cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2016, 02:27:17 PM |
|
are nanowallet and mobile wallets use same way of backup import keys? means can i use same addresses on both?
You can use the same private key in Nano, Android, Lighwallet, and NCC and you will have the same account on each wallet. Also, NCC has an option to export wallet to Lightwallet format. That wallet will work in both Nano and Lightwallet. And now that the Android app is out, the next update to Nano in a week or so will also have an "export wallet to Android" option where the app just scans a QR in Nano and now you have the same account on your phone and your desktop. thats exactly the answer i was hoping for! NEM marketing might be weak but their features are great the best marketing cant create features but great features can become more visible if u add more and better marketing the only thing that slow NEM on the way to the top 5 crypto coins is than many people dont know about it and its abilities
|
|
|
|
garp
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2016, 04:06:32 PM |
|
are nanowallet and mobile wallets use same way of backup import keys? means can i use same addresses on both?
You can use the same private key in Nano, Android, Lighwallet, and NCC and you will have the same account on each wallet. Also, NCC has an option to export wallet to Lightwallet format. That wallet will work in both Nano and Lightwallet. And now that the Android app is out, the next update to Nano in a week or so will also have an "export wallet to Android" option where the app just scans a QR in Nano and now you have the same account on your phone and your desktop. Can we add a second account to an existing nano or mobile wallet using the private key? Or do we need to import a second account into a second wallet?
|
garp
|
|
|
rockethead
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1016
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2016, 04:39:16 PM |
|
are nanowallet and mobile wallets use same way of backup import keys? means can i use same addresses on both?
You can use the same private key in Nano, Android, Lighwallet, and NCC and you will have the same account on each wallet. Also, NCC has an option to export wallet to Lightwallet format. That wallet will work in both Nano and Lightwallet. And now that the Android app is out, the next update to Nano in a week or so will also have an "export wallet to Android" option where the app just scans a QR in Nano and now you have the same account on your phone and your desktop. Can we add a second account to an existing nano or mobile wallet using the private key? Or do we need to import a second account into a second wallet? yes you can. But the feature was taken out. Reason is the NCC import function gets screwed up a little, so says @Jabo38
|
|
|
|
rockethead
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1016
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2016, 04:54:49 PM |
|
are nanowallet and mobile wallets use same way of backup import keys? means can i use same addresses on both?
You can use the same private key in Nano, Android, Lighwallet, and NCC and you will have the same account on each wallet. Also, NCC has an option to export wallet to Lightwallet format. That wallet will work in both Nano and Lightwallet. And now that the Android app is out, the next update to Nano in a week or so will also have an "export wallet to Android" option where the app just scans a QR in Nano and now you have the same account on your phone and your desktop. thats exactly the answer i was hoping for! NEM marketing might be weak but their features are great the best marketing cant create features but great features can become more visible if u add more and better marketing the only thing that slow NEM on the way to the top 5 crypto coins is than many people dont know about it and its abilities Looking at the enterprise class utility, there are only 3 that should be considered. Nxt, NEM and Ethereum. The rest are either application specific, not complete yet, or not it the same category, e.g., Monero and Dash. Decentralised Smart Contract is still a questionable solution as it relies on oracles which are centralised and centralised decision making. So, it is a paradox. Hence not relevant really. You strip that out of Ethereum as an enterprise class solution, it has nothing. NXT is ok, but lack cohesive offerings. Looking at it, NEM is in its own class in terms of offerings and utility. Creativity is the key to realising the potential of NEM. Edit: A whitepaper will be released soon to expound the real value of NEM as a project. It is something that will address what most of the world is talking about. Yes, talking about, not in production. Another thing to note is hyperledger. Today, it is a fact that hyperledger is a compilation of junk code and should not warrant any consideration unless it is completely re-written.
|
|
|
|
rigel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1240
Merit: 1001
Thank God I'm an atheist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2016, 05:09:20 PM |
|
are nanowallet and mobile wallets use same way of backup import keys? means can i use same addresses on both?
You can use the same private key in Nano, Android, Lighwallet, and NCC and you will have the same account on each wallet. Also, NCC has an option to export wallet to Lightwallet format. That wallet will work in both Nano and Lightwallet. And now that the Android app is out, the next update to Nano in a week or so will also have an "export wallet to Android" option where the app just scans a QR in Nano and now you have the same account on your phone and your desktop. thats exactly the answer i was hoping for! NEM marketing might be weak but their features are great the best marketing cant create features but great features can become more visible if u add more and better marketing the only thing that slow NEM on the way to the top 5 crypto coins is than many people dont know about it and its abilities Looking at the enterprise class utility, there are only 3 that should be considered. Nxt, NEM and Ethereum. The rest are either application specific, not complete yet, or not it the same category, e.g., Monero and Dash. Decentralised Smart Contract is still a questionable solution as it relies on oracles which are centralised and centralised decision making. So, it is a paradox. Hence not relevant really. You strip that out of Ethereum as an enterprise class solution, it has nothing. NXT is ok, but lack cohesive offerings. Looking at it, NEM is in its own class in terms of offerings and utility. Creativity is the key to realising the potential of NEM. Edit: A whitepaper will be released soon to expound the real value of NEM as a project. It is something that will address what most of the world is talking about. Yes, talking about, not in production. Another thing to note is hyperledger. Today, it is a fact that hyperledger is a compilation of junk code and should not warrant any consideration unless it is completely re-written. Great insight. What about R3? It looks promising even if in an early stage.
|
|
|
|
rockethead
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1016
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2016, 06:14:06 PM |
|
are nanowallet and mobile wallets use same way of backup import keys? means can i use same addresses on both?
You can use the same private key in Nano, Android, Lighwallet, and NCC and you will have the same account on each wallet. Also, NCC has an option to export wallet to Lightwallet format. That wallet will work in both Nano and Lightwallet. And now that the Android app is out, the next update to Nano in a week or so will also have an "export wallet to Android" option where the app just scans a QR in Nano and now you have the same account on your phone and your desktop. thats exactly the answer i was hoping for! NEM marketing might be weak but their features are great the best marketing cant create features but great features can become more visible if u add more and better marketing the only thing that slow NEM on the way to the top 5 crypto coins is than many people dont know about it and its abilities Looking at the enterprise class utility, there are only 3 that should be considered. Nxt, NEM and Ethereum. The rest are either application specific, not complete yet, or not it the same category, e.g., Monero and Dash. Decentralised Smart Contract is still a questionable solution as it relies on oracles which are centralised and centralised decision making. So, it is a paradox. Hence not relevant really. You strip that out of Ethereum as an enterprise class solution, it has nothing. NXT is ok, but lack cohesive offerings. Looking at it, NEM is in its own class in terms of offerings and utility. Creativity is the key to realising the potential of NEM. Edit: A whitepaper will be released soon to expound the real value of NEM as a project. It is something that will address what most of the world is talking about. Yes, talking about, not in production. Another thing to note is hyperledger. Today, it is a fact that hyperledger is a compilation of junk code and should not warrant any consideration unless it is completely re-written. Great insight. What about R3? It looks promising even if in an early stage. R3 is only a concept. It is going to the open source community because their concept will remain a concept unless they get the right people to do it. Don't think they have the means. Same as hyperledger from DAH. They just gave it away as they realised it was some rocket science they were dealing with. Anyway, when we unleash the catapult whitepaper one will immediately see who is going to set the standard on blockchain.
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2016, 06:32:53 PM |
|
Anyway, when we unleash the catapult whitepaper one will immediately see who is going to set the standard on blockchain.
thats the kind of self confidence i like! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FGiNWsW7.png&t=665&c=OdUiPPGIHfhfMg)
|
|
|
|
nzminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2016, 10:46:59 PM |
|
Anyway, when we unleash the catapult whitepaper one will immediately see who is going to set the standard on blockchain.
thats the kind of self confidence i like! Cant wait for the whitepaper! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
NEM, THE SECURE, SCALABLE BLOCKCHAIN [NEM.IO] [T.ME/NEMRED]
|
|
|
BigSirko
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 07, 2016, 02:42:49 AM |
|
There was a recent article on R3. Almost sounds like they had thrown in the towel - by giving the code away to Hyperledger and emphasizing their network effect. Network effect is Déjà vu for me, as Bitcoin maximalists have been using that arguments against alternates for years. Also I'm not sure if I can buy the idea of 70 companies "working together" on something. Every company has its' own interests and visions and no way could that many companies ever agree on something. Also that many companies working together is guaranteed social loafing. If I run one of these companies, why would I spend any money or assign staff when another company will do it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_loafingSeems a lot of people are buying into the quantity over quality argument.
|
|
|
|
rockethead
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1016
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 07, 2016, 09:41:20 AM |
|
There was a recent article on R3. Almost sounds like they had thrown in the towel - by giving the code away to Hyperledger and emphasizing their network effect. Network effect is Déjà vu for me, as Bitcoin maximalists have been using that arguments against alternates for years. Also I'm not sure if I can buy the idea of 70 companies "working together" on something. Every company has its' own interests and visions and no way could that many companies ever agree on something. Also that many companies working together is guaranteed social loafing. If I run one of these companies, why would I spend any money or assign staff when another company will do it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_loafingSeems a lot of people are buying into the quantity over quality argument. I read an article recently. If precedence is any measure, this is a sure failure, as has been the cases previously. The only people to gain from this are the consultants, i.e., R3 staffs. This is a "me too" nice feeling. None of them are really serious. Each bank will embark on their own initiatives and wrestle that into the consortium to gain an upper hand, leaving those suckers who are not, the real losers.
|
|
|
|
Fatih87SK
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 07, 2016, 02:20:30 PM |
|
Hi Rockethead,
Is it possible to import a wallet into the Mobile App just by its Address? So you can just see the transactions/harvesting rewards/supernode rewards?
And when you actually want to send XEM or do another kind of transaction; only then the App asks for the Private Key?
|
|
|
|
rockethead
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1016
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 07, 2016, 02:48:50 PM |
|
Hi Rockethead,
Is it possible to import a wallet into the Mobile App just by its Address? So you can just see the transactions/harvesting rewards/supernode rewards?
And when you actually want to send XEM or do another kind of transaction; only then the App asks for the Private Key?
>Is it possible to import a wallet into the Mobile App just by its Address? Not in our release version, but it can be programmed to watch though> only then the App asks for the Private Key? Too hard to implement because the Private key is too long.
|
|
|
|
garp
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 07, 2016, 05:23:23 PM |
|
are nanowallet and mobile wallets use same way of backup import keys? means can i use same addresses on both?
You can use the same private key in Nano, Android, Lighwallet, and NCC and you will have the same account on each wallet. Also, NCC has an option to export wallet to Lightwallet format. That wallet will work in both Nano and Lightwallet. And now that the Android app is out, the next update to Nano in a week or so will also have an "export wallet to Android" option where the app just scans a QR in Nano and now you have the same account on your phone and your desktop. Can we add a second account to an existing nano or mobile wallet using the private key? Or do we need to import a second account into a second wallet? yes you can. But the feature was taken out. Reason is the NCC import function gets screwed up a little, so says @Jabo38 The feature was taken out, so I understand this as "No, you can't". Correct?
|
garp
|
|
|
garp
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 07, 2016, 10:58:25 PM |
|
A whitepaper will be released soon to expound the real value of NEM as a project. It is something that will address what most of the world is talking about. Yes, talking about, not in production.
Take your time. We want the waiting to be worth it Keep up the good work.
|
garp
|
|
|
jabo38
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
mining is so 2012-2013
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 07, 2016, 11:07:19 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
nzminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 08, 2016, 01:37:50 AM |
|
Markets are reacting well to the news! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
NEM, THE SECURE, SCALABLE BLOCKCHAIN [NEM.IO] [T.ME/NEMRED]
|
|
|
rockethead
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1016
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 08, 2016, 06:57:53 PM |
|
are nanowallet and mobile wallets use same way of backup import keys? means can i use same addresses on both?
You can use the same private key in Nano, Android, Lighwallet, and NCC and you will have the same account on each wallet. Also, NCC has an option to export wallet to Lightwallet format. That wallet will work in both Nano and Lightwallet. And now that the Android app is out, the next update to Nano in a week or so will also have an "export wallet to Android" option where the app just scans a QR in Nano and now you have the same account on your phone and your desktop. Can we add a second account to an existing nano or mobile wallet using the private key? Or do we need to import a second account into a second wallet? yes you can. But the feature was taken out. Reason is the NCC import function gets screwed up a little, so says @Jabo38 The feature was taken out, so I understand this as "No, you can't". Correct? It is a feature that was taken out. So, you "can actually put that back in". But you are not having it now because it has been taken out. But anyone reasonably skilled can put that feature back in.
|
|
|
|
pow2poiConvert
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 09, 2016, 04:33:46 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
shapeshiftscam
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 09, 2016, 04:36:52 AM |
|
Thanks for sharing, very good news indeed.
|
|
|
|
|