[ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay]

[dsyahputera]

Magi (XMG) marketingteam is looking for people who speak the following languages: Portuguese, Chinese, Japanese, Indonesian, Spanish, Romanian, French, Korean.

Magi (XMG) marketingteam is also looking for a suitable poker site that accepts Cryptos.
Marketingteam also welcomes any information from the community about possible extensions and wishes of or for XMG!

if you can help it send me pm.

I'm an Indonesian, but I don't have any marketing experience

[111magic]

Magi (XMG) marketingteam is looking for people who speak the following languages: Portuguese, Chinese, Japanese, Indonesian, Spanish, Romanian, French, Korean.

Magi (XMG) marketingteam is also looking for a suitable poker site that accepts Cryptos.
Marketingteam also welcomes any information from the community about possible extensions and wishes of or for XMG!

if you can help it send me pm.

I'm an Indonesian, but I don't have any marketing experience

Thanks for your respons and pm!

[art4free81]

Magi (XMG) marketingteam is looking for people who speak the following languages: Portuguese, Chinese, Japanese, Indonesian, Spanish, Romanian, French, Korean.

Magi (XMG) marketingteam is also looking for a suitable poker site that accepts Cryptos.
Marketingteam also welcomes any information from the community about possible extensions and wishes of or for XMG!

if you can help it send me pm.

I'm an Indonesian, but I don't have any marketing experience

Thanks for your respons and pm!

i'm indonesia too

[sleepdog]

I'm Indonesia and so is my wife!   

[dsyahputera]

I'm Indonesia and so is my wife!   

Hey, do you can translate the OP into Bahasa Indonesia?

[111magic]

I'm Indonesia and so is my wife!  

Hey, do you can translate the OP into Bahasa Indonesia?

Think they are not online anymore!

https://twitter.com/rif4l/status/562960863100170243
Nice one!

[goldlabel]

Hi,

Is there a way to solo mining with wolf-m7m-cpuminer-V2-x64-0124-generic?

[Spexx]

Hi,

Is there a way to solo mining with wolf-m7m-cpuminer-V2-x64-0124-generic?

I am not sure about that particular version. The first release of the Wolf0 improved miner did not include the code required for solo mining. The latest release (modified by Joe) does include support for solo mining.

Source:-

https://github.com/magi-project/wolf-m7m-cpuminer-V2

Windows binaries:-

.rar https://www.dropbox.com/s/q8puq9w6uc240mx/Spexx-Win64-generic-XMGminerd.rar

.zip https://www.dropbox.com/s/o8i726sxnwe2wxa/Spexx-Win64-generic-XMGminerd.zip

self-extracting .exe (extracts to C:\XMGminer by default) https://www.dropbox.com/s/uudj2npeyixesjb/Spexx-Win64-generic-XMGminerd.exe

[joelao95]

Hi,

Is there a way to solo mining with wolf-m7m-cpuminer-V2-x64-0124-generic?

I am not sure about that particular version. The first release of the Wolf0 improved miner did not include the code required for solo mining. The latest release (modified by Joe) does include support for solo mining.

Source:-

https://github.com/magi-project/wolf-m7m-cpuminer-V2

Windows binaries:-

.rar https://www.dropbox.com/s/q8puq9w6uc240mx/Spexx-Win64-generic-XMGminerd.rar

.zip https://www.dropbox.com/s/o8i726sxnwe2wxa/Spexx-Win64-generic-XMGminerd.zip

self-extracting .exe (extracts to C:\XMGminer by default) https://www.dropbox.com/s/uudj2npeyixesjb/Spexx-Win64-generic-XMGminerd.exe

Thanks Spexx, I've played around the compilation too; your compilation is superb. Anyway for anyone who wants to look into different versions, here are a bunch of miners (x32 and x64) cross-compiled under linux (debian) by gcc 4.9 (the generic seems the best) for whatever reasons:

http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-miner/wolf-m7m-cpuminer-V2/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/coinmagi/files/m-miner/wolf-m7m-cpuminer-V2/

All are able to do solo mining.

[Zywiec]

I'm Indonesia and so is my wife!  

Hey, do you can translate the OP into Bahasa Indonesia?

He knows what he's doing.

It's pretty hard work I guess. Many content to translate beacause of #XMG's advended technologies.

[z0n0]

I have the following problem on 3 different machines:
I get almost same hash speed with 2, 3, or 4 threads (latest spexx miner).

Laptop i3 M350:
-t 2: 17,.. kh/s
-t 3: 17,.. kh/s
-t 4: 18,.. kh/s

Desktop i3 4330:
-t 2: 32,.. kh/s
-t 3: 38,.. kh/s
-t 4: 38,.. kh/s

Desktop i3 2100:
-t 2: 21,.. kh/s
-t 3: 26,.. kh/s
-t 4: 27,.. kh/s

Any ideas guys?
Thanks!

[compmaster]

What was the big thing that happened? The counter on the website has hit 0

[Spexx]

I have the following problem on 3 different machines:
I get almost same hash speed with 2, 3, or 4 threads (latest spexx miner).

Laptop i3 M350:
-t 2: 17,.. kh/s
-t 3: 17,.. kh/s
-t 4: 18,.. kh/s

Desktop i3 4330:
-t 2: 32,.. kh/s
-t 3: 38,.. kh/s
-t 4: 38,.. kh/s

Desktop i3 2100:
-t 2: 21,.. kh/s
-t 3: 26,.. kh/s
-t 4: 27,.. kh/s

Any ideas guys?
Thanks!

All of those processors have only 2 cores, so there is no advantage to be had by running more than 2 threads - they will interfere and compete for CPU time. If you run minerd.exe without specifying the number of threads with -t it will default to the number of processor cores in the machine.

You may be able to improve the total hashrate by running 2 instances of minerd.exe with -t 1 instead of a single instance of minerd.exe with -t 2.

The M350 hashrate seems about right but the figures for the desktops would depend on the clock speeds. Look up your CPU at https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php and divide the CPU Passmark by 100 to get an estimate of the Kh/s you can expect with the latest 64 bit Windows miners.

Hope this helps

[hefty]

hefty, very nice collection; someone before was asking hash data like this, that's handy. Post your XMG address (put it in the sig so that people can easily find where to donate ); will send over tips.

Hey joelao95 i benchmarked 70 machines at work in last 2,5 days and 31 different cpu-s with last spexx miner, i have another 290 machines to go   i hope i can make list of about 100+ cpus and they magi hash. Would you mind if i ask here now on this forum all the people and you to help me by pm-ing me your cpu, clock, os, khash so i can make more accurate data/list of khash for all of us magi miners. Few people already pmd me about khashs and what cpu to recommend, so when i finish the list ill post it here on this forum ofc or i can send it to you so you can post it for everyone.

cheers  

[Spexx]

Anyway for anyone who wants to look into different versions, here are a bunch of miners (x32 and x64) cross-compiled under linux (debian) by gcc 4.9 (the generic seems the best) for whatever reasons:

http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-miner/wolf-m7m-cpuminer-V2/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/coinmagi/files/m-miner/wolf-m7m-cpuminer-V2/

All are able to do solo mining.

I can see what you did there

A lot of time and effort and I think you may be just one or two compiler flags away from my final effort.

What a superb collection of minerds and I had some fun benchmarking that little lot. Its the same pattern as my efforts - the ones with AVX and AVX2 instruction sets are slower than the generic version - in this case slower than the SSE2 version

Is that magic?

[eule]

I have the following problem on 3 different machines:
I get almost same hash speed with 2, 3, or 4 threads (latest spexx miner).

Laptop i3 M350:
-t 2: 17,.. kh/s
-t 3: 17,.. kh/s
-t 4: 18,.. kh/s

Desktop i3 4330:
-t 2: 32,.. kh/s
-t 3: 38,.. kh/s
-t 4: 38,.. kh/s

Desktop i3 2100:
-t 2: 21,.. kh/s
-t 3: 26,.. kh/s
-t 4: 27,.. kh/s

Any ideas guys?
Thanks!

i3 = 2 cores, so I'd say that is normal.

edit: Seems like Spexx answered that already, and much better too. 

[z0n0]

I have the following problem on 3 different machines:
I get almost same hash speed with 2, 3, or 4 threads (latest spexx miner).

Laptop i3 M350:
-t 2: 17,.. kh/s
-t 3: 17,.. kh/s
-t 4: 18,.. kh/s

Desktop i3 4330:
-t 2: 32,.. kh/s
-t 3: 38,.. kh/s
-t 4: 38,.. kh/s

Desktop i3 2100:
-t 2: 21,.. kh/s
-t 3: 26,.. kh/s
-t 4: 27,.. kh/s

Any ideas guys?
Thanks!

All of those processors have only 2 cores, so there is no advantage to be had by running more than 2 threads - they will interfere and compete for CPU time. If you run minerd.exe without specifying the number of threads with -t it will default to the number of processor cores in the machine.

You may be able to improve the total hashrate by running 2 instances of minerd.exe with -t 1 instead of a single instance of minerd.exe with -t 2.

The M350 hashrate seems about right but the figures for the desktops would depend on the clock speeds. Look up your CPU at https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php and divide the CPU Passmark by 100 to get an estimate of the Kh/s you can expect with the latest 64 bit Windows miners.

Hope this helps

Thank you sir

[malekbaba]

what is the most recent magi miner ?? please tell me whole direction to use that miner...

[z0n0]

hefty, very nice collection; someone before was asking hash data like this, that's handy. Post your XMG address (put it in the sig so that people can easily find where to donate ); will send over tips.

Hey joelao95 i benchmarked 70 machines at work in last 2,5 days and 31 different cpu-s with last spexx miner, i have another 290 machines to go   i hope i can make list of about 100+ cpus and they magi hash. Would you mind if i ask here now on this forum all the people and you to help me by pm-ing me your cpu, clock, os, khash so i can make more accurate data/list of khash for all of us magi miners. Few people already pmd me about khashs and what cpu to recommend, so when i finish the list ill post it here on this forum ofc or i can send it to you so you can post it for everyone.

cheers  

Laptop i3 M350:
-t 4: ~18 kh/s

Desktop i3 4330:
-t 4: ~38 kh/s

Desktop i3 2100:
-t 4: ~27 kh/s

Desktop Quad Core Q8200:
-t 4: ~35 kh/s

AMD fx 8320 (not overclocked):
-t 8: ~75 kh/s

[hefty]

Thank You