Bitcoin Forum
November 03, 2024, 10:39:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 [181] 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 ... 276 »
  Print  
Author Topic: LTCgear.com, the best scrypt/scrypt n/X11 cloud mining service, Not paying!!!  (Read 361382 times)
Danz0r77
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 504


View Profile
January 26, 2015, 02:45:30 PM
 #3601

This I find also very troublesome:
Quote
As for example, it happened that an attacker injected in orders payment address pool a certain foreign address at a certain time, then next minute certain users came and placed big orders, all paid to foreign address until foreign address was removed, after which order frequency and value resumed regular trend.

So it is possible that the hacker introduced an address into the payment address pool, waited until a honest customer placed
and paid an order and then the coins were transferred further on to an address solely in control of the hacker? I wonder if Chris
pays this loss out of his pocket (i.e. if the shares credited to the honest customer will remain in the account.)

Either Chris is shittin us big times or his website was one giant security hole.

It's probably the latter.

Jesus. Baseless speculation. Moron.

Sound familiar?  Roll Eyes
alienesb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 26, 2015, 02:53:43 PM
 #3602

This I find also very troublesome:
Quote
As for example, it happened that an attacker injected in orders payment address pool a certain foreign address at a certain time, then next minute certain users came and placed big orders, all paid to foreign address until foreign address was removed, after which order frequency and value resumed regular trend.

So it is possible that the hacker introduced an address into the payment address pool, waited until a honest customer placed
and paid an order and then the coins were transferred further on to an address solely in control of the hacker? I wonder if Chris
pays this loss out of his pocket (i.e. if the shares credited to the honest customer will remain in the account.)

Either Chris is shittin us big times or his website was one giant security hole.

It's probably the latter.

Jesus. Baseless speculation. Moron.

Sound familiar?  Roll Eyes

Hey bud I didn't know it was rhetorical and that I wasn't invited into your circle jerk of assholeness. I'll add you to my growing list of ignored peeps.
Danz0r77
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 504


View Profile
January 26, 2015, 03:05:38 PM
 #3603

This I find also very troublesome:
Quote
As for example, it happened that an attacker injected in orders payment address pool a certain foreign address at a certain time, then next minute certain users came and placed big orders, all paid to foreign address until foreign address was removed, after which order frequency and value resumed regular trend.

So it is possible that the hacker introduced an address into the payment address pool, waited until a honest customer placed
and paid an order and then the coins were transferred further on to an address solely in control of the hacker? I wonder if Chris
pays this loss out of his pocket (i.e. if the shares credited to the honest customer will remain in the account.)

Either Chris is shittin us big times or his website was one giant security hole.

It's probably the latter.

Jesus. Baseless speculation. Moron.

Sound familiar?  Roll Eyes

Hey bud I didn't know it was rhetorical and that I wasn't invited into your circle jerk of assholeness. I'll add you to my growing list of ignored peeps.

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=24447.msg247902#msg247902

Just saying you should stop calling people morons for speculating things, when you also do it yourself. Unless you are proclaiming yourself as a moron too. In which case, I apologize.
rhkazani1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 26, 2015, 03:20:52 PM
 #3604

What is that withdraw button for?

is anyone seeing their MODs?
Warbigold
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 26, 2015, 03:38:52 PM
 #3605

What is that withdraw button for?

is anyone seeing their MODs?

I don't want to sound like a sarcastic douche but it's probably to withdraw.
rhkazani1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 26, 2015, 03:41:00 PM
 #3606

What is that withdraw button for?

is anyone seeing their MODs?

I don't want to sound like a sarcastic douche but it's probably to withdraw.

Right, but can you withdraw? I mean whats the point if you can't withdraw?
jackbox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1024



View Profile
January 26, 2015, 03:41:37 PM
 #3607

What is that withdraw button for?

is anyone seeing their MODs?

I don't want to sound like a sarcastic douche but it's probably to withdraw.

It is to withdraw our fictional balances that just say pending.

Buy a Trezor and Protect your BTC, BCH, BTG, DASH, LTC, DGB, ZEC, ETH and ETC from hackers.
If I was helpful please buy me a coffee BTC: 1DWK7vBaxcTC5Wd2nQwLGEoy8xdFVzGKLK  BTG: AWvN1iBqCUqG2tEh3XoVvRbdcGrAzfBBpW
If I was helpful please buy me a burger DGB: DLASV6CUQpGtGSyaVz5FYuu5YxZ17MoGQz
blackice2013
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 26, 2015, 04:40:26 PM
 #3608

What is that withdraw button for?

is anyone seeing their MODs?

I don't want to sound like a sarcastic douche but it's probably to withdraw.

It is to withdraw our fictional balances that just say pending.

Ohh!! But but... Who has any balance on there??
i think everyone's balance just says 'pending' insn't it?
sluppy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2020
Merit: 1041



View Profile
January 26, 2015, 04:41:49 PM
 #3609

Has anyone been able to withdraw anything , i hope the percent is his bad english and he means a percentage instead of just 1%.

I doubt anyone would pay the tax without getting their payments.
I thought when i bought the shares it said one YEAR of operation was paid for and After that year i would have to pay to keep the shares.
(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)

Edit: no i cant see my mods either.

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke -- May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house.George Carlin
We pay for life with death , so everything in between should be free. Bill Hicks -- It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light. Aristotle
Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment. Buddha -- The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Socrates
pbleak
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 26, 2015, 04:44:09 PM
 #3610

The withdraw button is presumably ready but he is not ready to allow payouts yet. So it's idle.
tonygal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 504



View Profile
January 26, 2015, 05:02:09 PM
 #3611

I thought when i bought the shares it said one YEAR of operation was paid for and After that year i would have to pay to keep the shares.
(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
It certainly said that one year of operation is included. That we write 2015 now is just a bad excuse. If he really asks for this "tax" for
all shares regardless of acquisition date, people will not accept this I'm pretty sure.
sluppy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2020
Merit: 1041



View Profile
January 26, 2015, 05:15:22 PM
 #3612

I thought when i bought the shares it said one YEAR of operation was paid for and After that year i would have to pay to keep the shares.
(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
It certainly said that one year of operation is included. That we write 2015 now is just a bad excuse. If he really asks for this "tax" for
all shares regardless of acquisition date, people will not accept this I'm pretty sure.

There wont be any "choice" in the matter im sure u will have to pay the tax to either get to your payments or keep your shares or both.

I know i wouldnt be Happy about it but if its that or lose all its not much of a choice.
I wonder what kind of number it will be.(since it read like one year was included i didnt care much at the time of purchase now im thinking that could be a huge number it said something like less then original purchase price so that could be 6-10 weeks of payment potentially.)

Does anyone have a SS of the what it said originally ?

Edit:

Also i bought some gen2 .. im gonna have to pay the "tax" on those as well that would seem a little , erm unfair?(Not that im agreeing with the other tax this just seems a little wel "bonus" unfair.)

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke -- May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house.George Carlin
We pay for life with death , so everything in between should be free. Bill Hicks -- It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light. Aristotle
Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment. Buddha -- The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Socrates
Flep182
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1007


View Profile
January 26, 2015, 05:44:13 PM
 #3613

I thought when i bought the shares it said one YEAR of operation was paid for and After that year i would have to pay to keep the shares.
(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
It certainly said that one year of operation is included. That we write 2015 now is just a bad excuse. If he really asks for this "tax" for
all shares regardless of acquisition date, people will not accept this I'm pretty sure.

There wont be any "choice" in the matter im sure u will have to pay the tax to either get to your payments or keep your shares or both.

I know i wouldnt be Happy about it but if its that or lose all its not much of a choice.
I wonder what kind of number it will be.(since it read like one year was included i didnt care much at the time of purchase now im thinking that could be a huge number it said something like less then original purchase price so that could be 6-10 weeks of payment potentially.)

Does anyone have a SS of the what it said originally ?

Edit:

Also i bought some gen2 .. im gonna have to pay the "tax" on those as well that would seem a little , erm unfair?(Not that im agreeing with the other tax this just seems a little wel "bonus" unfair.)


All is speculation, on Gen2 new costs would be weird since there hasn't been talk about "renewal" for those. For percentage, it will be between 5-20% if we go with the original post from the shop.
ajw7989
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 26, 2015, 05:49:40 PM
 #3614

Clearly ltcgear is not a scam or he would not be going this far. Sure  the business is questionable but he was hacked. Goes to show people abuse nice things. The one cloud miner that has been around for a while and made ROIs always in reach. Then some hackers have to abuse it and essentially try to bankrupt the company by creating all those fake shares. Sigh  Undecided
sluppy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2020
Merit: 1041



View Profile
January 26, 2015, 06:02:14 PM
 #3615

Clearly ltcgear is not a scam or he would not be going this far. Sure  the business is questionable but he was hacked. Goes to show people abuse nice things. The one cloud miner that has been around for a while and made ROIs always in reach. Then some hackers have to abuse it and essentially try to bankrupt the company by creating all those fake shares. Sigh  Undecided

Not a scam i dont know yet.ill let u know after ive withdrawn my  unknown pending balance.
Also if this tax would cost more then the missing payments id be very hessitant.
There is No tax on the MODS right ? or did those get added in 2 now i cant imagine how , just want to be 100% sure.(not that i can see mine atm but i sense their there.Wink






The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke -- May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house.George Carlin
We pay for life with death , so everything in between should be free. Bill Hicks -- It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light. Aristotle
Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment. Buddha -- The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Socrates
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
January 26, 2015, 06:52:43 PM
 #3616

Clearly ltcgear is not a scam or he would not be going this far. Sure  the business is questionable but he was hacked. Goes to show people abuse nice things. The one cloud miner that has been around for a while and made ROIs always in reach. Then some hackers have to abuse it and essentially try to bankrupt the company by creating all those fake shares. Sigh  Undecided

Not a scam i dont know yet.ill let u know after ive withdrawn my  unknown pending balance.
Also if this tax would cost more then the missing payments id be very hessitant.
There is No tax on the MODS right ?
I don't see why the MODS wouldn't have any... if the others have maintenance fee...

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
sluppy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2020
Merit: 1041



View Profile
January 26, 2015, 07:25:35 PM
 #3617

Clearly ltcgear is not a scam or he would not be going this far. Sure  the business is questionable but he was hacked. Goes to show people abuse nice things. The one cloud miner that has been around for a while and made ROIs always in reach. Then some hackers have to abuse it and essentially try to bankrupt the company by creating all those fake shares. Sigh  Undecided

Not a scam i dont know yet.ill let u know after ive withdrawn my  unknown pending balance.
Also if this tax would cost more then the missing payments id be very hessitant.
There is No tax on the MODS right ?
I don't see why the MODS wouldn't have any... if the others have maintenance fee...

It said u would have those forever and the shares had the yearly(read as after one year) renewal on them.

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke -- May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house.George Carlin
We pay for life with death , so everything in between should be free. Bill Hicks -- It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light. Aristotle
Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment. Buddha -- The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Socrates
jawitech
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 26, 2015, 07:34:12 PM
 #3618

I'm no expert, but to me this doesn't look like a share balance script, only a simple WP text widget

Code:
<div id="text-3" class="widget widget_text">			
<div class="textwidget">
<h1>Coin balances:<br></h1>
<font color="#999900">[pending..]</font> BTC<br>
<font color="#999900">[pending..]</font> LTC<br>
<font color="#999900">[pending..]</font> DRK<br>
</div>
</div>

Just my two satoshi...
Danz0r77
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 504


View Profile
January 26, 2015, 08:15:26 PM
 #3619

I'm no expert, but to me this doesn't look like a share balance script, only a simple WP text widget

Code:
<div id="text-3" class="widget widget_text">			
<div class="textwidget">
<h1>Coin balances:<br></h1>
<font color="#999900">[pending..]</font> BTC<br>
<font color="#999900">[pending..]</font> LTC<br>
<font color="#999900">[pending..]</font> DRK<br>
</div>
</div>

Just my two satoshi...

I mentioned this as well. It's not exactly conclusive proof that nobody can see balances.. but it's a strong argument for it. There are ways to make a text widget interact with the database etc, plus you could show different widgets to different users, but it seems an odd way of doing it. I would be close to 100% certain that every single user is currently seeing the same HTML content in that widget.
pbleak
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 26, 2015, 08:44:29 PM
 #3620

Sure, I presumed it was just cosmetic. He is showing what it will be like, but it's clearly not the proper thing yet. There's no real point adding it anyway except for those users he is letting withdraw (assuming they are not test accounts).
Pages: « 1 ... 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 [181] 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 ... 276 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!