[ANN] QIBUCK COIN - X13 - POS/POBH - 1st Proof of Baghold and asset backed.

[BITDV]

as far as i know . no.

The ZenPool was developed specially for the hashlet.

I asked and was told that if you purchase a rig of them then you can poit it towards the pools they have listed

yes, true.

clevermining, wafflepool etc no problem

But not ZenPool, that´s exclusive for hashlets

Introducing ZenPool “The Worlds Most Profitable Pool” Hashlets will be the only miners that will be able to mine to the new ZenPool

Ok there support was wrong then lol

Yup

And that´s the trick to get money from "old" customers.

Well, i`m purchasing 10 MH/s more. But i´m a little " if something looks to good to be true . it´s probably not"

Fingers crossed, have no idea if this is legit. I am not 100% sure.

yeah i bought mine thru gawminers with CC so works out at $2.66 US a day per 5MHZ so I have 10 MHZ so will see if I earn more than $5.32 US a day
But that will also depend on the value of BTC so can only use that as the value if BTC shoots up well great if the ass drops out well you know

[5ick3uffalo]

as far as i know . no.

The ZenPool was developed specially for the hashlet.

I asked and was told that if you purchase a rig of them then you can poit it towards the pools they have listed

yes, true.

clevermining, wafflepool etc no problem

But not ZenPool, that´s exclusive for hashlets

Introducing ZenPool “The Worlds Most Profitable Pool” Hashlets will be the only miners that will be able to mine to the new ZenPool

Ok there support was wrong then lol

Yup

And that´s the trick to get money from "old" customers.

Well, i`m purchasing 10 MH/s more. But i´m a little " if something looks to good to be true . it´s probably not"

Fingers crossed, have no idea if this is legit. I am not 100% sure.

yeah i bought mine thru gawminers with CC so works out at $2.66 US a day per 5MHZ so I have 10 MHZ so will see if I earn more than $5.32 US a day

Bought my 10MHS also with CC

But right now depositing my weekly btc payout (0.29btc) from PBMining to buy MHS.

Only invest what i can afford to lose and time will tell... could have re-invested that 0.29btc that to buy 100 GH/s also at PBMining.

I normally do but this time well, it´s hashlets.

[5ick3uffalo]

My 14 Gridseeds sure look silly now @5MH/S (got them cheap luckyly but no way positive ROI - no way!)

But it´s getting winter and they give little bit heat and can mine the coins what i want

And they look nice, lol

But i regret buying them, they made only 0.40btc so far and with the current btc prize hmmm

BTC is cheap i´ll grab some soon.

And yes, Qibuck Coin ,too 

[Pala_00]

When I compile the wallet (Ubuntu) I get some errors:

g++: error: /QiBucks/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a: No such file or directory
g++: error: /QiBucks/src/leveldb/libmemenv.a: No such file or directory

Someone can help me?

Thanks.

[qiwoman2]

When I compile the wallet (Ubuntu) I get some errors:

g++: error: /QiBucks/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a: No such file or directory
g++: error: /QiBucks/src/leveldb/libmemenv.a: No such file or directory

Someone can help me?

Thanks.

I am sending message to the Dev..

[maqa71]

When I compile the wallet (Ubuntu) I get some errors:

g++: error: /QiBucks/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a: No such file or directory
g++: error: /QiBucks/src/leveldb/libmemenv.a: No such file or directory

Someone can help me?

Thanks.

You need to compile leveldb first.
Go into /QiBucks/src/leveldb/ and run make

[qiwoman2]

When I compile the wallet (Ubuntu) I get some errors:

g++: error: /QiBucks/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a: No such file or directory
g++: error: /QiBucks/src/leveldb/libmemenv.a: No such file or directory

Someone can help me?

Thanks.

I am sending message to the Dev..

Please compile leveldb first



cd leveldb && chmod +x build_detect_platform && make libleveldb.a libmemenv.a

Hope this helps..

[qiwoman2]

VOTING ENDS SUNDAY 24TH AUGUST..  

[poornamelessme]

No-cap/Cap voting is closer than I expected it to be at this point. Although it is a small sample size.

I'm just wondering what benefit is there to not having a cap? Curious if anyone who voted for the first option would mention why they chose to give exchanges a percentage of the payouts?

[bloodyboy]

When I try to withdrawal QBK from polo i have error: "Withdrawals are frozen for this currency." Why they frozen withdrawals? O.o

[silverkinguk]

Must be the usual Poloniex wallet check on coin wallets.

[silverkinguk]

QBK now submitted for voting on the Coin Ticker App on IOS,vote using your iPhones,iPads.

[qiwoman2]

QBK now submitted for voting on the Coin Ticker App on IOS,vote using your iPhones,iPads.

Do you have a link I can post on the OP?

Also re frozen wd I am asking now Mods in the trollbox.

[qiwoman2]

No-cap/Cap voting is closer than I expected it to be at this point. Although it is a small sample size.

I'm just wondering what benefit is there to not having a cap? Curious if anyone who voted for the first option would mention why they chose to give exchanges a percentage of the payouts?

I voted for option no 3 and am thinking to be fair to the POLO mods of just giving them a little bounty bag every month as a giveaway for their hard work which would come from the giveaway section.

[poornamelessme]

No-cap/Cap voting is closer than I expected it to be at this point. Although it is a small sample size.

I'm just wondering what benefit is there to not having a cap? Curious if anyone who voted for the first option would mention why they chose to give exchanges a percentage of the payouts?

I voted for option no 3 and am thinking to be fair to the POLO mods of just giving them a little bounty bag every month as a giveaway for their hard work which would come from the giveaway section.

But assuming the coin gets on Bittrex too, or other exchanges, do you plan to give their mods a giveaway every month as well? It's like giving gifts to kids... how can you give one kid a gift and not expect the others to put their hand out too?

I'd think a bounty for this month only, due to running the ICO and such, would make sense. I'm not sure why they should get bounties every month though.

Voting-wise, I obviously voted for number 3. I am just curious if I overlooked some benefit to not having a cap. Perhaps some folks vote randomly or don't realize by choosing the first option they will actually get less in the way of payouts. It's sort of rare for people to vote themselves less money.

[silverkinguk]

Coin Ticker: https://iTunes.apple.com/gb/app/coin-ticker-bitcoin-altcoin/id636476147?mt=8

[qiwoman2]

No-cap/Cap voting is closer than I expected it to be at this point. Although it is a small sample size.

I'm just wondering what benefit is there to not having a cap? Curious if anyone who voted for the first option would mention why they chose to give exchanges a percentage of the payouts?

I voted for option no 3 and am thinking to be fair to the POLO mods of just giving them a little bounty bag every month as a giveaway for their hard work which would come from the giveaway section.

But assuming the coin gets on Bittrex too, or other exchanges, do you plan to give their mods a giveaway every month as well? It's like giving gifts to kids... how can you give one kid a gift and not expect the others to put their hand out too?

I'd think a bounty for this month only, due to running the ICO and such, would make sense. I'm not sure why they should get bounties every month though.

Voting-wise, I obviously voted for number 3. I am just curious if I overlooked some benefit to not having a cap. Perhaps some folks vote randomly or don't realize by choosing the first option they will actually get less in the way of payouts. It's sort of rare for people to vote themselves less money.

I have no idea lol to be honest. I wonder why people would sell the coin they bought after ICO at half price within a few hours of purchasing..my mind boggles at that also rofl.

[qiwoman2]

Coin Ticker: https://iTunes.apple.com/gb/app/coin-ticker-bitcoin-altcoin/id636476147?mt=8

Great I will post this later on the OP thanks Sam.

[AdamWhite]

No-cap/Cap voting is closer than I expected it to be at this point. Although it is a small sample size.

I'm just wondering what benefit is there to not having a cap? Curious if anyone who voted for the first option would mention why they chose to give exchanges a percentage of the payouts?

I voted for option no 3 and am thinking to be fair to the POLO mods of just giving them a little bounty bag every month as a giveaway for their hard work which would come from the giveaway section.

But assuming the coin gets on Bittrex too, or other exchanges, do you plan to give their mods a giveaway every month as well? It's like giving gifts to kids... how can you give one kid a gift and not expect the others to put their hand out too?

I'd think a bounty for this month only, due to running the ICO and such, would make sense. I'm not sure why they should get bounties every month though.

Voting-wise, I obviously voted for number 3. I am just curious if I overlooked some benefit to not having a cap. Perhaps some folks vote randomly or don't realize by choosing the first option they will actually get less in the way of payouts. It's sort of rare for people to vote themselves less money.

I see your point.. although there is still a lot of middle ground and I expect the devs will take everything into consideration before making their final decision, regardless of the poll

[poornamelessme]

I have no idea lol to be honest. I wonder why people would sell the coin they bought after ICO at half price within a few hours of purchasing..my mind boggles at that also rofl.

The selloff was due to the gambler mentality. If we are honest, everyone has that to a certain degree with most ICOs. They want to see a 2-4x return, quickly, don't get it, then panic. Some folks also gamble with money they can't afford to lose, or need quickly.

Selling for a minor loss I can understand. But I have no idea why people would panic and sell coins at a 50% loss so soon... that I admit is sort of crazy. Some folks sold for substantially less than 50% too (wish I had some buy orders in place then).