hedgy73
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1077
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:01:09 AM |
|
Looking good
|
|
|
|
hashforce101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:13:09 AM |
|
Feels good seeing Nav hit 3k again and high volume. Thanks devs for the updates
This is the our power. Someone that's not keeping up with the New Announcement has accidentally left this on Bittrex. They will regret soon 0.00003399 120000.69672278 4.0788 8.6844 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYtGl1dX5qI&feature=youtu.be
|
|
|
|
david1365
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:15:41 AM |
|
Feels good seeing Nav hit 3k again and high volume. Thanks devs for the updates
This is the our power. Someone that's not keeping up with the New Announcement has accidentally left this on Bittrex. They will regret soon 0.00003399 120000.69672278 4.0788 8.6844 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYtGl1dX5qI&feature=youtu.beSure, they will cry soon
|
|
|
|
ninjaboon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:19:41 AM |
|
3. Showing the anon confirmation dialog4. Confirmed transaction which is to one of the anon nodes rather than the address i set on the previous screen Nice pics, now the FUDDErs and trolls are pissing in their pants. Just got a PM from pakage, good things are coming for this coin. Hang in tight.
|
|
|
|
hashforce101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:29:58 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
david1365
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:31:22 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
david1365
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:31:56 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
GREEDYJOHN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:34:06 AM |
|
RICH LIST CHANGING SLIGHTLY
1 sWqp2puWCnc1SfyXAQJPCW6U64obhK6grR 8,100,100 2 sNyNwMYKkZFnzdx72qxUy3pRZtTSQdtqtr 3,269,207 3 sJVkG6Z5FzVTxaUYHdJQ5HoKQxZF9zaRCQ 3,000,000 4 sfdzo3PKsVTdRMPPKrW4bi6cUt1LruMNxe 2,858,764
|
|
|
|
hashforce101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:43:50 AM |
|
Please change your old signatures
|
|
|
|
GREEDYJOHN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 22, 2015, 09:56:10 AM |
|
Please change your old signatures
DONE
|
|
|
|
Sjacmur
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:07:25 AM |
|
@Remy_5
Thank you very much. Repairwallet command works. All fine now.
Thx for help.
|
|
|
|
ramtony
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:10:36 AM |
|
Thanks for that Pakage!
BTW i noticed a 5% transaction fee? Is that correct or a typo?
That is intentional. The percentage is adjustable and is still up for debate though, we do want it to be as small as possible. The transaction fee is not designed for us to skim profit, it is simply to cover hosting costs since this is a community project, not a business. The anon network consists of about a dozen server instances (which we've been paying for personally so far) that we need to have up and running for it all to work. None of these are free, so this transaction fee is how the network will cover its own costs. 5% is probably where it is going to start until the price and volume start to rise. As the volume grows, we will be able to scale back the transaction fee, probably down to about 2% or even 1% and still cover the server costs. Ideally we would survive on donations alone and scrap the fee all together, but we just have to see what balance will work out. Make sense? Just a thought for the developers, Seeing a transaction fee is perfectly reasonable and using it to cover server/hosing costs also fine. Why not use this as an opportunity for long term investment and set the transaction fee to a set amount, then use this as an investment asset and sell shares/coins/ or whatever you want to call them in the Navajo transaction tech. The transaction percentage can then cover the running costs and also produce a dividend for investors. If Nav follows the path that everyone is dreaming of then the volume of trading will be massive and ultimately transaction fees can generate a long term investment opportunity along the way.
|
|
|
|
ninjaboon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:12:29 AM |
|
Yes nice. I had a chat with the Talon, Editor in Chief on Bitcoinist.net on Mar 11 and looks like he finally posted that article. http://bitcoinist.net/navajo-coin-goes-anonymous/EDIT: Pass me some tips as I spread the love around my network: sZjpHEyPgrJXeg1BkKcCWStND4H3ikigPu
|
|
|
|
hashforce101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:31:38 AM |
|
Thanks ninjaboon. Ill send you some coins when the Double encryption gets turned on the 23rd March . Anonoumouly of course
|
|
|
|
ninjaboon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:54:18 AM |
|
Thanks ninjaboon. Ill send you some coins when the Double encryption gets turned on the 23rd March . Anonoumouly of course oh yes, I remembered. thanks for that.
|
|
|
|
|
hashforce101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 22, 2015, 11:25:43 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
sluppy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2020
Merit: 1041
|
|
March 22, 2015, 11:27:19 AM |
|
5% is probably where it is going to start until the price and volume start to rise. As the volume grows, we will be able to scale back the transaction fee, probably down to about 2% or even 1% and still cover the server costs. Ideally we would survive on donations alone and scrap the fee all together, but we just have to see what balance will work out.
Make sense?
The idea of fee which is based on percentage make sense, seem fair to me. Good work Pakage! Bye Bye To grow the volume i think 5% is way to much it might be better to have a round of donations to run the servers for at least a month and keep the % as low as possible 1% preferably.
|
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke -- May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house.George Carlin We pay for life with death , so everything in between should be free. Bill Hicks -- It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light. Aristotle Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment. Buddha -- The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Socrates
|
|
|
shahim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 22, 2015, 11:34:34 AM |
|
Don't know which Government is buying up all the coins - American? http://navajocoin.org/rich-list Place Address Amount 1 sWqp2puWCnc1SfyXAQJPCW6U64obhK6grR 8,100,100 that is logic buddy big whale always eat little fishes so that i am no wonder to see the amazing growth of top address in rich list, people are blind and never understand what is going to happen soon.Went from 5,000,000 to 8,000,000 in 2 days! BIGGEST WOW Ever sWqp2puWCnc1SfyXAQJPCW6U64obhK6grR this address is currently empty. This is my friend bittrex trading wallet. I am trying to tell you this because if suddenly developer fix the bug it went to zero people started to get panic. BTW Those top holder can try this by transfer all your coin to bittrex wallet and wait for it to appear in rich list then re transfer back to your desktop wallet. You will see that bittrex wallet is zero but still in rich list. Hope developer can fix this and few of the bittrex empty wallet will get eliminated from richlist This is not a BUG, but many coin RICHLISTS always take some time to adjust, sometimes over 3 hours. However, block explorers are always up to date John look at the pic address above. Block explorer seem to have not shown the out of bittrex wallet for some reason. My own bittrex address is there too. Developer need to take a look at it. I want to point out because later people will use this excuse to say the first wallet sell out Hi, thank you very much for your effort! I will check this. Even I don't know how bittrex work. But with the accounting inside the wallet. you move coins from from account to another, but still stay at the same address, cause there is no transaction when moving these coins. it is just to display coin amount. regards shahim
|
|
|
|
shahim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 22, 2015, 11:35:24 AM |
|
5% is probably where it is going to start until the price and volume start to rise. As the volume grows, we will be able to scale back the transaction fee, probably down to about 2% or even 1% and still cover the server costs. Ideally we would survive on donations alone and scrap the fee all together, but we just have to see what balance will work out.
Make sense?
The idea of fee which is based on percentage make sense, seem fair to me. Good work Pakage! Bye Bye To grow the volume i think 5% is way to much it might be better to have a round of donations to run the servers for at least a month and keep the % as low as possible 1% preferably. Hi, I understand your thinking. we will discuss this inside the team and keep you all updated! regards shahim
|
|
|
|
|