ghostlander (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 21, 2016, 03:55:46 PM |
|
testing orbit@TBF
Also 10-15% of "share is above target"
Switch from vardiff to the fixed diff of 4 (64 in the pool). --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2
These are ignored by the miner.
|
|
|
|
OverP
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 01, 2016, 12:08:01 PM |
|
Just to let you guys know, it is entirely possible to improve the OpenCL kernel of this miner by eliminating scratchpad registers (register spills). I am currently getting 795KH/s, a 30% increase in speed, with a RX 480 and a heavily modified kernel. It is also possible to optimize the generated GCN code and make the kernel even faster.
I am currently focused on Ethereum mining because it is more profitable, but I might release my custom NeoScrypt kernel when I have a chance.
Is your miner ready?
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2016, 08:39:03 PM Last edit: October 10, 2016, 01:11:13 PM by semajjames |
|
I am Solo mining with 2 rigs and one separate pc running the wallet,, everything seem's fine with all the miners untill a rig finds a block at this point the coin gets to the wallet ok but the miner starts saying that the wallet ip/port address is not responding and the hashing stops and say's wait Anything obvious that could cause this ?
cheers
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 08:24:10 PM |
|
Any way to run nsgminer on new 4xx series cards? Guess its the problem with 16.x drivers.
|
|
|
|
OverP
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 25, 2016, 08:09:54 AM |
|
480produces370Kh
|
|
|
|
|
ghostlander (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2017, 01:54:45 PM |
|
I have given your kernel a spin on my notebook with HD6750, got 25KH/s. My current parallel kernel outputs 45KH/s there with 3x lower kernel binary size. Perhaps your kernel isn't supposed to run on this hardware. I'll check with newer video cards later.
|
|
|
|
aciddude
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 04:47:02 PM |
|
@Ghostlander I'm getting: Invalid (out of bounds) block target 0xDE1D0F1C ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fsnag.gy%2FSbANEP.jpg&t=665&c=s-UuNj6xWw9jiw) This is just solomining on 0.9.6
|
|
|
|
ghostlander (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 06, 2017, 04:13:39 PM |
|
@Ghostlander I'm getting: Invalid (out of bounds) block target 0xDE1D0F1C ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fsnag.gy%2FSbANEP.jpg&t=665&c=s-UuNj6xWw9jiw) This is just solomining on 0.9.6 The miner receives incorrect input data and tells you. The current FTC network difficulty is about 10^4. The miner reports 10^18.
|
|
|
|
ghostlander (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 06, 2017, 04:21:46 PM |
|
I have given your kernel a spin on my notebook with HD6750, got 25KH/s. My current parallel kernel outputs 45KH/s there with 3x lower kernel binary size. Perhaps your kernel isn't supposed to run on this hardware. I'll check with newer video cards later.
A follow-up. I've tested it on a HD7990. Produces 900KH/s vs. 880KH/s of my kernel. No scratch registers used, but ISA size is 174Kb vs. 40Kb of my kernel. It stores all data buffers as uint's and bitaligns them for processing using conditionals. This is an interesting approach, though not for older GPUs definitely because they hate branching. That's why I went another way to optimise for older and newer GPUs at the same time. I guess it's time to split work into two separate kernels and optimise them independently.
|
|
|
|
aciddude
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 06, 2017, 05:01:59 PM |
|
@Ghostlander I'm getting: Invalid (out of bounds) block target 0xDE1D0F1C ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fsnag.gy%2FSbANEP.jpg&t=665&c=s-UuNj6xWw9jiw) This is just solomining on 0.9.6 The miner receives incorrect input data and tells you. The current FTC network difficulty is about 10^4. The miner reports 10^18. How does this make sense when I'm connected to a fully synced 0.9.6 client ?
|
|
|
|
ghostlander (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 06, 2017, 05:13:45 PM |
|
@Ghostlander I'm getting: Invalid (out of bounds) block target 0xDE1D0F1C ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fsnag.gy%2FSbANEP.jpg&t=665&c=s-UuNj6xWw9jiw) This is just solomining on 0.9.6 The miner receives incorrect input data and tells you. The current FTC network difficulty is about 10^4. The miner reports 10^18. How does this make sense when I'm connected to a fully synced 0.9.6 client ? Those who did QA on the v0.9.6 missed the solo mining part, i.e. getwork. It's broken. Try with the v0.8.7.3 to see the difference.
|
|
|
|
aciddude
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 06, 2017, 06:03:18 PM |
|
@Ghostlander I'm getting: Invalid (out of bounds) block target 0xDE1D0F1C ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fsnag.gy%2FSbANEP.jpg&t=665&c=s-UuNj6xWw9jiw) This is just solomining on 0.9.6 The miner receives incorrect input data and tells you. The current FTC network difficulty is about 10^4. The miner reports 10^18. How does this make sense when I'm connected to a fully synced 0.9.6 client ? Those who did QA on the v0.9.6 missed the solo mining part, i.e. getwork. It's broken. Try with the v0.8.7.3 to see the difference. Ok thanks man, I'll ask the Feathercoin Devs to look into it.
|
|
|
|
zawawa
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 07, 2017, 10:21:54 PM |
|
I have given your kernel a spin on my notebook with HD6750, got 25KH/s. My current parallel kernel outputs 45KH/s there with 3x lower kernel binary size. Perhaps your kernel isn't supposed to run on this hardware. I'll check with newer video cards later.
A follow-up. I've tested it on a HD7990. Produces 900KH/s vs. 880KH/s of my kernel. No scratch registers used, but ISA size is 174Kb vs. 40Kb of my kernel. It stores all data buffers as uint's and bitaligns them for processing using conditionals. This is an interesting approach, though not for older GPUs definitely because they hate branching. That's why I went another way to optimise for older and newer GPUs at the same time. I guess it's time to split work into two separate kernels and optimise them independently. Yeah, my optimizations are only for GCN. Like you said, they don't make any sense for VLIW4/5. I did a quick run and got 970KH/s on my stock 7990 with Crimson 16.9.2. I am currently working on an offline OpenCL compiler for GCN with inline assembly support. If I can pull this off, we will see more interesting stuff. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4VBTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
|
|
|
Lanet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 16, 2017, 11:43:02 AM Last edit: February 16, 2017, 12:01:04 PM by Lanet |
|
Hi I want to know if this temperature is normal or I have to turn it off the video card already has 2 years of normal use just now I start to mine. Where I can calculate earnings with NeoScrypt. Do you recommend mining with nvidia video cards? https://i.imgur.com/UP3sWuI.jpg
|
|
|
|
Lanet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 16, 2017, 03:36:54 PM |
|
any solution?
|
|
|
|
ghostlander (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 17, 2017, 03:07:56 AM |
|
any solution?
WhatToMine.com
|
|
|
|
supersnips
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2017, 03:20:44 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ghostlander (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 27, 2017, 02:20:12 PM |
|
Miner "infected" with a miner. You must be genius.
|
|
|
|
supersnips
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 27, 2017, 04:37:36 PM |
|
Miner "infected" with a miner. You must be genius. you forgot the Trojan there. well i dont get this message on other miners at all. But if this isnt one, thanks for your work and effort to the community. i just shared what i saw, everybody needs to decide for them selve to use or not.
|
|
|
|
|