[ANN][DCN] Deepcoin secure hashing (CPU/GPU) New algo/ No premine/ No IPO/ PoW

[Timmy95]

So the dev is still alive! 

[yellowduck2]

So the dev is still alive! 

This is deepcoin. U have to be deep to know what is happening.

[sungrely]

https://alcurex.com

There seems to be a defect the trading platform.

[jox]

https://alcurex.com

There seems to be a defect the trading platform.

I saw this, I bought some DCN , for last day I saw so many bugs here, so I'am done with that exchange, they need  mature.

[marada]

Yes, this exchange is far from being perfect.
I am still having login issues.
I wish them the best, but they must work hard to get mature. 

[jox]

My hardware performance:

Radeon 7950 Sapphire dual-xcore: 1100, memory: 1250, -g 1 -I 18   4,4 Mh/s
Radeon 7950 Sapphire dual-x   core: 1200, memory: 1500, -g 1, -I 18   4,6 Mh/s
Radeon 7950 Gigabyte core: 1100, memory: 1400, -g 1, -I 18   4,5 Mh/s
Radeon R9 270 Gigabyte   core: 1100, memory: 1100, -g 2, -I 15   2,9 Mh/s
Radeon 7790 Asus   core: 1200, memory: 1200, -g 1, -I 16   2,2 Mh/s
Radeon 5570 Sapphire   core: 880, memory: 800, -g 1, -I 16   0,5 Mh/s

The 7790 performance is surprisingly high. The card is very cool and takes about 85W.

It looks quite low, with my underclocked r9 280x (core:1000, memory: 1500) I have 5.05 MH/s. But it was lots of experiments.

[marada]

I think the problem is qubitcoin algo not really optimized. I was trying to add the AES helper (used by SHAvite that is a cell of qubit algo chain) to sgminer code and kernel, but encountered some strange issues. I wish someone could help to optimize qubitcoin kernel usung the same trick used to optimize x11/x13. I mean the AES helper and the table of constants.

[alicea]

My hardware performance:

Radeon 7950 Sapphire dual-xcore: 1100, memory: 1250, -g 1 -I 18   4,4 Mh/s
Radeon 7950 Sapphire dual-x   core: 1200, memory: 1500, -g 1, -I 18   4,6 Mh/s
Radeon 7950 Gigabyte core: 1100, memory: 1400, -g 1, -I 18   4,5 Mh/s
Radeon R9 270 Gigabyte   core: 1100, memory: 1100, -g 2, -I 15   2,9 Mh/s
Radeon 7790 Asus   core: 1200, memory: 1200, -g 1, -I 16   2,2 Mh/s
Radeon 5570 Sapphire   core: 880, memory: 800, -g 1, -I 16   0,5 Mh/s

The 7790 performance is surprisingly high. The card is very cool and takes about 85W.

It looks quite low, with my underclocked r9 280x (core:1000, memory: 1500) I have 5.05 MH/s. But it was lots of experiments.

my r9 270 gives 3.1 (according to what sgminer shows), the same settings except intensity (I have 17 or 18) and I like it...

I think the problem is qubitcoin algo not really optimized. I was trying to add the AES helper (used by SHAvite that is a cell of qubit algo chain) to sgminer code and kernel, but encountered some strange issues. I wish someone could help to optimize qubitcoin kernel usung the same trick used to optimize x11/x13. I mean the AES helper and the table of constants.

...but more hashrate is welcome

tomorrow there will be the launch of.......... oh no, I havn't said anything 

[jox]

tomorrow there will be the launch of.......... oh no, I havn't said anything 

What? Whaaaat?, I am too excited. I want to know, hmmm, maybe website? Are you somehow connected to dev?

[marada]

My hardware performance:

Radeon 7950 Sapphire dual-xcore: 1100, memory: 1250, -g 1 -I 18   4,4 Mh/s
Radeon 7950 Sapphire dual-x   core: 1200, memory: 1500, -g 1, -I 18   4,6 Mh/s
Radeon 7950 Gigabyte core: 1100, memory: 1400, -g 1, -I 18   4,5 Mh/s
Radeon R9 270 Gigabyte   core: 1100, memory: 1100, -g 2, -I 15   2,9 Mh/s
Radeon 7790 Asus   core: 1200, memory: 1200, -g 1, -I 16   2,2 Mh/s
Radeon 5570 Sapphire   core: 880, memory: 800, -g 1, -I 16   0,5 Mh/s

The 7790 performance is surprisingly high. The card is very cool and takes about 85W.

It looks quite low, with my underclocked r9 280x (core:1000, memory: 1500) I have 5.05 MH/s. But it was lots of experiments.

my r9 270 gives 3.1 (according to what sgminer shows), the same settings except intensity (I have 17 or 18) and I like it...

I think the problem is qubitcoin algo not really optimized. I was trying to add the AES helper (used by SHAvite that is a cell of qubit algo chain) to sgminer code and kernel, but encountered some strange issues. I wish someone could help to optimize qubitcoin kernel usung the same trick used to optimize x11/x13. I mean the AES helper and the table of constants.

...but more hashrate is welcome

tomorrow there will be the launch of.......... oh no, I havn't said anything 

Should have updated this table.
I can also get about 3.08 MH/s with R9 270 with -I 21, -g 1. Could get a bit more if it was the only card in the system.
I use -I 15 -g 2 anyway to keep the system more useable for other task. It is my base machine.

[Goldshredder]

I use -I 15 -g 2 anyway to keep the system more useable for other task. It is my base machine.

I never understood why more miners don't use inbuilt Intel graphics for everyday usage.  The dedicated graphics cards can mine at full power and not affect the system performance for everyday tasks.  I have been doing that for a long time on my base machine.

[marada]

I use -I 15 -g 2 anyway to keep the system more useable for other task. It is my base machine.

I never understood why more miners don't use inbuilt Intel graphics for everyday usage.  The dedicated graphics cards can mine at full power and not affect the system performance for everyday tasks.  I have been doing that for a long time on my base machine.

May because of having no integrated Intel graphics card?
The mining performance is reduced very slightly: 2.95 vs. 3.05.

[sungrely]

DEV,we need a stable trading platform. On the C-CEX is a good choice.

[Goldshredder]

I use -I 15 -g 2 anyway to keep the system more useable for other task. It is my base machine.

I never understood why more miners don't use inbuilt Intel graphics for everyday usage.  The dedicated graphics cards can mine at full power and not affect the system performance for everyday tasks.  I have been doing that for a long time on my base machine.

May because of having no integrated Intel graphics card?

Of course!   Just saying, for the record.  Over the year+ I've been mining, this setup for my base machine has saved me much hassle, because the mining subsystem is separate and does it's own thing without affecting my everyday usage.

[romeshomey]

I use -I 15 -g 2 anyway to keep the system more useable for other task. It is my base machine.

I never understood why more miners don't use inbuilt Intel graphics for everyday usage.  The dedicated graphics cards can mine at full power and not affect the system performance for everyday tasks.  I have been doing that for a long time on my base machine.

I use my onboard intel accelerated graphics card for everyday use and have all of my GPU's dedicated to solely mining.

I think more miners use the AMD chipsets though and only the higher price AMD chipsets have decent onboard graphics.

[marada]

DEV,we need a stable trading platform. On the C-CEX is a good choice.

It's not a good idea.
You know, the price might skyrocket and the diff increase too high...
Someone may invent an ASIC...
Do we really need that?

[marada]

Of course!  Just saying, for the record.  Over the year+ I've been mining, this setup for my base machine has saved me much hassle, because the mining subsystem is separate and does it's own thing without affecting my everyday usage.

Some cards combined with some algos could make real harm to the system performance if used as main graphics adapter.
R9 270 is really graceful thought. Whatever algo I use the system performs perfect and mining performance decreases only very slightly.

I think more miners use the AMD chipsets though and only the higher price AMD chipsets have decent onboard graphics.

Not exactly. All the onboard AMD cards will not work with newest proprietary drivers and open drivers supporting both them and new cards are in the early stage of development. Higher priced AMD chipsets like 890FX/990FX don't have integrated graphics cards at all. FM2/FM2+ chipsets don't have onboard cards but you can use APU built-in card and it works well with the newest drivers combined with discrete GPU. It can also mine and the system performance looks unaffected. Of course you can't expect too much from your IGP.

So, if you must have a discrete GPU for serving your screen, but don't like to waste the slot and want to use it for mining - R9 270 seems to be a very good choice.

[alicea]

DEV,we need a stable trading platform. On the C-CEX is a good choice.

It's not a good idea.
You know, the price might skyrocket and the diff increase too high...
Someone may invent an ASIC...
Do we really need that?

Inventing ASIC takes a lot of months... don't worry before the next year

[Markos]

It looks quite low, with my underclocked r9 280x (core:1000, memory: 1500) I have 5.05 MH/s. But it was lots of experiments.

I corrected my result - 5.35 Mhash on R9 280X Vapor-X (core: 1080, memory: 1500) But 290s are still slow

[marada]

Inventing ASIC takes a lot of months... don't worry before the next year

You think they wouldn't speed it up at 0.1 BTC/DCN exchange rate?