ocminer
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
 |
March 29, 2015, 09:02:59 PM |
|
DRK miner, here  I like some of the ideas you have for masternodes. I would like to mine for a while. I downloaded 64bit win wallet. I got a spreadcoin gpu miner for AMD. Need a guide, please to get the sgminer built for spreadcoin working. the github guide says use the start.bat. It doesn't exist. is there an example of a bat file? I got the spreadcoin.conf done ok, i think. Anything help files with images that exists? If you'd like on a pool, look here: https://spr.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=gettingstartedStill breaking GPL rules? Lol talking about "copyright" rules in crypto is kinda ridiculous but the source is on my github, i just need to remove the crypto key used for the encryption to the pool and make it public. Dont worry, soon. |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
AnotherNode
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Nodes That Serve
|
|
March 29, 2015, 09:08:03 PM |
|
DRK miner, here I like some of the ideas you have for masternodes. I would like to mine for a while. I downloaded 64bit win wallet. I got a spreadcoin gpu miner for AMD. Need a guide to get the sgminer built for spreadcoin working. the github guide says use the start.bat. It doesn't exist. is there an example of a bat file? I got the spreadcoin.conf done ok, i think. Anything help files with images that exists? There is an example of the .bat file on github. sgminer -I 20 This is all you need. Set the intensity to taste. Thanks. The bat file is called runme, spreadcoinbat, start and a few other names depending on where you look. I got an AMD GPU miner from here http://cryptomining-blog.com/3879-amd-and-nvidia-gpu-miners-for-spreadcoin-now-available/I guess it is quite old? I think I got mining started ok now. I will do a few images and sample files once I've figured the best settings. Not getting any WU values so I guess my workers are not very efficient atm. |
|
|
|
|
AnotherNode
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Nodes That Serve
|
|
March 29, 2015, 09:20:44 PM |
|
DRK miner, here I like some of the ideas you have for masternodes. I would like to mine for a while. I downloaded 64bit win wallet. I got a spreadcoin gpu miner for AMD. Need a guide, please to get the sgminer built for spreadcoin working. the github guide says use the start.bat. It doesn't exist. is there an example of a bat file? I got the spreadcoin.conf done ok, i think. Anything help files with images that exists? If you'd like on a pool, look here: https://spr.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=gettingstartedAMD & win7? I dont want the hassle of switching to run linux. I've got some other stuff going on for windows atm. Unfortunately i cannot get the miner compiled on win7 correctly for now, but i am working on it will give your pool a go once you're ready |
|
|
|
|
AnotherNode
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Nodes That Serve
|
|
March 29, 2015, 10:02:00 PM |
|
6.11 block reward?
Currently seeing 2 blocks every ~60mins with ~15 MH/s
About right for this level of difficulty?
|
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
March 30, 2015, 02:23:15 AM |
|
6.11 block reward?
Currently seeing 2 blocks every ~60mins with ~15 MH/s
About right for this level of difficulty?
yup - it is ... we are on nonce-pool ( private and invite only ) which you can use the 'standard' miners for ... but it IS private and need to request to come in - due to the use of the 'standard' ( optimized in my case ) miners and the sharing of the private key to the pool ... unlike ocminers pool which does not share the private key ... but thats why its a private pool and invite only ... we have NEVER had an issue there and continue to mine there - as the pool owner is trustworthy also ( like ocminer ) ... we hit much more blocks - but thats due to the hashrate also ... we are not hitting as many blocks as we like due to our internet connection dropouts ( which is getting looked at today by the isp ) so hopefully we will be back up and running at full pace after today ... if you want try out the pool - let the pool owner ( nonce-pool here on bct ) via pm ... hope this helps ... #crysx |
|
|
|
chup
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 736
Merit: 262
Me, Myself & I
|
 |
March 30, 2015, 06:56:03 AM |
|
Still breaking GPL rules? Lol talking about "copyright" rules in crypto is kinda ridiculous but the source is on my github, i just need to remove the crypto key used for the encryption to the pool and make it public. Dont worry, soon. I'm not laughing. You are laughing to people that invested tremendous time and effort to bring crypto currency world to the point of being usable and practical for everyone. You are breaking rules that crypto currency world is based on. You have to change the way your crypto key is inserted into code, because if you publish source that is not compiling towards published binaries you will again break rules. |
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
March 30, 2015, 07:09:09 AM |
|
Still breaking GPL rules? Lol talking about "copyright" rules in crypto is kinda ridiculous but the source is on my github, i just need to remove the crypto key used for the encryption to the pool and make it public. Dont worry, soon. I'm not laughing. You are laughing to people that invested tremendous time and effort to bring crypto currency world to the point of being usable and practical for everyone. You are breaking rules that crypto currency world is based on. You have to change the way your crypto key is inserted into code, because if you publish source that is not compiling towards published binaries you will again break rules. Incorrect, crypto keys are of course NOT under GPL, only the source itself. I am releasing my mods to the source - WITHOUT the crypto keys so that everyone, also other pools, can start own projects/pools by using own - new keys. BTW maybe you should talk to the "devs" that compile and relase binary-only version of (faster) miners with forced donation or even those who sell pre-compiled binaries etc ? GPL mainly wants to prevent you make any money with public code - I'm not and never did. :-) (No, the Pool is 0% fee) I see your point, and I agree by releasing the source - I never intended to NOT to but you're fighting against the wrong person here - it's a public project - just take a look at my github, there is lots of stuff already. |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
March 30, 2015, 08:07:33 AM |
|
Still breaking GPL rules? Lol talking about "copyright" rules in crypto is kinda ridiculous but the source is on my github, i just need to remove the crypto key used for the encryption to the pool and make it public. Dont worry, soon. I'm not laughing. You are laughing to people that invested tremendous time and effort to bring crypto currency world to the point of being usable and practical for everyone. You are breaking rules that crypto currency world is based on. You have to change the way your crypto key is inserted into code, because if you publish source that is not compiling towards published binaries you will again break rules. Incorrect, crypto keys are of course NOT under GPL, only the source itself. I am releasing my mods to the source - WITHOUT the crypto keys so that everyone, also other pools, can start own projects/pools by using own - new keys. BTW maybe you should talk to the "devs" that compile and relase binary-only version of (faster) miners with forced donation or even those who sell pre-compiled binaries etc ? GPL mainly wants to prevent you make any money with public code - I'm not and never did. :-) (No, the Pool is 0% fee) I see your point, and I agree by releasing the source - I never intended to NOT to but you're fighting against the wrong person here - it's a public project - just take a look at my github, there is lots of stuff already. exactly what is ocminer breaking here? ... nothing? ... thats what i thought too ... if ocminer really WAS breaking any arrangement with the GPL - or whatever licence - you would have FOSS on his ass in no time ... ocminer - keep up the good work mate ... ill wait ... #crysx |
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
March 30, 2015, 08:14:05 AM |
|
Still breaking GPL rules? Lol talking about "copyright" rules in crypto is kinda ridiculous but the source is on my github, i just need to remove the crypto key used for the encryption to the pool and make it public. Dont worry, soon. I'm not laughing. You are laughing to people that invested tremendous time and effort to bring crypto currency world to the point of being usable and practical for everyone. You are breaking rules that crypto currency world is based on. You have to change the way your crypto key is inserted into code, because if you publish source that is not compiling towards published binaries you will again break rules. Incorrect, crypto keys are of course NOT under GPL, only the source itself. I am releasing my mods to the source - WITHOUT the crypto keys so that everyone, also other pools, can start own projects/pools by using own - new keys. BTW maybe you should talk to the "devs" that compile and relase binary-only version of (faster) miners with forced donation or even those who sell pre-compiled binaries etc ? GPL mainly wants to prevent you make any money with public code - I'm not and never did. :-) (No, the Pool is 0% fee) I see your point, and I agree by releasing the source - I never intended to NOT to but you're fighting against the wrong person here - it's a public project - just take a look at my github, there is lots of stuff already. exactly what is ocminer breaking here? ... nothing? ... thats what i thought too ... if ocminer really WAS breaking any arrangement with the GPL - or whatever licence - you would have FOSS on his ass in no time ... ocminer - keep up the good work mate ... ill wait ... #crysx thanks ! btw the source is now on github |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
March 30, 2015, 08:51:27 AM |
|
Still breaking GPL rules? Lol talking about "copyright" rules in crypto is kinda ridiculous but the source is on my github, i just need to remove the crypto key used for the encryption to the pool and make it public. Dont worry, soon. I'm not laughing. You are laughing to people that invested tremendous time and effort to bring crypto currency world to the point of being usable and practical for everyone. You are breaking rules that crypto currency world is based on. You have to change the way your crypto key is inserted into code, because if you publish source that is not compiling towards published binaries you will again break rules. Incorrect, crypto keys are of course NOT under GPL, only the source itself. I am releasing my mods to the source - WITHOUT the crypto keys so that everyone, also other pools, can start own projects/pools by using own - new keys. BTW maybe you should talk to the "devs" that compile and relase binary-only version of (faster) miners with forced donation or even those who sell pre-compiled binaries etc ? GPL mainly wants to prevent you make any money with public code - I'm not and never did. :-) (No, the Pool is 0% fee) I see your point, and I agree by releasing the source - I never intended to NOT to but you're fighting against the wrong person here - it's a public project - just take a look at my github, there is lots of stuff already. exactly what is ocminer breaking here? ... nothing? ... thats what i thought too ... if ocminer really WAS breaking any arrangement with the GPL - or whatever licence - you would have FOSS on his ass in no time ... ocminer - keep up the good work mate ... ill wait ... #crysx thanks ! btw the source is now on github no worries ... github address please? ... does this mean that we just need to compile and start to mine? ... or is there something else we need to do beforehand? ... been waiting to test mining on your pool mate ... #crysx |
|
|
|
chup
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 736
Merit: 262
Me, Myself & I
|
 |
March 30, 2015, 09:04:48 AM |
|
Still breaking GPL rules? Lol talking about "copyright" rules in crypto is kinda ridiculous but the source is on my github, i just need to remove the crypto key used for the encryption to the pool and make it public. Dont worry, soon. I'm not laughing. You are laughing to people that invested tremendous time and effort to bring crypto currency world to the point of being usable and practical for everyone. You are breaking rules that crypto currency world is based on. You have to change the way your crypto key is inserted into code, because if you publish source that is not compiling towards published binaries you will again break rules. Incorrect, crypto keys are of course NOT under GPL, only the source itself. I am releasing my mods to the source - WITHOUT the crypto keys so that everyone, also other pools, can start own projects/pools by using own - new keys. BTW maybe you should talk to the "devs" that compile and relase binary-only version of (faster) miners with forced donation or even those who sell pre-compiled binaries etc ? GPL mainly wants to prevent you make any money with public code - I'm not and never did. :-) (No, the Pool is 0% fee) I see your point, and I agree by releasing the source - I never intended to NOT to but you're fighting against the wrong person here - it's a public project - just take a look at my github, there is lots of stuff already. Devs that are NOT PUBLISHING their own forks, but are selling them are not breaking GPL rules. Believe it or not. So, fight is legitimate, person is not wrong. If You send binaries to one that asks for them, everything is OK. If You publish them, as you did - GPL rules are broken. Glad to hear that you published source. |
|
|
|
chup
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 736
Merit: 262
Me, Myself & I
|
|
March 30, 2015, 09:12:46 AM |
|
exactly what is ocminer breaking here? ... nothing? ... thats what i thought too ... if ocminer really WAS breaking any arrangement with the GPL - or whatever licence - you would have FOSS on his ass in no time ... ocminer - keep up the good work mate ... ill wait ... #crysx thanks ! btw the source is now on github no worries ... github address please? ... does this mean that we just need to compile and start to mine? ... or is there something else we need to do beforehand? ... been waiting to test mining on your pool mate ... #crysx No, it means that You still have to use closed binaries and trust the person that releases them. Because You can't get key in visible form and compile source by yourself. If You do, You could rip off "pool" anytime. Or being ripped off from other "pool" miner. |
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 30, 2015, 09:13:33 AM
Last edit: March 30, 2015, 10:02:43 AM by coins101 |
|
That wall I had up, it just earned me quite a few ServiceNodes. Thanks Will put up another wall for you later. You obviously have greater faith in my bitcoins than I do.  edit I am perfectly confident that gjhiggins, elbandi and me will do a fine job as new devs. http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=526.msg3193#msg3193I have great faith in the ability and motivation of the new devs and other members of the community......this project has a great network and sufficient ability in a variety of areas to make this project epic. |
|
|
|
|
AnotherNode
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Nodes That Serve
|
|
March 30, 2015, 10:22:54 AM |
|
6.11 block reward?
Currently seeing 2 blocks every ~60mins with ~15 MH/s
About right for this level of difficulty?
yup - it is ... we are on nonce-pool ( private and invite only ) which you can use the 'standard' miners for ... but it IS private and need to request to come in - due to the use of the 'standard' ( optimized in my case ) miners and the sharing of the private key to the pool ... unlike ocminers pool which does not share the private key ... but thats why its a private pool and invite only ... we have NEVER had an issue there and continue to mine there - as the pool owner is trustworthy also ( like ocminer ) ... we hit much more blocks - but thats due to the hashrate also ... we are not hitting as many blocks as we like due to our internet connection dropouts ( which is getting looked at today by the isp ) so hopefully we will be back up and running at full pace after today ... if you want try out the pool - let the pool owner ( nonce-pool here on bct ) via pm ... hope this helps ... #crysx Thanks! I'm still trying to find my way around. The WU is so low. Once I get a configuration working and then tested mining on my other rigs, I'll test out the pools. |
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
March 30, 2015, 01:07:19 PM |
|
6.11 block reward?
Currently seeing 2 blocks every ~60mins with ~15 MH/s
About right for this level of difficulty?
yup - it is ... we are on nonce-pool ( private and invite only ) which you can use the 'standard' miners for ... but it IS private and need to request to come in - due to the use of the 'standard' ( optimized in my case ) miners and the sharing of the private key to the pool ... unlike ocminers pool which does not share the private key ... but thats why its a private pool and invite only ... we have NEVER had an issue there and continue to mine there - as the pool owner is trustworthy also ( like ocminer ) ... we hit much more blocks - but thats due to the hashrate also ... we are not hitting as many blocks as we like due to our internet connection dropouts ( which is getting looked at today by the isp ) so hopefully we will be back up and running at full pace after today ... if you want try out the pool - let the pool owner ( nonce-pool here on bct ) via pm ... hope this helps ... #crysx Thanks! I'm still trying to find my way around. The WU is so low. Once I get a configuration working and then tested mining on my other rigs, I'll test out the pools. do you have issues with your configuration? ... if there is any way i can help - let me know ... #crysx |
|
|
|
AnotherNode
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Nodes That Serve
|
|
March 30, 2015, 05:46:34 PM |
|
-
do you have issues with your configuration? ...
if there is any way i can help - let me know ...
#crysx
Not sure yet. I'm coming on 24hours, have mined 28 blocks with ~7mhs and WU is starting to be consistent on all GPUs. Temps are good, no hardware errors, some rejects, hash rate is still about 2.2mhs per miner. still running stock configurations. Thanks for offer. Will post pictures of miners later. |
|
|
|
|
AnotherNode
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Nodes That Serve
|
|
March 30, 2015, 07:27:50 PM
Last edit: March 30, 2015, 07:55:39 PM by AnotherNode |
|
Results are in. Asrock mobo Corsair 8GB RAM Cheap CPU Radeon AMD R9 290 x3 Corsair RM1000 80 Plus Gold 1000W edit Latest AMD drivers - checked with AMD Driver Autodetect Found an Spreadcoinx11 SGminer on internet - checked for malware Windows 7 34 Blocks in 24 hours   Hopefully I didn't post anything I shouldn't. |
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 30, 2015, 07:57:10 PM |
|
Nice.
Looks about the same as my Tri-x cards.
Do you have a power meter?
|
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 30, 2015, 08:32:19 PM |
|
34 Blocks in 24 hours Does anyone else get similar results? |
|
|
|
|
|
