idonothave
|
|
November 06, 2014, 07:08:21 PM |
|
I am running now 2 blades each with own cp2102 connected to easy usb hub with cgminer 4.7.0 at avg 92GHs / 108W (really not bad 1.17W/GHs) with 0.6% pool rejections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2014, 07:20:17 PM |
|
I am running now 2 blades each with own cp2102 connected to easy usb hub with cgminer 4.7.0 at avg 92GHs / 108W (really not bad 1.17W/GHs) with 0.6% pool rejections. what are your settings?
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
idonothave
|
|
November 06, 2014, 07:26:41 PM |
|
I am running now 2 blades each with own cp2102 connected to easy usb hub with cgminer 4.7.0 at avg 92GHs / 108W (really not bad 1.17W/GHs) with 0.6% pool rejections. what are your settings? sudo ./cgminer -c pool.conf --bmsc-options 115200 --bmsc-freq 0781 (nothing special in pool.conf) blades are pencil undervolted ( https://bitcointa.lk/threads/guide-undervolt-antminer-s1-1-19w-gh-at-the-wall.286480/) ...sorry for edit, I tried 0781 0881 0981 with the best results with 0781
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2014, 07:31:08 PM Last edit: November 06, 2014, 07:45:36 PM by CHAOSiTEC |
|
are you running bitmaintechs branch? if yes, could you try this: sudo ./cgminer -c pool.conf --bmsc-options 115200 :0.55 --bmsc-freq 0881 right now, if my assumtions are right, your running the timing at 100ms which means your not reading the chips fast enough, therefor loosing a few GHs, in the same power usage. edit: of course i forgot to order any solder paste... doh! so ill have to wait until it arrives...
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
idonothave
|
|
November 06, 2014, 07:44:10 PM |
|
are you running bitmaintechs branch? if yes, could you try this: sudo ./cgminer -c pool.conf --bmsc-options 115200 :0.55 --bmsc-freq 0881 right now, if my assumtions are right, your running the timing at 100ms which means your not reading the chips fast enough yes, seems be better a little bit... 92GHs/106W 0.02% err and yes, your assumption is correct, default timeout is 100ms
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2014, 07:47:34 PM |
|
we need to read the chips fast enough for when the chips have anything to deliver, but not too fast to waiste time, and chip speed, so its a tradeoff.. the timings are the same as those found in the antminers config file versus speed.
edit: on my test board with 200MHz and timing 100 vs timing 55 60 = aprox 5 GH lost if read to slow
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
idonothave
|
|
November 06, 2014, 07:51:17 PM |
|
we need to read the chips fast enough for when the chips have anything to deliver, but not too fast to waiste time, and chip speed, so its a tradeoff.. the timings are the same as those found in the antminers config file versus speed.
edit: on my test board with 200MHz and timing 100 vs timing 55 = aprox 5 GH lost if read to slow
even better with 0.44 - 93-4GHs/106-7W
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2014, 07:52:11 PM |
|
we need to read the chips fast enough for when the chips have anything to deliver, but not too fast to waiste time, and chip speed, so its a tradeoff.. the timings are the same as those found in the antminers config file versus speed.
edit: on my test board with 200MHz and timing 100 vs timing 55 = aprox 5 GH lost if read to slow
even better with 0.44 - 93-4GHs/106-7W seems like we need to make a speed vs timing list
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
idonothave
|
|
November 06, 2014, 07:53:31 PM |
|
we need to read the chips fast enough for when the chips have anything to deliver, but not too fast to waiste time, and chip speed, so its a tradeoff.. the timings are the same as those found in the antminers config file versus speed.
edit: on my test board with 200MHz and timing 100 vs timing 55 = aprox 5 GH lost if read to slow
even better with 0.44 - 93-4GHs/106-7W seems like we need to make a speed vs timing list sure, but as I have noticed, we use different blades, I have undervolted... edit: it means I will have probably a litle bit different table... and at the moment, for me it is just fun, I have only 4 blades
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2014, 07:57:08 PM |
|
we need to read the chips fast enough for when the chips have anything to deliver, but not too fast to waiste time, and chip speed, so its a tradeoff.. the timings are the same as those found in the antminers config file versus speed.
edit: on my test board with 200MHz and timing 100 vs timing 55 = aprox 5 GH lost if read to slow
even better with 0.44 - 93-4GHs/106-7W seems like we need to make a speed vs timing list sure, but as I have noticed, we use different blades, I have undervolted... edit: it means I will have probably a litle bit different table... and at the moment, for me it is just fun, I have only 4 blades mine is also undervolted with a pen, but im waiting for my solder paste to add a resistor in parallel to the other ones (i have 20 blades :-p ) i havnt done a decent job on my test board (74 watts / 52 GHs)
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
idonothave
|
|
November 06, 2014, 08:01:27 PM |
|
we need to read the chips fast enough for when the chips have anything to deliver, but not too fast to waiste time, and chip speed, so its a tradeoff.. the timings are the same as those found in the antminers config file versus speed.
edit: on my test board with 200MHz and timing 100 vs timing 55 = aprox 5 GH lost if read to slow
even better with 0.44 - 93-4GHs/106-7W seems like we need to make a speed vs timing list sure, but as I have noticed, we use different blades, I have undervolted... edit: it means I will have probably a litle bit different table... and at the moment, for me it is just fun, I have only 4 blades mine is also undervolted with a pen, but im waiting for my solder paste to add a resistor in parallel to the other ones (i have 20 blades :-p ) i havnt done a decent job on my test board (74 watts / 52 GHs) yep, I was also thinking about to solder it... would You share then how You did it? If I will be able to make cheap and easy box I will buy some blades and build unit, but only if get consumption low enough edit: but it would be very difficult to get better then 1.17W/GHs... so...
|
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2014, 08:12:24 PM |
|
impossible just happened... 104GHS/109W 0.44 0781 edit: pool rej. 1% theoritical it should be possible to get 100 GH vs 90 watts but depends on resistor setting and psu
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
HerbPean
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1005
|
|
November 06, 2014, 08:12:42 PM |
|
impossible just happened... 104GHS/109W 0.44 0781 edit: pool rej. 1% Epic !
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2014, 08:15:57 PM |
|
impossible just happened... 104GHS/109W 0.44 0781 edit: pool rej. 1% Epic ! timing is critical my undervolt isnt the best, im getting 1.34 (53 GHs 74 Watt) 1 blade at 200 MHz and timing 60
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
idonothave
|
|
November 06, 2014, 08:32:49 PM |
|
impossible just happened... 104GHS/109W 0.44 0781 edit: pool rej. 1% Epic ! timing is critical my undervolt isnt the best, im getting 1.34 (53 GHs 74 Watt) 1 blade at 200 MHz and timing 60 do not be afraid to go below 2.8kOhm... if You would see my multimeter which I used You would laugh... as that guy says, it is not rocket engineering
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2014, 08:45:41 PM |
|
impossible just happened... 104GHS/109W 0.44 0781 edit: pool rej. 1% Epic ! timing is critical my undervolt isnt the best, im getting 1.34 (53 GHs 74 Watt) 1 blade at 200 MHz and timing 60 do not be afraid to go below 2.8kOhm... if You would see my multimeter which I used You would laugh... as that guy says, it is not rocket engineering ive been thinking of trying 2.56 (4.47 + 12 + 12 kohm :-p )
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
idonothave
|
|
November 06, 2014, 10:01:56 PM |
|
impossible just happened... 104GHS/109W 0.44 0781 edit: pool rej. 1% Epic ! timing is critical my undervolt isnt the best, im getting 1.34 (53 GHs 74 Watt) 1 blade at 200 MHz and timing 60 do not be afraid to go below 2.8kOhm... if You would see my multimeter which I used You would laugh... as that guy says, it is not rocket engineering ive been thinking of trying 2.56 (4.47 + 12 + 12 kohm :-p ) prommising results with 0.27 0781 - 103/108 ... more tommorow
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 06, 2014, 10:25:45 PM |
|
impossible just happened... 104GHS/109W 0.44 0781 edit: pool rej. 1% Epic ! timing is critical my undervolt isnt the best, im getting 1.34 (53 GHs 74 Watt) 1 blade at 200 MHz and timing 60 do not be afraid to go below 2.8kOhm... if You would see my multimeter which I used You would laugh... as that guy says, it is not rocket engineering ive been thinking of trying 2.56 (4.47 + 12 + 12 kohm :-p ) prommising results with 0.27 0781 - 103/108 ... more tommorow redid my pensil mod, all just slight below 2 kohm - measured 0.75, 0.75, 0.76, 0.79 volts 200 MHz timing 60 53 GHs 62 Watts
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
zziggi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
November 07, 2014, 12:29:30 AM |
|
I thought I'd missed something you put out earlier! Thanks for the pointer. I managed to compile having made the changes to driver-bmsc.c, aka replace memcpy((char *)&nonce, nonce_bin, sizeof(nonce_bin)); with memcpy((char *)&nonce, nonce_bin, sizeof(nonce));Then issued: ./autogen.sh --enable-bmsc CFLAGS="-02 -Wall -W -march=i686" --host=i686-pc-mingw32 make I did NOT include driver-icarus as has been suggested somewhere else, and the device was detected albeit with some issues. Below are the two screen shots i grabbed: EDIT: I run the executable with the options: --bmsc-options 115200:0.6 --bmsc-freq 0F81 http://s18.postimg.org/dqch8g7yh/470_Err2.pnghttp://s28.postimg.org/hqshlfj6l/470_Err1.pngExactly the same result without zadig) if zadig is installed -no USB device detected
|
|
|
|
|