Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2021, 01:42:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 [908] 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 ... 1243 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!!  (Read 2083071 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Sjacmur
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 883
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 31, 2016, 12:39:20 PM
 #18141

An hour already looking for coins that sent the wallet in my computer to Poloniex.
Is it normal ?
Smiley


My some NAV was send in few minutes. Maybe you send it from not synchronize wallet ?
you have transaction in wallet show ? And you make wallet addres on Poloniex first if you dont have one ? If you send when staking stop staking close wallet and send again coins with closed wallet to poloniex. Always first few coins to avoid any human mistakes !
I make it all in few minutes.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1638668573
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638668573

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638668573
Reply with quote  #2

1638668573
Report to moderator
1638668573
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638668573

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638668573
Reply with quote  #2

1638668573
Report to moderator
1638668573
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638668573

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638668573
Reply with quote  #2

1638668573
Report to moderator
hashforce101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 31, 2016, 12:46:07 PM
 #18142


Great Achievement NAV Team!
hashforce101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 31, 2016, 12:50:59 PM
 #18143

You can still trade at Bittrex - just cant withdraw or deposit your NAV just yet - shouldn't be long
isen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 31, 2016, 12:53:00 PM
 #18144

Any info when the bittrex wallet will be fixed?I made a deposit two days ago and i am still waiting for the coins to shown on my balance.
Wish i had chosen poloniex instead of bittrex but now it's too late i guess.
soopy452000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1001

Founder - NavCoin Ⓝ


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2016, 12:54:43 PM
 #18145

Any info when the bittrex wallet will be fixed?I made a deposit two days ago and i am still waiting for the coins to shown on my balance.
Wish i had chosen poloniex instead of bittrex but now it's too late i guess.

They are syncing their wallet , I believe they should be ready by now.

Warm Regards,
~SoopY~

Working/Online Times
04:00:00 GMT - 12:00:00 GMT / 00:00:00 EDT - 08:00:00 EDT

Coin Developments & Contributions 1. SherlockCoin (SHC) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=454981) 2. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Life to Growthcoin (GRW) , Community Backed Development! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469464) 3. [ANN][66][New Maintainer] ★Coin 66★ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=493987) 4. [RE-ANN] Galaxycoin Revival!-FORK AT BLOCK 255145, KGW, RANDOM BLOCK REWARDS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=495693) 5. [RESURRECTION] Taking Astrocoin to the Moon,KGW Implemented + HARD FORK AT 17520 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516549 6. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Electric back to the grid, Community Backed Development! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514790
sempron
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 31, 2016, 12:58:26 PM
Last edit: July 31, 2016, 01:12:49 PM by sempron
 #18146

I lost around 300 navs while syncing. Tried repairwallet command and this is what it says

Quote
{
"mismatched spent coins" : 2,
"amount affected by repair" : 501.16863010
}

i lost track of my total nav coins I just left it on to stake. So as it turns out the wallet is out of sync and I'm indeed 300 navs short? I had a back-up of my wallet a few days ago should I load it?
rakesh1_90
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Fall seven times, stand up eight.


View Profile
July 31, 2016, 01:23:39 PM
 #18147

Nice to c weak hands leaving....Makes thing easier  Cheesy

Keep your buy support low and buy off the sell wall...Let dumpers dump.
Sjacmur
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 883
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 31, 2016, 01:23:47 PM
 #18148

maybe it was orphant from staking sometimes its not exactly the same amount in wallet and in blockchain but it normal on PoS coins.
Depend from your wallet if is bigger it can have little not the same number coins like 200-300 coins. In my wallet I full synchro I have different something like 200 coins but I dont care.
But if you have very small amount coins and not staking you maybe will try repair wallet.
WolfLee84
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2016, 01:27:09 PM
 #18149

The new GUI updates look great, but why does the updated application still run OpenSSL 1.0.1g 7 Apr 2014 (HeartBleed) & not a more updated secure one? I'm not an SSL specialist or anything, but it was one of the first things I notice in testing the apps. Which some of the older Scrypt ones still have as well, making anyone who starts the apps risk more than they would possible understand to networks around them?

//
CVE-2014-0160 (OpenSSL advisory) 7th April 2014:
    A missing bounds check in the handling of the TLS heartbeat extension can be used to reveal up to 64kB of memory to a connected client or server (a.k.a. Heartbleed). This issue did not affect versions of OpenSSL prior to 1.0.1. Reported by Neel Mehta.

        Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.1g (Affected 1.0.1f, 1.0.1e, 1.0.1d, 1.0.1c, 1.0.1b, 1.0.1a, 1.0.1)

https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#2014-0076
soopy452000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1001

Founder - NavCoin Ⓝ


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2016, 01:31:22 PM
 #18150

The new GUI updates look great, but why does the updated application still run OpenSSL 1.0.1g 7 Apr 2014 (HeartBleed) & not a more updated secure one? I'm not an SSL specialist or anything, but it was one of the first things I notice in testing the apps. Which some of the older Scrypt ones still have as well, making anyone who starts the apps risk more than they would possible understand to networks around them?

//
CVE-2014-0160 (OpenSSL advisory) 7th April 2014:
    A missing bounds check in the handling of the TLS heartbeat extension can be used to reveal up to 64kB of memory to a connected client or server (a.k.a. Heartbleed). This issue did not affect versions of OpenSSL prior to 1.0.1. Reported by Neel Mehta.

        Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.1g (Affected 1.0.1f, 1.0.1e, 1.0.1d, 1.0.1c, 1.0.1b, 1.0.1a, 1.0.1)

https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#2014-0076

Please take a read on this.

https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20140407.txt

Code:
OpenSSL Security Advisory [07 Apr 2014]
========================================

TLS heartbeat read overrun (CVE-2014-0160)
==========================================

A missing bounds check in the handling of the TLS heartbeat extension can be
used to reveal up to 64k of memory to a connected client or server.

Only 1.0.1 and 1.0.2-beta releases of OpenSSL are affected including
1.0.1f and 1.0.2-beta1.

Thanks for Neel Mehta of Google Security for discovering this bug and to
Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> and Bodo Moeller <bmoeller@acm.org> for
preparing the fix.

Affected users should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.1g. Users unable to immediately
upgrade can alternatively recompile OpenSSL with -DOPENSSL_NO_HEARTBEATS.

1.0.2 will be fixed in 1.0.2-beta2.

Heartbleed was fixed on version 1.0.1g which being the same that the wallet uses, it is also important to note that there hasn't been a vulnerability that has been discovered in the current version as well as other versions thereafter that would affect the cryptographic processes of the blockchain , where the blockchain technology itself being far more secure than OpenSSL itself.

Warm Regards,
~SoopY~

Working/Online Times
04:00:00 GMT - 12:00:00 GMT / 00:00:00 EDT - 08:00:00 EDT

Coin Developments & Contributions 1. SherlockCoin (SHC) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=454981) 2. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Life to Growthcoin (GRW) , Community Backed Development! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469464) 3. [ANN][66][New Maintainer] ★Coin 66★ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=493987) 4. [RE-ANN] Galaxycoin Revival!-FORK AT BLOCK 255145, KGW, RANDOM BLOCK REWARDS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=495693) 5. [RESURRECTION] Taking Astrocoin to the Moon,KGW Implemented + HARD FORK AT 17520 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516549 6. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Electric back to the grid, Community Backed Development! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514790
WolfLee84
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2016, 01:49:50 PM
 #18151

Thanks for the quick reply Soopy452000, as I've read the entire OpenSSL site for years now & keep up on each update. Only reason why I ask, because of testing more than 5000+ of these applications (same as Operating Systems with all their Package^s & just wondering why OpenSSL "git" passed on so many of them. It's very simple to update 1 line of code to the newest with all the bugs in the worldwide net "fixed or improved", but as said before I'm no network specialist or anything Wink

https://www.openssl.org/news/newslog.html

07-Apr-2014
   Security Advisory: Heartbeat overflow issue.
07-Apr-2014
   OpenSSL 1.0.1g is now available, including bug and security fixes

//There have been many flaws in OpenSSL since 2014, just not Giant Bugs & or anything like the HeartBleed
soopy452000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1001

Founder - NavCoin Ⓝ


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2016, 01:53:58 PM
 #18152

Thanks for the quick reply Soopy452000, as I've read the entire OpenSSL site for years now & keep up on each update. Only reason why I ask, because of testing more than 5000+ of these applications (same as Operating Systems with all their Package^s & just wondering why OpenSSL "git" passed on so many of them. It's very simple to update 1 line of code to the newest with all the bugs in the worldwide net "fixed or improved", but as said before I'm no network specialist or anything Wink

https://www.openssl.org/news/newslog.html

07-Apr-2014
   Security Advisory: Heartbeat overflow issue.
07-Apr-2014
   OpenSSL 1.0.1g is now available, including bug and security fixes

//There have been many flaws in OpenSSL since 2014, just not Giant Bugs & or anything like the HeartBleed

I agree with you when it comes to not having giant bugs on OpenSSL since 2014 or anything like HeartBleed at all. Smiley And I m going leave it at that I have more faith in the blockchain technology than OpenSSL. Haha. Smiley
Regards to your suggestion surely I'll make a version update , just so to make everyone happy about a version upgrade. Smiley

Thank you very much for your kind suggestions and thoughts.

Warm Regards,
~SoopY~

Working/Online Times
04:00:00 GMT - 12:00:00 GMT / 00:00:00 EDT - 08:00:00 EDT

Coin Developments & Contributions 1. SherlockCoin (SHC) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=454981) 2. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Life to Growthcoin (GRW) , Community Backed Development! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469464) 3. [ANN][66][New Maintainer] ★Coin 66★ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=493987) 4. [RE-ANN] Galaxycoin Revival!-FORK AT BLOCK 255145, KGW, RANDOM BLOCK REWARDS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=495693) 5. [RESURRECTION] Taking Astrocoin to the Moon,KGW Implemented + HARD FORK AT 17520 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516549 6. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Electric back to the grid, Community Backed Development! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514790
Affilate User
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 31, 2016, 01:56:15 PM
 #18153

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 31/07/2016 20:23
To: NMRKxco6eWVjWpQeDPMoVjaHPuNYbFTz1w
Debit: -7199.99 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0011 NAV
Net amount: -7199.9911 NAV
Transaction ID: 5f859cd7d0ebff8bc81aa164da5301bc0834c2528d7b97ae222d094492e029c8-000
soopy452000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1001

Founder - NavCoin Ⓝ


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2016, 01:56:57 PM
 #18154

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 31/07/2016 20:23
To: NMRKxco6eWVjWpQeDPMoVjaHPuNYbFTz1w
Debit: -7199.99 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0011 NAV
Net amount: -7199.9911 NAV
Transaction ID: 5f859cd7d0ebff8bc81aa164da5301bc0834c2528d7b97ae222d094492e029c8-000

Yes?

Working/Online Times
04:00:00 GMT - 12:00:00 GMT / 00:00:00 EDT - 08:00:00 EDT

Coin Developments & Contributions 1. SherlockCoin (SHC) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=454981) 2. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Life to Growthcoin (GRW) , Community Backed Development! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469464) 3. [ANN][66][New Maintainer] ★Coin 66★ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=493987) 4. [RE-ANN] Galaxycoin Revival!-FORK AT BLOCK 255145, KGW, RANDOM BLOCK REWARDS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=495693) 5. [RESURRECTION] Taking Astrocoin to the Moon,KGW Implemented + HARD FORK AT 17520 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516549 6. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Electric back to the grid, Community Backed Development! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514790
sempron
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 31, 2016, 01:57:34 PM
 #18155

maybe it was orphant from staking sometimes its not exactly the same amount in wallet and in blockchain but it normal on PoS coins.
Depend from your wallet if is bigger it can have little not the same number coins like 200-300 coins. In my wallet I full synchro I have different something like 200 coins but I dont care.
But if you have very small amount coins and not staking you maybe will try repair wallet.

Well this my first experience of the issue and i had bigger wallets than this before it reported the same exact amount fine. Anyways, I could live past it, just odd for that's all.
Affilate User
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 31, 2016, 02:01:51 PM
 #18156

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 31/07/2016 20:23
To: NMRKxco6eWVjWpQeDPMoVjaHPuNYbFTz1w
Debit: -7199.99 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0011 NAV
Net amount: -7199.9911 NAV
Transaction ID: 5f859cd7d0ebff8bc81aa164da5301bc0834c2528d7b97ae222d094492e029c8-000

Yes?
Status: 0/unconfirmed
DolgiyFCLM
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 31, 2016, 02:03:45 PM
 #18157

Wow price 3000 sat.....?))) This is begin?)
Sjacmur
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 883
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 31, 2016, 02:08:06 PM
 #18158

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 31/07/2016 20:23
To: NMRKxco6eWVjWpQeDPMoVjaHPuNYbFTz1w
Debit: -7199.99 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0011 NAV
Net amount: -7199.9911 NAV
Transaction ID: 5f859cd7d0ebff8bc81aa164da5301bc0834c2528d7b97ae222d094492e029c8-000

Yes?
Status: 0/unconfirmed

You sure you have new NAV after swap ? so low amount maybe its old NAV or you send it to bittrex they have still wallet maintenance so you cant send it to bittrex.
I have newest walet full synch and all working perfect. Read some last page if you dont familiar with NAV.
Affilate User
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 31, 2016, 02:11:47 PM
 #18159

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 31/07/2016 20:23
To: NMRKxco6eWVjWpQeDPMoVjaHPuNYbFTz1w
Debit: -7199.99 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0011 NAV
Net amount: -7199.9911 NAV
Transaction ID: 5f859cd7d0ebff8bc81aa164da5301bc0834c2528d7b97ae222d094492e029c8-000

Yes?
Status: 0/unconfirmed

You sure you have new NAV after swap ? so low amount maybe its old NAV or you send it to bittrex they have still wallet maintenance so you cant send it to bittrex.
I have newest walet full synch and all working perfect. Read some last page if you dont familiar with NAV.
i sent to polo
http://imgur.com/a/oEqka
WolfLee84
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2016, 02:14:35 PM
 #18160


I agree with you when it comes to not having giant bugs on OpenSSL since 2014 or anything like HeartBleed at all. Smiley And I m going leave it at that I have more faith in the blockchain technology than OpenSSL. Haha. Smiley
Regards to your suggestion surely I'll make a version update , just so to make everyone happy about a version upgrade. Smiley

Thank you very much for your kind suggestions and thoughts.

Warm Regards,
~SoopY~



Thanks SoopY, as I've watched NAV & many more for years, also trust+ BlockChain more than SSL. Mostly because BlockChain would be everything, like a self sustainable operating system & or the entire future of software Wink

http://distrowatch.com/
Things One watches everyday = Latest Packages

//wish they would add this to http://cryptocoin.cc/table.php?cryptocoin=navcoin as well  Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 [908] 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 ... 1243 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!