Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 12:28:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 139 »
  Print  
Author Topic: delete  (Read 165493 times)
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:39:17 AM
 #181

don't take my word.  look at bcx post history.  to me it says he is not going to hit xmr.  if otherwise i would like evidence.

everything posted here could be easily fabricated by fud scammers.  they want your xmr, and they want them cheap.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
1715128109
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715128109

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715128109
Reply with quote  #2

1715128109
Report to moderator
1715128109
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715128109

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715128109
Reply with quote  #2

1715128109
Report to moderator
1715128109
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715128109

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715128109
Reply with quote  #2

1715128109
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715128109
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715128109

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715128109
Reply with quote  #2

1715128109
Report to moderator
1715128109
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715128109

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715128109
Reply with quote  #2

1715128109
Report to moderator
RadDragon
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 188
Merit: 100

Sound science


View Profile WWW
September 21, 2014, 01:40:34 AM
 #182

just buy xst.  it's safer either way.
or ssd.

BTC donations: 13aybLjCevCow87LaQQ3CtsFLMgBFchs3Y
vuduchyld
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:40:57 AM
 #183

don't take my word.  look at bcx post history.  to me it says he is not going to hit xmr.  if otherwise i would like evidence.

What makes you think the Polo trollbox thing was fake.  Man, I was there.  Seemed legit. I copy/pasted the end of the conversation on page 5 of this thread.

Edit: this is also reposted in post 192 on the page right before this if you want to find it. 
rdnkjdi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1256
Merit: 1009


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:42:59 AM
 #184

don't take my word.  look at bcx post history.  to me it says he is not going to hit xmr.  if otherwise i would like evidence.

What makes you think the Polo trollbox thing was fake.  Man, I was there.  Seemed legit. I copy/pasted the end of the conversation on page 5 of this thread.

Edit: this is also reposted in post 192 on the page right before this if you want to find it. 

What I don't get is why he deleted his identity confirmation on BCT
EvilDave
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1001



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:45:08 AM
 #185

I was watching, he posted a link to the forum where he confirmed that it was him who showed up @ poloniex (but he has deleted that post now, after it was verified by the chat).

Also here is some more of the chat log...
Quote
rdnkjdi1: told u guys he was a litecoin whale
lookup: Nekomaou, ya.lol

**cut lots**

user54: Honestly, if they cant fix this in three days, other people than bcx will also figure this out.
Nekomaou: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789978.msg8905722#msg8905722

I can verify the trollbox chat log...looked like BCX for real to me.
I've got no skin in the Monero game, btw, so I'm reaching for the popcorn....got some BBR, tho', wonder how this will affect the old Runeberry?

Nulli Dei, nulli Reges, solum NXT
Love your money: www.nxt.org  www.ardorplatform.org
www.nxter.org  www.nxtfoundation.org
vuduchyld
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:45:41 AM
 #186

don't take my word.  look at bcx post history.  to me it says he is not going to hit xmr.  if otherwise i would like evidence.

What makes you think the Polo trollbox thing was fake.  Man, I was there.  Seemed legit. I copy/pasted the end of the conversation on page 5 of this thread.

Edit: this is also reposted in post 192 on the page right before this if you want to find it. 

What I don't get is why he deleted his identity confirmation on BCT

It was captured
TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:45:59 AM
Last edit: September 21, 2014, 02:03:25 AM by TheFascistMind
 #187

What are your thoughts and this 72 hour attack?  do you think it is a legit concern?  is it something different from what you are looking at?

We have not confirmed that private keys can be cracked by this. And some mathematicians are so far skeptical. I have not spent enough time on the private key aspect yet, as I have been more focus on the amplification described below since it is a prerequisite for the private key factoring and it is all I have to prove to collect the 11 BTC.

We have confirmed that sometimes the sender of a ring signature can be determined. But this was always the case due to Sybil attacks. What is new is that I have proposed an amplification algorithm which I think makes a little Sybil attacking a lot more powerful than it was. I believe this is a key ingredient of BCX's threatened attack (but not the only ingredient he needs). But I am having trouble characterizing the algorithm's performance but we are working on it. So it is unsure if I have proven amplification, but I would say it is very likely.

BCX has admitted in the trollbox that he needs a TimeWarp attack to rewind the blockchain and spend the private keys he cracks. He claims he has that TW attack and he also thinks he can crack the private keys. But we have not yet figured out either of those two things. And we are skeptical (well lets say they are skeptical and I am not sure what I think, I'm too sleepy).

So all in all, I think we will find a solution within the 72 hours.

If nothing else, they can set ______ ( I am so sleepy I can't remember the term for locking the history of a blockchain at a certain block forward). Mental block due to sleep deprivation.

Edit: a checkpoint
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:46:15 AM
 #188

it is possible that a legit post by bcx was linked.  if so he repented of it, since it was deleted.

likely it was a fake, and deleted to hide the evidence of fakery.

i was there for the trollbox.  i was skeptical because the account name was misspelled.  now i am convinced it was probably fake.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
TheKoziTwo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:48:11 AM
 #189

don't take my word.  look at bcx post history.  to me it says he is not going to hit xmr.  if otherwise i would like evidence.

What makes you think the Polo trollbox thing was fake.  Man, I was there.  Seemed legit. I copy/pasted the end of the conversation on page 5 of this thread.

Edit: this is also reposted in post 192 on the page right before this if you want to find it. 

What I don't get is why he deleted his identity confirmation on BCT
The answer is simple, then he can go full retard like aminorex and claim that it never happened.

TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:49:49 AM
 #190

got some BBR, tho', wonder how this will affect the old Runeberry?

Afaik BCX has explicitly stated XMR and not mentioned BBR.

Afaics the BBR feature that I mentioned upthread doesn't diminish the threat of BCX's exploit.
TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:50:53 AM
 #191

don't take my word.  look at bcx post history.  to me it says he is not going to hit xmr.  if otherwise i would like evidence.

What makes you think the Polo trollbox thing was fake.  Man, I was there.  Seemed legit. I copy/pasted the end of the conversation on page 5 of this thread.

Edit: this is also reposted in post 192 on the page right before this if you want to find it. 

What I don't get is why he deleted his identity confirmation on BCT
The answer is simple, then he can go full retard like aminorex and claim that it never happened.

I saw he post confirmation in this thread before it was deleted. I guarantee you. Can't be denied any more.
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:51:58 AM
 #192

TheKoziTwo, if so he planned ahead to delete it: evidence is the misspelled name in trollbox , free and quick to create.


that is more maliciousness than i am willing to attribute to bcx.

more likely you didnt compare account name spellings.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
vuduchyld
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:52:37 AM
 #193

it is possible that a legit post by bcx was linked.  if so he repented of it, since it was deleted.

likely it was a fake, and deleted to hide the evidence of fakery.

i was there for the trollbox.  i was skeptical because the account name was misspelled.  now i am convinced it was probably fake.

I saw that it was BitcoinEXpress.  Are you saying the capitalized "X" was the misspelling?
TheKoziTwo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:54:39 AM
 #194

Apparently I still had a window open with that page. Final proof:

TheFascistMind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:55:54 AM
 #195

The "Good enough for you irmeli?" wasn't there when I read it. He must have edited the post.
Kuriso
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:56:25 AM
 #196

You'll notice the message to irmeli.  He did not believe that was really BCX and left a message for him

"Good enough for you irmeli?"
vuduchyld
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:57:00 AM
 #197

The "Good enough for you irmeli?" wasn't there when I read it. He must have edited the post.

He edited it while posting in trollbox.  There was a user named irmeli who was questioning whether or not it was really him.  So he edited the post here.  Good grab, KoziTwo!
papa_lazzarou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 649
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:58:26 AM
 #198

You'll notice the message to irmeli.  He did not believe that was really BCX and left a message for him

"Good enough for you irmeli?"


True.
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:59:23 AM
 #199

okay i was wrong.  or the capture is fake.  one of the two.  probably i was wrong since so many eyes.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
Kuriso
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 01:59:31 AM
 #200

The "Good enough for you irmeli?" wasn't there when I read it. He must have edited the post.

Quote
...
joseph-54f8: Intentions can change
irmeli: BitcoinEXpress, BCT post did not say what nick will be used at poloniex
BitcoinEXpress: I have tested this on an XMR sandboxed herd, it works or I sure as hell would not drop 500 BTC in the mix.
joseph-54f8: that's why they are called intentions
rdnkjdi1: i think bcx changes his mind sometimes ....
blaaaaacksuit: Ultros, duh, hes announcing this on the trollbox for crying out loud
Monkeychanger: lookup, oh they do baby
BitcoinEXpress: irmeli, hold on
Monkeychanger: Ultros, I guess he had a change of heart
maqa71: vuduchyld, Smiley
rdnkjdi1: from monero-dev chanel / fluffy
blaaaaacksuit: all you people dumping right now are falling for some grade D trolling
rdnkjdi1: "there's nothing we're going to do in the next 72 hours that will make a single bit of difference "
vuduchyld: Look at the sentence structure. It's clearly BCX.
BitcoinEXpress: irmeli, look now https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789978.msg8905499#msg8905499
joseph-54f8: intention =/= committment
...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789978.msg8907627#msg8907627

The link there matches the links that have been provided many times.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 139 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!