 14, 2014, 10:47:04 PM
Last edit: July 14, 2014, 11:23:34 PM by SolidStateSurvivor
 #314

I am getting this error when I am trying to build the windows-qt on ubuntu, with VM.

Starting target
Checking if target is up.
Preparing build environment
qt-win32-4.7.4-gitian.zip                     100%   21MB  21.1MB/s   00:01    
boost-win32-1.49.0-gitian2.zip                100%   17MB  17.3MB/s   00:01    
growthcoin-deps-1.2.0.zip                     100% 4050KB   4.0MB/s   00:00    
growthcoin.zip                                100%   58MB  29.2MB/s   00:02    
Updating apt-get repository (log in var/install.log)
Installing additional packages (log in var/install.log)
Grabbing package manifest
Creating build script (var/build-script)
Running build script (log in var/build.log)
bin/gbuild:21:in `system!': failed to run on-target setarch i386 bash -x < var/build-script > var/build.log 2>&1 (RuntimeError)
   from bin/gbuild:118:in `build_one_configuration'
   from bin/gbuild:235
   from bin/gbuild:230:in `each'
   from bin/gbuild:230
   from bin/gbuild:228:in `each'
   from bin/gbuild:228

So I'm currently looking in the "gitian-win32.yml" and comparing it with other wallet that works to build, to see if I can find the error there.

Also going to look in build script (var/build-script) & (log in var/build.log)

I was thinking I could build the windows wallet, when it is needed, but it doesn't seem to work atm.

Founding member of Hashmeisters Inc...
unick (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 12:43:28 AM
 #315

Same here, followed your link and it shows:

"version" : "v1.3.0.0-beta",
"protocolversion" : 60007,
"walletversion" : 60000,



also, the network shouldn't reject blocks from protocol version 60007, so if you can share your debug.log when the rejection occcurs, I would like to take a look at it.


thanks

Your 1.3.0.0 github version does seems to stake, now up to 35 confirms, didn't get that with the old 1.3.0.0 dropbox version.
Don't know if its relevant, but I remember it showed networkweight of 5000 while my walletweight alone is 17k+
The github 1.3.0.0 version shows more realistic numbers: wallet 17k and networkweight 57065.4

Will try the new wallet from presstab now.

BTW the new wallet looks great! :-)


ok, thanks for the heads up, orphans are normal when staking, it is still based on luck so that might just have been the issue.  Glad to know it's working then Smiley


netstakeweight and your wallet weight are surprisingly not related. They are 2 metrics calculated differently.  while your wallet weight is based on your blocks age, the netstakeweight is based on the last few blocks of stake generated.

hope this makes it a little bit more sense


New wallet working correctly.

Shows version:
 "version" : "v1.3.0.1-beta",
"protocolversion" : 70001,
"walletversion" : 60000,

And stakes without orphans, already 6 pos stakes complete, 50+ confirms!

I did lose all my old stakes of tonight, but i suppose it was because i was on the wrong fork as well as noise23.
My wallet now shows: getblockhash 593090 - 000000011be8c3e99e0baffb7100161e7568a5cf787cbbe7d6045678b40de8b5

But with my old stakes (those who disappeared), it showed getblockhash 593090 - 3c56abc5208295cbc2c6cfa27d5ff282d1554a94b4e5bd054b8c661f66fcb099

I guess getblockhash 593090 - 000000011be8c3e99e0baffb7100161e7568a5cf787cbbe7d6045678b40de8b5 it the current and correct chain, am i correct?

BTW your explanation of walletweight i understand, i guess that the comparison of both weights it is also the way the "next stake in xxx days" message is calculated.
BTW2....... Are the download links on the grw site and github updated? This to prevent new users from installing the old client.

Thanks for all the replies, I hope my information is perceived as helpful and not as complaining, you and all others are doing a great job!



excellent news that everything is staking away Smiley   Losing those Stakes is not that of a big deal since they will stake again on the correct chain.

getblockhash 593090 - 000000011be8c3e99e0baffb7100161e7568a5cf787cbbe7d6045678b40de8b5 is indeed on the right chain. You are good there.


Wallet weight is based on your coin age. but presently, this information is wrong since no coins will stake before about 8.8 days of age.  It will be necessary to create a hard fork and make changes to the stake modifier in order to get the desired 5 days of minimum age.

The link on the site (I assume http://growthco.in) I can't change, the link on the github has been updated for the pre-release download.

I think it's neilh that provides the website, I'll make sure he gets the info to update the version on the site

Awesome Explorers for Awesome Coins | Show some BTC love here: 1AAYAZgaz2me7hyumexUZzcyGRZEYtCx5C
HoboNickels: hbn.blockx.info | BottleCaps: cap.blockx.info | GrowthCoin: grw.blockx.info
unick (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 12:45:58 AM
 #316

I am getting this error when I am trying to build the windows-qt on ubuntu, with VM.

Starting target
Checking if target is up.
Preparing build environment
qt-win32-4.7.4-gitian.zip                     100%   21MB  21.1MB/s   00:01    
boost-win32-1.49.0-gitian2.zip                100%   17MB  17.3MB/s   00:01    
growthcoin-deps-1.2.0.zip                     100% 4050KB   4.0MB/s   00:00    
growthcoin.zip                                100%   58MB  29.2MB/s   00:02    
Updating apt-get repository (log in var/install.log)
Installing additional packages (log in var/install.log)
Grabbing package manifest
Creating build script (var/build-script)
Running build script (log in var/build.log)
bin/gbuild:21:in `system!': failed to run on-target setarch i386 bash -x < var/build-script > var/build.log 2>&1 (RuntimeError)
   from bin/gbuild:118:in `build_one_configuration'
   from bin/gbuild:235
   from bin/gbuild:230:in `each'
   from bin/gbuild:230
   from bin/gbuild:228:in `each'
   from bin/gbuild:228

So I'm currently looking in the "gitian-win32.yml" and comparing it with other wallet that works to build, to see if I can find the error there.

Also going to look in build script (var/build-script) & (log in var/build.log)

I was thinking I could build the windows wallet, when it is needed, but it doesn't seem to work atm.

Haven't had time to play with the gitian builder. I'm not even sure these files are configured properly, if you make any changes and you make it work, let me know Smiley

Awesome Explorers for Awesome Coins | Show some BTC love here: 1AAYAZgaz2me7hyumexUZzcyGRZEYtCx5C
HoboNickels: hbn.blockx.info | BottleCaps: cap.blockx.info | GrowthCoin: grw.blockx.info
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


Blockchain Developer


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 01:04:37 AM
 #317

Ahh the GRW community is very crypto saavy. Seems like every other person knows how to compile, check forks, etc. Good luck here guys!  Make my GRW grow!

Projects I Contribute To: libzerocoin | Veil | PIVX | HyperStake | Crown | SaluS
SolidStateSurvivor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 553
Merit: 500


Solo Miner Legend


View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 01:29:14 PM
 #318

Haven't had time to play with the gitian builder. I'm not even sure these files are configured properly, if you make any changes and you make it work, let me know Smiley

They are not configured? Hmm, then that might be it. I didn't have any luck, with it. Seems like they compile fine in windows, though. But I don't do that, I've been
doing these kind of things in Linux since the late 90s, almost. I'll find another coin wallet, build it with gitian and see if I can find out what is missing.

Founding member of Hashmeisters Inc...
dengnizaidongji
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250

Colossuscoin - the future of payment methods


View Profile
July 15, 2014, 01:43:40 PM
 #319

Cryptsy
Request submitted
Follow discussion and submit interest on the following thread: https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/4000279240

MintPal
Voting here: https://www.mintpal.com/voting#GRW

Colossuscoin - the future of payment methods
ice00
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 296
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
July 15, 2014, 05:48:23 PM
 #320

It is from this morning that I try to sync the pool using the bootstrap of day 11.
Now it is blocked at 496288 and seems to not go ahead. The daemon is the latest from source.

NXT: 1408301140704352478
EMC: Ec2TpuRxcYr4WHMp12vZYck5ch3ymzskbZ
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!