Elder III
|
|
December 01, 2017, 01:50:07 AM |
|
I have 12 RX580 free now.. What would be the proffit.?
In my testing with Rx 480s I can't get past 450 hashrate..... so it's not really worth mining with AMD right now as there are better options for daily profit.
|
|
|
|
parker423
|
|
December 01, 2017, 12:34:02 PM |
|
What is the hasrate for a GTX 1080 ti ?
|
|
|
|
henrynguyen
Member
Offline
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
|
|
December 02, 2017, 03:12:27 AM |
|
Nivia GTX 1080Ti doesn't work with software
|
The crypto currency of the future! ● RACE ● ✔ Fast ✔ Secure ✔ Anonymous ▄▄▄███ Masternodes | PoW | Secure | ASIC resistant | Lyra2REv2 ███▄▄▄ DISCORD TWITTER
|
|
|
matey1111
Member
Offline
Activity: 178
Merit: 13
|
|
December 02, 2017, 02:54:21 PM Last edit: December 02, 2017, 03:37:13 PM by matey1111 |
|
So I'm trying a 1080ti card with both NSGminer and CCminer, but found the following issue (no, the card is in perfect health and mines multiple other coins flawlessly, and games like a beast), and I realize the cuda miner is what I should be utilizing however needed to try it anyways to compare results. NSG miner creates over 50% bad shares consistently. CCminer creates 90% accepted shares at first then 10% bad shares all in a bunch, after that it creates 20+% bad shares intermittently. Regardless of lower or higher clock/mem speeds and/or Power limit, adjusted -I and tested multiple different drivers cleanly installed, and in a pool closest to my location. Also what Does "share is above target" actually mean. I'm thinking If I could find this out this will lead me to the source of the problem. Any Ideas?
|
|
|
|
splat1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 02, 2017, 05:45:33 PM |
|
what miner and setting are you guys using for the 1070 to get neoscrypt pass 1000? Mine only does 800 . OC doesn't seem to do much I get around 1150 or so with my 1070 FE's using CCminer-alexis78. Whats weird is with Alexis my 1070ti only gets 650. This is using the following clock settings Win10 X64 80% power +200 Clock +600 Mem
|
|
|
|
xixou
Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 11
|
|
December 03, 2017, 09:11:43 AM |
|
I have 5 gtx1070, but i cannot found an option to only compute on 4 gpu (to let my fifth gpu free for gaming). How can i so this? I didn't see such option in the readme file.
|
|
|
|
elgi76
Member
Offline
Activity: 124
Merit: 10
|
|
December 03, 2017, 09:21:12 AM |
|
I have 5 gtx1070, but i cannot found an option to only compute on 4 gpu (to let my fifth gpu free for gaming). How can i so this? I didn't see such option in the readme file.
--device|-d <arg> Select device to use, (Use repeat -d for multiple devices, default: all)
|
|
|
|
xixou
Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 11
|
|
December 03, 2017, 11:48:16 AM |
|
I have 5 gtx1070, but i cannot found an option to only compute on 4 gpu (to let my fifth gpu free for gaming). How can i so this? I didn't see such option in the readme file.
--device|-d <arg> Select device to use, (Use repeat -d for multiple devices, default: all) Thanks, this is working with -d 0 -d 1 -d 2 -d3 I was hopping that the parameter would work like other miners or like the intensity option that accepts coma (-d 0,1,2,3)
|
|
|
|
matey1111
Member
Offline
Activity: 178
Merit: 13
|
|
December 03, 2017, 07:05:58 PM |
|
So I'm trying a 1080ti card with both NSGminer and CCminer, but found the following issue (no, the card is in perfect health and mines multiple other coins flawlessly, and games like a beast), and I realize the cuda miner is what I should be utilizing however needed to try it anyways to compare results. NSG miner creates over 50% bad shares consistently. CCminer creates 90% accepted shares at first then 10% bad shares all in a bunch, after that it creates 20+% bad shares intermittently. Regardless of lower or higher clock/mem speeds and/or Power limit, adjusted -I and tested multiple different drivers cleanly installed, and in a pool closest to my location. Also what Does "share is above target" actually mean. I'm thinking If I could find this out this will lead me to the source of the problem. Any Ideas? anyone?
|
|
|
|
xixou
Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 11
|
|
December 04, 2017, 04:46:36 PM |
|
I noticed that sgminer is very cpu intensive, maybe your cpu is not stable enough? BTW, could the cpu usage be reduced?
|
|
|
|
totallyG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
December 04, 2017, 11:50:37 PM |
|
SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
D:\Downloads\nsgminer-win64-0.9.2\nsgminer-win64-0.9.2>nsgminer.exe -neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://stratum.tzcpool.xyz:3026 -u crypto88.tzc1 -p 1 [2017-09-26 18:55:23] OpenCL platform 0 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [18:55:23] OpenCL platform 0 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing [18:55:23] OpenCL platform 0 version: OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (2442.12) [18:55:23] Platform 0 devices: 1 [18:55:23] 0 gfx804
[18:55:23] 1 OpenCL GPU device detected
[18:55:23] GPU 0 Radeon RX 550 Series hardware monitoring enabled [18:55:23] Failed to ADL_Overdrive5_ODPerformanceLevels_Get [18:55:23] Unable to load the NVIDIA Management Library
D:\Downloads\nsgminer-win64-0.9.2\nsgminer-win64-0.9.2>pause Press any key to continue . . .
anyone got a clue with this i am running a amd rx 550 it is saying can't load nvidia
It seems you got the same issue as me with the Intel GPU. I guess you are running windows too? It seems to work fine in Linux.
|
|
|
|
ghostlander (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1240
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
|
|
December 05, 2017, 10:47:16 PM |
|
NSGMiner not working with GPU on Linux.
I tries 4 more times - never working, even on CPU I install Linux Kernel 4.13.2 final release but this not helped I have 2x GTX1060
...
user@PC1 /media/user/F/Work/Mining/nsgminer-trezarcoin-cryptopia-neoscrypt $ sh _2_start_trezar_cryptopia_neoscrypt.sh NeoScrypt CPUminer v2.4.3 Engines: INT SSE2 SSE2-4way (enabled: SSE2-4way)
How do you expect CPUminer to work on your GPUs? I'm getting this on a GTX 1070 under Debian. [07:30:42] Probing for an alive pool [07:30:42] The network difficulty has been set to 8376950971 [07:30:42] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block [07:30:43] Error -9999: Building Program (clBuildProgram) [07:30:43] ptxas error : Entry function 'search' uses too much shared data (0x10040 bytes, 0xc000 max) [07:30:43] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0 [07:30:43] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this. [07:30:43] Try to restart the miner. Don't use -w 256 even if the driver reports to the miner it's alright.
|
|
|
|
ghostlander (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1240
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
|
|
December 05, 2017, 10:49:08 PM |
|
So I'm trying a 1080ti card with both NSGminer and CCminer, but found the following issue (no, the card is in perfect health and mines multiple other coins flawlessly, and games like a beast), and I realize the cuda miner is what I should be utilizing however needed to try it anyways to compare results. NSG miner creates over 50% bad shares consistently. CCminer creates 90% accepted shares at first then 10% bad shares all in a bunch, after that it creates 20+% bad shares intermittently. Regardless of lower or higher clock/mem speeds and/or Power limit, adjusted -I and tested multiple different drivers cleanly installed, and in a pool closest to my location. Also what Does "share is above target" actually mean. I'm thinking If I could find this out this will lead me to the source of the problem. Any Ideas? There are many NeoScrypt CCminers with kernels patched by many people, so I honestly cannot tell you what's wrong with one or another. My one in the OP is for Maxwells only. Not patched for Pascals yet. To be absolutely correct, the patched version hasn't been uploded yet. When a share is above target, it's rejected by the pool because considered invalid. Although it isn't necessarily true. I noticed that sgminer is very cpu intensive, maybe your cpu is not stable enough? BTW, could the cpu usage be reduced?
NVIDIA defaults to software polling which burns CPU time. One CPU thread per one GPU thread. It can use interrupts instead. If you tell me an OpenCL equivalent to cudaSetDeviceFlags(DeviceScheduleBlockingSync), we have no problem.
|
|
|
|
splat1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 05:32:11 AM Last edit: December 06, 2017, 07:09:01 AM by splat1 |
|
Is this normal? [00:30:35] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart [00:30:35] Pool 0 is sending mismatched block contents to us (0 is not 1-1) [00:30:41] Accepted 5A9CACED96000000x0 Diff 27.139/12.000 OCL 0 [00:30:44] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart [00:30:44] Pool 0 is sending mismatched block contents to us (0 is not 1-1) [00:30:46] Accepted 67E98E4849010000x0 Diff 12.439/12.000 OCL 0 [00:30:47] Accepted 5344953E0A010000x0 Diff 15.384/12.000 OCL 0 [00:30:48] Accepted FE5CF273BD000000x0 Diff 21.620/12.000 OCL 0 [00:30:51] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart [00:30:51] Pool 0 is sending mismatched block contents to us (0 is not 1-1) [00:30:53] Accepted 65BF442121000000x0 Diff 123.634/12.000 OCL 0 Getting a lot of work restart's Getting this on a Vega64.. although it is doing about 1Mh 1.4Mh
|
|
|
|
crypper
Member
Offline
Activity: 239
Merit: 12
|
|
December 06, 2017, 10:27:52 AM |
|
Hi guys, How do I direct the miner to NiceHash? My script is: nsgminer -k neoscrypt --no-adl --gpu-platform 2 -g 1 -w 128 -I 16 -o stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 -u MyBTCwallet The miner returns: "No login credentials supplied for pool 0 stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341" Thanks
|
|
|
|
leobot29
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 11:10:54 AM |
|
Getting 600k-1000k on my RX 580, anyone getting their RX 580 to stay at 1000k? or closer to anyway.
|
|
|
|
gregfromo
Member
Offline
Activity: 134
Merit: 10
|
|
December 06, 2017, 04:14:34 PM |
|
Getting 600k-1000k on my RX 580, anyone getting their RX 580 to stay at 1000k? or closer to anyway.
the 600ish seems to be normal, getting 3,1 mh/s with 5x 580
|
|
|
|
xixou
Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 11
|
|
December 06, 2017, 06:09:33 PM |
|
So I'm trying a 1080ti card with both NSGminer and CCminer, but found the following issue (no, the card is in perfect health and mines multiple other coins flawlessly, and games like a beast), and I realize the cuda miner is what I should be utilizing however needed to try it anyways to compare results. NSG miner creates over 50% bad shares consistently. CCminer creates 90% accepted shares at first then 10% bad shares all in a bunch, after that it creates 20+% bad shares intermittently. Regardless of lower or higher clock/mem speeds and/or Power limit, adjusted -I and tested multiple different drivers cleanly installed, and in a pool closest to my location. Also what Does "share is above target" actually mean. I'm thinking If I could find this out this will lead me to the source of the problem. Any Ideas? There are many NeoScrypt CCminers with kernels patched by many people, so I honestly cannot tell you what's wrong with one or another. My one in the OP is for Maxwells only. Not patched for Pascals yet. To be absolutely correct, the patched version hasn't been uploded yet. When a share is above target, it's rejected by the pool because considered invalid. Although it isn't necessarily true. I noticed that sgminer is very cpu intensive, maybe your cpu is not stable enough? BTW, could the cpu usage be reduced?
NVIDIA defaults to software polling which burns CPU time. One CPU thread per one GPU thread. It can use interrupts instead. If you tell me an OpenCL equivalent to cudaSetDeviceFlags(DeviceScheduleBlockingSync), we have no problem. I have tweeted the question to nvidia ^^
|
|
|
|
|
totallyG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 10:12:18 PM |
|
Is this normal? [00:30:35] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart [00:30:35] Pool 0 is sending mismatched block contents to us (0 is not 1-1) [00:30:41] Accepted 5A9CACED96000000x0 Diff 27.139/12.000 OCL 0 [00:30:44] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart [00:30:44] Pool 0 is sending mismatched block contents to us (0 is not 1-1) [00:30:46] Accepted 67E98E4849010000x0 Diff 12.439/12.000 OCL 0 [00:30:47] Accepted 5344953E0A010000x0 Diff 15.384/12.000 OCL 0 [00:30:48] Accepted FE5CF273BD000000x0 Diff 21.620/12.000 OCL 0 [00:30:51] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart [00:30:51] Pool 0 is sending mismatched block contents to us (0 is not 1-1) [00:30:53] Accepted 65BF442121000000x0 Diff 123.634/12.000 OCL 0 Getting a lot of work restart's Getting this on a Vega64.. although it is doing about 1Mh 1.4Mh Are you kidding? What settings and drivers? I think you need to have vardiff (about 3-4 pages something similar is mentioned)
|
|
|
|
|