Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2017, 09:45:21 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 [123] 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 ... 277 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][SLR] SolarCoin | PoW to PoS v. 2.0 | Solar Proof of Generation (§1 = 1MWh)  (Read 432611 times)
babbey
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 02:52:54 AM
 #2441

Just checking: is everyone else's 'Unconfirmed' total showing zero on the overview page? I've got plenty of unconfirmed payments so it looks like this may not be populating correctly?
1513374321
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513374321

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513374321
Reply with quote  #2

1513374321
Report to moderator
1513374321
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513374321

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513374321
Reply with quote  #2

1513374321
Report to moderator
1513374321
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513374321

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513374321
Reply with quote  #2

1513374321
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
lfloorwalker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 220


solcrypto.com


View Profile WWW
October 05, 2015, 03:02:37 AM
 #2442

Just checking: is everyone else's 'Unconfirmed' total showing zero on the overview page? I've got plenty of unconfirmed payments so it looks like this may not be populating correctly?

I have this as well on the overview page. Unconfirmed is "0.000000 SLR"

On the History page all my historical interest payments that were generated but conflicted have a "?" next to them, these are meant to be this way as I understand.
Interest payments that are still waiting block confirmations (i.e. <500 confirms) are displaying a "loading symbol" next to them, this looks normal.

|Solcrypto|ElectriCChain| SLR Tips: 8Hocu8s8u8FFAyh5ev2qsNmLZYgeiVToHi
corather
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


Solarcoin.org


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 03:26:36 AM
 #2443

Just checking: is everyone else's 'Unconfirmed' total showing zero on the overview page? I've got plenty of unconfirmed payments so it looks like this may not be populating correctly?

The Unconfirmed column refers to coins received by the wallet through a send action from another wallet before any blocks are generated to confirm the transaction. It doesn't refer to staking payments.

babbey
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 03:44:20 AM
 #2444

Ah, that's makes sense, thanks Corather... but it begs the question, why aren't staking transactions treated like normal transactions in that overview? Wouldn't it make sense to show them there as well?
corather
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


Solarcoin.org


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 03:58:47 AM
 #2445

Ah, that's makes sense, thanks Corather... but it begs the question, why aren't staking transactions treated like normal transactions in that overview? Wouldn't it make sense to show them there as well?

I think because they become confirmed through a different mechanism. The result is the same.

corather
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


Solarcoin.org


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 04:06:25 AM
 #2446

I think I may have stumbled on a workaround for the synchronizing issue some of you may still be experiencing. Once you've rescanned your wallet and everything appears functional, if this issue pops up again simply exit the wallet and rerun the application. So far both my wallets appear stable after doing this. Still a bug, but maybe this will help diagnose the problem.

y_virtual
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 370

Note to self: it's not you doing it, it's us.


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 04:24:42 AM
 #2447

Ah, that's makes sense, thanks Corather... but it begs the question, why aren't staking transactions treated like normal transactions in that overview? Wouldn't it make sense to show them there as well?

These are Immature, different from Unconfirmed. Steve mentioned he may add them on a separate row on the Stats. You can check out the previous discussion here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=785257.msg12462589#msg12462589

Edit: also "Staking" is better to be labeled "Staked". I will now add here the link to another discussion on a remake of the Stats panel:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=785257.msg12559814#msg12559814
nickgogerty
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 365

Making things better with better things.


View Profile WWW
October 05, 2015, 04:40:57 AM
 #2448

what's the interest rate target again? 2%?

The interest rate target is 2% of the current circulating SLR balance.  From a macro perspective the SLR experience nominal inflation from rewards and grants with deflation due to lost wallets and now transaction fees which are burned.

An important point to note is that currency function with network economics. The more people accepting the protocol the more value it has.  BTC with estimated 1.5m users is worth say $3billion so the users network of combined transactional and speculative utility equates to about $2k/user.

If you know of anyone with a solarfarm or panels have them register and you get 10% of their first year claim. Growing the network SLR participants grows network value.

The foundations focus is on growing the size of the solar incentive by increasing the networks transactional value, ie. more nodes (users). Speculative value which is volatile and thus antithetical to sound monetary policy isn't useful to the 40 yr solar energy mission.

Solarcoin (§ SLR) are like airmiles. Each 1 Mhw generated gets you §1 free. Solarcoins can purchase what others will trade: USD,BTC, Soy candles..etc.
corather
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


Solarcoin.org


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 09:57:43 AM
 #2449

I found another way to workaround the synchronization error. Choose Logoff in the file menu, and log back in. It should synch up and start staking properly.

y_virtual
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 370

Note to self: it's not you doing it, it's us.


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 11:10:17 AM
 #2450

So we've also got someone on their own wallet version/protocol No.:
/66:0.7.0/   node list   70007   1   1.7 %   94.9 %
node list:
addnode=109.124.222.36
IP Address   Country   Region   City   ISP
109.124.222.36   Russian Federation    Samara   Samara   Llc Sip Nis
Snake Pliskin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 12:06:17 PM
 #2451

Quote
So we've also got someone on their own wallet version/protocol No.:
/66:0.7.0/   node list   70007   1   1.7 %   94.9 %
node list:
addnode=109.124.222.36
IP Address   Country   Region   City   ISP
109.124.222.36   Russian Federation    Samara   Samara   Llc Sip Nis

What does that mean, do we have a stowaway
y_virtual
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 370

Note to self: it's not you doing it, it's us.


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 01:02:49 PM
 #2452

Quote
So we've also got someone on their own wallet version/protocol No.:
/66:0.7.0/   node list   70007   1   1.7 %   94.9 %
node list:
addnode=109.124.222.36
IP Address   Country   Region   City   ISP
109.124.222.36   Russian Federation    Samara   Samara   Llc Sip Nis

What does that mean, do we have a stowaway

Yeah, that's the question. And then - if I decide to hire a coder who re-compiles a version of the wallet with a better interest rate - like 200% cap on interest rate - will the system stop me from getting on board and actually getting those custom-made rewards? Or may be just 2%, but non-variable... thus difficult to notice...Will that work?
Snake Pliskin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 01:33:19 PM
 #2453

Quote
Yeah, that's the question. And then - if I decide to hire a coder who re-compiles a version of the wallet with a better interest rate - like 200% cap on interest rate - will the system stop me from getting on board and actually getting those custom-made rewards? Or may be just 2%, but non-variable... thus difficult to notice...Will that work?

That's a worrying thought if that can be done but surely there are safeguards in place to protect that from happening.

I'm sure that someone will enlighten us if this is possible.
vipgelsi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302

Solarcoin.org


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 03:46:01 PM
 #2454

Bittrex site is down.  Up.

onsightit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280


truth=(true?true:false);


View Profile WWW
October 05, 2015, 04:29:33 PM
 #2455

I found another way to workaround the synchronization error. Choose Logoff in the file menu, and log back in. It should synch up and start staking properly.

All,

The synchronization issue is related to the nodes still on 2.0.5.  They are reporting a higher block count.  Your 2.0.7 node says "ok, send me the blocks" and they get orphaned.  It will go away when everyone is on 2.0.7.

-Steve

VRC: VMTMcvFjZHAshmVNLY5KYVHCTqcfEnH6Bd  SLR: 8W7D6D7rortYp51BK9MSrfripSoZWyVPVr  BTC: 1LbgAsTDtyWEGjiSaguJhJbaHBPgcMnHfP  BCC: 1Ta39PK67VXTD2xnmPNo5J9KJyBVHdYmy
onsightit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280


truth=(true?true:false);


View Profile WWW
October 05, 2015, 04:33:14 PM
 #2456

Quote
So we've also got someone on their own wallet version/protocol No.:
/66:0.7.0/   node list   70007   1   1.7 %   94.9 %
node list:
addnode=109.124.222.36
IP Address   Country   Region   City   ISP
109.124.222.36   Russian Federation    Samara   Samara   Llc Sip Nis

What does that mean, do we have a stowaway

Yeah, that's the question. And then - if I decide to hire a coder who re-compiles a version of the wallet with a better interest rate - like 200% cap on interest rate - will the system stop me from getting on board and actually getting those custom-made rewards? Or may be just 2%, but non-variable... thus difficult to notice...Will that work?

The node on protocol 70007 is not a problem.  It's likely a developer simply using the same port as SolarCoin.  If they wanted to "hack" the blockchain they would probably use the same protocol number and sub-version.  Even if they did try to bump the interest, the blocks they submitted would be orphaned by consensus of the 2.0.7 nodes.

-Steve

VRC: VMTMcvFjZHAshmVNLY5KYVHCTqcfEnH6Bd  SLR: 8W7D6D7rortYp51BK9MSrfripSoZWyVPVr  BTC: 1LbgAsTDtyWEGjiSaguJhJbaHBPgcMnHfP  BCC: 1Ta39PK67VXTD2xnmPNo5J9KJyBVHdYmy
vipgelsi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302

Solarcoin.org


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 04:53:14 PM
 #2457

Quote
So we've also got someone on their own wallet version/protocol No.:
/66:0.7.0/   node list   70007   1   1.7 %   94.9 %
node list:
addnode=109.124.222.36
IP Address   Country   Region   City   ISP
109.124.222.36   Russian Federation    Samara   Samara   Llc Sip Nis

What does that mean, do we have a stowaway

Yeah, that's the question. And then - if I decide to hire a coder who re-compiles a version of the wallet with a better interest rate - like 200% cap on interest rate - will the system stop me from getting on board and actually getting those custom-made rewards? Or may be just 2%, but non-variable... thus difficult to notice...Will that work?

The node on protocol 70007 is not a problem.  It's likely a developer simply using the same port as SolarCoin.  If they wanted to "hack" the blockchain they would probably use the same protocol number and sub-version.  Even if they did try to bump the interest, the blocks they submitted would be orphaned by consensus of the 2.0.7 nodes.

-Steve


Once again thanks!

Scalextrix
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150


View Profile WWW
October 05, 2015, 04:59:19 PM
 #2458

Hi, my Solarcoin wallet is broken, I cant upgrade, and it appears I cant uninstall version 2.0.1.

When I install 2.0.7. the wallet still reports as 2.0.1, however in my uninstall programs its listed as 2.0.7.

The in-wallet update feature cannot close the applications it needs to, so that upgrade path fails as well.

Can I get some help?

SolarCoin Address: 8cESoZyjFvx2Deq6VjQLqPfAwu8UXjcBkK
Gridcoin Address: SAuPu8zarzQykWLGwxc6JRvW3imM8YU9wc
vipgelsi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302

Solarcoin.org


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 05:07:17 PM
 #2459

I am thinking delete roaming solarcoin folder then start from scratch but make sure you backup first! to a safe location.


run- appdata- roaming- solarcoin

vipgelsi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302

Solarcoin.org


View Profile
October 05, 2015, 05:08:19 PM
 #2460

My mothers solarcoin wallet connects to 28 nodes but i have 11 nodes connected to does this matter? TIA

Pages: « 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 [123] 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 ... 277 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!