BTCD is no more

[bitkokos2]

Altough btcd didn't go well for me, I am still happy I have a nice amount.
The best luck I ever had with altcoins was with VPN. I bought thousands for 71 satoshis and sold 75% of it at 950 satoshis.
Next day it went up to 1300 if I remember well.

[1714847019]

1714847019

[1714847019]

1714847019

[1714847019]

1714847019

[razen489]

Great time to enter BitcoinDark https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitcoindark
Bought some at a good price now me thinks

[etoque]

Im ready to buy moar between 200-250k,I have good feeling for this one at this cheap

[bitkokos2]

Im ready to buy moar between 200-250k,I have good feeling for this one at this cheap

A few days ago, it was down to 150k but, missed that

[Azeh]

Week 24: 25 BTCD have been paid to 690 unique BitcoinDark addresses for successfully staking blocks 798631-809402

Week 25: 19.7 BTCD have been paid to 676 unique BitcoinDark addresses for successfully staking blocks 809403-820173

As promised double-divs have been paid. Sorry for the delay this week. Good news, I don't foresee any delays in the near future.

Also good news, the low price of BTCD in terms of BTC and increasing success of MMBTCD, which donates 10% of profits each week, is creating a nice situation for stakers with higher weekly div payments.

As always, thanks for staking and supporting the BitcoinDark network.

[bitkokos2]

I have another question about dividents.
Dividents are sent to my addresses with (received with)
Is it normal to receive divident with an address which is not mine?
That address is not in my list of addresses in "Receive coins"

I once received stake (mined) with that address too.

Also the address is greyed in the transactions list.

[OSMIUMCOIN]

DEV Interested NEW LOGO + OP Image for BTCD 

[david1365]

this is nice, but BitcoinDark logo is more powerful and also with a  deeper concept.  

[ASICHEAD]

BitcoinDark no need to new logo.

[Starfleet.Intelligence]

I have another question about dividents.
Dividents are sent to my addresses with (received with)
Is it normal to receive divident with an address which is not mine?
That address is not in my list of addresses in "Receive coins"

I once received stake (mined) with that address too.

Also the address is greyed in the transactions list.

You mean the dividends from the MMBTCD fund?
They are send by Azeh? And of course through another address which is not yours. Its another address because its staking revenue which is not implemented in the BTCD-system. Ammount is depending on the number of blocks minted by your addresses...

[bitkokos2]

I have another question about dividents.
Dividents are sent to my addresses with (received with)
Is it normal to receive divident with an address which is not mine?
That address is not in my list of addresses in "Receive coins"

I once received stake (mined) with that address too.

Also the address is greyed in the transactions list.

You mean the dividends from the MMBTCD fund?
They are send by Azeh? And of course through another address which is not yours. Its another address because its staking revenue which is not implemented in the BTCD-system. Ammount is depending on the number of blocks minted by your addresses...

Ok, I get what you are saying but again...
Last time I received dividents twice on one of my addresses and once on that address which is not mine.
I have also received coins from staking (Mined) on that address which is not mine. In this case it was not dividents.

[crackfoo]

I have another question about dividents.
Dividents are sent to my addresses with (received with)
Is it normal to receive divident with an address which is not mine?
That address is not in my list of addresses in "Receive coins"

I once received stake (mined) with that address too.

Also the address is greyed in the transactions list.

You mean the dividends from the MMBTCD fund?
They are send by Azeh? And of course through another address which is not yours. Its another address because its staking revenue which is not implemented in the BTCD-system. Ammount is depending on the number of blocks minted by your addresses...

Ok, I get what you are saying but again...
Last time I received dividents twice on one of my addresses and once on that address which is not mine.
I have also received coins from staking (Mined) on that address which is not mine. In this case it was not dividents.

have you run validateaddress on the addresses you say are not yours?

[bitkokos2]

I have another question about dividents.
Dividents are sent to my addresses with (received with)
Is it normal to receive divident with an address which is not mine?
That address is not in my list of addresses in "Receive coins"

I once received stake (mined) with that address too.

Also the address is greyed in the transactions list.

You mean the dividends from the MMBTCD fund?
They are send by Azeh? And of course through another address which is not yours. Its another address because its staking revenue which is not implemented in the BTCD-system. Ammount is depending on the number of blocks minted by your addresses...

Ok, I get what you are saying but again...
Last time I received dividents twice on one of my addresses and once on that address which is not mine.
I have also received coins from staking (Mined) on that address which is not mine. In this case it was not dividents.

have you run validateaddress on the addresses you say are not yours?

No, how can I do that?

Ok, I found how to do that.
It returns

{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "R                      9",
"ismine" : true,
"isscript" : false,
"pubkey" : "                                ",
"iscompressed" : true
}



But again, I do not have such address starting with R and ending with 9

[bhokor]

..... price is suffering one week ago 1 dollar, now 69 cents...lets see what happens this week

[vytasz7]

After jl777 and nxt dev feud it is so silent here , no news of whats going on ,what to expect from btcd ,nothing at all . People dont know what to expect from btcd coin after that nxt jl777 fiasko ,nobody from devs are comunicating ,so disapointing situation 

[vytasz7]

same situation on slack channel as well , like after nuclear war.

[_mr_e]

After jl777 and nxt dev feud it is so silent here , no news of whats going on ,what to expect from btcd ,nothing at all . People dont know what to expect from btcd coin after that nxt jl777 fiasko ,nobody from devs are comunicating ,so disapointing situation 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mACqcZZwG0k

[bitkokos2]

buy, accumulate, stake and shut up 

[CryptoSporidium]

After jl777 and nxt dev feud it is so silent here , no news of whats going on ,what to expect from btcd ,nothing at all . People dont know what to expect from btcd coin after that nxt jl777 fiasko ,nobody from devs are comunicating ,so disapointing situation 

Crypto investing, especially in fully decentralized ones, is high risk, with possible high returns.

I think jl777 is working hard in stealth mode, so i am buying btcd every week now

[iCEBREAKER]

After jl777 and nxt dev feud it is so silent here , no news of whats going on ,what to expect from btcd ,nothing at all . People dont know what to expect from btcd coin after that nxt jl777 fiasko ,nobody from devs are comunicating ,so disapointing situation 

That's typical of life in Dependency Hell.

Which is why such practices are universally shunned by professionals in the real world.

"Bitcoin" Dark depends on SuperNet.  SuperNet depends on NXT.  NXT depends on Java.  Java depends on Oracle.

Why not make a coin that runs in Adobe Flash, if you love requiring users to install a bloated layer of massive-security-hole-creating crapware?

The Turing-incomplete NXT platform is as obsolete as an adding machine from the 1960s, not to mentioned all but abandoned after numerous community forks and ensuing clones.

I hope jl777 decides to 'go legit' and ports his stuff to ETH.