kano (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
 |
February 06, 2015, 11:42:20 PM |
|
Thanks Kano, I have a question. Earlier you said tubes would be supported after the next restart. Did this every become implemented or was it cancelled due the bug you had mentioned? I tried to run them here and all shares were rejected, please look at my account stats.
I'll chase up what happened there - I think there was some extra change required that I didn't realise but yeah when all the restarting/debugging happen over the previous weeks, that pretty much got left in the dust. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sjc1490
|
|
February 07, 2015, 12:34:51 AM |
|
Thanks Kano, I have a question. Earlier you said tubes would be supported after the next restart. Did this every become implemented or was it cancelled due the bug you had mentioned? I tried to run them here and all shares were rejected, please look at my account stats.
You can proxy them through BFG miner and point the proxy here. I ran 3 for a while like that pointed here with no problems. If you need any info PM me. |
BTC ADDRESS: 12Qwd8VKLQ4xF44ytHXBpCAKuF9VknG4X2
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 07, 2015, 12:36:31 AM |
|
Thanks Kano, I have a question. Earlier you said tubes would be supported after the next restart. Did this every become implemented or was it cancelled due the bug you had mentioned? I tried to run them here and all shares were rejected, please look at my account stats.
I'll chase up what happened there - I think there was some extra change required that I didn't realise but yeah when all the restarting/debugging happen over the previous weeks, that pretty much got left in the dust. It might be a "feature not working" issue. It used to work and seems may be no longer functional? I have seen a few workernames on the pool that include "tube" in the name with a bit higher than normal rejects, but still working. If your one does work on other pools, then we'll have to add it back into the todo list for ckpool. |
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 07, 2015, 12:17:05 PM |
|
Payout 342302 sent and confirmed
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7865
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
February 07, 2015, 12:25:39 PM |
|
Payout 342302 sent and confirmed
Payment received thanks. |
|
|
|
|
sloopy
|
|
February 07, 2015, 01:58:20 PM |
|
When I added my first SP20 here it takes a while to build up to the hashrate I usually see on other pools much faster.
I'm not complaining I want to understand.
Is it because I do not set a difficulty? Starting at 1k should be perfect for an SP20 and be right there at 1.3 1.6 however you have it setup.
I restored an S3, new used fans, re-pasted the chips, put it on the pool and local hashrate was straight to 450ish right away.
I try to pay attention and I know I've read the pool shows what matters. Does it truly take that long at any pool, do I have a poor connection, or something set wrong?
The 1 minute you see there means "rolling exponential average with 1 minute time constant" which means it gives you a more accurate estimate than grabbing just the last minute's shares and estimating a hashrate from them, but that also means if you start at zero it takes ~5 time constants to plateau meaning 5 minutes. The hashrate used as the accurate current hashrate on the website is the 5 minute time constant one so it takes even longer to rise. It does not mean your hashrate is less than on other pools during that time, it's just far more likely to give you an accurate estimate of hashrate. The per hashrate stats are now updated every minute on the website after one of the many changes recently added to both ckpool and ckdb instead of the old way which updated them every 10 minutes. Specifically with the sp20, they go through a process of fine tuning each time they start as well so it takes them longer than S3s to get to their final hashrate. Thank you very much for this level of detail in both yours and Kano's replies. It is refreshing. |
Transaction fees go to the pools and the pools decide to pay them to the miners. Anything else, including off-chain solutions are stealing and not the way Bitcoin was intended to function.
Make the block size set by the pool. Pool = miners and they get the choice.
|
|
|
|
stan258
|
|
February 07, 2015, 07:07:29 PM |
|
I moved some stuff over to push this block.  |
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7865
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
February 07, 2015, 09:22:35 PM |
|
Rented 100 th I am tossing it here for a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
Digitalmocking
|
|
February 08, 2015, 01:07:15 AM |
|
Funny to see this block at only 150% after so long near 5PH/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
727miner
|
|
February 08, 2015, 01:13:06 AM |
|
Go bitminerpro!!
|
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 08, 2015, 01:15:52 AM |
|
Funny to see this block at only 150% after so long near 5PH/s
Just means your payout per block will be higher  |
|
|
|
|
stan258
|
|
February 08, 2015, 01:42:03 AM |
|
I don't mind smaller pools. If luck can wake up we start stacking up the coins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sloopy
|
|
February 08, 2015, 05:06:33 AM |
|
This pool had amazing luck. Since understanding how luck works much better after this thread, I'll say the luck was great and I look forward to saying such again in the future, but no matter how hard I wish upon a star I cannot predict it Simple n00b question for you guys. What is the best way to determine a price for your miner when renting? I read many threads discussing setting the price, and I have not seen a post by someone who said 'use this formula' or 'this website does it like this'. I understand the power usage amount, the estimated amount say 1 TH mines per day, and how it correlates to difficulty. Is there a more dynamic method with other variables? I don't mean a calculator to know how much 1 TH will mine, but a calculator which uses that as a variable, the power as a variable, even maintenance, downtime, Bitcoin difficulty, even pool difficulty. Maybe I am going to far for my initial question, but any input is appreciated. TY!! |
Transaction fees go to the pools and the pools decide to pay them to the miners. Anything else, including off-chain solutions are stealing and not the way Bitcoin was intended to function.
Make the block size set by the pool. Pool = miners and they get the choice.
|
|
|
|
Digitalmocking
|
|
February 08, 2015, 05:15:30 AM |
|
Boo, I've been told I have to turn about half my hashing power off mon-fri during work hours, the fans are bothering some folk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
stan258
|
|
February 08, 2015, 05:41:47 AM |
|
Boo, I've been told I have to turn about half my hashing power off mon-fri during work hours, the fans are bothering some folk.
look into sound proofing mats that can be nailed up. They are not as expensive as you think. I use them as I am next to a stairwell and the heavy door slamming shut every 5 mins was driving nuts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Digitalmocking
|
|
February 08, 2015, 05:55:56 AM |
|
Boo, I've been told I have to turn about half my hashing power off mon-fri during work hours, the fans are bothering some folk.
look into sound proofing mats that can be nailed up. They are not as expensive as you think. I use them as I am next to a stairwell and the heavy door slamming shut every 5 mins was driving nuts. That's a great idea, thanks. |
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 08, 2015, 08:20:14 AM
Last edit: February 08, 2015, 09:41:31 AM by kano |
|
i check it now and i still not see my adders here  I don't know, im i blind or i don't know how to check or there is no payment for me. Last income in my address is from 18th january. The address is 1CAUwS8PTD2dW4CWGxGTjWhXPaFYVDY3Kk Your previous 5 payouts have been dust so they just gather in the pool wallet (for you) for now: Block DiffAcc Pool% AvgHashRate BTC
339316 118938.0 0.000% 2,269,865,069 0.00001330 1CAUwS8PTD2dW4CWGxGTjWhXPaFYVDY3Kk
340609 126578.0 0.000% 2,513,100,488 0.00001442 1CAUwS8PTD2dW4CWGxGTjWhXPaFYVDY3Kk
341646 4168.0 0.000% 86,052,491 0.00000050 1CAUwS8PTD2dW4CWGxGTjWhXPaFYVDY3Kk
341766 4168.0 0.000% 87,990,788 0.00000049 1CAUwS8PTD2dW4CWGxGTjWhXPaFYVDY3Kk
341855 4168.0 0.000% 87,962,381 0.00000049 1CAUwS8PTD2dW4CWGxGTjWhXPaFYVDY3Kk
Last 3 blocks - no payout - you stopped mining on 2015-02-01 around 22:00 UTC and got the above payouts (but not sent since they are dust) i.e by the time block 341919 was found, your last share submitted to the pool was more than 5N (500%) before it so wasn't new enough to be paid again. You didn't start mining again until after block 342302 was found (your first share was after 2015-02-06 21:20 UTC) I guess when we found block 342302 prompted you to start mining again an hour after it Edit: 'dust' is less than 10,000 satoshi |
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 08, 2015, 08:40:47 AM |
|
The 2 winners of the AVA 4.1s should be getting their miners soon (they've been shipped) let us know how they go |
|
|
|
itod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1076
^ Will code for Bitcoins
|
|
February 08, 2015, 11:55:21 AM |
|
Is there a more dynamic method with other variables?
I don't mean a calculator to know how much 1 TH will mine, but a calculator which uses that as a variable, the power as a variable, even maintenance, downtime, Bitcoin difficulty, even pool difficulty.
There's no such calculator because it's too simple. Since difficulty is stagnant and dances from 40B to 43B in the last 3.5 months, all those variables boil down to simple 1 THs produces 0.35 BTC per month minus expenses. Those expenses are electricity and maintenance, which are constants. Why do you need fancy calculator for that? |
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7865
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
February 08, 2015, 12:52:14 PM |
|
This pool had amazing luck. Since understanding how luck works much better after this thread, I'll say the luck was great and I look forward to saying such again in the future, but no matter how hard I wish upon a star I cannot predict it Simple n00b question for you guys. What is the best way to determine a price for your miner when renting? I read many threads discussing setting the price, and I have not seen a post by someone who said 'use this formula' or 'this website does it like this'. I understand the power usage amount, the estimated amount say 1 TH mines per day, and how it correlates to difficulty. Is there a more dynamic method with other variables? I don't mean a calculator to know how much 1 TH will mine, but a calculator which uses that as a variable, the power as a variable, even maintenance, downtime, Bitcoin difficulty, even pool difficulty. Maybe I am going to far for my initial question, but any input is appreciated. TY!! I am going to link you to another pool https://www.f2pool.com/help it shows its payout rate per th right now it is 0.0116977 btc a th daily this is the current rate - 4% ……. if you are renting your gear you want 25% more for your gear. If you want to rent gear you want to pay exactly number give or take 5%. quick easy to know. |
|
|
|
|
