|
jzhoulon
|
 |
August 30, 2014, 07:43:33 AM |
|
Total Blocks 6706 mined by 672 miners it seems 52 new miners mined the burst in these two days,  i can't compete with you guys any more, didn't find a block in three days,,,see you in the v2 pools  how big is your plot file? 3.8T I am in the same situation, but 2.7tb for me, hope v2 pool will be realeased soon when i download the wallet 1.0.3,i was thought there will be a choice when open the wallet sever, sever linked to pool or solo ,,,but nothing,...just wait, hope switch solo and pool mode will not too complicate |
|
|
|
|
jzhoulon
|
|
August 30, 2014, 08:43:16 AM
Last edit: August 30, 2014, 10:40:38 AM by jzhoulon |
|
Basic pool support (done) Improved pool support (in progress) BurstId authentication system i am really curious what is "BurstId authentication system". does this is a new concept ? and for the multipool , i think it is good idea, and will improve the coin's popularity, but sadly, i can't make it, but occationaly, i find a tile who teach how to make multipool by yourself, i think community who has the ability to learn it will do it, or we can PM this guy to see weather he is willing do it for us https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=701200.0 or this, it needs 0.25 btc to setup, but don't know they will setup the poc miner,can try https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=733216.0 |
|
|
|
|
kenshirothefist
|
|
August 30, 2014, 10:38:25 AM |
|
Question regarding the "staggnation" parameter when generating plots:
"staggnation : is the number of plots to group together per run, which causes less disk reads / seeks the higher it is, the lower the more disk reads/ seeks"
Does this parameter only affects performance when generating plots or does it also affect performance later on when mining with these generated plots?
|
|
|
|
|
coin-cidence
Member
 Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
August 30, 2014, 11:07:16 AM |
|
Almost no sell at c-cex, only more buyers with every hour  |
BTC compared to PASC looks like big clumsy dinosaur - still not aware of meteor coming.
|
|
|
|
saamxx
|
|
August 30, 2014, 11:52:07 AM |
|
Almost no sell at c-cex, only more buyers with every hour Nice dream  BTC sell amount 605.85 Total BTC buy amount 9.58 Total It is because you can't see the whole orders book |
|
|
|
|
|
jzhoulon
|
|
August 30, 2014, 12:02:57 PM |
|
Almost no sell at c-cex, only more buyers with every hour Nice dream BTC sell amount 605.85 Total BTC buy amount 9.58 Total It is because you can't see the whole orders book that's not true, some one set the high price of burst, look at the burst on sell Price per BURST BURST amount 2122181.65 Total BTC amount 605.85 Total and the burst on buy Price per BURST BURST amount 10845720.31 Total BTC amount 9.58 Total burst buy amount is 5 times of sell, you can't say 605 btc is larger than 9.85, if someone set 1btc / burst at the top and with a log, these could be ingore |
|
|
|
CryptoSurfer
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
August 30, 2014, 12:11:24 PM |
|
I consolidate my drives Plots from 1TB HDDs to 4TB HDDs. Now i have 4 folder with 4 plots and 4 miner on the 4TB drive.
On my system run to many miner jobs, it would be clearer if I this 4x 1TB plots in one folder with one miner could work.
But I am not sure whether the miner also used all my 4 plots.
If the plots are generated using the same address on all the drives you can use symlink (linux) or mklink (windows) to link all plots to one plot folder and just use one miner (tamke care to not use overlapping plots-> waiste of space). |
|
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
|
August 30, 2014, 12:43:45 PM |
|
I consolidate my drives Plots from 1TB HDDs to 4TB HDDs. Now i have 4 folder with 4 plots and 4 miner on the 4TB drive.
On my system run to many miner jobs, it would be clearer if I this 4x 1TB plots in one folder with one miner could work.
But I am not sure whether the miner also used all my 4 plots.
If the plots are generated using the same address on all the drives you can use symlink (linux) or mklink (windows) to link all plots to one plot folder and just use one miner (tamke care to not use overlapping plots-> waiste of space). This is not a bottle neck. Miner do not use so much resources. You can use 4 or more miners with no problem. I don't know what is better for performance! |
|
|
|
|
Blago
|
|
August 30, 2014, 12:55:29 PM |
|
I consolidate my drives Plots from 1TB HDDs to 4TB HDDs. Now i have 4 folder with 4 plots and 4 miner on the 4TB drive.
On my system run to many miner jobs, it would be clearer if I this 4x 1TB plots in one folder with one miner could work.
But I am not sure whether the miner also used all my 4 plots.
If the plots are generated using the same address on all the drives you can use symlink (linux) or mklink (windows) to link all plots to one plot folder and just use one miner (tamke care to not use overlapping plots-> waiste of space). This is not a bottle neck. Miner do not use so much resources. You can use 4 or more miners with no problem. I don't know what is better for performance! 4 miners + server = 12Gb RAM (Win7 x64) (16Gb installed) жpeт дo xepa! |
Relax, I’m russian!...
BURST-B2LU-SGCZ-NYVS-HZEPK
|
|
|
Hix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1971
Merit: 1036
|
|
August 30, 2014, 12:58:32 PM |
|
I consolidate my drives Plots from 1TB HDDs to 4TB HDDs. Now i have 4 folder with 4 plots and 4 miner on the 4TB drive.
On my system run to many miner jobs, it would be clearer if I this 4x 1TB plots in one folder with one miner could work.
But I am not sure whether the miner also used all my 4 plots.
If the plots are generated using the same address on all the drives you can use symlink (linux) or mklink (windows) to link all plots to one plot folder and just use one miner (tamke care to not use overlapping plots-> waiste of space). This is not a bottle neck. Miner do not use so much resources. You can use 4 or more miners with no problem. I don't know what is better for performance! 4 miners + server = 12Gb RAM (Win7 x64) (16Gb installed) жpeт дo xepa! how much TB you have? |
|
|
|
|
|
Trollollo
|
|
August 30, 2014, 01:32:00 PM |
|
My lucky day! Two blocks with only 4.5 Tb |
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
August 30, 2014, 01:40:33 PM |
|
Total Blocks 6706 mined by 672 miners it seems 52 new miners mined the burst in these two days, i can't compete with you guys any more, didn't find a block in three days,,,see you in the v2 pools we still seeing old NRS on peers, for pool v2 we need all peers to use atleast 1.0.3 or we will have a bad fork... please update guys |
|
|
|
|
|
jzhoulon
|
|
August 30, 2014, 01:47:00 PM |
|
Total Blocks 6706 mined by 672 miners it seems 52 new miners mined the burst in these two days, i can't compete with you guys any more, didn't find a block in three days,,,see you in the v2 pools we still seeing old NRS on peers, for pool v2 we need all peers to use atleast 1.0.3 or we will have a bad fork... please update guys ...don't dev announce that update 1.0.3 before 6500? now is almost 6800, if use old wallet, can still download blockchain after 6500? |
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
August 30, 2014, 01:58:57 PM |
|
Total Blocks 6706 mined by 672 miners it seems 52 new miners mined the burst in these two days, i can't compete with you guys any more, didn't find a block in three days,,,see you in the v2 pools we still seeing old NRS on peers, for pool v2 we need all peers to use atleast 1.0.3 or we will have a bad fork... please update guys ...don't dev announce that update 1.0.3 before 6500? now is almost 6800, if use old wallet, can still download blockchain after 6500? yes 1.0.2 is still work, but if pool miner start doing reward_assignment, i dont know what happen to 1.0.2 since that wallet dont understand this new kind of transaction, thats what preventing us from start pooled (v2) mining |
|
|
|
|
bitminer82
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
August 30, 2014, 02:02:49 PM |
|
Can you do a ls -al in your plots folder? I'm guessing there's something called .fuse in it.
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4096 Aug 29 22:27 .
drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4096 Aug 29 22:34 ..
-rwxrwxrwx 0 root root 1563177254912 Aug 30 09:59 .fuse_hidden0000029000000003 Yup. And the plot file is nowhere to be found (changed to .fuse_hidden)? Weird... Meanwhile dcct's generator is still chugging away and is up to 83% finished. Can a file be renamed in Linux while it's still being modified?  |
|
|
|
|
|
m3ta
|
|
August 30, 2014, 02:07:23 PM |
|
Total Blocks 6706 mined by 672 miners it seems 52 new miners mined the burst in these two days, i can't compete with you guys any more, didn't find a block in three days,,,see you in the v2 pools we still seeing old NRS on peers, for pool v2 we need all peers to use atleast 1.0.3 or we will have a bad fork... please update guys ...don't dev announce that update 1.0.3 before 6500? now is almost 6800, if use old wallet, can still download blockchain after 6500? yes 1.0.2 is still work, but if pool miner start doing reward_assignment, i dont know what happen to 1.0.2 since that wallet dont understand this new kind of transaction, thats what preventing us from start pooled (v2) mining Well, then a different solution is needed. If you're waiting for everyone to read this thread (or just pay attention) and upgrade.... it won't happen. |
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
August 30, 2014, 02:09:20 PM |
|
Total Blocks 6706 mined by 672 miners it seems 52 new miners mined the burst in these two days, i can't compete with you guys any more, didn't find a block in three days,,,see you in the v2 pools we still seeing old NRS on peers, for pool v2 we need all peers to use atleast 1.0.3 or we will have a bad fork... please update guys ...don't dev announce that update 1.0.3 before 6500? now is almost 6800, if use old wallet, can still download blockchain after 6500? yes 1.0.2 is still work, but if pool miner start doing reward_assignment, i dont know what happen to 1.0.2 since that wallet dont understand this new kind of transaction, thats what preventing us from start pooled (v2) mining Well, then a different solution is needed. If you're waiting for everyone to read this thread (or just pay attention) and upgrade.... it won't happen. yeah, or we just leave 1.0.2 on bad fork |
|
|
|
|
|
jzhoulon
|
|
August 30, 2014, 02:12:51 PM |
|
Total Blocks 6706 mined by 672 miners it seems 52 new miners mined the burst in these two days, i can't compete with you guys any more, didn't find a block in three days,,,see you in the v2 pools we still seeing old NRS on peers, for pool v2 we need all peers to use atleast 1.0.3 or we will have a bad fork... please update guys ...don't dev announce that update 1.0.3 before 6500? now is almost 6800, if use old wallet, can still download blockchain after 6500? yes 1.0.2 is still work, but if pool miner start doing reward_assignment, i dont know what happen to 1.0.2 since that wallet dont understand this new kind of transaction, thats what preventing us from start pooled (v2) mining Well, then a different solution is needed. If you're waiting for everyone to read this thread (or just pay attention) and upgrade.... it won't happen. to be honest, this would be a serious problem , for example, if i am a investor, and i want get the burst out of the platform and send to my wallet, and now we only have a website wallet, and if opening the wallet , you must open the wallet sever, for investor, they don't need update wallet so frequently ，right? the normal situation is ,investor should only open an gui wallet and the blockchain will download automaticlly, they don't need to update the wallet to 1.0.2 or 1.0.3. they just need to connect the wallet sever..then this will result the wallet severl be all updated to 1.0.3. |
|
|
|
|
Blago
|
|
August 30, 2014, 02:34:10 PM |
|
I consolidate my drives Plots from 1TB HDDs to 4TB HDDs. Now i have 4 folder with 4 plots and 4 miner on the 4TB drive.
On my system run to many miner jobs, it would be clearer if I this 4x 1TB plots in one folder with one miner could work.
But I am not sure whether the miner also used all my 4 plots.
If the plots are generated using the same address on all the drives you can use symlink (linux) or mklink (windows) to link all plots to one plot folder and just use one miner (tamke care to not use overlapping plots-> waiste of space). This is not a bottle neck. Miner do not use so much resources. You can use 4 or more miners with no problem. I don't know what is better for performance! 4 miners + server = 12Gb RAM (Win7 x64) (16Gb installed) жpeт дo xepa! how much TB you have? ~8Tb, FX6300, 16 Gb RAM screenshot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/kbn76taqao8m9cv/screen.JPG?dl=0 |
Relax, I’m russian!...
BURST-B2LU-SGCZ-NYVS-HZEPK
|
|
|
|
Trollollo
|
|
August 30, 2014, 02:54:24 PM |
|
Total Blocks 6706 mined by 672 miners it seems 52 new miners mined the burst in these two days, i can't compete with you guys any more, didn't find a block in three days,,,see you in the v2 pools we still seeing old NRS on peers, for pool v2 we need all peers to use atleast 1.0.3 or we will have a bad fork... please update guys ...don't dev announce that update 1.0.3 before 6500? now is almost 6800, if use old wallet, can still download blockchain after 6500? yes 1.0.2 is still work, but if pool miner start doing reward_assignment, i dont know what happen to 1.0.2 since that wallet dont understand this new kind of transaction, thats what preventing us from start pooled (v2) mining Well, then a different solution is needed. If you're waiting for everyone to read this thread (or just pay attention) and upgrade.... it won't happen. to be honest, this would be a serious problem , for example, if i am a investor, and i want get the burst out of the platform and send to my wallet, and now we only have a website wallet, and if opening the wallet , you must open the wallet sever, for investor, they don't need update wallet so frequently ，right? the normal situation is ,investor should only open an gui wallet and the blockchain will download automaticlly, they don't need to update the wallet to 1.0.2 or 1.0.3. they just need to connect the wallet sever..then this will result the wallet severl be all updated to 1.0.3. Yes,I think,this may be the problem.This is the reason why I don't like nxt based coins.But from other side,this is not POS coin,and investors can keep coins on exchanges. |
|
|
|
|
