Bitcoin Forum
December 02, 2016, 10:26:16 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 [139] 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 »
  Print  
Author Topic: http://www.pyramining.com/ - Discussion thread (no advertising here)  (Read 297090 times)
BobbyJo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 354



View Profile WWW
July 23, 2014, 11:48:51 AM
 #2761

I m pretty sure he sent me pics some time ago before the latest ASIC upgrade (may have even been the FPGA stage).  He has previously sent out pics personally if you have PM'd him!!

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480717576
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480717576

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480717576
Reply with quote  #2

1480717576
Report to moderator
1480717576
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480717576

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480717576
Reply with quote  #2

1480717576
Report to moderator
Anillos2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
July 24, 2014, 07:42:01 PM
 #2762

There have been rewards every day since 20/07!!!
Yes, I have a new satoshi for each account. Grin

Squeaker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2014, 04:34:52 AM
 #2763

hey, Pyra...

Just what is it we're waiting on to get our referral links active again?

=squeak=

Muhammed Zakir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


Bit-x.com - Fast & Easy Trade with Low Fees!


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2014, 07:11:25 AM
 #2764

hey, Pyra...

Just what is it we're waiting on to get our referral links active again?

=squeak=


I am waiting too as I want to join. Why don't you make an option to join without inviting and you can put the person under another joined member? So everybody will get referrals and new members can join easily. Smiley
Kindly,
       MZ

rdyoung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


View Profile
July 25, 2014, 07:02:02 PM
 #2765

hey, Pyra...

Just what is it we're waiting on to get our referral links active again?

=squeak=


I am waiting too as I want to join. Why don't you make an option to join without inviting and you can put the person under another joined member? So everybody will get referrals and new members can join easily. Smiley
Kindly,
       MZ

Thats not a bad idea, any new signups without a ref link could be routed randomly to an existing account.
Squeaker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2014, 07:32:38 PM
 #2766

hey, Pyra...

Just what is it we're waiting on to get our referral links active again?

=squeak=


I am waiting too as I want to join. Why don't you make an option to join without inviting and you can put the person under another joined member? So everybody will get referrals and new members can join easily. Smiley
Kindly,
       MZ

Thats not a bad idea, any new signups without a ref link could be routed randomly to an existing account.
I'd go along with this... it would take care of the problem of having to hunt for a valid referral link on the forums... how often have someone tried to use a referral to just find it has expired? (Granted, it isn't as big a problem as it used to be, since they became a little reusable, but a random link to an _ACTIVE_ account would be good, IMHO... just don't refer to an account that isn't active)

=squeak=

rdyoung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


View Profile
July 25, 2014, 08:13:40 PM
 #2767

hey, Pyra...

Just what is it we're waiting on to get our referral links active again?

=squeak=


I am waiting too as I want to join. Why don't you make an option to join without inviting and you can put the person under another joined member? So everybody will get referrals and new members can join easily. Smiley
Kindly,
       MZ

Thats not a bad idea, any new signups without a ref link could be routed randomly to an existing account.
I'd go along with this... it would take care of the problem of having to hunt for a valid referral link on the forums... how often have someone tried to use a referral to just find it has expired? (Granted, it isn't as big a problem as it used to be, since they became a little reusable, but a random link to an _ACTIVE_ account would be good, IMHO... just don't refer to an account that isn't active)

=squeak=


Good point. It could also be weighted so that those that have few or none would get some.
Squeaker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2014, 08:24:13 PM
 #2768

Good point. It could also be weighted so that those that have few or none would get some.
I dunno if I would go along with weighting it...

I would think just going by active account is enough. The % bonus is relative to the amounts that were deposited anyways.

Basically, just loop... pick account at random... is it active? no? repeat... yes? set referral to that account.

Favoring one account over another based on what the deposit was doesn't seem right to me, and ends up being less random, when each account would otherwise have an equal chance of getting the referral assigned to it.

=squeak=

kreeften
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2014, 10:56:13 AM
 #2769

why did with me so low?
my info
Total deposited amount:   0.10518028 BTC
Total allocated hashing power:   21.0 MH/s
[/b]


I saw someone who had

Total deposited amount:   0.11 BTC
Total allocated hashing power:   2.9 GH/s
[/b]

21.0MH/s or 2.9GH/s is a big difference  Embarrassed

Squeaker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2014, 02:03:54 PM
 #2770

what were the dates the deposits were made?

the exchange rate comes into play too... 0.10518028 @ 20 USD buys less hash power than 0.11 @ 600 USD does.

=squeak=

simonk83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 09:53:38 PM
 #2771

Quick update:

?
rigel
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 859


Thank God I'm an atheist


View Profile
July 27, 2014, 07:48:35 AM
 #2772

Quick update: the first payout was small because most of it went to cover up the last part of the hole.
There are some "stuck" transactions: after the wallet update there is a strange behaviour. However don't be alarmed, I am working to fix it. If you see a transaction in the logs but you don't see the transaction in the blockchain, it doesn't mean that your bitcoins are lost.

Are you involved in pyramining?
I thought it was a one man band...

Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591



View Profile WWW
July 27, 2014, 02:59:17 PM
 #2773

Quick update: the first payout was small because most of it went to cover up the last part of the hole.
There are some "stuck" transactions: after the wallet update there is a strange behaviour. However don't be alarmed, I am working to fix it. If you see a transaction in the logs but you don't see the transaction in the blockchain, it doesn't mean that your bitcoins are lost.

Are you involved in pyramining?
I thought it was a one man band...
It's the same update that was posted by Pyramining a while back. I dunno why this person is posting it again.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
seot
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 05:45:28 AM
 #2774

Quick update: the first payout was small because most of it went to cover up the last part of the hole.
There are some "stuck" transactions: after the wallet update there is a strange behaviour. However don't be alarmed, I am working to fix it. If you see a transaction in the logs but you don't see the transaction in the blockchain, it doesn't mean that your bitcoins are lost.

Are you involved in pyramining?
I thought it was a one man band...

No, he is not involved with pyramining. He has been spamming other threads.

I think he has been removed by this time   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=712301.0
Muhammed Zakir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


Bit-x.com - Fast & Easy Trade with Low Fees!


View Profile WWW
July 28, 2014, 06:24:46 AM
 #2775

Good point. It could also be weighted so that those that have few or none would get some.
I dunno if I would go along with weighting it...

I would think just going by active account is enough. The % bonus is relative to the amounts that were deposited anyways.

Basically, just loop... pick account at random... is it active? no? repeat... yes? set referral to that account.

Favoring one account over another based on what the deposit was doesn't seem right to me, and ends up being less random, when each account would otherwise have an equal chance of getting the referral assigned to it.

=squeak=


I am sorry for not telling correctly. What I told was putting the newly registered member under member who joined just before him. If that account has 1 or 1+ ref, then newly registered member can be put under any member who got no referral.

Kindly,
      MZ

Squeaker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450


View Profile WWW
July 28, 2014, 07:01:28 AM
 #2776

I am sorry for not telling correctly. What I told was putting the newly registered member under member who joined just before him. If that account has 1 or 1+ ref, then newly registered member can be put under any member who got no referral.
yeah... I wouldn't go along with that... that effectively shuts out everyone who already has accounts, creating one single long referral chain.

By your method...

New person joins, last account created before him gets listed as his referral
The new account now becomes the last account created with no referrals
Repeat

The condition that the last-joined account would need 1 or more referrals already, before the new account gets linked to someone random instead, would never hit, and no new account would ever be assigned randomly.

You would end up with a chain of: A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-etc-etc-etc in a single unbroken chain.

=squeak=

BobbyJo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 354



View Profile WWW
July 28, 2014, 07:59:30 AM
 #2777

Agreed, it should be random, like it was in the beginning with members who joined on their own.  People have to stop trying to penalise those who have already made money, or joined a long time ago in order to benefit newer members.

Squeaker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450


View Profile WWW
July 28, 2014, 08:01:56 AM
 #2778

some people just can't let go of their class-warfare indoctrination... :shrugs:

=squeak=

BobbyJo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 354



View Profile WWW
July 28, 2014, 10:59:25 AM
 #2779

A communist/ socialist/ everyone is equal, even those who haven't invested as much or who joined late etc, approach is clearly not going to work.  What incentive is there to join if you think that as soon as you get 50% of your money back you will get screwed over in favor of someone who joined 1 year after you???  This is business not some socialist class struggle.

rdyoung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


View Profile
July 28, 2014, 01:35:46 PM
 #2780

A communist/ socialist/ everyone is equal, even those who haven't invested as much or who joined late etc, approach is clearly not going to work.  What incentive is there to join if you think that as soon as you get 50% of your money back you will get screwed over in favor of someone who joined 1 year after you???  This is business not some socialist class struggle.

Who in this thread has ever said someone should/would be penalized after receiving 50% of their funds back?

What I have said is that those that invested when btc was 20$ and have made likely 1000% profit in fiat, should get their payouts temporarily halted so that those of that us that have only recieved 10% or less of our investment might have a chance at seeing it before we die. You fuckers remind me of the rightwing republicans, its a good idea when its benefiting you, but as soon as it doesn't benefit you even as much as it was, its a bad, evil idea and the world will stop spinning if its done.
Pages: « 1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 [139] 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!