[ANN] [KEY] KeyCoin | Fair Launch | Daily Updates | 8/9 Status Update

[magaura]

thanx major shake out...thanx fuders.. XD

[TheNewsHasCome]

Lol at all the weak hands responding to the FUD. Big mistake. Big things coming guys, these devs are dedicated.

[pbremen01]

I managed to compile this app. For your parameters (Block Height: 11237 Exact Amount: 1.9998) this app returns KMoKz1gPhEeofG9wp8BKHKdz4cphPqEPdH.

This address does not belong to me, it is most likely a mixer address.

This is mixer address. No one has ever claimed that this address is your address (that you own private keys). See original description of the program.

But your wallet sent coins to this address. See blockchain for transactions and check the inputs of these transactions.

The inputs of these transactions probably belong to your wallet and you have private keys for them (check with dumpprivkey if you're unsure).

[magaura]

fuder need  somebody to love.. XD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IprPh35SNn4

[Cornett]

Daily Dev Update - 7/31/2014

Just checking in. Work on KeyOS is going well and we will have a beta for the community to test in Virtualbox soon.

In the meantime we are compiling Mac OS and Debian/Ubuntu Linux wallets with the anon feature built in. I expect release tomorrow at latest.

Regarding the "de-anon" FUD - it is exactly that, FUD. Multiple members of the dev team have tested it and it doesn't de-anon anything, it merely gives a mixer address as output.

The program's output string even says "Mixer Address (Your wallet sent coins to this mixer)" - it doesn't even attempt to de-anon the entire transaction, and can't.

Decentralized anon is also a longer term goal we are working on.


The KeyCoin promo video is on target for Saturday release.

We are currently working with CoinsSource and Bittrex to be one of the first "vetted safe" coins, hopefully soon enough for it to be featured in our "Sponsored" bittrex banner.

Thanks all for support, fuel up those engines

Look at this :

https://twitter.com/vangainvest/status/494978517625753600

[WheresMyWallet]

So much bollocks FUD it's brilliant. Another fantastic day of trading and cheap coins from weak hands.
And for my next bollocks trick, I go back to teabagging my groupies, "care bear wanna be" MeAndYouForever and "I can't understand anon" pbremen01

[WheresMyWallet]

Daily Dev Update - 7/31/2014

Just checking in. Work on KeyOS is going well and we will have a beta for the community to test in Virtualbox soon.

In the meantime we are compiling Mac OS and Debian/Ubuntu Linux wallets with the anon feature built in. I expect release tomorrow at latest.

Regarding the "de-anon" FUD - it is exactly that, FUD. Multiple members of the dev team have tested it and it doesn't de-anon anything, it merely gives a mixer address as output.

The program's output string even says "Mixer Address (Your wallet sent coins to this mixer)" - it doesn't even attempt to de-anon the entire transaction, and can't.

Decentralized anon is also a longer term goal we are working on.


The KeyCoin promo video is on target for Saturday release.

We are currently working with CoinsSource and Bittrex to be one of the first "vetted safe" coins, hopefully soon enough for it to be featured in our "Sponsored" bittrex banner.

Thanks all for support, fuel up those engines

Nice work devs, looking forward to KEY being on of Trex's first vetted safe coin.

[damiano]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

[WheresMyWallet]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

And it has taken 4 attempts so far to try and understand it.
Seems he might need coins 5 and 6 too.

[magaura]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

Hmm he's xc buddy?! Hgrrrr

[magaura]

but do not talk about this guy... he deserve it? we are all fool..if care about ..................

[pbremen01]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.

[pbremen01]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

Hmm he's xc buddy?! Hgrrrr

No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't).

[damiano]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.

I find it interesting that you have avoided

Cloak
XC
Super

Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. 

[WheresMyWallet]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.

Unfortunately interested is about as far as you can go, taking the leap into understanding seems to be out of reach.

[pbremen01]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.

I find it interesting that you have avoided

Cloak
XC
Super

Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. 

Sorry, I can't be familiar with every crapcoin out there. I registered on bitcointalk not long ago.

[raffern]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.

I find it interesting that you have avoided

Cloak
XC
Super

Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. 

Sorry, I can't be familiar with every crapcoin out there. I registered on bitcointalk not long ago.

Do you work for NSA, GCHQ ? Why the big obsession?

[damiano]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

Hmm he's xc buddy?! Hgrrrr

No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't).

Ok...
If your that fixated on anonymity and it's obvious you feel it doesn't work then why haven't you gone into there thread asking your usual questions?  It's obvious you like to challenge the developers am I not right?

[WheresMyWallet]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity.

I find it interesting that you have avoided

Cloak
XC
Super

Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. 

Sorry, I can't be familiar with every crapcoin out there. I registered on bitcointalk not long ago.

Ah so you envisage all of them as crapcoin's, now your base standpoint becomes clearer.
You will still hammer on like a 80 y/o prostitute who doesn't know she is past her sell-buy date

[pbremen01]

I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following

1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin

He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.

Hmm he's xc buddy?! Hgrrrr

No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't).

Ok...
If your that fixated on anonymity and it's obvious you feel it doesn't work then why haven't you gone into there thread asking your usual questions?  It's obvious you like to challenge the developers am I not right?

Which threads?

In most of the threads there are not many competent people that are capable of answering technical questions.

See this KeyCoin thread for example.

Challenge the developers? By asking questions? 

I personally think that the anonymity is extremely important thing and that it shouldn't be abused (for example, for pump&dumps because of anonymity features that in reality don't provide any anonymity).