Bitcoin Forum
November 19, 2024, 07:07:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 [367] 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 ... 551 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][CLOAK] Private, Secure, Untraceable & Decentralized Digital Currency  (Read 810890 times)
wizardee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 666
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 07:11:24 AM
 #7321

im staking everyday, thats why i was asking

How much coins is required for stacking ? Huh

No minimum ammount required.
By staking you earn 6% annual from your holdings, no matter if you have 10, 100, 10000 its 6% of that.

The algorithm, of cloakcoin is still x13? Does this support posmineria?

what is posmineria?
raizor
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100

Some people just want to watch the world dance.


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 08:43:34 AM
 #7322

im staking everyday, thats why i was asking

How much coins is required for stacking ? Huh

No minimum ammount required.
By staking you earn 6% annual from your holdings, no matter if you have 10, 100, 10000 its 6% of that.

The algorithm, of cloakcoin is still x13? Does this support posmineria?

Yes, it's still X13. Changing from X13 would require a fork. I've no idea what posmineria is and Google seems equally in the dark Smiley
exslave
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 174
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 26, 2017, 08:47:12 AM
 #7323

im staking everyday, thats why i was asking

How much coins is required for stacking ? Huh

No minimum ammount required.
By staking you earn 6% annual from your holdings, no matter if you have 10, 100, 10000 its 6% of that.

The algorithm, of cloakcoin is still x13? Does this support posmineria?

Yes, it's still X13. Changing from X13 would require a fork. I've no idea what posmineria is and Google seems equally in the dark Smiley

teosanru maybe you are from a spannish speaking country?, by 'pos mineria' you mean Pos minning?? if so Pos coins cant be directly mined you stack your coins and win an interest

cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 12:48:15 PM
 #7324

decentralised governance is a key feature i see it mentioned but roughly how far away with full funding is it?


MedaR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2380
Merit: 1026



View Profile
April 26, 2017, 02:28:07 PM
 #7325

I have prepared Serbian translation and i have opened new thread (majority of ex-YU countries can understand it without problems). It is still under construction but already i have put lot of effort in this presentation. I'm waiting graphics and i will translate and OP as soon as i get it.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1886897.0

Feel free to send donations Grin..Cloaks of course!
C2L9xBHMQdUFQx7QPGMghNLZopSRng3yk2

Thanks!

You can rent this space
cuteflower
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 04:02:02 PM
 #7326


CLOAK is why not going to the moon Huh? all famous coins almost going to moon or arrived at moon but CLOAK taking tooooooo much longer time why why why?
R-J-F
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 310


AKA RJF - Member since '13


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 05:41:20 PM
 #7327


CLOAK is why not going to the moon Huh? all famous coins almost going to moon or arrived at moon but CLOAK taking tooooooo much longer time why why why?

Because YOU are still posting here!  Angry

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin
cuteflower
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 06:12:31 PM
 #7328


CLOAK is why not going to the moon Huh? all famous coins almost going to moon or arrived at moon but CLOAK taking tooooooo much longer time why why why?

Because YOU are still posting here!  Angry

is this fun talk? hahahahahaha Smiley
l33tn00b
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 06:56:36 PM
 #7329

I'm more interested in a blocknet integration.

Maybe Joe can look into it.

Let me know who I should email and at what address and I'll gladly make some enquiries Smiley

Contact synechist https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=148620
arlynculwick[at]blocknet.co

Cheers!

Never invest more than you can afford to lose!
raizor
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100

Some people just want to watch the world dance.


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 07:38:49 PM
 #7330

I'm more interested in a blocknet integration.

Maybe Joe can look into it.

Let me know who I should email and at what address and I'll gladly make some enquiries Smiley

Contact synechist https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=148620
arlynculwick[at]blocknet.co

Cheers!

Thank you l33tn00b Smiley
Fern
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 26, 2017, 08:16:22 PM
 #7331

I was using Enigma yesterday to send a few transactions but it wasn't consistent.

The first tx went using 3, the next using 5 expired and so did the following TX i tried to make. But then the next one using 5 went.

There were 25 nodes online. What holds up or allows Enigma transactions to expire? Is it lack of nodes?

And how does another node accept/validate an Enigma transaction, is it automatic or does the user have to 'okay' it?
raizor
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100

Some people just want to watch the world dance.


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 09:22:06 PM
 #7332

I was using Enigma yesterday to send a few transactions but it wasn't consistent.

The first tx went using 3, the next using 5 expired and so did the following TX i tried to make. But then the next one using 5 went.

There were 25 nodes online. What holds up or allows Enigma transactions to expire? Is it lack of nodes?

And how does another node accept/validate an Enigma transaction, is it automatic or does the user have to 'okay' it?

Hi Fern

Thanks for the feedback! Enigma requests have a finite time to complete [default 1 minute]. Lack of nodes probably isn't the issue, it's more likely that the request is timing out. You can set a longer timeout by selecting a higher value on the send-coins page in the wallet. There are some improvements planned for the future to speed up onion-routing, which will help to improve the negotiation speed for Enigma transactions.

The accepting/validating by Enigma peers is automatic. As long as the node has Enigma enabled [default], it will participate in Enigma cloaking.

Hope this helps,

Joe
Fern
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 26, 2017, 09:40:08 PM
 #7333

I was using Enigma yesterday to send a few transactions but it wasn't consistent.

The first tx went using 3, the next using 5 expired and so did the following TX i tried to make. But then the next one using 5 went.

There were 25 nodes online. What holds up or allows Enigma transactions to expire? Is it lack of nodes?

And how does another node accept/validate an Enigma transaction, is it automatic or does the user have to 'okay' it?

Hi Fern

Thanks for the feedback! Enigma requests have a finite time to complete [default 1 minute]. Lack of nodes probably isn't the issue, it's more likely that the request is timing out. You can set a longer timeout by selecting a higher value on the send-coins page in the wallet. There are some improvements planned for the future to speed up onion-routing, which will help to improve the negotiation speed for Enigma transactions.

The accepting/validating by Enigma peers is automatic. As long as the node has Enigma enabled [default], it will participate in Enigma cloaking.

Hope this helps,

Joe


Thanks Joe. It was still all very impressive. A compelling currency for sure
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 10:47:30 PM
 #7334

I was using Enigma yesterday to send a few transactions but it wasn't consistent.

The first tx went using 3, the next using 5 expired and so did the following TX i tried to make. But then the next one using 5 went.

There were 25 nodes online. What holds up or allows Enigma transactions to expire? Is it lack of nodes?

And how does another node accept/validate an Enigma transaction, is it automatic or does the user have to 'okay' it?

Hi Fern

Thanks for the feedback! Enigma requests have a finite time to complete [default 1 minute]. Lack of nodes probably isn't the issue, it's more likely that the request is timing out. You can set a longer timeout by selecting a higher value on the send-coins page in the wallet. There are some improvements planned for the future to speed up onion-routing, which will help to improve the negotiation speed for Enigma transactions.

The accepting/validating by Enigma peers is automatic. As long as the node has Enigma enabled [default], it will participate in Enigma cloaking.

Hope this helps,

Joe






I am specifically interested in the decentralised governance mentioned. Do you have the design for this already and what time frame until implementation?


raizor
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100

Some people just want to watch the world dance.


View Profile
April 27, 2017, 05:26:38 AM
 #7335

I was using Enigma yesterday to send a few transactions but it wasn't consistent.

The first tx went using 3, the next using 5 expired and so did the following TX i tried to make. But then the next one using 5 went.

There were 25 nodes online. What holds up or allows Enigma transactions to expire? Is it lack of nodes?

And how does another node accept/validate an Enigma transaction, is it automatic or does the user have to 'okay' it?

Hi Fern

Thanks for the feedback! Enigma requests have a finite time to complete [default 1 minute]. Lack of nodes probably isn't the issue, it's more likely that the request is timing out. You can set a longer timeout by selecting a higher value on the send-coins page in the wallet. There are some improvements planned for the future to speed up onion-routing, which will help to improve the negotiation speed for Enigma transactions.

The accepting/validating by Enigma peers is automatic. As long as the node has Enigma enabled [default], it will participate in Enigma cloaking.

Hope this helps,

Joe






I am specifically interested in the decentralised governance mentioned. Do you have the design for this already and what time frame until implementation?



Hi cryptohunter

Only a rough design for the governance so far. We still have a few technical details to flesh out. In terms of time frame, the work won't start until the project is open sourced as it will require a fork.

Joe
cuteflower
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 27, 2017, 09:04:44 AM
 #7336

CLOAK should be 50$
raizor
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100

Some people just want to watch the world dance.


View Profile
April 27, 2017, 09:19:01 AM
 #7337

Good morning everybody,

I'm close to pushing out a v2.0.2.0 release for Cloak. This will incorporate a number of changes that have been made as part of the work for open sourcing the project. Development for this update is pretty much complete, so once it's been tested, it will be ready to go - hopefully within a week or so.

Note: Due to security improvements to both Enigma and CloakShield, the Enigma protocol version number has been bumped for this release. This means that v2.0.2.0 will not accept or process Enigma requests from older clients, the finalised Enigma transactions will of course be fully compatible with all previous versions of Cloak though Smiley

Here's a look at the current change log:

-------------------
v2.0.2.0
-------------------
* BugFix: Fix active CloakShield peer list pruning.
* New Feature: Add French translation set [QT] - Thanks BamBukah!
* Enhancement: Improve node-banning mechanisms for Enigma and CloakShield.
* Enhancement: Add signatures and verify sender and data integrity for CloakShield onion packets.
* Enhancement: Add signatures and verify sender and data integrity for Enigma announcements.
* Enhancement: Enigma peers broadcast a message to announce they are going offline.
* Enhancement: Add 'View TX on Block Explorer' to context menu in transaction view [QT].
* Enhancement: Give the QT wallet an additional lick of red paint [QT].

Joe

wise88
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 27, 2017, 10:19:14 AM
 #7338


I am specifically interested in the decentralised governance mentioned. Do you have the design for this already and what time frame until implementation?



Hi cryptohunter

Only a rough design for the governance so far. We still have a few technical details to flesh out. In terms of time frame, the work won't start until the project is open sourced as it will require a fork.

Joe

What is the governance? What does that mean?
raizor
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100

Some people just want to watch the world dance.


View Profile
April 27, 2017, 10:35:17 AM
 #7339


I am specifically interested in the decentralised governance mentioned. Do you have the design for this already and what time frame until implementation?



Hi cryptohunter

Only a rough design for the governance so far. We still have a few technical details to flesh out. In terms of time frame, the work won't start until the project is open sourced as it will require a fork.

Joe

What is the governance? What does that mean?

Governance is essentially control. The idea being that users cast votes with their wallet (while PoS mining) to control the future direction of the project. This could be used to control which new features are funded and implemented and also allow some community control over things such as block rewards.
Buchi-88
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3990
Merit: 2693



View Profile
April 27, 2017, 11:17:21 AM
 #7340

Good morning everybody,

I'm close to pushing out a v2.0.2.0 release for Cloak. This will incorporate a number of changes that have been made as part of the work for open sourcing the project. Development for this update is pretty much complete, so once it's been tested, it will be ready to go - hopefully within a week or so.

Note: Due to security improvements to both Enigma and CloakShield, the Enigma protocol version number has been bumped for this release. This means that v2.0.2.0 will not accept or process Enigma requests from older clients, the finalised Enigma transactions will of course be fully compatible with all previous versions of Cloak though Smiley

Here's a look at the current change log:

-------------------
v2.0.2.0
-------------------
* BugFix: Fix active CloakShield peer list pruning.
* New Feature: Add French translation set [QT] - Thanks BamBukah!
* Enhancement: Improve node-banning mechanisms for Enigma and CloakShield.
* Enhancement: Add signatures and verify sender and data integrity for CloakShield onion packets.
* Enhancement: Add signatures and verify sender and data integrity for Enigma announcements.
* Enhancement: Enigma peers broadcast a message to announce they are going offline.
* Enhancement: Add 'View TX on Block Explorer' to context menu in transaction view [QT].
* Enhancement: Give the QT wallet an additional lick of red paint [QT].

Joe



Hello, i hope also for the BugFix for the
Quote
CloakCoin.conf -> datadir=D:\Coins\CloakCoin
Bug, can't find the Blockchain...

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
Pages: « 1 ... 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 [367] 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 ... 551 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!