|
child_harold
|
 |
March 13, 2015, 11:49:44 AM |
|
All the best with the Arizona event. If you make it to Phoenix say hi to the Dash Dev. I still prefer Cannabiis to CannabisCoin, but I'll take ur CannabisCoin over fiat  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TalkImg was created especially for hosting images on bitcointalk.org: try it next time you want to post an image
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
March 13, 2015, 12:59:06 PM |
|
Nice, thanks for letting us know; voted. Let's kick in, guys! VOTE… VOTE NOW!  We're doing good! But we can do better!! |
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
March 13, 2015, 01:32:55 PM |
|
Thank You Dasource ! With regards. Cornett So the amount of SDT created increases faster than SDC are destroyed? How does that work dasource? |
|
|
|
waecrum
Member
 Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
Altcom : AZwV4Zh2MdYhvyni4QbR5c2CfsAWkcCXAC
|
|
March 13, 2015, 01:57:25 PM |
|
Thank You Dasource ! With regards. Cornett So the amount of SDT created increases faster than SDC are destroyed? How does that work dasource? From what i heard on irc: It's because each time you make a transaction SDT to SDT, you increase the number of SDT available for new ring-sig without destroying any SDC. |
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
March 13, 2015, 02:00:57 PM |
|
Thank You Dasource ! With regards. Cornett So the amount of SDT created increases faster than SDC are destroyed? How does that work dasource? From what i heard on irc: It's because each time you make a transaction SDT to SDT, you increase the number of SDT available for new ring-sig without destroying any SDC. thanks waecrum that's ingenious |
|
|
|
waecrum
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
Altcom : AZwV4Zh2MdYhvyni4QbR5c2CfsAWkcCXAC
|
|
March 13, 2015, 02:13:52 PM |
|
So the amount of SDT created increases faster than SDC are destroyed?
How does that work dasource?
From what i heard on irc: It's because each time you make a transaction SDT to SDT, you increase the number of SDT available for new ring-sig without destroying any SDC. thanks waecrum that's ingenious Here's the exact quote from SDCDev on irc: Mar 02 14:36:00 <@SDCDev> mmm SDT->SDT would increase it, SDC->SDT would increase it, SDT->SDC is just converting back to normal funds anonymously |
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
March 13, 2015, 02:15:51 PM |
|
So the amount of SDT created increases faster than SDC are destroyed?
How does that work dasource?
From what i heard on irc: It's because each time you make a transaction SDT to SDT, you increase the number of SDT available for new ring-sig without destroying any SDC. thanks waecrum that's ingenious Here's the exact quote from SDCDev on irc: Mar 02 14:36:00 <@SDCDev> mmm SDT->SDT would increase it, SDC->SDT would increase it, SDT->SDC is just converting back to normal funds anonymously great quote. that goes up on the wall thanks again |
|
|
|
|
dasource
|
|
March 13, 2015, 02:16:07 PM |
|
<snip>
So the amount of SDT created increases faster than SDC are destroyed?
How does that work dasource?
In short: SDT Created = total of all and any SDT created. (at some point this will exceed SDC Supply and the higher this number the more "anonymity" available; this comes back to the what is the difference between 16 and 300 ring sigs) SDC Destroyed = the active number of SDC destroyed at time of snapshot ... What does that mean? It basically means at the time of the snapshot 425,000 SDC has been removed from the SDC Supply. In theory that means the Coin Supply is 6,466,166 - 450,000 = ~6,016,000. Why have you not updated the coin supply to reflect this? Quite simple, it would show drastic changes if/when large sums of SDT was created or SDC destroyed. The Coin Supply reflects the maximum available SDC. |
^ I am with STUPID!
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
March 13, 2015, 04:13:13 PM |
|
<snip>
So the amount of SDT created increases faster than SDC are destroyed?
How does that work dasource?
In short: SDT Created = total of all and any SDT created. (at some point this will exceed SDC Supply and the higher this number the more "anonymity" available; this comes back to the what is the difference between 16 and 300 ring sigs) SDC Destroyed = the active number of SDC destroyed at time of snapshot ... What does that mean? It basically means at the time of the snapshot 425,000 SDC has been removed from the SDC Supply. In theory that means the Coin Supply is 6,466,166 - 450,000 = ~6,016,000. Why have you not updated the coin supply to reflect this? Quite simple, it would show drastic changes if/when large sums of SDT was created or SDC destroyed. The Coin Supply reflects the maximum available SDC. Thank You Sir |
|
|
|
LiteBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1133
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 13, 2015, 04:19:38 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
March 13, 2015, 04:51:25 PM |
|
another warning… ****WARNING - DON'T TRADE ON IRC***
Scammers scamming on IRC 24/7
Not just Shadow
Every Coin
Hijacking/copying nicks (handles) on IRC is far too easy.
Stay in the main channel… don't negotiate "privately"
PLS BE CAREFUL…
"Do not trade over IRC"
Agree. Usually it is a slight misspelling of someone you know.
|
|
|
|
|
Automatic Monkey
|
|
March 13, 2015, 05:42:39 PM
Last edit: March 13, 2015, 06:11:35 PM by Automatic Monkey |
|
I didn't know that Bitcoin was anonymous  I am sure someone in the government is parsing the blockchain data and building evidence of relationships. All those Silk Road coins, they know where they came from, and which wallets were also used to pay Dish bills and buy things from Newegg. And that's the big advantage of the coin-destruction scheme of Shadow over mixers. I can use Darkcoin to play on a poker site (technically illegal in the US), and the winnings I get back could be mixed with coins from a drug or CP transaction. (Really illegal in the US, and worth their trouble to go after you.) Then what? Plausible deniability is also plausible guilt, and when the other people in the mixing pool are worse than you are then it benefits them at your expense. |
Try ShadowCash, the first coin with instant and decentralized private transactions!
SDC address: SUPERMAN8eDvcPL6RWYMVwtPzUtqWi2zCr
Wallet Private Key: 7S6fJBEzXqJuuGCvEPcgBSbd5wmjVTvDj7591gNKcTmS7X47e98
|
|
|
|
Blazin604
|
|
March 13, 2015, 06:18:13 PM |
|
Hopefully some news regarding the "marketplace" comes this month.
|
|
|
|
|
Pline
|
|
March 13, 2015, 06:39:15 PM |
|
Hopefully some news regarding the "marketplace" comes this month.
I think the announcement is probably going to be within the next few days. But I wouldn't expect a completely finished product or anything like that. On IRC I read that they expected the announcement to be yesterday, but seems like they are putting some polishing touches on it as they are "perfectionists" in the words of SDCDev. According to shadow.cash website, phase 1 which is the wire framing and marketplace graphic design was about 80% finished. So it makes sense that this phase 1 of the marketplace may be completed soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
skip60
|
|
March 13, 2015, 07:03:28 PM
Last edit: March 13, 2015, 07:17:53 PM by skip60 |
|
what is DAApps...  it is written ready for it at the thread title |
|
|
|
|
|
Pline
|
|
March 13, 2015, 07:32:28 PM |
|
what is DAApps... it is written ready for it at the thread title Well I am pretty sure it means something like Distributed Autonomous Applications. Not sure how it is related to the Shadow Project. This is first I am hearing of it, but sounds interesting. I have heard of DAOs before which are distributed autonomous organizations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralized_Autonomous_Organization |
|
|
|
|
Erkallys
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 13, 2015, 08:52:59 PM |
|
what is DAApps... it is written ready for it at the thread title I would like to know too ! |
|
|
|
|
|
Bavaria
|
|
March 13, 2015, 08:56:30 PM |
|
How to know the number of tokens?
|
|
|
|
|
|
chinchs
|
|
March 13, 2015, 09:08:01 PM |
|
what is DAApps... it is written ready for it at the thread title I would like to know too ! Maybe Dapps (decentralized applications / smart contracts)? This looks like the future of crypto. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
