AriesIV10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
|
|
January 17, 2016, 06:04:15 AM |
|
... It takes me seconds to seamlessly replace bitcoind with whatever I want whenever I want without affecting mining on solo, so whatever turns out to be the majority I can switch before it becomes a problem.
Noice! -ck's da man That little colorful thing is Anoying!
|
|
|
|
iglasses
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 17, 2016, 06:09:48 AM |
|
... It takes me seconds to seamlessly replace bitcoind with whatever I want whenever I want without affecting mining on solo, so whatever turns out to be the majority I can switch before it becomes a problem.
Noice! -ck's da man That little colorful thing is Anoying! [ x ]working as designed
|
I only have a signature because I'm allowed.
|
|
|
tutorialevideo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1161
Merit: 1001
Don`t invest more than you can afford to lose
|
|
January 17, 2016, 07:46:37 AM |
|
just pointed 20 x s3 miners
|
|
|
|
AriesIV10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
|
|
January 17, 2016, 06:36:23 PM |
|
... It takes me seconds to seamlessly replace bitcoind with whatever I want whenever I want without affecting mining on solo, so whatever turns out to be the majority I can switch before it becomes a problem.
Noice! -ck's da man That little colorful thing is Anoying! [ x ]working as designed
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 18, 2016, 03:46:16 AM |
|
Maybe I picked a bad time to expand the solo infrastructure
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 18, 2016, 03:47:46 AM |
|
Maybe I picked a bad time to expand the solo infrastructure Blame that annoying frog, it scared the blocks away
|
|
|
|
hedgy73
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1077
|
|
January 18, 2016, 07:26:55 AM |
|
Maybe I picked a bad time to expand the solo infrastructure Blame that annoying frog, it scared the blocks away Dont blame the frog its not his fault . I thought he was bringing a bit of colour and fun at a miserable time . -ck I think your comment is right, its now becoming clear exactly how much difference the recent increased network size and difficulty spikes have made .
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 18, 2016, 08:20:46 AM Last edit: January 18, 2016, 08:38:17 AM by -ck |
|
SG node is coming up on a week of uptime tomorrow. Unfortunately its total hashrate over that time hasn't even averaged one modern mining piece of mining hardware so I'm sorry to say that I'm forced to give it up. It appears that there really is only room for 2 solo mining nodes in 2 major parts of the world. I'll give it another day so that existing miners can take note and move their hashes but I'll be shutting down SG tomorrow (unless someone dumps a whole lot of hash on there or it finds a block), leaving only solo main and the DE node.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
January 18, 2016, 09:24:40 AM |
|
SG node is coming up on a week of uptime tomorrow. Unfortunately its total hashrate over that time hasn't even averaged one modern mining piece of mining hardware so I'm sorry to say that I'm forced to give it up. It appears that there really is only room for 2 solo mining nodes in 2 major parts of the world. I'll give it another day so that existing miners can take note and move their hashes but I'll be shutting down SG tomorrow (unless someone dumps a whole lot of hash on there or it finds a block), leaving only solo main and the DE node.
hi ck, just curious, is the "sg.kano.is" take up ok? we should be able to get most of South East Asia and ANZ users... I mean, if there 100 user at sg.kano, I would assume at least half will do solo mining at sg.ckpool, unless the solo miners are mining somewhere else. I may wrong, since not all solo mining is not for the faint hearted :-)
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 18, 2016, 09:26:56 AM |
|
SG node is coming up on a week of uptime tomorrow. Unfortunately its total hashrate over that time hasn't even averaged one modern mining piece of mining hardware so I'm sorry to say that I'm forced to give it up. It appears that there really is only room for 2 solo mining nodes in 2 major parts of the world. I'll give it another day so that existing miners can take note and move their hashes but I'll be shutting down SG tomorrow (unless someone dumps a whole lot of hash on there or it finds a block), leaving only solo main and the DE node.
hi ck, just curious, is the "sg.kano.is" take up ok? we should be able to get most of South East Asia and ANZ users... I mean, if there 100 user at sg.kano, I would assume at least half will do solo mining at sg.ckpool, unless the solo miners are mining somewhere else. I may wrong, since not all solo mining is not for the faint hearted :-) I'm in control of both of those nodes. sg.kano.is currently has 207TH sg.ckpool.org currently has 3TH There are effectively no solo miners here.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
Moria843
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 442
Merit: 250
Found Lost beach - quiet now
|
|
January 18, 2016, 03:16:48 PM |
|
New solo miner. Read your instructions and have a question about the following statement: "Proxy support: Miners with many devices wishing to consolidate their devices into a single connection to solo ckpool are recommended to use the complementary ckpool code as ckproxy stratum proxy (for linux)."
I have 7 miners.
Is there's any advantage to using the proxy support versus just setting all 7 miners to the same payout address? In particular I'm wondering whether it makes the overall odds better due to some increase in processing efficiency or provides some other advantage.
Also, with regards to overall odds of one of my rigs solving a block, does it make any difference whether I use the same payout address for all 7 miners or whether I give them each a separate address?
|
Hot time, summer in the city, back of my mine getting hot & gritty!!!
|
|
|
o_solo_miner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2484
Merit: 1482
-> morgen, ist heute, schon gestern <-
|
|
January 18, 2016, 07:52:58 PM |
|
congrats to 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY for the Block!
|
from the creator of CGMiner http://solo.ckpool.org for Solominers paused: passthrough for solo.ckpool.org => stratum+tcp://rfpool.org:3334
|
|
|
HerbPean
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1005
|
|
January 18, 2016, 07:53:31 PM |
|
congrats to 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY for the Block! {"hashrate1m": "125T", "hashrate5m": "123T", "hashrate1hr": "124T", "hashrate1d": "124T", "hashrate7d": "112T", "lastupdate": 1453146737, "workers": 112, "shares": 249386150227, "bestshare": 5858515.5556973545, "bestever": 252987485486}
|
|
|
|
bubu22
|
|
January 18, 2016, 08:04:32 PM |
|
the lucky winner 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
January 18, 2016, 08:07:36 PM |
|
New solo miner. Read your instructions and have a question about the following statement: "Proxy support: Miners with many devices wishing to consolidate their devices into a single connection to solo ckpool are recommended to use the complementary ckpool code as ckproxy stratum proxy (for linux)."
I have 7 miners.
Is there's any advantage to using the proxy support versus just setting all 7 miners to the same payout address? In particular I'm wondering whether it makes the overall odds better due to some increase in processing efficiency or provides some other advantage.
Also, with regards to overall odds of one of my rigs solving a block, does it make any difference whether I use the same payout address for all 7 miners or whether I give them each a separate address?
All that really matters is your total hash rate. If you want to use 7 different workers and BTC addresses to help manage your systems that is fine.
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 18, 2016, 08:11:30 PM |
|
[2016-01-18 13:47:30.755] Possible block solve diff 114715923118.361893 ! [2016-01-18 13:47:30.875] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2016-01-18 13:47:30.876] Solved and confirmed block 393904 by 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.101 [2016-01-18 13:47:30.876] User 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY:{"hashrate1m": "126T", "hashrate5m": "124T", "hashrate1hr": "124T", "hashrate1d": "124T", "hashrate7d": "112T"} [2016-01-18 13:47:30.876] Worker 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.101:{"hashrate1m": "1.89T", "hashrate5m": "1.33T", "hashrate1hr": "1.15T", "hashrate1d": "1.14T", "hashrate7d": "1.03T"}
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/00000000000000000995a1d73f17369dd6fec32738f4c53fb99c258e645f6fbeFinally breaking the dry spell.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 18, 2016, 08:15:43 PM |
|
New solo miner. Read your instructions and have a question about the following statement: "Proxy support: Miners with many devices wishing to consolidate their devices into a single connection to solo ckpool are recommended to use the complementary ckpool code as ckproxy stratum proxy (for linux)."
I have 7 miners.
Is there's any advantage to using the proxy support versus just setting all 7 miners to the same payout address? In particular I'm wondering whether it makes the overall odds better due to some increase in processing efficiency or provides some other advantage.
Also, with regards to overall odds of one of my rigs solving a block, does it make any difference whether I use the same payout address for all 7 miners or whether I give them each a separate address?
With 7 miners it's probably not worth it. When I say many miners I mean miners with 100+ devices. Decreasing the network bandwidth is the only real advantage. Nothing changes your chances of finding a block - only overall hashrate matters.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
Xunknown
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
January 18, 2016, 08:24:20 PM |
|
congrats to 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY for the Block! {"hashrate1m": "125T", "hashrate5m": "123T", "hashrate1hr": "124T", "hashrate1d": "124T", "hashrate7d": "112T", "lastupdate": 1453146737, "workers": 112, "shares": 249386150227, "bestshare": 5858515.5556973545, "bestever": 252987485486} That's 3 in a row for this particular user. Nice returns for 125T. Congrats! X
|
|
|
|
willi9974
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3612
Merit: 2843
Escrow Service
|
|
January 18, 2016, 08:32:56 PM |
|
concrats !!! A nice wallet https://blockchain.info/address/3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY 300 BTC and the most of them are mined by solo pool or it self....
|
Tesla 1000 EUR Rabatt über den Empfehlungslink, Interesse dann schreib mir eine PM Tesla 1000 EUR discount via the referral link, if you are interested then write me a PM
|
|
|
armadora
|
|
January 18, 2016, 08:40:43 PM |
|
148. block was came. congratulations to winner 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY .
|
|
|
|
|